|
Post Number: 31
|
Self-Banished
Group: Members
Posts: 22594
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Mar. 25 2014,4:15 am |
|
|
^^^ You know if you keep playing the same side of that album it'll will eventually wear out.
-------------- Remember boys and girls,
Don’t be a Dick …
Or a “Wayne”
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 32
|
Common Citizen
Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Mar. 27 2014,7:02 am |
|
|
(irisheyes @ Mar. 24 2014,5:32 pm)
QUOTE (Self-Banished @ Mar. 10 2014,6:31 pm)
QUOTE (irisheyes @ Mar. 10 2014,5:53 pm)
QUOTE Because if the government doesn't protect those buildings with everything possible the conservative media will claim Obama has blood on his hands and Rep. Issa will spend a year investigating the scandal. Maybe if when folks being questioned wouldn't plead the 5th Rep. Issa would need a year. You always plead the 5th if you're subpoenad to a witch hunt/ McCarthy hearing. Rep. Issa doesn't have any proof of scandal or corruption, so the best he can do is keep questioning until they get some soundbites for FauxNews and the blogs to play. Maybe if Issa keeps holding hearings they'll find a blue dress somewhere in the State Department the Republicans can examine for DNA. When did the Republicans start caring about human lives lost, anyway? They presided over the first 9/11. What I don't understand is why Learner is allowed to stonewall in turning over her work emails. The last time I checked she works for the government and the employer has the right to those emails. It should take the IT department an hour to hand those emails over.
And you wonder why this investigation is taking so long. The lead investigator is a political appointee and Learner is stonewalling. It doesn't take a genius to recognize who is playing reindeer games.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 33
|
|
Post Number: 34
|
Common Citizen
Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 03 2014,9:36 pm |
|
|
Do you understand the difference between a committee of congress asking for that information versus an individual politician?
If employees emails are subject to scrutiny by their private employer, one would naturally believe that a public employees emails would be even more scrutinized and made available to the people (employer), barring national security. The public sector has an implied higher degree of fiduciary responsibility and should be transparent as such.
The committee is acting on behalf of the people (employer).
Excuse me...my head hurts from liberal stupidity.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 35
|
Common Citizen
Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 11 2014,7:19 am |
|
|
BLM vs Private Citizen
Has anyone else been following this? Reminds me of the Waco and Ruby Ridge scenarios.
And why does Eric Holder's vagina hurt?
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 36
|
Self-Banished
Group: Members
Posts: 22594
Joined: Feb. 2006
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 11 2014,8:34 am |
|
|
^^^yes, I have, seems a new tidbit of info pops up regularly tipping the scales for one side or the other.
-------------- Remember boys and girls,
Don’t be a Dick …
Or a “Wayne”
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 37
|
|
Post Number: 38
|
|
Post Number: 39
|
|
Post Number: 40
|
MADDOG
Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 12 2014,12:48 pm |
|
|
Anyone know where I can get one of these?
Attached Image
-------------- Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up. -Liberal
|
|
|
|
|