|
Post Number: 11
|
|
Post Number: 12
|
Stone-Magnon
Group: Members
Posts: 1540
Joined: Dec. 2010
|
|
Posted on: Jul. 14 2011,1:21 pm |
|
|
Dandeliar..."Albert Lea was one of the only communities in the nation last year to see real estate growth"
Prove it arswipe. What a pantload. Virtually everything you said was pure anadulterated doggy doo doo. You must be Moen. Nobody else could make up such drivel and the key here is how you think you're so much smarter than your readers...it has Moen written all over it.
You wanna start with me? You wanna make me mad...keep it up...
selfish bastard...
-------------- ...everybody must get stoned
-Bob Dylan
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 13
|
usmcr
Group: Members
Posts: 922
Joined: Sep. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Jul. 14 2011,1:36 pm |
|
|
dandelion: Albert Lea was one of the only communities in the nation last year to see real estate growth. would you please post the site where this information came from. thanks.
-------------- "Do not confuse dissent with disloyalty" Edward R Murrow
Memento homo quia pulvis es, et in pulverem veverteris
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 14
|
dandelion
Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: Jul. 2011
|
|
Posted on: Jul. 14 2011,3:42 pm |
|
|
Despite a strong December, home sales in Rochester in 2010 dropped 20.7 percent from 2009.
There were 1,370 sales, compared to 1,728 in 2009, according to newly released data from the Southeast Minnesota Association of Realtors. In 2008, there were 1,862 sales.
"When looking at the full year 2010, it continued to reflect the struggles of the real estate market," said Duane Sauke, SEMAR's MLS president.
The numbers reflect home sales with representation by SEMAR members.
Other cities in southeastern Minnesota also saw sales drop, except for Albert Lea, which rose 5.4 percent to 236.
This is from the 1/11/11 article in the Rochester post Bulletin...Note the EXCEPT FOR ALBERT LEA part. There also was a story on KIMT the next day reporting on this taking it further to compare Albert Lea to the nation Ps I can promise you I am not Moen...not that you care and just because 2 business are owned by the same person does not make them intertwined.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 15
|
dandelion
Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: Jul. 2011
|
|
Posted on: Jul. 14 2011,3:51 pm |
|
|
I also believe this ran in the Austin paper
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 16
|
HiggsBoson
Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: Oct. 2010
|
|
Posted on: Jul. 14 2011,5:59 pm |
|
|
Consider the pot stirred.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 17
|
|
Post Number: 18
|
|
Post Number: 19
|
|
Post Number: 20
|
Stone-Magnon
Group: Members
Posts: 1540
Joined: Dec. 2010
|
|
Posted on: Jul. 15 2011,11:22 am |
|
|
When two business's are owned by the same person they're related in that they ARE OWNED BY THE SAME PERSON.
Why is it so important to separate these two businesses in your mind?
Does one taint the other, aren't they both on the up and up??
-------------- ...everybody must get stoned
-Bob Dylan
|
|
|
|
|