Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 5 of 6<<123456>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: The “Evolution” myth< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 41
Santorini Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2015
Joined: Nov. 2007
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,12:11 am  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(irisheyes @ Apr. 08 2011,2:16 am)
QUOTE

(Santorini @ Apr. 07 2011,5:16 pm)
QUOTE
Irisheyes is it?  Just taking a wild guess here that if you are Irish...then you were probably brought up Catholic.
And if my theory is correct...then you of ALL people should know WHO wrote the Bible :thumbsup:

Your theory is correct, but nothing in my post was wrong, I simply claimed that the Bible was not written by God or Jesus.  It was written by man, although it may also be said by those same men to have been divinely inspired, that doesn't change the authorship.  I don't have a problem with the Bible or those that read the Bible, I've read plenty of it myself.

Santorini-
QUOTE
Why you have become the resistance is what I do not understand

I'm not a part of any resistance other than the idea that we should let science class be for science.  I would be just as adamantly opposed if anyone suggested teaching the Torah, Koran, or Laws of Manu in a science class.  If you want to teach about all those books in another class, feel free to open them up and learn all they want.

You are right...the Book WAS divinely inspired... :angel: AND I agree with you that science class should be just for science!
My problem with science [which BTW my degree is in Science!], is what is currently being taught regarding evolution [which just simply means changing]! Some of Faith are offended by this injustice; by this I mean teaching evolution is one thing but to put the idea in a childs head that human beings somehow evolved from apes without allowing our description of how human life begins is biased teaching.


--------------
"Things turn out best for those who make the best
 of the way things turned out."    Jack Buck
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 42
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,12:41 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

The problem is finding a scientist that's sane and believes in intelligent design.

In your bizarro world why do men have one less rib? Is it because they took something us men weren't even using mixed it with a little dirt and came up with a woman? And if God just conjured up us men, why couldn't he do the same for women? Why did God need our rib and dirt? He just got done making a whole freaking universe out of thin air but he needed our rib to make women?

And how do you young Earthers explain carbon 14 dating that goes back about 60,000 years? What about Chinese pottery that dates back older than 15,000 years?


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 43
the breeze Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1154
Joined: May 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,9:10 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Santorini @ Apr. 08 2011,11:59 pm)
QUOTE

(the breeze @ Apr. 08 2011,9:17 am)
QUOTE

(Santorini @ Apr. 07 2011,6:03 pm)
QUOTE
Breeze,
What exactly is your point with that LONG submission on did the Catholics give us the Bible?
Please explain :angel:

history shows it didn't happen that way.

Breeze, you do not have any authors that wish to take credit for the article you posted...what are they afraid of?

2nd...St. Ignatius [50-107AD] was the first to ever use the Greek work  Katholicos meaning universal.  This word was used to describe the universality of the Church established by Christ.
and in 397AD the Catholic Church gave definitive decision as to which writings and books should be admitted into the Bible.  As stated previously, Catholic is the only religion that can be traced back to Jesus :angel:

frist lets get the name right                                         Why does The Apostle's Creed Refer
to the Holy 'Catholic' Church?
-by Tony Warren

   The question is often asked, why did the early Church fathers refer to the Church as Catholic. Particularly, the Apostle's Creed which is truly an ecumenical symbol of faith and is dated to about a century after the New Testament was completed. It is important to understand that the term 'Catholic Church' simply refers to the universal Church of believers. It is in no way referring to Roman Catholicism.

To fully understand this, we need to look at the original languages. For example the word Creed is from the Latin [credo] meaning I believe, thus the apostles creed was a statement of Christian beliefs. Some people have the mistaken idea that the word 'catholic' belongs to the Roman Church. But simply because Rome claims to be the catholic church, doesn't make it so. In truth the word catholic is simply a form of the Greek word [katholikos] which means, "of the whole." Taken from two root words [kata], meaning pertaining to, or about, and the word [holos], meaning the whole. i.e., the it means the whole or Universal Church.

Before those grounded in sound Biblical Theology broke away from the dominant Roman Church in protest (thus they were called, protestants) of that Churches slipping into idolatry and unscriptural practices, they were of the one whole (universal) Church. They still are. Rome can claim ownership of the word, but that is mere semantics. For they are not holy, nor catholic, nor in the real sense, the Church. In the false sense, they are a church, but they have long ago left being under authority of God.

The name catholic in our day has come to denote a denomination rather than it's true meaning. But in the early Church it was the title denoting it's universal nature, and had nothing to do with a denomination in Rome. Denominations are an invention of man. There is only the universal Church, not a Roman Church and a Protestant Church, but one holy universal Church.

In the big picture, this hasn't really changed today. The true Church of God is the Universal (catholic, in Greek) Church, no matter what label man puts upon it by denominational edict. There is one Holy Universal Church fulfilling it's commission to go to the ends of the earth with the gospel. And it exists all over the world and has gone by many denominational names. It has nothing to do with what is the Roman Catholic Church today.

the truth is, since we don't speak Greek, we could just as easily translate it:


I believe in the Holy Spirit,
The Holy Universal Church,
The communion of saints..
Every educated scholar of course knows this. But because Reformed Churches are steeped in tradition, and have a high regard for their creeds (nothing inherently wrong with that) it is still rendered (usually) the Holy Catholic Church. And really, there is no good reason to change it. Why should we? No denomination can usurp a word as exclusively their own. Just so long as we all understand that the word simply means universal.

We should also be aware that it is not called "The Apostles' Creed," because it was written or authored by any of the Apostles, it is called this because it is actually an excellent brief synopsis of what they taught. Moreover, it sets forth the Christian gospel in a concise, though pertinent fashion, with proper reverential and liturgical high regard.

Peace,

Copyright 2000 Tony Warren
For other studies free for the Receiving, Visit our web Site
The Mountain Retreat! http://www.mountainretreatorg.net
-------------------------*---------------------------
Feel free to duplicate, display or distribute this publication to anyone so long as the above copyright notice remains intact and there are no changes made to the article. This publication can be distributed only in it's original form, unedited, and without cost.


Created 8/15/00 / Last Modified 8/15/00
The Mountain Retreat / twarren10@aol.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------
JESUS DID THE ORGANIZING for His church and whenever men go beyond that pattern (found only in the New Testament of Jesus Christ) they do so at their own peril. One needs to only read the New Testament to see the problem that has been created over the last two centuries within the churches.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 44
the breeze Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1154
Joined: May 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,9:21 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(grassman @ Apr. 08 2011,10:48 am)
QUOTE
This has merit. Note the last few words. The Republicans read that to mean give to the wealthy.

very nice. :)

--------------
JESUS DID THE ORGANIZING for His church and whenever men go beyond that pattern (found only in the New Testament of Jesus Christ) they do so at their own peril. One needs to only read the New Testament to see the problem that has been created over the last two centuries within the churches.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 45
Santorini Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2015
Joined: Nov. 2007
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,1:20 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Breeze, I get confused as to the substance and motivation of your authors that you quote :angel:

Frank whats his name was a mechanic :dunno:
and this Tony Warren is he not a British soap script writer?

Where exactly would their expertise lie :dunno:


--------------
"Things turn out best for those who make the best
 of the way things turned out."    Jack Buck
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 46
Santorini Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2015
Joined: Nov. 2007
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,1:49 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Liberal @ Apr. 09 2011,12:41 am)
QUOTE
The problem is finding a scientist that's sane and believes in intelligent design.

In your bizarro world why do men have one less rib? Is it because they took something us men weren't even using mixed it with a little dirt and came up with a woman? And if God just conjured up us men, why couldn't he do the same for women? Why did God need our rib and dirt? He just got done making a whole freaking universe out of thin air but he needed our rib to make women?

And how do you young Earthers explain carbon 14 dating that goes back about 60,000 years? What about Chinese pottery that dates back older than 15,000 years?

Liberal, the insane scientists are the ones that believe that you somehow formed through an inanimate, unintelligent manner...
The sane scientists understand the complexity and design of all living things; can scientifically and categorically list their makeup; yet realize the forces needed to create the intelliegence cannot be tested, put under a microscope and defined :angel:


--------------
"Things turn out best for those who make the best
 of the way things turned out."    Jack Buck
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 47
the breeze Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1154
Joined: May 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,3:05 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Santorini @ Apr. 09 2011,1:20 pm)
QUOTE
Breeze, I get confused as to the substance and motivation of your authors that you quote :angel:

Frank whats his name was a mechanic :dunno:
and this Tony Warren is he not a British soap script writer?

Where exactly would their expertise lie :dunno:

Jesus was a carpenter. i think these men are experts in the truth. what about what they wrote.?

--------------
JESUS DID THE ORGANIZING for His church and whenever men go beyond that pattern (found only in the New Testament of Jesus Christ) they do so at their own peril. One needs to only read the New Testament to see the problem that has been created over the last two centuries within the churches.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 48
the breeze Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1154
Joined: May 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,3:10 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Santorini @ Apr. 07 2011,6:03 pm)
QUOTE
Breeze,
What exactly is your point with that LONG submission on did the Catholics give us the Bible?
Please explain :angel:

Dating of the New Testament Books
In order By Most Likely Date
Free Beginning Home
The following chart provides the dates when the New Testament books were written. In the cases in which historians disagree on the date, we have identified the prominent historians who support the earliest and lastest possible dates.
http://www.freebeginning.com/new_testament_dates/
Related topics:
Our sources
When were the New Testament writtings accepted as scripture?
Did Eusibius rewrite the New Testament?

N.T. Book Author Earliest
Latest Most Likely
Galatians Apostle Paul A.D. 48 A.D. 50 A.D. 48
1 Thessalonians Apostle Paul A.D. 50 A.D. 52 A.D. 51
2 Thessalonians Apostle Paul A.D. 50 A.D. 52 A.D. 51
Mark Mark A.D. 45
John Wenham / John A. T. Robinson A.D. 60
A. Harnack A.D. 48-55
1 Corinthians Apostle Paul A.D. 55 A.D. 55 A.D. 55
2 Corinthians Apostle Paul


--------------
JESUS DID THE ORGANIZING for His church and whenever men go beyond that pattern (found only in the New Testament of Jesus Christ) they do so at their own peril. One needs to only read the New Testament to see the problem that has been created over the last two centuries within the churches.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 49
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,3:12 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider our equal.
Charles Darwin


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 50
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Apr. 09 2011,11:33 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

Nobody is dense enough to believe that Roman Catholics were around since Jesus. Christianity wasn't even legal in Rome until the sun got to Emperor Constantine in the early 4th century.

Later he gathered all the Christian Bishops at the Council of Nicea and they decided what books to put in the new testament and which to leave out. That was over 300 years after the death of Jesus.


QUOTE

Constantine is perhaps best known for being the first Christian Roman emperor; his reign was certainly a turning point for the Church. In February 313, Constantine met with Licinius in Milan where they developed the Edict of Milan. The edict stated that Christians should be allowed to follow the faith of their choosing.[199] This removed penalties for professing Christianity (under which many had been martyred in previous persecutions of Christians) and returned confiscated Church property. The edict did not only protect Christians from religious persecution, but all religions, allowing anyone to worship whichever deity they choose. A similar edict had been issued in 311 by Galerius, then senior emperor of the Tetrarchy; Galerius' edict granted Christians the right to practice their religion but did not restore any property to them.[200] The Edict of Milan included several clauses which state that all confiscated churches will be returned as well as other provisions for previously persecuted Christians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki...tinople


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
53 replies since Jan. 17 2011,3:50 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 5 of 6<<123456>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply The “Evolution” myth
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon