|
|
| Post Number: 11
|
Liberal 
Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
 |
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,1:17 pm |
|
   |
Yep, if it don't come from a junkie like Limbaugh or a pervert like O'Reilly it's not news to JimHanson. 
--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 12
|
jimhanson
Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,1:29 pm |
|
 |
More liberal (and Liberal) smear. I provide the context, cite the source (Wikipedia)--and you make untrue allegations. | Quote | | if it don't come from a junkie like Limbaugh or a pervert like O'Reilly it's not news to JimHanson. |
NOTHING I posted came from Limbaugh or O'Reilly, did it?
How can you make these accusations, when I quoted something else?
Your true agenda, bias, prejudice, and desire to Bash Bush at all costs has been exposed. Why you would make an attempt to smear me by making these false accusations is beyond me--except that you will do ANYTHING--including sacrificing a friend--to accomplish your goals.
Don't reply right away--take some time to THINK about your actions. 
--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 13
|
Liberal
Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,1:52 pm |
|
|
I've got no problems with my actions.
| Quote |
More liberal (and Liberal) smear.
|
Weren't you the one that started the smear campaign by saying, "Only a flaming liberal would believe anything in Newsweek"
I guess you want it both ways.
Go ahead and let that thought sink in before you reply.
--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 14
|
jimhanson
Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,2:35 pm |
|
|
You can call party names and affiliations all you want to--that doesn't hurt anybody. "Wingnut, Moonbat, liberal (the unkindest cut of all!)  Conservative, tree-hugger, Hollywood Half-wit, reactionary, Socialist, Luddite--all OK--they either describe the party, or what the opposition thinks of the party.
But when you make untrue and specific allegations, that's another matter--example--you like to say that I'm a Republican--despite denials on my part, and absence of ANY PROOF ON YOUR PART. I wouldn't post for the record "CHAD HAYSON IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY" without evidence.
You like to post that "I get my news from O'Reilley and Limbaugh"--but you have no evidence of that. I read--a lot. I watch the cable news networks--including CNN. Once again, I'll ask--DID ANYTHING I POST IN THE REBUTTAL TO YOUR COLUMN COME FROM O'REILLY OR LIMBAUGH?
You take issue with | Quote | "Only a flaming liberal would believe anything in Newsweek"
|
. Webster's lists FLAMING as (in addition to the incendiary sense) | Quote | | intensely emotional; ardent; passionate |
or | Quote | | startling; flagrant |
WELL, AREN'T YOU?
Once again--I provided context and attribution in rebutting your post--and in return, you make an untrue statement in an attempt ot belittle and discredit.
When making your point, deal with the FACTS, NOT INNUENDO. There is no way we can have a discussion without citing FACTS. If you want to state OPINION, go ahead and do so--but be prepared to have someone challenge you to prove your point.
--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 15
|
Liberal
Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,2:59 pm |
|
|
Everyone knows Rush is a junkie, and the smoking gun website has the court documents that say O'Reilly called his producers and masturbated with a vibrator while watching himself on TV and talking to her on the phone. If that isn't a pervert, I don't know what is.
As far as backing up facts, you don't do that. You post the same republican rhetoric that the junkie and the pervert are currently talking about but you get it second hand from right wing bloggers like that Ed Morrisey character and repeat it as if it were the gospel. The whole time bashing any source you don't agree with, you know like the "Red Star".
| Quote |
I wouldn't post for the record "CHAD HAYSON IS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY" without evidence.
|
If you did, do you think I'd whine about it like you do?
Maybe we should put it to a vote and see how many people think you're a GOP tool, that spews republican rhetoric? 
| Quote |
If you want to state OPINION, go ahead and do so--but be prepared to have someone challenge you to prove your point.
|
That's funny coming from the guy that thinks all of Washington DC is covering up Able danger for the Clinton administration, but refuses to offer one shred of evidence. The worst part about it is you think that second hand info from a right wing blogger is proof and at the same time you call credible news sources demeaning and belittling names like "The Red Star".
--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 16
|
jimhanson
Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,3:55 pm |
|
|
| Quote | | You post the same republican rhetoric that the junkie and the pervert are currently talking about but you get it second hand from right wing bloggers like that Ed Morrisey character and repeat it as if it were the gospel |
"Republican Rhetoric?" From WIKIPEDIA? WHO KNEW?
"Junkie". "Pervert". "Thief". Words you like to use to denigrate people that don't subscribe to liberal lunacy. Never mind that NOT ONE OF THE PEOPLE YOU MENTION HAS EVER BEEN CHARGED IN COURT. Question: IS it EVER possible for libbies to be charged with "hate speech", or is that something they are just outraged about when someone else utters the words? What do these three guys have in common, other than the [b]admitted liar and perjorer Clinton, THEY have never been charged?[/b] O'Reilly settled his case--AS DID CLINTON IN THE PAULA JONES CASE.
Your loss of civility and civil discourse is sad. 
--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 17
|
Liberal
Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,6:18 pm |
|
|
| Quote |
Your loss of civility and civil discourse is sad.
|
This from the guy that can't stop talking about Bill Clinton's sex life.
| Quote |
O'Reilly settled his case--AS DID CLINTON IN THE PAULA JONES CASE.
|
Sure O'Reilly settled but have you read the legal documents? I can see why he settled the case.
He's never been charged but he sure paid a crapload of money to keep it out of court.
Here's my favorite part of the court documents.
| Quote |
“Immediately after climaxing, Defendant BILL O’REILLY launched into a discussion concerning how good he was during a recent appearance on “The Tonight Show” with Jay Leno…,”
|
Hey baby, did you see me on the Tonight show the other day?
Here's a deal for you, If you want more civil discourse then you quit bringing up Clinton's sex life every single day, and I'll quit calling Rush a junkie and O'Reilly a pervert. Of course just because I don't say it anymore doesn't mean it isn't true, and I know that it would be impossible for you to quit talking about Clinton's sex life. So I'll continue to put up with your Clinton fixation and also continue to call them as I see them. 
--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 18
|
bancgrl
Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: Dec. 2005
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,8:26 pm |
|
|
| Quote (Wolfie @ Dec. 13 2005,1:32am) | | Nice demeaning graphic there jackass. Either your racist or you just look good in sheets. Either way I am not impressed. |
And the "Liberal" wants to be mayor!
Good God, bring back Jean Eaton!
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 19
|
Liberal
Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,8:42 pm |
|
|
You must have missed my earlier post.
| Quote |
Isn't it funny how the dumb ones call people racists yet have no clue as to what a racist actually is.
So I'll try this one more time for the dumb ones, There is nothing racist about someone superimposing an image of Condi Rice over Aunt Jemima. Obviously if it's racist to put Rice's picture on the box then it's just as racist to have Aunt Jemima on the box. So maybe you need to talk to the people that make those products about your racism hangup.
|
If the shoe fits...
--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 20
|
Ole1kanobe
Group: Members
Posts: 1360
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 13 2005,8:55 pm |
|
|
| Quote | | Never mind that NOT ONE OF THE PEOPLE YOU MENTION HAS EVER BEEN CHARGED IN COURT. |
But didn't Rush admit to the whole world that he was hooked on pills?
I never knew that a court would have to still convict a person that whole-heartedly admitted to something they have done for it to be true.
| Quote | And the "Liberal" wants to be mayor!
Good God, bring back Jean Eaton! |
Because we all know that it is better to have a liar and a thief in office than someone with Photoshop.
--------------
The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
-Albert Einstein-
Some of what is said here (myself included) is about as tolerable as listening to someone vacuum a cat.
-nphilbro-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
