What part did I leave out? I quoted Obumbler's web site--in full.
Obama prohibits lobbyists--UNLESS he gives them an exception!
The list is long and the "exceptions" are more convoluted. From the St. Petersberg Times PolitiFactChecknullMy Webpage
QUOTE
But there's more than just Lynn. The administration's handling of other former lobbyists provides further evidence that the promise has been broken:
* In some cases, the White House apparently has decided that former lobbyists don't need waivers at all. If the former lobbyists simply recuse themselves from discussions concerning whatever interest it is for which they used to lobby, then that suffices.
* Recusals appear to have even less documentation than waivers. We have yet to see a recusal "order," despite having asked the White House for them. We know there are at least two recusals; there may be more. We're not sure how recusals specifically differ from waivers because the White House has said little about the policy.
* The White House is not prompt about releasing the waivers. For two nominees who didn't require Senate approval, waivers were released weeks after they were signed and after the people took their positions. These two waivers were also substantially less detailed than the waiver issued for Lynn.
Read the rest of the article for more names.
Obambi requires 2 years out of office. Remember, these are the same libbies that went berserk about any possible ties of VP Cheney to Halliburton--even though Cheney had been gone and sold his stock 3 years before taking office.
I must have missed where you quoted me?
-------------- The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
-------------- Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up. -Liberal