Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 3 of 9<<1234567>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Democratic debate, Three hours of...?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 21
stardust14 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 337
Joined: Nov. 2014
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,11:36 am  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Self-Banished @ Oct. 15 2015,5:18 am)
QUOTE
To a certain extent the others tried but Bullsh!t and stroke lady seemed to be engaged in mutual ass-kissing. Was there an agreement before the debate started?

If this is the best the Dems have to offer we just might end up with Trump as prez. :O

True. But then civility does have its merits.

Bernie and Trump are similar in one way---foreign policy is not their strength.

How many of either's supporters will actually vote in primaries? How many will cave to the "electable safe square" candidate? By the time S. Carolina primaries arrive we should know. Once more those states late in the primaries will have little say in candidates. Media will have annointed their choice and the sheep will bow in reverence.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 22
Botto 82 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 6293
Joined: Jan. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,12:06 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(stardust14 @ Oct. 15 2015,11:36 am)
QUOTE
Bernie and Trump are similar in one way---foreign policy is not their strength.

What's the benchmark, there? Clinton? Obama? Reagan? Bush 1 or 2? Seems to me nobody's winning that race, given the quagmire that the Middle East has become.

--------------
Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum.

- Kurt Vonnegut
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 23
MADDOG Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,12:52 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(stardust14 @ Oct. 15 2015,11:36 am)
QUOTE
By the time S. Carolina primaries arrive we should know. Once more those states late in the primaries will have little say in candidates. Media will have annointed their choice and the sheep will bow in reverence.

Wouldn't you say that the media has already picked their anointed ones?  There's little doubt that the MSM has Hillary already elected.  Sure, they are pushing the Trump train down the tracks but seem confident that train will run off the track soon enough.  I think the left loonies believe the Donald will self implode.  The later, the better.  

At that point, the only sheep will be following  the bitchwolf.


Attached Image
Attached Image

--------------
Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up.  -Liberal
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 24
stardust14 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 337
Joined: Nov. 2014
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,1:53 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Botto 82 @ Oct. 15 2015,12:06 pm)
QUOTE
What's the benchmark, there? Clinton? Obama? Reagan? Bush 1 or 2? Seems to me nobody's winning that race, given the quagmire that the Middle East has become.

That's a toughy. At first glance it's difficult to come up with a benchmark president on foreign policy.

There are hordes of dysfunctional nations to deal with following the collapse of the Cold War. The Cold War artificially hid dysfunction, or it impeded responsible foreign players.

I so despise the rampant tribalism politics in the Middle East. Wish we could elect officials that knew how to deal with other rational nations as far as trade and climate. Unfortunately it's the bad actors around the world that attract our attention and time.

Conclusion: I have no answer to your question.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 25
stardust14 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 337
Joined: Nov. 2014
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,2:12 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(MADDOG @ Oct. 15 2015,12:52 pm)
QUOTE
Wouldn't you say that the media has already picked their anointed ones?  There's little doubt that the MSM has Hillary already elected.  Sure, they are pushing the Trump train down the tracks but seem confident that train will run off the track soon enough.  I think the left loonies believe the Donald will self implode.  The later, the better.

Agreed. Question is: what % of the public trusts media with their choices? As I have pointed out here several times media has become the conscience of citizens. Personal conscience and gut feelings are being wiped out, sanitized, regulated, illegitimized by media.

Judging from my online experience I would say a high percentage of people use media as consultants in their personal decision making. Sure, they bitch about media. But it's biased bitching from one side of the fence. Corporate media is corporate media, despite their leanings. None to be trusted.

Sheep love a herd. Media shepard the sheep on over-grazed pastureland. Trump and Bernie are played as wolves threatening to both sheep and shepard.

Listen. Hear the Baaaaaaing all around.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 26
Rosalind_Swenson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1527
Joined: May 2011
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,2:26 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(MADDOG @ Oct. 15 2015,12:52 pm)
QUOTE

(stardust14 @ Oct. 15 2015,11:36 am)
QUOTE
By the time S. Carolina primaries arrive we should know. Once more those states late in the primaries will have little say in candidates. Media will have annointed their choice and the sheep will bow in reverence.

Wouldn't you say that the media has already picked their anointed ones?  There's little doubt that the MSM has Hillary already elected.  Sure, they are pushing the Trump train down the tracks but seem confident that train will run off the track soon enough.  I think the left loonies believe the Donald will self implode.  The later, the better.  

At that point, the only sheep will be following  the bitchwolf.

The media has been working to sway voters for decades. It's crap. The democratic debates are an example.

Slate debate poll: Sanders 71% of the votes. Clinton 16%
http://www.slate.com/article...ll.html

Slate writer declares Clinton the "winner".
http://www.slate.com/article...ut.html

The group of people CNN had assembled for the debates had also chosen Sanders as the one they liked the best after the debate. And the polls:

CNN debate poll: Sanders 81% Clinton 13%.
https://www.facebook.com/cnn/app_1667241686824039

CNN writers declare clinton the big winner of the debate:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/13/politics/democratic-debate-updates/

Time magazine poll of the democratic debate. Sanders 56% of the votes Hillary only got 11%:
http://time.com/4071956...who-won    

Time magazine writers declare Hillary debate winner:
http://time.com/4072784/democratic-debate-hillary-clinton-offense/

I don't think there's a single article in the other mainstream press that isn't calling Clinton the "big winner" of the debate. Because there's too damn many people who will only vote for the one they think has the best chance at winning, just so the other party won't get their guy in.

Stardust and Botto, so true on foreign policy. In my opinion we need our leaders to stop meddling and screwing with other countries. Hillary Clinton? yeesh. She was the only person on that stage who pushed for the Iraq war. Everyone else strongly opposed it.

My favorite quote from the debate was from Chafee
QUOTE
“ Well, we just heard Senator Sanders say that it's the worst decision in American history. That's very significant, the worst decision in American history, I just heard from Senator Sanders.

So, as we look ahead, if you're going to make those poor judgment calls, a critical time in our history, we just finished with the Vietnam era, getting back into another quagmire -- if you're looking ahead, and you're looking at someone who made that poor decision in 2002 to go into Iraq when there was no real evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- I know because I did my homework, and, so, that's an indication of how someone will perform in the future. And that's what's important.”


Her "ooops, my bad" defense whenever it is brought up doesn't cut it either.

Stardust:
QUOTE
Sheep love a herd. Media shepard the sheep on over-grazed pastureland.


Completely agree.


--------------
And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 27
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22616
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,2:42 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I think the Lincoln Chaffee answer (or more accurately, excuse) "I had just gotten to the senate" was my favorite of the night though I had to clean up my soda I shot through my nose. :rofl:

If nothing else those of us on either side of the coin, who actually pay attention will be entertained for the next year.


--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 28
stardust14 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 337
Joined: Nov. 2014
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,6:00 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 15 2015,2:26 pm)
QUOTE
The media has been working to sway voters for decades. It's crap. The democratic debates are an example.

Slate debate poll: Sanders 71% of the votes. Clinton 16%
http://www.slate.com/article...ll.html

Slate writer declares Clinton the "winner".
http://www.slate.com/article...ut.html

The group of people CNN had assembled for the debates had also chosen Sanders as the one they liked the best after the debate. And the polls:

CNN debate poll: Sanders 81% Clinton 13%.
https://www.facebook.com/cnn/app_1667241686824039

CNN writers declare clinton the big winner of the debate:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/13/politics/democratic-debate-updates/

Time magazine poll of the democratic debate. Sanders 56% of the votes Hillary only got 11%:
http://time.com/4071956...who-won    

Time magazine writers declare Hillary debate winner:
http://time.com/4072784/democratic-debate-hillary-clinton-offense/

I don't think there's a single article in the other mainstream press that isn't calling Clinton the "big winner" of the debate. Because there's too damn many people who will only vote for the one they think has the best chance at winning, just so the other party won't get their guy in.

Stardust and Botto, so true on foreign policy. In my opinion we need our leaders to stop meddling and screwing with other countries. Hillary Clinton? yeesh. She was the only person on that stage who pushed for the Iraq war. Everyone else strongly opposed it.

My favorite quote from the debate was from Chafee
QUOTE
“ Well, we just heard Senator Sanders say that it's the worst decision in American history. That's very significant, the worst decision in American history, I just heard from Senator Sanders.

So, as we look ahead, if you're going to make those poor judgment calls, a critical time in our history, we just finished with the Vietnam era, getting back into another quagmire -- if you're looking ahead, and you're looking at someone who made that poor decision in 2002 to go into Iraq when there was no real evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq -- I know because I did my homework, and, so, that's an indication of how someone will perform in the future. And that's what's important.”


Her "ooops, my bad" defense whenever it is brought up doesn't cut it either.

:clap:  :clap:  :clap:

How many people you know whine about "the media" but are hard-wired to it 24/7?

How many people you know give you the impression they  think for themselves even though they may be expelled from the media herd?

How many local hicks believe Sanders won the debate?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 29
Rosalind_Swenson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1527
Joined: May 2011
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,8:19 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Stardust:
QUOTE
How many people you know whine about "the media" but are hard-wired to it 24/7?


Drives me NUTS. The worst part is that so many people only consider certain news outlets to be "credible".- No matter how many times they've been busted lying, fabricating, spinning or omitting. And not everyone will even agree on which sources are "credible" .   Ugh, "liberal bias" "liberal rag" "conservative kook station". Honestly, all the big media outlets lie and spin on a regular basis. Silver lining in it though, since some people get most of their news from alternative sites which are not "credible" to either side, we have to go directly to government websites to get and distribute the information. A lot more information on other things is discovered that way.

QUOTE
How many people you know give you the impression they  think for themselves even though they may be expelled from the media herd?


There's repercussions for stepping out of line. We also keep slipping further down the list in the World Press Freedom Index. I think this year we're #49.

QUOTE
How many local hicks believe Sanders won the debate?


Sadly, I'm going to say, not many.
Read comment sections in all the big national news sites below pretty much any political article. Or the facebook accounts for CNN, and the other big national news sites. A lot of people making comments in support of Sanders, but a lot of people making comments that Hillary's going to be the winner and repeating MSM talking points. And sooo many people making comments "Go Blue!" or "Team Blue!" Very irritating. So many people making comments that Hillary is by far the best for foreign policy. That Chafee quote has come in quite handy since the debate.


--------------
And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 30
stardust14 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 337
Joined: Nov. 2014
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 15 2015,10:36 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

Admittedly I spend little time chasing media stories or links. It's a jungle out there! One must be an optimist to venture forth.

I do learn a few things from feeds on FB. Like the mood and thinking of average Americans. From that it can be deduced why America is what it is. Some hopeful signs, others not so.

After watching the Obama administration fail to prosecute Wallstreet crooks I swore to never vote Dem again. If Hillary is candidate I will adhere to that oath. With Bernie I will break that oath.

I've never attended a primary caucus. Have you? If so, what's it like? If it were tonight I would atend.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
80 replies since Oct. 13 2015,6:42 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 3 of 9<<1234567>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Democratic debate
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon