Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 5 of 10<<123456789>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Commander and CEO, or Socialist in Chief< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 41
MADDOG Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 02 2009,1:39 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I think it might have been Jim that posted this quite some time ago

QUOTE
Life Cycle of a Democracy

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that time on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the results that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.  The average age of the world's great civilizations has been 200 years.

These nations have progressed through this sequence:
from bondage to spiritual faith
from spiritual faith to great courage
from courage to liberty
from liberty to abundance
from abundance to selfishness
from selfishness to complacency
from complacency to apathy
from apathy to dependency
from dependency back to bondage.
-- Alexander Fraser Tytler (1742-1813)


Perhaps we can't escape fate anymore?


--------------
Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up.  -Liberal
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 42
MADDOG Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 03 2009,10:17 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

More socialism.  I received this today.
QUOTE
CHRYSLER


Important Announcement to all Chrysler Customers

In these difficult economic times, it is important to have peace of mind when
making a significant purchase, like a new car or truck. At Chrysler, we are happy
to inform our customers that on Monday, March 30th, President Obama
announced a plan to provide a government backed "Warranty Commitment
Program".

In summary, the key points from the President's announcement are:

• Government backing of warranty starts with vehicles purchased on or after
March 30, 2009.
• The program will cover the participating manufacturer's warranty on every
new car sold during the company's restructuring period.
• If you buy a new Chrysler, Jeep or Dodge vehicle during this restructuring
period you will be eligible.
• You do not have to do anything to receive the U.S. commitment to your
warranty, it is automatic.
• The U.S. Treasury will back your warranty, and will commit to honoring the
warranty in the event that the manufacturer cannot.
Today Chrysler has the best quality in its 84 year history. 73% of our vehicles
have improved fuel efficiency over the past year. There has never been a better
time than today to purchase a Chrysler, Jeep or Dodge vehicle.


--------------
Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up.  -Liberal
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 43
Common Citizen Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 03 2009,10:31 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I will never ever buy another GM or Chrysler vehicle unless the gov't gets their friggen hands out of the company.

Buy Ford!!   :rockon:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 44
MADDOG Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 03 2009,5:38 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE
I will never ever buy another GM or Chrysler
 How about a FIAT?  :D

QUOTE
Obama's Own Report on GM Says Plan to Build Non-Gas-Burning Car Would Not Save Company
Thursday, April 02, 2009
By Matt Cover

The report on General Motors released by the White House says the company’s restructuring plan will not lead to a stronger company, in part because the beleaguered auto giant’s proposal to rely more heavily on advanced, fuel-efficient cars is not commercially viable.  (I know, it's the White House talking, not Obama)

The report’s findings stand in stark contrast with the President’s chief goal for America’s auto industry: leading the world in green car production.

“I am absolutely committed to working with Congress and the auto companies to meet one goal:  The United States of America will lead the world in building the next generation of clean cars,” Obama declared  CNS News


--------------
Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up.  -Liberal
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 45
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 03 2009,7:27 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

As the article says, part of GM's failure is their committment to building the Politically Correct cars that the government tells us we need--and nobody will buy at the  price-point. :rofl:

The much-hyped Chevy Volt, for example--very short range, very high price, very high development cost--and GM couldn't make money at producing and selling it. :dunce:

Hybrids were going to be the next big thing--until people actually TRIED them, and put a pencil to them.  The reality?  Despite all the hype, Hybrids are only 2% of new car sales. :p

For all of the left's demonizing of SUVs and pickups, sales are better than the econo-boxes.  The Obamunists keep telling us that "we're going to have the car companies build the cars that we think American needs".   :rofl:

America isn't listening to the Obamunist Central Planning Committee Great Leap Forward.  Despite them telling us that we don't want big cars--we keep buying them.  Nobody FORCED us to buy them--I DON'T KNOW OF A SINGLE SUV THAT WAS SOLD AT THE POINT OF A GUN! :rofl:

The Obamunists campaigned on "not allowing overseas companies to take our industry"--but is now FORCING THE SALE OF CHRYSLER TO THE ITALIANS!  You can't make this kind of comedy up! :rofl:

Central planning--a failure all over the world--but that doesn't prevent the libtards from trying it AGAIN!


Attached Image
Attached Image

--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 46
Common Citizen Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 04 2009,7:55 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

White House aides who have made millions from bailed out banks.

QUOTE
Lawrence Summers, a top economic adviser to President Barack Obama, pulled in more than $2.7 million in speaking fees paid by firms at the heart of the financial crisis, including Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America Corp. and the now-defunct Lehman Brothers.

He pulled in another $5.2 million from D.E. Shaw, a hedge fund for which he served as managing director from October 2006 until joining the administration.

Thomas E. Donilon, Obama’s deputy national security adviser, was paid $3.9 million by the power law firm O’Melveny & Myers to represent clients including two firms that receieved federal bailout funds: Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. He also disclosed that he’s a member of the Trilateral Commission and sits on the steering committee of the supersecret Bilderberg group. Both groups are favorite targets of conspiracy theorists.

And White House Counsel Greg Craig earned $1.7 million in private practice representing an exiled Bolivian president, a Panamanian lawmaker wanted by the U.S. government for allegedly murdering a U.S. soldier and a tech billionaire accused of securities fraud and various sensational drug and sex crimes.


b u double L poop
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 47
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,2:36 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Liberal whimper--"But.........But............But..........OBAMA promised no lobbyists!  It CAN'T be true! :rofl:

From the Obama campaign page
QUOTE
Close the revolving door on former and future employers:
No political appointees in an Obama-Biden administration will be permitted to work on regulations or contracts directly and substantially related to their prior employer for two years. And no political appointee will be able to lobby the executive branch after leaving government service during the remainder of the administration.


Of course--Obumbler promptly broke that promise numerous times within the FIRST FEW WEEKS of his administration. :dunce:  :rofl:


--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 48
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,2:57 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE

While Mr. Obama campaigned on a pledge to restrict lobbyists from working in the White House, a step intended to reduce any influence between the administration and corporations, the ban did not apply to former executives like Mr. Summers, who was not a registered lobbyist. In 2006, he became a managing director of D. E. Shaw, a firm that manages about $30 billion in assets, making it one of the biggest hedge funds in the world.

“Dr. Summers was not an adviser to or an employee of the firms that paid him to speak,” Mr. LaBolt said.

He added, “Of course, since joining the White House, he has complied with the strictest ethics rules ever required of appointees and will not work on specific matters to which D. E. Shaw is a party for two years.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/us/politics/04disclose.html?ref=us


Left out part of the story as usual.


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 49
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,3:35 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

What part did I leave out? :dunno:   I quoted Obumbler's web site--in full.

Obama prohibits lobbyists--UNLESS he gives them an exception! :rofl:



The list is long and the "exceptions" are more convoluted.    From the St. Petersberg Times PolitiFactChecknullMy Webpage


QUOTE
But there's more than just Lynn. The administration's handling of other former lobbyists provides further evidence that the promise has been broken:

* In some cases, the White House apparently has decided that former lobbyists don't need waivers at all. If the former lobbyists simply recuse themselves from discussions concerning whatever interest it is for which they used to lobby, then that suffices.

* Recusals appear to have even less documentation than waivers. We have yet to see a recusal "order," despite having asked the White House for them. We know there are at least two recusals; there may be more. We're not sure how recusals specifically differ from waivers because the White House has said little about the policy.

* The White House is not prompt about releasing the waivers. For two nominees who didn't require Senate approval, waivers were released weeks after they were signed and after the people took their positions. These two waivers were also substantially less detailed than the waiver issued for Lynn.


Read the rest of the article for more names.

Obambi requires 2 years out of office.  Remember, these are the same libbies that went berserk about any possible ties of VP Cheney to Halliburton--even though Cheney had been gone and sold his stock 3 years before taking office. :rofl:


--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 50
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 05 2009,3:58 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE

What part did I leave out?    I quoted Obumbler's web site--in full.


What is it with you thinking I'm posting to you?

Just a little bit of thinking would tell you that you didn't post a story, you just commented on CC's story. :dunce:

My comment was also directed to CC's story that left out a bunch of the facts. ???


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
92 replies since Mar. 31 2009,8:09 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 5 of 10<<123456789>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Commander and CEO
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon