Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 6 of 10<<2345678910>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Commander and CEO, or Socialist in Chief< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 51
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,4:15 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE
What is it with you thinking I'm posting to you?
 

Maybe it was because my post directly preceeded your response.

Maybe it was because I posted at 2:36, and you replied at 2:57--only 21 minutes later.  You say you were replying to CC--who posted 19 hours before? :p

You COULD have eliminated any possible confusion, by putting his name on your quote and response--but you didn't. :p

Using your fuzzy logic, you could have been replying to someone who posted LAST WEEK! :laugh:

Now--LIBERAL (I wanted to let you know I was talking to YOU!) :sarcasm:  What do you think about the broken Obama lobbyist promise?


--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 52
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,4:25 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE

You COULD have eliminated any possible confusion, by putting his name on your quote and response--but you didn't.  

Like you did?


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 53
Common Citizen Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,11:08 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Just curious...what additional facts did you want me to include?  Time and temp when the article was written?   :D
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 54
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 06 2009,4:58 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Liberal @ Apr. 05 2009,4:25 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE

You COULD have eliminated any possible confusion, by putting his name on your quote and response--but you didn't.  

Like you did?

Now you're just being argumentative.  By quoting your post--I don't think there is any confusion as to who I'm replying to. :p

--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 55
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 06 2009,5:15 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(jimhanson @ Apr. 05 2009,3:35 pm)
QUOTE
What part did I leave out? :dunno:   I quoted Obumbler's web site--in full.

Obama prohibits lobbyists--UNLESS he gives them an exception! :rofl:



The list is long and the "exceptions" are more convoluted.    From the St. Petersberg Times PolitiFactChecknullMy Webpage


QUOTE
But there's more than just Lynn. The administration's handling of other former lobbyists provides further evidence that the promise has been broken:

* In some cases, the White House apparently has decided that former lobbyists don't need waivers at all. If the former lobbyists simply recuse themselves from discussions concerning whatever interest it is for which they used to lobby, then that suffices.

* Recusals appear to have even less documentation than waivers. We have yet to see a recusal "order," despite having asked the White House for them. We know there are at least two recusals; there may be more. We're not sure how recusals specifically differ from waivers because the White House has said little about the policy.

* The White House is not prompt about releasing the waivers. For two nominees who didn't require Senate approval, waivers were released weeks after they were signed and after the people took their positions. These two waivers were also substantially less detailed than the waiver issued for Lynn.


Read the rest of the article for more names.

Obambi requires 2 years out of office.  Remember, these are the same libbies that went berserk about any possible ties of VP Cheney to Halliburton--even though Cheney had been gone and sold his stock 3 years before taking office. :rofl:

I must have missed where you quoted me?


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 56
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 06 2009,5:53 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(jimhanson @ Apr. 05 2009,4:15 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE
What is it with you thinking I'm posting to you?
 

Maybe it was because my post directly preceeded your response.

Maybe it was because I posted at 2:36, and you replied at 2:57--only 21 minutes later.  You say you were replying to CC--who posted 19 hours before? :p

You COULD have eliminated any possible confusion, by putting his name on your quote and response--but you didn't. :p

Using your fuzzy logic, you could have been replying to someone who posted LAST WEEK! :laugh:

Now--LIBERAL (I wanted to let you know I was talking to YOU!) :sarcasm:  What do you think about the broken Obama lobbyist promise?

We've already been THROUGH that.

Since you bring it up, though, care to comment on the question I asked you--highlighted in the post? :p


--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 57
MADDOG Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 22 2009,7:36 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

This guy must be a kook too.



Milton Friedman


--------------
Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up.  -Liberal
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 58
Botto 82 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 6293
Joined: Jan. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 22 2009,11:12 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Liberal @ Apr. 05 2009,3:58 pm)
QUOTE
My comment was also directed to CC's story that left out a bunch of the facts. ???

What it DIDN'T leave out was the fact that this douche is a Bilderberger.

When are the delusional libbies going to realize that Obama is not an improvement?


--------------
Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum.

- Kurt Vonnegut
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 59
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 22 2009,11:45 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Just out of curiosity, is there any conspiracy theory you don't believe in?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 60
Botto 82 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 6293
Joined: Jan. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 23 2009,12:51 am Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

:rofl:

Touché.


--------------
Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum.

- Kurt Vonnegut
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
92 replies since Mar. 31 2009,8:09 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 6 of 10<<2345678910>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Commander and CEO
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon