Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 5 of 27<<123456789>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Dead Children in Connecticut, Another Mass Shooting< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 41
SimpleLife Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 332
Joined: Sep. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,1:58 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Self-Banished @ Dec. 17 2012,1:24 pm)
QUOTE
The term "well regulated" was referring to militia men having proper rifle, ball and powder.

Explain " the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

Please.

Arms also apply to bombs and nuclear weapons.  I'm assuming you have no problem infringing on those rights.  And you actually answered your own question - rifle, ball, and powder.  I believe there are no restrictions on those currently, and no plans to take them off the table.


--------------
Won't somebody please think of the children!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 42
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16914
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,2:37 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

The guns were here thirty years ago, the nut jobs were here thirty years ago so what’s changed?
We now have antidepressants like Zoloft, Prozac etc. we’re feeding these kids like candy!


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 43
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22654
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,2:54 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

^ My God! Something we agree on!

I'm feeling faint.


--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 44
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22654
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,2:58 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(SimpleLife @ Dec. 17 2012,1:58 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Dec. 17 2012,1:24 pm)
QUOTE
The term "well regulated" was referring to militia men having proper rifle, ball and powder.

Explain " the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

Please.

Arms also apply to bombs and nuclear weapons.  I'm assuming you have no problem infringing on those rights.  And you actually answered your own question - rifle, ball, and powder.  I believe there are no restrictions on those currently, and no plans to take them off the table.

They want to ban my rifle, tax my ammo and right after Oklahoma City, they wanted to put tag ants in my powder.

The rifle the patriots fought the British with were state of the art assault weapons for there time.


--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 45
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,3:20 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE

Mark Tambascio, another family friend, said he believed Lanza's mother, Nancy, had become increasingly concerned in the last few months about Lanza's emotional and behavioral issues.

ABC News Story

Not the kind of kid that I would let access firearms. Would you?

Nothing in that article says he was volatile, or dangerous? Do you think people shouldn't own guns if they have a kid that avoids eye contact, is an A/V nerd, or has a high tolerance for pain?


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 46
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,3:35 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(SimpleLife @ Dec. 17 2012,1:06 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Dec. 17 2012,10:58 am)
QUOTE

(SimpleLife @ Dec. 17 2012,10:02 am)
QUOTE
Assault weapons bans are only part of it.  No one thing is going to fix the gun problem in this country.  That's not even high up on my list of cares because if you're a responsible person with a shotgun you're more than likely going to be just as responsible with an AR-15.  You have to figure out a way to keep them out of the hands of the mentally ill.  Japan only allows shotguns only after getting a license including a background check, completion of safety course, passing a written and practical test, a psych test, and verifying that they have secure storage.  They've had 11 gun homicides in the last year, compared to the +9,000 in the US.  Their policy is on the extreme side and would die a painful death if anyone tried to enact it in the US, but Australia and the UK also passed huge gun reform after massacres in their countries with huge decreases in the numbers of gun deaths.  In the US, what, you need to just apply for a gun license, and as long as you don't have a history of shooting people up or extremely violent behavior you can get one?  Really?

Are you one of those peoe that believe the 2nd amendment is about hunting?

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Explain to me how gun laws in the US are in any way well-regulated?

/SIGH
Well regulated in this context means well trained or maintained.

The militia IS dependent upon the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, not the other way around, because obviously you cannot have a well armed militia sans firearms now can you.


--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 47
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,3:39 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(SimpleLife @ Dec. 17 2012,1:58 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Dec. 17 2012,1:24 pm)
QUOTE
The term "well regulated" was referring to militia men having proper rifle, ball and powder.

Explain " the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

Please.

Arms also apply to bombs and nuclear weapons.  I'm assuming you have no problem infringing on those rights.  And you actually answered your own question - rifle, ball, and powder.  I believe there are no restrictions on those currently, and no plans to take them off the table.

Well to a point you are correct.  In the context of arms that is defined in the 2nd Amendment, it is referring to all small arms that can be carried by a soldier.

Are you really that ignorant of firearms and terminology?  Ball and powder is still used in describing today's modern ammunition.


--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 48
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,3:46 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(SimpleLife @ Dec. 17 2012,7:55 am)
QUOTE
You're an idiot.  Nobody but the fringe wants to get rid of the guns.  Fringe, like the tea party; nobody pays them any attention.  The people who are looking for an actual solution want mental health screenings (for the PEOPLE), registrations (for the PEOPLE), buy-back programs (for the PEOPLE), gun training (for the PEOPLE), and bans on assault weapons.  But sure, keep spouting "guns don't kill people, people do!" like it's an original idea.

Sure, lets turn a Right into a privilege.  After all we peons must prostrate ourselves before the alter of govt to gain permission to exercise an inalienable Right.  I think we should  require background checks and psych evaluations before someone can post online, until then NO 1st Amendment for you.

Gun buy back programs are a joke, and are nothing more than feel good do nothing programs, please cite one example of these types of taxpayer wasted money programs has done anything to reduce crime?


--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 49
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,3:48 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(SimpleLife @ Dec. 17 2012,9:25 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Dec. 17 2012,9:07 am)
QUOTE
The assault weapons ban in '94 did squat, so here we are again. Be it blamed on lack of parental guidance or blamed on video games or a host of other reasons this is nothing more than a knee-jerk reaction and gun grabbers like Feinstein and Schumer want to take advantage of it.

The assault weapons ban expired in 2004, but the assault weapons he used would have been included in the ban were it still in effect today.

:rofl:
You are clueless aren't ya?  No it wouldn't have been.


--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 50
Botto 82 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 6293
Joined: Jan. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 17 2012,4:55 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Liberal @ Dec. 17 2012,3:20 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE

Mark Tambascio, another family friend, said he believed Lanza's mother, Nancy, had become increasingly concerned in the last few months about Lanza's emotional and behavioral issues.

ABC News Story

Not the kind of kid that I would let access firearms. Would you?

Nothing in that article says he was volatile, or dangerous? Do you think people shouldn't own guns if they have a kid that avoids eye contact, is an A/V nerd, or has a high tolerance for pain?

Okay. You know what? You're right. No cause for alarm. I'm sure Mom couldn't have seen this coming.

Happy now?


--------------
Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum.

- Kurt Vonnegut
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
264 replies since Dec. 14 2012,12:33 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 5 of 27<<123456789>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Dead Children in Connecticut
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon