Topic: Missing Civil Process Monies
started by: Bluehosta
Posted by Bluehosta on Aug. 24 2010,8:00 am
In the debates this topic was spoken of. Missing money from the civil process at the Sheriff's Office. That there was approximately $40,000 taken in in 2006, $45,000 in 2007, $50,000 in 2008, and only approximately $9,000 in 2009. They say the State Auditor is investigating. Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. Why would you need him? Where is the money. Whats taking so long? Monthly bank statements, records of service, deposit slilps, monthly statements, endorsements on the back of the checks, why isn't this addressed. Where is the money, and why wasn't it noticed missing right away? Are we going to find out it was stolen, or are we going to find out it was short cutted or kited right into the Sheriff's budget with no record? Where is it?
Posted by ICU812 on Aug. 24 2010,8:53 am
QUOTE
Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. Why would you need him?
He wood be a she, in this case.
< Minnesota State Auditor Site >
Posted by Bluehosta on Aug. 24 2010,9:00 am
Thank you, I like "Her" even better.
Posted by Two Bears on Aug. 25 2010,12:07 am
(Bluehosta @ Aug. 24 2010,8:00 am)
QUOTE
In the debates this topic was spoken of. Missing money from the civil process at the Sheriff's Office. That there was approximately $40,000 taken in in 2006, $45,000 in 2007, $50,000 in 2008, and only approximately $9,000 in 2009. They say the State Auditor is investigating. Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. Why would you need him? Where is the money. Whats taking so long? Monthly bank statements, records of service, deposit slilps, monthly statements, endorsements on the back of the checks, why isn't this addressed. Where is the money, and why wasn't it noticed missing right away? Are we going to find out it was stolen, or are we going to find out it was short cutted or kited right into the Sheriff's budget with no record? Where is it?
I find it interesting that it didn't take the law dogs years to arrest the county commish Linda Tuttle when they figured out money was missing, but this seems to be taking way too long to audit the books and find where this missing money went.
Posted by Twiggs50 on Aug. 25 2010,12:16 am
Just depends on who you know and who you blow.
Posted by gijoeman on Aug. 26 2010,2:33 pm
^I think that's hilarious coming from Tutts friend. Is that how you people talk? Steal money, gamble and talk about blowing people? Amature...
Posted by Twiggs50 on Aug. 26 2010,3:12 pm
Gee, you're ususally one of the first to jump on the "good old boy's club" bandwagon, but when I make a comment alluding to that, all you can bring up is Linda Tuttle and question my integrity. I was seriously questioning why this hasn't been investigated more thoroughly, but you, of course, have to try to change the focus on to something else completely. Are you a "friend" of the person at the sheriff's office, and should we question your integrity?
Posted by hairhertz on Aug. 26 2010,5:31 pm
It takes big balls to challenge the big dog 'cuz the potential consequences are terrible if you lose.
Posted by MADDOG on Aug. 26 2010,6:42 pm
(Twiggs50 @ Aug. 26 2010,3:12 pm)
QUOTE
Are you a "friend" of the person at the sheriff's office, and should we question your integrity?
How 'bout we work on Tuttle's, Kehr's and Ahern's first? Afterall, they are the peas in your pod. The rest is chump change compared to the amount your people got their hands on.
I would think the OSA will handle the rest.
Posted by Twiggs50 on Aug. 26 2010,7:15 pm
Give it a rest about Kehr and Ahern. I'm sick to death of hearing about this. Let's get beyond this, because nothing is going to change, no matter how much you howl. I don't agree with the process that took place, and I feel that someone else should have been given the job that was more qualified, but I have more important things to worry about in my life, and this is nothing that affects me personally, so I don't worry about it anymore. I believe there are more important things to worry about in our local government and local law enforcement that are much more unfair. I had nothing to do with any of this, but I seem to be the one you keep targeting. Any time I have an opinion about something that doesn't agree with you, you keep throwing Tuttle into the mix. What, I'm not supposed to have an opinion on anything and I'm just supposed to shut my mouth if I don't agree with everything you say? I don't think so.
All I am is a friend of Tuttle's family, and I have my own opinions of what happened. I don't agree with everything that she did, but I'm leaving it up to the courts to decide what should be done, because guess what, they don't care what I think and don't want my input.
Posted by busybee on Aug. 28 2010,12:26 am
Who supposedly stole this money?
Posted by hairhertz on Aug. 28 2010,9:25 am
(busybee @ Aug. 28 2010,12:26 am)
QUOTE
Who supposedly stole this money?
Gotta keep this thread hot. Somebody [CRAIG NELSON] needs to investigate this immediately and make a public accounting of the results.
Of course that means if Craig Nelson is in charge, well......
Posted by MADDOG on Aug. 28 2010,10:39 am
(Twiggs50 @ Aug. 26 2010,7:15 pm)
QUOTE
Give it a rest about Kehr and Ahern.
I'm a long way out from being done with them.
QUOTE
I had nothing to do with any of this, but I seem to be the one you keep targeting.
Nice to see you noticed, but you see, Tuttle is being dealt with.
Posted by Twiggs50 on Aug. 28 2010,11:27 am
Give it up. You're not that important. Tuttle is not being "dealt" with because of anything said on this forum. And keep ranting and raving about Kehr and Ahern, it'll really get you somewhere. NOT!I have more important things in my life to worry about than Kehr and Ahern, like how I'm going to pay my bills and feed my family when I don't have a job. Since you're so important, got a job for me that pays well?
Posted by Bluehosta on Aug. 28 2010,1:35 pm
Well the city at least went to Waseca Co. to do their investigation into the city manager and it happened in May, June and July of this year. The county went to the State Auditor (maybe) for something that happened in 2009, and was brought to light in March of 2010, and noone has heard anything since. I think they should have went to Waseca Co. to get it done with.?
? Looks like intentional foot dragging
Posted by busybee on Aug. 28 2010,1:55 pm
hairhertz · Posted on Aug. 28 2010,9:25 amQUOTE
Gotta keep this thread hot. Somebody [CRAIG NELSON] needs to investigate this immediately and make a public accounting of the results.
Of course that means if Craig Nelson is in charge, well...
Of course that means if Craig Nelson is in charge, well...
It is not Craig Nelson's job to investigate alleged crimes.
Law Enforcement is responsible for investigations and initializing the process to pursue charges against a person if they believe a crime may have been committed.
After Law Enforcement sends their investigation information to the County Attorney's office for review, the County Attorney's office then decides if or what charges can be filed against a person. This usually is determined by what crimes (if any) the County Attorney's office believes has the best potential to pursue because of sufficient evidence leading to a conviction and/or plea agreement.
This is why I asked WHO is supposed to have allegedly stolen civil process money?
If an investigation was done by law enforcement and if they were able to determine a crime may have been committed by someone, I think the public should know.
On the other hand, if Law Enforcement didn't determine any one person (s) might have took this money inappropriately, the County Attorney's office can't file charges against an "unknown suspect" either, therefore, the public won't be informed any further.
I'd really like to know who people on here think the "main" suspect could be for the missing civil process money.
Posted by alcitizens on Aug. 28 2010,2:08 pm
I bet Sheriff Mark Harig is the crook.. 
Posted by Bluehosta on Aug. 28 2010,2:09 pm
The original article in the paper said they would have more. There hasn't been anymore let out. If they have a suspect, we can be told who. If they don't have a suspect we can be told they don't. If it was misappropriated or lost becasue of bad managing, we can be told that to. If they screwed up the investigation, they can tell us that. And if they claim they have found it after the fact in some unknow account they forgot about, lets have an explanation for that. They are not telling us anything. The Sheriff is responsible for the Sheriff's Department. There is nothing says he cannot address this matter with an explanation. I think he would have addressed it but he wants us to worry about issuing gun permits.
Posted by busybee on Aug. 28 2010,2:17 pm
Twiggs50 · Posted on Aug. 28 2010,11:27 amQUOTE
Give it up. You're not that important. Tuttle is not being "dealt" with because of anything said on this forum.
That's absolutely true!
Posted by busybee on Aug. 28 2010,2:28 pm
Bluehosta · Posted on Aug. 28 2010,2:09 pmQUOTE
The original article in the paper said they would have more. There hasn't been anymore let out. If they have a suspect, we can be told who. If they don't have a suspect we can be told they don't. If it was misappropriated or lost becasue of bad managing, we can be told that to. If they screwed up the investigation, they can tell us that. And if they claim they have found it after the fact in some unknow account they forgot about, lets have an explanation for that. They are not telling us anything.
They typically don't tell the public anything if they don't know anything and they sure as heck aren't going to admit to screwing up an investigation.
QUOTE
The Sheriff is responsible for the Sheriff's Department. There is nothing says he cannot address this matter with an explanation. I think he would have addressed it but he wants us to worry about issuing gun permits.
It is my understanding also that the Sheriff's Department is who handles civil process.
In my opinion the Sheriff wants to campaign to support the right to bear arms.
Have you thought of asking to talk to the Sheriff in person and directly about this?
Posted by busybee on Aug. 31 2010,1:34 am
From another thread...QUOTE
Bluehosta Posted on: Aug. 28 2010,7:49 pm
I think if hes looking for work, Sheriff Harig might hire him to work in Civil Process or manage the seizure sales for him.
I think if hes looking for work, Sheriff Harig might hire him to work in Civil Process or manage the seizure sales for him.
After reading this comment on another thread...I apologize for my suggestion to talk to Sheriff Harig directly about the missing Civil Process money.
It's obvious that's not an option you would consider.
Although I don't understand or know what your knowledge is about the missing civil process money and/or seizure sales, I do know what it is like to fear telling too much on this forum and the potential risk of consequences that come with it by some who work in/for the FC Sheriff's Dept.
Posted by Bluehosta on Sep. 01 2010,12:32 pm
No appology nessessary. In the one debate the other canidates did speak of the missing money and Harig did not acknowlege it and does not address it. Hoping no one will bring it out until after the election. Apparently it has to be mismanagement, misappropriation, or just plain theft, but they must be trying to keep it quiet. I did talk to another Sheriff, and he said there isn't any Sheriff in the state of MN that does not endorse the second ammendment. As the only elected law enforcement in Minnesota, it is a career killer for a Sheriff not to endorse the second ammendment. Something like that usually distracts the pubic from the real issues. Public doesn't need to worry about a Sheriff taking away their second amendment rights, thats not going to happen. The public needs to worry about waste and mismanagement of resources.
Posted by Expatriate on Apr. 10 2011,2:30 pm
Guess she has a nine month head start, run Kelley run... the swift hand of Justice..
Posted by Stone-Magnon on Apr. 10 2011,3:05 pm
If she did something wrong why didn't Harig charge her. he had PLENTY of time to do so. I honestly fear for my safety living around these people. The prosecutors brother even a thief C'mon...If I'm ever shot by the police or Cory what's his name, it'll be murder one.
Posted by Expatriate on Apr. 10 2011,3:33 pm
four felony counts of theft and a warrant, Mrs Couch is in trouble, looks like the crossbar hotel...
Posted by hairhertz on Apr. 10 2011,5:04 pm
Craig "The Hammer" Nelson will nail down another stunning conviction, ah, plea bargain, I am certain.