Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 5 of 29<<123456789>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: GOP Social Security Cuts< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 41
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: May 15 2018,6:02 am  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE
Big Pharma Owns the Trump Administration

(Washington, DC) — The following is a statement from Alex Lawson, Executive Director of Social Security Works, on Donald Trump’s upcoming speech on drug pricing:

“Donald Trump works for the prescription drug industry, not the people. He talked a big game on the campaign trail and immediately after the election, but tough rhetoric means nothing if it is not matched by actions.

Trump’s speech today will include yet more tough talk, but no one should be fooled. He promised that he would let Medicare negotiate lower prices, but now he has completely caved to the drug corporations and is blocking Medicare from doing so.

Far from taking on the prescription drug corporations, Trump has put them in charge and made the US government the industry’s enforcer, bullying countries around the world into raising drug prices. Even knowing that pharma owns DC, this is a new low of industry control of government. I wonder if Donald Trump will get a new title and paycheck from big pharma to go along with all the work he is doing for it.”


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 42
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22550
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: May 15 2018,8:57 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

^^ and what source did you copy and paste this drivel from?

--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 43
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: May 24 2018,5:47 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Banking Industry Wins; Working and Retired Americans Lose
May 23rd, 2018|Latest News, News Releases

News Release

“The majority in the House of Representatives just betrayed working Americans by passing reckless banking legislation known as the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S 2155).  The only accurate part of the title is “regulatory relief,” in that it rolls back crucial regulations on the banking industry enacted after the 2008 financial crisis.  American workers lost trillions of dollars in retirement savings in the wake of the ’08 financial meltdown.  This bill makes another financial crisis more likely. How fair is it to ask workers to be responsible and save when the government strips away protections intended to keep our savings secure?

Of course, there is one thing that Americans count on for basic financial security in retirement:  Social Security. But the same fiscal conservatives in a hurry to deregulate banking are still gunning for Social Security under the guise of “entitlement reform.”  Seniors and their advocates can’t let that happen. Retirees’ Social Security benefits must be preserved because, at least for now, they are the only thing workers can depend on after the next financial crash.” – Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

###

The National Committee, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the Board of Directors and professional staff.  The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing better-informed citizens and voters.


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 44
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 02 2018,5:27 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Social Security and the Elections

The next Congress faces tough decisions about keeping the program funded

by Kenneth Terrell, AARP Bulletin, June 2018

Many voters worry more about the effect the midterm elections could have on their monthly Social Security benefits, both today and decades from now.

How will the midterm elections affect Social Security? The first place to look for answers is the tax-cut law enacted last December. According to projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, that legislation will add more than $1.8 trillion to the federal deficit by 2028. Experts say that, depending on the makeup of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives after Election Day, Congress might look to make cuts to programs such as Social Security to reduce that debt.

“Social Security has been getting more attention recently, largely as a result of the tax bill. There’s more talk about cutting programs like Social Security to address the growing deficit,” says David Certner, legislative policy director at AARP.

There’s even some attempt at action. This spring, House Republicans introduced a bill to require Congress to balance the federal budget. That legislation could have led to cuts in Social Security and other programs, but it failed to pass. Advocates for these programs, however, are concerned about what might come after the elections. “What we continue to worry about is that the next shoe to drop will be Congress saying, ‘Now we have to look at Social Security and Medicare, because now we have this ballooning deficit,’ ” says Max Richtman, CEO of the nonprofit National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

The most immediate way Congress could make cuts to the Social Security Administration (SSA) is through the funding it provides in federal spending bills. In the most recently passed appropriations bill, which funds the government through the end of September, the SSA got an increase of $480 million. That boost, which was somewhat unexpected, raised the agency’s administrative budget to over $12 billion. A big part of the increase is aimed at speeding up the time to get a hearing to receive disability benefits. The average wait time currently is more than 600 days.

Many advocates for Social Security cite that stunning statistic — along with the long wait times for help on the SSA phone line and in person at a field office — as proof that the agency already is struggling to keep up with increased demands. “Ten thousand Americans are turning age 65 every day,” says Nancy Altman, president of the advocacy organization Social Security Works. “SSA should be opening new field offices, not simply maintaining them, and certainly not closing them.”

Many voters worry more about the effect the elections might have on their monthly benefits, both today and decades from now. Based on projections from the SSA, the agency can pay benefits in full until 2034. Then, with the agency’s trust fund spent, SSA would be able to use revenue from payroll taxes to pay benefits at about 77 percent of their target amounts.

Eventually, Congress will need to address Social Security’s long-term fiscal health. What’s less clear is when the legislature might tackle that debate, and which policies it might consider. In the past, options have ranged from privatizing parts of the program — a proposal that was rejected during the George W. Bush administration — to raising the age to become eligible for retirement benefits. Whatever path Congress ultimately pursues, Social Security advocates urge voters to make sure they get real answers from politicians.

“It’s important that, as members of Congress hold town halls and campaign rallies, people ask questions about Social Security and get a commitment on where candidates stand,” Richtman says. “Candidates saying ‘I’m for Social Security’ is not enough.”


Take the Pledge to Vote!

This year's elections are some of the most important in our lifetimes. Every vote counts, and together, we the people can hold politicians accountable.


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 45
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 10 2018,6:40 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


View on YouTube


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 46
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 23 2018,4:53 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Larry Kudlow Re-Affirms Trump/GOP Commitment to Cutting Social Security & Medicare
September 18th, 2018|Latest News, News Releases

News Release

“In case there was any doubt that the White House and Congressional Republicans still want to cut Americans’ earned benefits, chief economic advisor Larry Kudlow just confirmed it.  Kudlow told CNBC Monday that ‘everybody’s going to look at entitlements’ next year.  This aligns with comments from National Republican Congressional Committee chair, Rep. Steve Stivers, and House Speaker Paul Ryan about the need to pay for last year’s tax cuts by ‘reforming’ Social Security and Medicare.  ‘Reforming,’ of course, means cutting and privatizing. Polls consistently indicate that majorities of Americans oppose cutting earned benefits and privatization – and do not support the Trump/GOP tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations.  Kudlow’s remarks are particularly ironic in light of President Trump’s recent assertion that the administration and its allies in Congress will ‘protect’ Social Security and Medicare while Democrats want to ‘destroy’ them.  In reality, Democrats last week invigorated their campaign to boost benefits by launching Expand Social Security caucuses in the House and Senate.  Democrats have introduced legislation to strengthen Social Security and reduce costs for Medicare beneficiaries. Meanwhile, the Republicans’ latest budget proposals call for billions in cuts to both Social Security and Medicare.  The president’s top economic advisor has just reinforced the political right’s true priorities:  cutting benefits for seniors and disabled Americans living on fixed incomes to pay for tax cuts for the rich.” – Max Richtman, President and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

###

The National Committee, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the Board of Directors and professional staff.  The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing better-informed citizens and voters.


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 47
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 25 2018,10:13 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Recent Federal legislation is canceling Medicare Cost Plans in Minnesota and throughout the Nation. I post this warning because many of US will be moved to full blown Medicare Advantage Plans

Trump and Company have gave Medicare Advantage Plan's the right to use Step Therapy...the take two aspirin go home and die plan to cut drug prices....this is what you get when you vote Republican...

https://khn.org/news.... 

QUOTE
Starting next year, Medicare Advantage plans will be able to add restrictions on expensive, injectable drugs administered by doctors to treat cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, macular degeneration and other serious diseases.



Under the new rules, these private Medicare insurance plans could require patients to try cheaper drugs first. If those are not effective, then the patients could receive the more expensive medication prescribed by their doctors.



Insurers use such “step therapy” to control drug costs in the employer-based insurance market as well as in Medicare’s stand-alone Part D prescription drug benefit, which generally covers medicine purchased at retail pharmacies or through the mail. The new option allows Advantage plans — an alternative to traditional, government-run Medicare — to extend that cost-control strategy to these physician-administered drugs.



In traditional Medicare, which covers 40 million older or disabled adults, those medications given by doctors are covered under Medicare Part B, which includes outpatient services, and step therapy is NOT allowed.



About 20 million people have private Medicare Advantage policies, which include coverage for Part D and Part B medications.



Some physicians and patient advocates are concerned that the pursuit of lower Part B drug prices could endanger very sick Medicare Advantage patients if they can’t be treated promptly with the medicine that was their doctor’s first choice.



Critics of the new policy, part of the administration’s efforts to fulfill President Donald Trump’s promise to cut drug prices, say it lacks some crucial details, including how to determine when a less expensive drug isn’t effective.


“Do you have to lose vision before you are allowed to use” medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration, asked Richard O’Neal, vice president for market access for Regeneron, which makes Eylea, a medicine that is injected into the eye to treat macular degeneration. In 2016, Medicare paid $2.2 billion for Eylea prescriptions for patients in traditional Medicare, more than any other Part B drug, according to government data.



Medicare Advantage insurers spend about $12 billion on Part B drugs, compared to the $25.7 billion traditional Medicare spent in 2016 on such drugs.



Insurers that adopt the step therapy policy can apply it only to new prescriptions — medicine a patient hasn’t received in the past 108 days.



The change in policy gives insurers a new bargaining tool: Pharmaceutical makers may want to compete by cutting prices to get their product on the plans’ list of preferred lists, allowing patients to receive the medicines without step therapy pre-conditions. That “strengthens their negotiating position with the manufacturers,” Medicare chief Seema Verma said when she unveiled the policy last month.



It could also save patients money since they usually pay a portion of the Part B prescription cost. In addition, Medicare is requiring plans to share the savings with enrollees.



“Competition is a big factor in price concessions,” said Daniel Nam, executive director of federal programs at America’s Health Insurance Plans, an industry trade group. But insurers haven’t had much leverage to negotiate lower prices for these drugs without strategies like step therapy, he said.



Federal health officials told insurers in a memo last month that they could substitute a less expensive Part B drug to treat a medical condition the FDA has not approved it for, if insurers can document that it is safe and effective. Yet coverage for a Part D drug is usually denied for a condition that doesn’t have FDA approval, according to the Center for Medicare Advocacy, which helps beneficiaries with appeals.



Several representatives of medical specialty groups recently met with Alex Azar, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, to express their concerns.



Dr. Stephen Grubbs, vice president of clinical affairs at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, was among them. He said Azar told then the new step therapy policy would not have a big impact on cancer treatment.



Patients and their physicians who encounter problems getting specific Part B drugs can appeal using the “process that we have throughout the Medicare Advantage program and Part D plans,” advised Verma.



Under this system, if patients don’t want to follow their insurance plans’ requirements to try a less expensive medication first, they can request an exception to step therapy.



“They need their doctor’s support,” said Francine Chuchanis, director of entitlement rights at Direction Home, an Area Agencies on Aging organization that serves older adults and people with disabilities in northeastern Ohio. The physician must tell the plan why its restrictions should be lifted and provide extensive documentation.



The plans have 24 hours to respond to an expedited exception request and 72 hours for a regular one. During this time, “people are going without their drugs,” said Sarah Jane Blake, a Medicare counselor for New York’s StateWide Senior Action Council.



However, Dr. David Daikh, president of the American College of Rheumatology, said plans frequently do not meet the 72-hour deadline.



“We raised this point with the secretary and his staff,” he said. “They replied that they felt that there would not be a backlog for this program.”



If a plan denies the exemption, patients can file a “reconsideration” appeal. During this process, patients still can’t get their medicine unless they pay for it out-of-pocket.



Only a tiny fraction of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries filed a reconsideration appeal last year. Of the 3,498 cases that were decided, just 1 in 10 beneficiaries won decisions fully or partially in their favor, according to Medicare statistics.



“That’s disheartening to say the least,” said Blake, but she wasn’t surprised. “Beneficiaries are intimidated by the hoops they have to go through and often give up trying to purchase the drugs prescribed for them.


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 48
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 12 2018,8:18 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Pharmacists and Seniors Say Goodbye to “Gag Clause” and Hello to Lower Drug Costs


News Release

Pharmacists finally will be free to disclose lower prices for prescription drugs, thanks to a new law introduced by Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), which was endorsed by the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.  The Know the Lowest Price Act was signed into law by President Trump Wednesday after receiving bipartisan support in Congress.  It blocks Medicare Part D insurers and pharmacy benefit managers from restricting a pharmacist’s ability to tell beneficiaries that certain medications may be cheaper when purchased out of pocket than by going through their insurance plan.

“The passage and signing of Senator Stabenow’s legislation proves that Congress and the president are indeed capable of coalescing around common sense solutions to lower prescription drug prices.  This law will particularly help seniors on fixed incomes struggling to afford the medications they need,” said National Committee President and CEO Max Richtman.

Before Sen. Stabenow’s legislation was enacted, some insurers and pharmacy benefit managers imposed ‘gag clauses’ on pharmacies which prevented them from sharing information about cheaper prices.  For example, a diabetes or high blood pressure medication may cost $20 through insurance coverage but only $8 by paying out of pocket.  A recent report found that customers overpaid for prescription drugs at the pharmacy counter more than 20% of the time.

“We hope to see continued bipartisan cooperation as other bills to save Americans money at the drug counter work their way through Congress, including the Lower Out of Pocket Costs for Seniors Act and the Affordable and Safe Prescription Drug Importation Act, among others,” Richtman said.

###

The National Committee, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization acts in the interests of its membership through advocacy, education, services, grassroots efforts and the leadership of the Board of Directors and professional staff.  The work of the National Committee is directed toward developing better-informed citizens and voters.


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 49
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 24 2018,7:40 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

...Don't let your voice go unheard this mid-term election. Be the difference. Vote. Medicare and Social Security are at stake...

Attached Image
Attached Image

--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 50
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16725
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 27 2018,4:51 am Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

You can vote to save Medicare and Social Security or cut these vital programs the choice is yours Nov 6th...

Republicans Have Not ‘Changed Their Tune’ on Medicare

Far from “abandoning” their campaign to cut Americans’ earned benefits, GOP leaders have doubled-down on it.  The ink was barely dry on the Trump/GOP tax scheme when Speaker Paul Ryan called for ‘entitlement reform’ to pay for it. He was quickly joined by a chorus of fellow partisans, most recently National Republican Congressional Committee Chair Steve Stivers.  The party has hardly declared Medicare “sacrosanct,” proposing in its 2019 budget plan to cut the program by $537 billion over ten years.  Likewise, President Trump, who promised “not to touch” Social Security or Medicare during the 2016 campaign, issued a budget that includes billions in cuts to both programs and has surrounded himself with advisors (most prominently, budget chief Mick Mulvaney) who are focused on slashing benefits.  At a time when Social Security and Medicare should be expanded to meet seniors’ rising health and retirement costs, the President and his party are clearly marching in the wrong direction


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
287 replies since Dec. 10 2016,8:36 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 5 of 29<<123456789>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply GOP Social Security Cuts
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon