S.B. wants to forgive and forget everything Nixon did. Let's see, what was Nixon's future going to be??? Oh yeah, that word S.B. and his buddies keep throwing around, impeachment. DON'T FIGURE!
Nixon the most disgraced President of our lifetime
QUOTE
No, that would be thee president we have now
Nixon led the country to the edge of collapse Carter save US from imploding. Bush led US into a Depression with rightwing policy, Obama saved US from the impending Bush collapse.
If you'd stop listening to the rightwing propagandists and open your eyes you'd see the nation has recovered from your party's failed agenda.
Attached Image
-------------- History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
It is now clear that any deal with Iran will by its terms be a non-binding agreement. That means the United States will have no international law obligation to comply with the agreement, considered in isolation, and that only diplomatic and political considerations – which might not be trivial – will stand in the way of the next President backing out of the deal and reimposing U.S. sanctions. This is why I concluded yesterday that “in comparison with a binding executive agreement under international law, a non-binding agreement with Iran is easier to make (because the President can clearly do it on his own) and easier to break (because there is no domestic or international legal obstacle to breaking it).”
The letter to Iranian leaders warned that unless Congress approved it, any nuclear deal they cut with President Barack Obama could expire once he leaves office. The letter could serve as a source of division in the upcoming presidential campaign: Democrats have assailed it as an attempt to undercut Obama at the negotiating table while Republicans have warned that a deal could lead to a nuclear-armed Iran.
My Webpage Kerry himself stated that this would be a non-binding agreement. My Webpage So why is Expat accusing Republicans of sabotage and treason? Because he is a liberal hack, that's why.
A non-binding agreement would allow the President to by-pass congress because it is not a treaty. I would argue that Obama thinks he is above the constitution. He wants to go around congress and take it to the UN and if passed there, it could then become a international binding agreement, ergo, treaty. What ever happened to checks and balances? This administration has thrown it out the window along with the constitution.
Hillary tweeted, "GOP letter to Iranian clerics undermines American leadership. No one considering running for commander-in -chief should be signing on.
Cotton replied, "No. @HillaryClinton, letter to Iran helps protect the USA from bad deal. No CinC should allow world's worst regime to get world's worst weapon."
I find it odd that a Donk would complain about the undermining of a sitting US President when that is exactly what the loony left did during the entire Bush presidency.
There's more good in Carter's little finger than in Nixon's whole body! He didn't get US involved in any wars to further his political ambitions. He's still out doing selfless good works. You'd do well to emulate the man, he's a far better role model then any Republican propagandist you parrot now. You are too young to actually know what was going on in those years you're just parroting the rightwing hatemongers!
