Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 2 of 3<<123>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

 reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Missing Civil Process Monies, Sheriff's Election< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 11
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,12:26 am  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Who supposedly stole this money?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 12
hairhertz Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3489
Joined: Dec. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,9:25 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(busybee @ Aug. 28 2010,12:26 am)
QUOTE
Who supposedly stole this money?

Gotta keep this thread hot.  Somebody [CRAIG NELSON] needs to investigate this immediately and make a public accounting of the results.

Of course that means if Craig Nelson is in charge, well...... :dunno:

--------------
metis movement
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 13
MADDOG Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 7821
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,10:39 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(Twiggs50 @ Aug. 26 2010,7:15 pm)
QUOTE
Give it a rest about Kehr and Ahern.

I'm a long way out from being done with them.

QUOTE
I had nothing to do with any of this, but I seem to be the one you keep targeting.
 Nice to see you noticed, but you see, Tuttle is being dealt with.

--------------
Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up.  -Liberal
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 14
Twiggs50 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 88
Joined: Nov. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,11:27 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Give it up. You're not that important. Tuttle is not being "dealt" with because of anything said on this forum. And keep ranting and raving about Kehr and Ahern, it'll really get you somewhere. NOT!

I have more important things in my life to worry about than Kehr and Ahern, like how I'm going to pay my bills and feed my family when I don't have a job. Since you're so important, got a job for me that pays well?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 15
Bluehosta Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: Jul. 2010
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,1:35 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Well the city at least went to Waseca Co. to do their investigation into the city manager and it happened in May, June and July of this year.  The county went to the State Auditor (maybe) for something that happened in 2009, and was brought to light in March of 2010, and noone has heard anything since.  I think they should have went to Waseca Co. to get it done with.????????  Looks like intentional foot dragging :dunno:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 16
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,1:55 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
hairhertz · Posted on Aug. 28 2010,9:25 am

QUOTE
Gotta keep this thread hot.  Somebody [CRAIG NELSON] needs to investigate this immediately and make a public accounting of the results.

Of course that means if Craig Nelson is in charge, well... :dunno:


It is not Craig Nelson's job to investigate alleged crimes.  

Law Enforcement is responsible for investigations and initializing the process to pursue charges against a person if they believe a crime may have been committed.  

After Law Enforcement sends their investigation information to the County Attorney's office for review, the County Attorney's office then decides if or what charges can be filed against a person.  This usually is determined by what crimes (if any) the County Attorney's office believes has the best potential to pursue because of sufficient evidence leading to a conviction and/or plea agreement.  

This is why I asked WHO is supposed to have allegedly stolen civil process money?

If an investigation was done by law enforcement and if they were able to determine a crime may have been committed by someone, I think the public should know.  

On the other hand, if Law Enforcement didn't determine any one person (s) might have took this money inappropriately, the County Attorney's office can't file charges against an "unknown suspect" either, therefore, the public won't be informed any further.

I'd really like to know who people on here think the "main" suspect could be for the missing civil process money.   :dunno:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 17
alcitizens Search for posts by this member.
Albert Lea
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3664
Joined: Jul. 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,2:08 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
I bet Sheriff Mark Harig is the crook.. :blush:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 18
Bluehosta Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: Jul. 2010
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,2:09 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
The original article in the paper said they would have more.  There hasn't been anymore let out.  If they have a suspect, we can be told who.  If they don't have a suspect we can be told they don't.  If it was misappropriated or lost becasue of bad managing, we can be told that to.  If they screwed up the investigation, they can tell us that.  And if they claim they have found it after the fact in some unknow account they forgot about, lets have an explanation for that.  They are not telling us anything.  The Sheriff is responsible for the Sheriff's Department.  There is nothing says he cannot address this matter with an explanation.  I think he would have addressed it but he wants us to worry about issuing gun permits.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 19
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,2:17 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Twiggs50 · Posted on Aug. 28 2010,11:27 am

QUOTE
Give it up. You're not that important. Tuttle is not being "dealt" with because of anything said on this forum.


That's absolutely true!  

:clap:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 20
busybee Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,2:28 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE
Bluehosta · Posted on Aug. 28 2010,2:09 pm

QUOTE
The original article in the paper said they would have more.  There hasn't been anymore let out.  If they have a suspect, we can be told who.  If they don't have a suspect we can be told they don't.  If it was misappropriated or lost becasue of bad managing, we can be told that to.  If they screwed up the investigation, they can tell us that.  And if they claim they have found it after the fact in some unknow account they forgot about, lets have an explanation for that.  They are not telling us anything.


They typically don't tell the public anything if they don't know anything and they sure as heck aren't going to admit to screwing up an investigation.   :;):

QUOTE
The Sheriff is responsible for the Sheriff's Department.  There is nothing says he cannot address this matter with an explanation.  I think he would have addressed it but he wants us to worry about issuing gun permits.


It is my understanding also that the Sheriff's Department is who handles civil process.  

In my opinion the Sheriff  wants to campaign to support the right to bear arms.

Have you thought of asking to talk to the Sheriff in person and directly about this?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
25 replies since Aug. 24 2010,8:00 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 2 of 3<<123>> 		reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Missing Civil Process Monies
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon