Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 13 of 14<<91011121314>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Tuttle sentencing scheduled for August< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 121
Santorini Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2015
Joined: Nov. 2007
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 23 2011,10:25 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(busybee @ Aug. 21 2011,3:11 pm)
QUOTE
This is where I think the "American Dream" fails to prove accurate.  

Why should you have to insure yourself against another person's choice to break the law?  

It's one thing to be insured for the accidents that occur due to human error in judgement and natural causes...such as high winds, hail, ect...  

But to pay for "insurance" just in case you are CHOSEN as a victim to a crime is insane!!!  

I wish the U.S. System of Justice was doing it's job appropriately on behalf of those in society who are negatively impacted by those who choose to commit crimes that have a direct negative impact on others.  

I'm sad to hear how damaging this has been on you financially!!

are they referring to Title Insurance?

--------------
"Things turn out best for those who make the best
 of the way things turned out."    Jack Buck
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 122
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 23 2011,10:46 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Does it matter if it's about "title insurance" or not?  

It's not that I don't get your point Santorini...because I do.  

I also believe that the U.S. PUBLIC Citizens should NOT have to PAY to INSURE themselves just in case another U.S. Citizen decieves and steals from them.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 123
babyangel56007 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: Oct. 2010
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 24 2011,12:00 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Agree busybee- theft should not have to be insurance paid expense to the owners in this kind of case !!!!!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 124
Mamma Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1474
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 24 2011,6:58 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I'm thinking she misunderstood what was said. Tuttle had some insurance that was paying the victims.

--------------
A conclusion is simply the place where you got tired of thinking.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 125
Stone-Magnon Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1540
Joined: Dec. 2010
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 24 2011,7:49 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

It's like the blind leading the blind in here and instead of ever turning on my light, I'd prefer to watch you bang into the walls.

--------------
...everybody must get stoned


-Bob Dylan
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 126
Santorini Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2015
Joined: Nov. 2007
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 24 2011,10:52 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(busybee @ Aug. 23 2011,10:46 pm)
QUOTE
Does it matter if it's about "title insurance" or not?  

It's not that I don't get your point Santorini...because I do.  

I also believe that the U.S. PUBLIC Citizens should NOT have to PAY to INSURE themselves just in case another U.S. Citizen decieves and steals from them.

You are right...it is unfair.  Yet we pay to carry homeowners insurance to protect us from theft :dunno:   I am just curious about the poster that said  Others got $$$ but they have not gotten anything.   As a business owner Tuttle was required to carry insurance one called errors and ommissions and another I forget the name.  This is probably why others got some of their losses covered.  But why the poster that said they have not received anything is a mystery!  (BTW my daughter and her husband were first time home buyers and victims as well), yet we are not capable of the degree of hatred others on this site are. :angel:


--------------
"Things turn out best for those who make the best
 of the way things turned out."    Jack Buck
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 127
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 24 2011,11:53 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Mamma · Posted on Aug. 24 2011,6:58 am

***I'm thinking she misunderstood what was said. Tuttle had some insurance that was paying the victims.  ***

So?  

Having business insurance is not the same as being ACCOUNTABLE for stealing someone else's money.  

Having business insurance is just what it is...no more, no less.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 128
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 25 2011,12:06 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Santorini...

Sadly...if we just opened up our eyes and minds...we wouldn't have to carry insurance to protect ourselves from the deceitful and manipulative cons that try to run our lives.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 129
Mamma Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1474
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 25 2011,7:01 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Wellj, Hell, I didn't even know "con" insurance even existed.  :p

--------------
A conclusion is simply the place where you got tired of thinking.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 130
mncowgirl Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 247
Joined: Nov. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 25 2011,8:40 am Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

yes she has insurance to cover the victims and one is a million dollar policy, BUT it only covers employee theft, not owner theft, so they only paid out $75,000 and United Fire only covered $20,000 so theres $95,000 to be paid out to victims, BUT one lawyer took $10,000 out right away and another insurance company wants $14,000 so that leaves $71,000 left for victims, and there is $486,250.35 still owed to victims so how far is that $71,000 dollars going to go??????? we might get enough money to go out for dinner! or burger king!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
130 replies since Jul. 22 2011,12:46 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 13 of 14<<91011121314>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Tuttle sentencing scheduled for August
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon