Another Supreme Court Justice CAUGHT RED HANDED - Outed as Unethical Scoundrel!!! The latest instance of ProPublica uncovering naked corruption from a United State Supreme Court Justice. This time Samuel Alito has been busted accepting extravagant luxury fishing trips and gifted private jet flights costing $100,000 (one way). To make matters even worse, Justice Alito ruled in favor of the gift giver in multiple cases before the SCOTUS!
Another Supreme Court Justice CAUGHT RED HANDED - Outed as Unethical Scoundrel!!! The latest instance of ProPublica uncovering naked corruption from a United State Supreme Court Justice. This time Samuel Alito has been busted accepting extravagant luxury fishing trips and gifted private jet flights costing $100,000 (one way). To make matters even worse, Justice Alito ruled in favor of the gift giver in multiple cases before the SCOTUS!
propublica? pfft it's an enquirer tier rag. Hell maybe they should do one on a more recent one from a couple years ago on sotomayer? Taking $3k in money from a company in which was involved in a supreme court case? Or how about ruth bader ginsberg? She got transportation, lodging and food as a guest of billionaire morris kahn. The financial disclosure form was under different rules 15yrs ago. There were other judges that were also present on the same fishing trip and personal hospitality need not be reported.
All of this is a nothing-burger.
-------------- *SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis *The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position; gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Attached Image
-------------- History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position; gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes? Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of. It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
-------------- *SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis *The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position; gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes? Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of. It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Well bro, I'll say this.... If ANY justice is being anywhere near what could be considered a bribe they should be investigated. I'm not so naive as to think there isn't any politics involved in any decision on whom to investigate, and that's the sad part. Our gov't has lost it's way a LONG time ago. It's all Jets vs Sharks at this point and until we the people demand better we will continue to get the same shit candidates we've been getting the last few cycles. I know that with justices it's different as they aren't elected. But investigating them when warranted is fine with me. I don't wanna think the highest court in the land is for sale to the highest bidder...
-------------- After we screw up health care reform, let's take on the initiative of unscrewing the education system (gov't education) Tacitus: (c. 56 AD-c. 117) "The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates."
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position; gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes? Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of. It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Well bro, I'll say this.... If ANY justice is being anywhere near what could be considered a bribe they should be investigated. I'm not so naive as to think there isn't any politics involved in any decision on whom to investigate, and that's the sad part. Our gov't has lost it's way a LONG time ago. It's all Jets vs Sharks at this point and until we the people demand better we will continue to get the same shit candidates we've been getting the last few cycles. I know that with justices it's different as they aren't elected. But investigating them when warranted is fine with me. I don't wanna think the highest court in the land is for sale to the highest bidder...
As I said before if propublica is gonna do a piece and be considered a reputable rag instead of signaling out Thomas and Alito it should have dug into all of the jurists and CJ, but instead chose the "let's make it a political hit job" route. It's all done due to the fact the SCOTUS is finally rejecting the tiers of scrutiny and interest balancing nonsense that has taken hold in the inferior courts in the last few decades and telling the courts enumerated rights are not subject to public/govt balancing interests.
-------------- *SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis *The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Remember boys and girls,
