|
Post Number: 21
|
|
Post Number: 22
|
|
Post Number: 23
|
Self-Banished
Group: Members
Posts: 22581
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 02 2012,6:41 am |
|
|
I'll never ignore you Roz.
-------------- Remember boys and girls,
Don’t be a Dick …
Or a “Wayne”
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 24
|
|
Post Number: 25
|
Self-Banished
Group: Members
Posts: 22581
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 02 2012,9:23 am |
|
|
^ That's what makes life fun.
-------------- Remember boys and girls,
Don’t be a Dick …
Or a “Wayne”
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 26
|
Santorini
Group: Members
Posts: 2015
Joined: Nov. 2007
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 02 2012,11:59 am |
|
|
(Rosalind_Swenson @ Apr. 01 2012,2:25 pm)
QUOTE This is my last comment to you. I used to think you were somewhat amusing with some of the things you would say, but after you called me a "terrorist sympathizer" and after I read Grinning Dragon's response, I started thinking how right he is that statements and thought patterns like yours are dangerous and troubling. Especially now with these new laws. I don't really want to be hauled away and locked up indefinitely without a lawyer, trial, and without even my family knowing what happened to me. Far fetched as it may seem, it is possible now for these things to happen. Right here in America, it is possible now. After your reaction towards the UC Davis students, and (you won't answer my question on if you think it was appropriate action from police) I have to assume by your other comments that you do approve and think the police had every right to blast those kids in the face with pepper spray. Peaceful kids doing nothing wrong. Exercising their first amendment right. Now I find absolutely nothing amusing about anything you say. ---------------- I can't believe I am even going to respond to your reverse osmosis comment as being the right option instead of considering STOPPING the poisoning of our water supplies: Reverse Osmosis does not remove all of the chemicals that ends up in water from the process of fracking. There are still some chemicals that can't be removed, which in fact degrade the reverse osmosis filters quite rapidly, and cause cancer. There are people whose water has been poisoned by fracking, and are now dying of cancer. People whose land and water is damaged by fracking can't even sell their property and leave. Nobody in their right mind would buy it. And I suppose in your way of thinking "They should have sold their property to the fracking companies. Personal Responsibility! They made the choice to not sell. Their neighbors on the other hand DID sell and became quite rich! Their neighbors can now move wherever they want to! But since they CHOSE to not sell or lease their property to frackers, it is THEIR FAULT their property has absolutely no value now, it is THEIR FAULT they aren't rich and are dying of cancer. They can always walk away with nothing and move somewhere else. It's called PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FREE CHOICE!! That is how this country works and why it is so great! I think they should not be allowed to get welfare or any other type of government assistance though, after all, they did give up the chance to make money from their property, but they REFUSED! ---------------- I also can't believe you are still taking the side of the banks when they almost crashed the entire economy. Personal responsibility must only apply to we the people. Bankers work hard for their money! They deserved those million dollar bonuses right after they paid back their bail out money! You are jealous of other peoples' success and if you don't have what you want out of your life IT'S YOUR FAULT. So now you will be put on ignore, but I will let you get in one last jab before I do, so make it good. Rant your heart out at my lazy-good-for-nothing-socialist-occupying-filthy-leftist-jealousofotherssuccess-gimmewhats yours ass. Give it all ya got, because after this next comment from you I will not see any more. You never did respond...what should be done with American terrorists waging war on our own soil?! Perhaps being charged? then bail set? What would you call someone who sympathizes with the terrorists thrown into prisons for treasonist actions against the US Your thought patterns are the ones that are dangerous and you seem to forget that along with Constitutional rights comes responsibility! You cannot have one without the other! Seriously...you ridicule reverse osmosis? Just how brainwashed are you? It is a known fact the RO systems put a serious dent in concentrations commonly found in drinking water INCLUDING a number of components currently identified as fracking components. Water treated with RO systems contain far fewer contaminants. (huffington post) But I am positive your environmental websites/blogs will love to dispute this...its doesnt help their cause!
But the big thing... the peaceful US Davis protesters (I still find you amusing!) Was it appropriate action by the police? Quote from multiple sources: First, you have a 1st ammendment right to free speech, you do not have a 1st ammendment right to trespass or set up a hobo camp! The occupiers scream at police, threaten them, flick lit cigarettes at cops, deliberately back into polices riot gear, block traffic, refuse orders to move and quit blocking the walkways, they do everything they can to bait the police. That brings us to US Davis where the occupy mob set up tents, refused to take them down when asked by police, at that point they sat down and locked arms to keep police from moving them. ALL of the protesters KNEW they were going to be pepper sprayed and they could have gotten up and moved. The problem wasnt the officers it was that the protesters thought they should be allowed to break the law with impunity! Again, along with Constitutional rights comes responsibility! You bet the cops were right
Now remember...no more comments
-------------- "Things turn out best for those who make the best of the way things turned out." Jack Buck
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 27
|
|
Post Number: 28
|
|
Post Number: 29
|
hymiebravo
Group: Members
Posts: 4989
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 03 2012,8:29 am |
|
|
(Santorini @ Apr. 02 2012,4:22 pm)
QUOTE (Common Citizen @ Apr. 02 2012,2:56 pm)
QUOTE (Self-Banished @ Apr. 01 2012,3:41 pm)
QUOTE Roz, I know we've had our tiffs in the past but putting someone on ignore is pretty much sticking you fingers in your ears and singing la la la la, pretty childish IMHO I don't see it as childish. When I put Hymen on ignore, I consider that an efficient use of time. I dont see it as childish either! I see it as the equivalent of waving the white flag Coomin - Is a case in point of somebody who needs more fiber in their diet.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 30
|
|
|
|