Topic: SCOTUS
started by: Brand New Day
Posted by Brand New Day on Jul. 08 2022,2:38 pm
QUOTE
‘SCOTUS Gone Wild’
A few years ago, holier-than-thou Republicans deemed those “Girls Gone Wild” videos as immoral. But what’s even more obscene is “SCOTUS Gone Wild” with the Supreme Court’s moves to undermine the will of the people:
A few years ago, holier-than-thou Republicans deemed those “Girls Gone Wild” videos as immoral. But what’s even more obscene is “SCOTUS Gone Wild” with the Supreme Court’s moves to undermine the will of the people:
< https://defendernetwork.com/videos....ne-wild >
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jul. 08 2022,3:36 pm
(Brand New Day @ Jul. 08 2022,2:38 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE
‘SCOTUS Gone Wild’
A few years ago, holier-than-thou Republicans deemed those “Girls Gone Wild” videos as immoral. But what’s even more obscene is “SCOTUS Gone Wild” with the Supreme Court’s moves to undermine the will of the people:
A few years ago, holier-than-thou Republicans deemed those “Girls Gone Wild” videos as immoral. But what’s even more obscene is “SCOTUS Gone Wild” with the Supreme Court’s moves to undermine the will of the people:
< https://defendernetwork.com/videos....ne-wild >
*Yawn*
The guy is an idiot. The US isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional republic, and as such the often repeated nonsense of "will of the people" isn't how the supreme court goes about its rulings, the supreme court is bound by constitutional law.
I mean come on, this is stuff you learned back in 6th grade in how a constitutional framework is what is suppose to guide our system of govt.
Posted by Brand New Day on Jul. 09 2022,2:27 pm
The post-legal Supreme CourtWhat happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
QUOTE
The Supreme Court handed down a brief order Tuesday evening that effectively reinstates racially gerrymandered congressional maps in the state of Louisiana, at least for the 2022 election.
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 09 2022,3:22 pm
^^...and if it doesn’t go your way of interpretation you cry like a bitch.
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jul. 09 2022,4:18 pm
(Brand New Day @ Jul. 09 2022,2:27 pm)
QUOTE
The post-legal Supreme Court
What happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
What happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
QUOTE
The Supreme Court handed down a brief order Tuesday evening that effectively reinstates racially gerrymandered congressional maps in the state of Louisiana, at least for the 2022 election.
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
You're first mistake was thinking vox is in any way a reputable source.
Secondly, the states are what set gerrymandering and isn't at all any of the federal govts business as per the 10th Amendment.
So yes the USSC, ruled correctly according to constitutional law.
Posted by Brand New Day on Jul. 09 2022,5:25 pm
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jul. 09 2022,4:18 pm)
QUOTE
(Brand New Day @ Jul. 09 2022,2:27 pm)
QUOTE
The post-legal Supreme Court
What happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
What happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
QUOTE
The Supreme Court handed down a brief order Tuesday evening that effectively reinstates racially gerrymandered congressional maps in the state of Louisiana, at least for the 2022 election.
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
You're first mistake was thinking vox is in any way a reputable source.
Secondly, the states are what set gerrymandering and isn't at all any of the federal govts business as per the 10th Amendment.
So yes the USSC, ruled correctly according to constitutional law.
what's wrong about it?
you probably didn't even read any of it
the first one is pretty long. . and covers a lot of issues
doubt ANUS could read it. . .
so you thought you would just take an easy potshot at the second one?
so these rulings aren't bad for black voters?
and racial gerrymandering should be allowed?
Posted by Brand New Day on Jul. 09 2022,5:37 pm
QUOTE
^^...and if it doesn’t go your way of interpretation you cry like a bitch.
speaking of crying. . .
did you take your DONNIE T sign down yet?
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jul. 09 2022,7:39 pm
(Brand New Day @ Jul. 09 2022,5:25 pm)
QUOTE
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jul. 09 2022,4:18 pm)
QUOTE
(Brand New Day @ Jul. 09 2022,2:27 pm)
QUOTE
The post-legal Supreme Court
What happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
What happens if the Court rejects the rule of law?
< https://www.vox.com/2318063....uns-epa >
The Supreme Court just handed down very bad news for Black voters
QUOTE
The Supreme Court handed down a brief order Tuesday evening that effectively reinstates racially gerrymandered congressional maps in the state of Louisiana, at least for the 2022 election.
< https://www.vox.com/2318711....b45550e >
You're first mistake was thinking vox is in any way a reputable source.
Secondly, the states are what set gerrymandering and isn't at all any of the federal govts business as per the 10th Amendment.
So yes the USSC, ruled correctly according to constitutional law.
what's wrong about it?
you probably didn't even read any of it
the first one is pretty long. . and covers a lot of issues
doubt ANUS could read it. . .
so you thought you would just take an easy potshot at the second one?
so these rulings aren't bad for black voters?
and racial gerrymandering should be allowed?
I've read enough of vox so called journos to already know how it went down.
And this just proves the point where vox has decided to interject race into an issue when that wasn't the case, the Louisiana supreme court rejected the need for an additional district based on population, it was the states demos that were trying to bolster a whole new district based strictly on race and the state court said nah bro, which is why it went up the USSC, the district in question is the district I'm in and as such my rep is that dipshit troy carter, blacks in this district are slowly rejecting electing another dem rep and as such the demos needed to bolster the dem vote by creating this new district.
Posted by Brand New Day on Jul. 10 2022,8:02 am
it's even in books on tape type mode for the illiterate who can't read like ANUS T GERBIL
QUOTE
At Liberty Podcast
The Insidious Practice of Racial Gerrymandering
The Insidious Practice of Racial Gerrymandering
< https://www.aclu.org/podcast....ndering >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 10 2022,10:12 am
^^ wow, your really fixated on my exit hole, and that’s what it shall always remain, an exit.Did you have a good Saturday night with Kraken? Or did you give him a well deserved break?
Posted by Brand New Day on Jul. 11 2022,7:38 am
QUOTE
my exit hole, and that’s what it shall always remain, an exit.
yeah in your case that's where all your words and comments come from. . .
ass·hole
/ˈasˌhōl/
nounvulgar slang•North American
noun: asshole; plural noun: assholes
1.
a person's anus.
2.
a stupid, irritating, or contemptible person.
Phrases
tear someone a new asshole — scold or criticize someone harshly.
Origin
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 11 2022,8:55 am
^^ contemptible? You have no idea But since you’re Ta liking about you anal orifice, how’s kraken?
Posted by Expatriate on Jun. 22 2023,4:08 am
Another Supreme Court Justice CAUGHT RED HANDED - Outed as Unethical Scoundrel!!!The latest instance of ProPublica uncovering naked corruption from a United State Supreme Court Justice. This time Samuel Alito has been busted accepting extravagant luxury fishing trips and gifted private jet flights costing $100,000 (one way). To make matters even worse, Justice Alito ruled in favor of the gift giver in multiple cases before the SCOTUS!
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 22 2023,5:20 am
^^ you were traumatized last night by a long hauler, right 
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jun. 22 2023,2:55 pm
(Expatriate @ Jun. 22 2023,4:08 am)
QUOTE
Another Supreme Court Justice CAUGHT RED HANDED - Outed as Unethical Scoundrel!!!
The latest instance of ProPublica uncovering naked corruption from a United State Supreme Court Justice. This time Samuel Alito has been busted accepting extravagant luxury fishing trips and gifted private jet flights costing $100,000 (one way). To make matters even worse, Justice Alito ruled in favor of the gift giver in multiple cases before the SCOTUS!
< View on YouTube >
The latest instance of ProPublica uncovering naked corruption from a United State Supreme Court Justice. This time Samuel Alito has been busted accepting extravagant luxury fishing trips and gifted private jet flights costing $100,000 (one way). To make matters even worse, Justice Alito ruled in favor of the gift giver in multiple cases before the SCOTUS!
< View on YouTube >
propublica? pfft it's an enquirer tier rag. Hell maybe they should do one on a more recent one from a couple years ago on sotomayer? Taking $3k in money from a company in which was involved in a supreme court case?Or how about ruth bader ginsberg? She got transportation, lodging and food as a guest of billionaire morris kahn.
The financial disclosure form was under different rules 15yrs ago.
There were other judges that were also present on the same fishing trip and personal hospitality need not be reported.
All of this is a nothing-burger.
Posted by Expatriate on Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal GovernmentGovernment ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 23 2023,6:05 am
^^ well then find someone…
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jun. 23 2023,6:17 am
(Expatriate @ Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am)
QUOTE
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal Government
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes?
Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of.
It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Posted by Glad I Left on Jun. 23 2023,10:13 am
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jun. 23 2023,6:17 am)
QUOTE
(Expatriate @ Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am)
QUOTE
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal Government
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes?
Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of.
It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Well bro, I'll say this....
If ANY justice is being anywhere near what could be considered a bribe they should be investigated.
I'm not so naive as to think there isn't any politics involved in any decision on whom to investigate, and that's the sad part.
Our gov't has lost it's way a LONG time ago.
It's all Jets vs Sharks at this point and until we the people demand better we will continue to get the same shit candidates we've been getting the last few cycles.
I know that with justices it's different as they aren't elected.
But investigating them when warranted is fine with me. I don't wanna think the highest court in the land is for sale to the highest bidder...
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jun. 23 2023,3:09 pm
(Glad I Left @ Jun. 23 2023,10:13 am)
QUOTE
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jun. 23 2023,6:17 am)
QUOTE
(Expatriate @ Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am)
QUOTE
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal Government
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes?
Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of.
It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Well bro, I'll say this....
If ANY justice is being anywhere near what could be considered a bribe they should be investigated.
I'm not so naive as to think there isn't any politics involved in any decision on whom to investigate, and that's the sad part.
Our gov't has lost it's way a LONG time ago.
It's all Jets vs Sharks at this point and until we the people demand better we will continue to get the same shit candidates we've been getting the last few cycles.
I know that with justices it's different as they aren't elected.
But investigating them when warranted is fine with me. I don't wanna think the highest court in the land is for sale to the highest bidder...
As I said before if propublica is gonna do a piece and be considered a reputable rag instead of signaling out Thomas and Alito it should have dug into all of the jurists and CJ, but instead chose the "let's make it a political hit job" route.
It's all done due to the fact the SCOTUS is finally rejecting the tiers of scrutiny and interest balancing nonsense that has taken hold in the inferior courts in the last few decades and telling the courts enumerated rights are not subject to public/govt balancing interests.
Posted by Expatriate on Jun. 24 2023,4:03 am
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jun. 23 2023,6:17 am)
QUOTE
(Expatriate @ Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am)
QUOTE
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal Government
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes?
Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of.
It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Just as other Judges Supreme Court Jurist are subject to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states that a judge should not accept any gifts, favors, or loans from anyone seeking official action from or doing business with the court.
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 24 2023,7:07 am
(Expatriate @ Jun. 24 2023,4:03 am)
QUOTE
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jun. 23 2023,6:17 am)
QUOTE
(Expatriate @ Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am)
QUOTE
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal Government
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes?
Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of.
It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Just as other Judges Supreme Court Jurist are subject to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states that a judge should not accept any gifts, favors, or loans from anyone seeking official action from or doing business with the court.
You can lead a jackass to water GD but you can’t make him drink (comprehend)
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Jun. 24 2023,7:35 am
(Expatriate @ Jun. 24 2023,4:03 am)
QUOTE
(Grinning_Dragon @ Jun. 23 2023,6:17 am)
QUOTE
(Expatriate @ Jun. 23 2023,4:13 am)
QUOTE
^^ Rules on Gifts in the Federal Government
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
Government ethical rules restrict giving and accepting gifts among employees and from outside interests. Policies on exchanges of gifts among employees—as well as on acceptance of gifts or hospitality from other sources—are set by government-wide rules found in the Code of Federal Regulations at 5 CFR 2635 201–205 and 301–304.
Under current regulation these so called Judges can only except gifts based on a personal relationship when it is clear that the motivation is not his official position;
gifts of $20 or less per occasion, not to exceed $50 in a year from one source....
You do realize the SCOTUS sets their own rules for such matters, yes?
Congress does not over see the SCOTUS, you know all part of the separate but equal deal.
Also find it funny your lil short brained pic, left out Kagan, Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who equally have done the same thing as Alito and Thomas are being accused of.
It's a nothing burger and an obvious hit job against judges who aren't leftist hacks.
Just as other Judges Supreme Court Jurist are subject to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states that a judge should not accept any gifts, favors, or loans from anyone seeking official action from or doing business with the court.
See the underlined, that there is the rub of which needs to be proved by the accusers and if you want a more recent possible violation, that would had been jurist Sotomayer.
Again, if you weren't so damn blind to see what propublica in what is attempting to smear only certain particular textualist jurists because they fear the administrative state isn't going to run roughshod over the plebs.
Posted by Expatriate on Jun. 25 2023,7:07 am
^^ yeah right, Friends of the Court Harlan Crow and Paul Singer wouldn't buy these for-sale GQP justices...Both Singer and Crow had cases before the Court...
and all this time I thought Fatso was the idgit...
your attack on ProPublica highlights your bias....
NEW report reveals SECRET RELATIONSHIP corrupting the Supreme Court
Samuel Alito accepted gifts from a billionaire hedge fund manager without reporting them, and then didn't recuse himself from hearing over ten cases involving the company.
< View on YouTube >
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 25 2023,7:52 am
^^ appears you’re not paying attention to GD’s posts.You can lead an idiot to knowledge but he’s still fuckin’ stupid.
Posted by Expatriate on Jun. 25 2023,7:57 am
^^^Right Wing Billionaires Are Slapping SCOTUS in Golden Handcuffs - No Shades of Grey Here..
< YwRQdb-Ar3AView on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 25 2023,8:35 am
^^ yep, still fuckin’ stupid
Posted by Expatriate on Jun. 29 2023,4:48 am
^^
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 29 2023,5:14 am
^^ doubtful but…Ding Ding Ping bought this…
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 04 2023,6:57 am
..
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 04 2023,5:36 pm
^^ how has the scotus made life tougher for people of color and women?
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 05 2023,4:44 am
^^^
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 05 2023,5:20 am
^^ can’t answer my question comrade Dick Whistle?
Posted by Glad I Left on Jul. 05 2023,9:43 am
(Expatriate @ Jul. 05 2023,4:44 am)
QUOTE
^^^
Our history of how we have treated non white people in this country is abhorrent I think most can agree.
But I don't feel addressing racism with more racism is the answer.
Affirmative action while good mentioned is rife with all kinds of inherent problems.
As a side note, I'm gonna guess you didn't think SCOTUS was "radical" when it agreed with upholding Obamacare.
It all depends on whose ox is getting gored I guess...
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 05 2023,6:40 pm
^^ well put, you win some, you lose some.
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 06 2023,4:27 am
(Glad I Left @ Jul. 05 2023,9:43 am)
QUOTE
(Expatriate @ Jul. 05 2023,4:44 am)
QUOTE
^^^
Our history of how we have treated non white people in this country is abhorrent I think most can agree.
But I don't feel addressing racism with more racism is the answer.
Affirmative action while good mentioned is rife with all kinds of inherent problems.
As a side note, I'm gonna guess you didn't think SCOTUS was "radical" when it agreed with upholding Obamacare.
It all depends on whose ox is getting gored I guess...
You're too young to remember how bad things got during the Civil Rights Movement it made BLM look like a walk in the park, it tore at the very fabric of our Society.
Affirmative Action was a product of the Civil Rights Movement, the Court should have left well enough alone. It helped reduce discrimination and promote diversity. It also create more opportunities for people who face systemic barriers or biases. It also benefited society as a whole by fostering social justice and inclusion.
Affirmative action is a policy that aims to increase the representation of historically disadvantaged groups in education, employment, or other areas. It is often based on criteria such as race, ethnicity, gender, or disability.
The Court has put US on a slippery slope!
As to Obama Care, it caved to Corporate Republican demands did little to control cost...
I'm not a Liberal I'm a Progressive, IF I HAD MY WAY we'd have a Single Payer Healthcare System like the rest of the CIVILIZED Industrial World..
Government-run healthcare can provide universal access, lower costs, better quality, more equity, and more efficiency than private market systems. It can also reduce administrative complexity, improve public health, and promote social solidarity.
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 06 2023,5:36 am
^^ the only slippin’ you do is on the shit you spew.You have to pay your debt, I did, my wife did, anyone else who signed papers for a student loan has to. Considering your intellect comrade Dick Whistle, you have nothing to worry about.
No special treatment for minorities, a meritocracy as it should be.
Thankfully, we don’t operate like Burger King and you won’t be getting it your way any time soon. Pay your own damned healthcare.
Posted by Glad I Left on Jul. 06 2023,9:47 am
(Expatriate @ Jul. 06 2023,4:27 am)
QUOTE
Government-run healthcare can provide universal access, lower costs, better quality, more equity, and more efficiency than private market systems. It can also reduce administrative complexity, improve public health, and promote social solidarity.
NOTHING the government has EVER run is efficient, cheaper, or better quality.
That much trust in government only leads to dependency which is exact opposite of what why we want government. While I agree with you I'd prefer a singe payer system, but not sure I want the government running it. Oversight yes, but running it? Hell no.
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 07 2023,4:19 am
Gil Quote:QUOTE
While I agree with you I'd prefer a singe payer system, but not sure I want the government running it. Oversight yes, but running it? Hell no.
Based on my Military Service Record I qualified for VA medical treatment in a high priority group. So essentially I'm participating in a government run single payer system.
I never used the VA during my working years my Employer provided excellent insurance, problem was Insurance is a big and ever increasing expense and as an individual Employer there's little that can be done to control costs.
I still carry a supplement to my Medicare as a precaution because the VA operates at the whims of the Government.
Our current Healthcare System is a hodgepodge of robber barons paying themselves multi-million dollar compensation packages with our premiums while denying healthcare and complicating the system.
How Bad Is U.S. Health Care? Among High-Income Nations, It's the Worst, Study says
< https://www.newsweek.com/united-states-health-care-rated-worst-637114 >
We do agree a single payer system would be the path..
A single payer healthcare system would simplify payment administration and reduce drug costs, which are major sources of savings.
A single payer healthcare system would also increase healthcare utilization by providing universal coverage, which could improve health outcomes but also raise costs.
A single payer healthcare system would likely save money over time, even in the first year of operation, according to most economic analyses. However, some studies suggest that costs could initially increase or vary depending on the design and implementation of the system.
A single payer healthcare system would have more incentive to invest in public health measures and preventive care, which could lower costs and improve outcomes.
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 07 2023,5:39 am
^^immm, comrade Dick Whistle < https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.....%20shit >
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 07 2023,8:06 am
^^^^ Go away fat man..< View on YouTube >
Posted by Glad I Left on Jul. 07 2023,3:01 pm
(Expatriate @ Jul. 07 2023,4:19 am)
QUOTE
Gil Quote:
Based on my Military Service Record I qualified for VA medical treatment in a high priority group. So essentially I'm participating in a government run single payer system.
QUOTE
While I agree with you I'd prefer a singe payer system, but not sure I want the government running it. Oversight yes, but running it? Hell no.
Based on my Military Service Record I qualified for VA medical treatment in a high priority group. So essentially I'm participating in a government run single payer system.
And the VA doesn't exactly have stellar record (especially as of the last decade) of providing quality care (or any care at all in some cases) KARE 11 has a series of really great investigative reporting about the local VA here. So much so that they ended up getting a Dr. fired for her absolutely shoddy work.
As for private sector, there's a shit ton that needs to be done. Way too many kickbacks for prescribing specific meds, etc...
While I hated Obamacare I was hoping that at least something good would come of it eventually but alas that was not to be. Didn't change anything about the quality and/or cost of care, just how it was paid for. All I saw was my rates increase every year at higher percentages than before it.
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 08 2023,1:09 am
(Expatriate @ Jul. 07 2023,8:06 am)
QUOTE
^^^^ Go away fat man..
Awwwe, all pissy because I called you out on your lie?
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 14 2023,4:59 am
^^^You didn't call out any lie Fatso, you just can't except the truth!Supreme Court Bribery Scandal! Can You Really Pay SCOTUS To Rule In Your Favor?
Clarence Thomas, a Supreme Court Justice is involved in an alleged bribery scandal where lawyers in SCOTUS cases used Venmo to pay Clarence Thomas... Is he the most corrupt Supreme Court Justice ever?
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 14 2023,5:01 am
^^
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 15 2023,8:39 am
Trump files brief in Georgia Supreme Court demanding they STOP DA Fani Willis from indicting himDonald Trump's latest court filing is a doozy: his attorneys filed a petition for a writ of mandamus - what's called an 'extraordinary writ' - in the Georgia state Supreme Court demanding that the court stop Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from indicting him. The problem is, there is no legal basis whatsoever for the relief Trump is seeking, as this video discusses. What's becoming increasingly clear by the day is that Donald Trump's desperation is showing.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 15 2023,8:50 am
^^ what becoming increasingly evident is the weaponization of our legal system
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 16 2023,7:40 am
Investigations Into Supreme Court DEMANDED as CORRUPTION Runs WildNew public pressure being brought to bear on the Senate Democratic leadership by grassroots and progressive organizations to open immediate Senate oversight hearings over the Supreme Court to develop new legislation to stop its corruption and continued assault on liberty and democracy.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 16 2023,7:42 am
^^ yes, investigations 🧐< https://www.newsweek.com/conserv....1798460 >
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 19 2023,4:52 am
How to Fix a Broken Supreme Court | Robert Reich< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jul. 21 2023,6:09 am
Very telling of a failure like Reisch < https://www.hoover.org/research/economic-fantasies-robert-reich >
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 26 2023,4:30 am
^^
Posted by Expatriate on Jul. 27 2023,5:11 am
Wow! Republicans utterly EXPOSED in Most POWERFUL Ad of the YearIn today’s episode, Ken Harbaugh explains how Republican attacks on reproductive freedom and attempts persecute women who seek them should be seen as a warning for the rest of the country.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 14 2023,5:06 am
Right Wing Supreme Court Justice CAUGHT in Biggest Scandal YetLegal AF Host Karen Friedman Agnifilo reports on more gifts, more billionaires, and a totally compromised Justice, Clarence Thomas. Explaining why Congress needs to hold hearings and consider impeachment.
< View on YouTube >
< https://www.propublica.org/article....e-court >
After new Justice Thomas bombshell, Sen. Whitehouse says SCOTUS scandals will get worse
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) joins MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell to discuss ProPublica’s new report on the billionaires who have funded at least 38 luxury trips for Justice Clarence Thomas, and the potential pressures on Justice Thomas and other “rogue” justices
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 14 2023,5:21 am
^^ “yawn”
Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 16 2023,10:28 am
^^^^Pressure Grows on Clarence Thomas to Resign as ProPublica Finds More Undisclosed Lavish Trips, Gifts
In the wake of ProPublica's bombshell report detailing even more lavish gifts from right-wing billionaires to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, five House Democrats are calling on the Justice Department to investigate Thomas under the Ethics in Government Act for accepting the series of gifts from wealthy benefactors without following disclosure laws. Federal judges are required to disclose gifts worth more than $1,000 — including travel. ProPublica's report documents Justice Thomas accepting 38 destination vacations, 26 private jet flights, 12 VIP passes to sporting events and eight helicopter flights, all paid for by wealthy patrons. We speak with co-author of the ProPublica investigation Brett Murphy about the process of revealing these lavish gifts and why even other judges consider it "an unprecedented amount of largesse for a justice to be accepting, let alone accepting and not disclosing."
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 16 2023,7:05 pm
^^Bad hair day comrade Dick Whistle?
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 27 2023,10:55 am
Honest Government Ad | The Supreme Court < View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2023,5:59 pm
^^ there is no honest government as I write this comrade Dick Whistle
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 04 2023,5:12 am
These Upcoming Supreme Court Cases Could Turn America Into A Sh*thole CountrySCOTUS is about to change things, Thom Hartmann goes over the most important Supreme Court cases that could change the very fabric of America.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 04 2023,5:30 am
^^< https://youtu.be/AKN1Q5SjbeI?si=6ahYkLK30EttJp99 >
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 06 2023,5:59 am
Big Oil Fueled SCOTUS Seeks END of Regulation on Corporate Fraud…Why would the U.S. Supreme Court end regulations that protect Americans? It couldn’t possibly be that these very same corporate entities committing fraud are also giving the Supreme Court justices obscene amounts of money to do their bidding…could it?! Judicial “pay for play” as it were? Just sayin….
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 06 2023,11:47 am
The problem with using thom hartmann as a source is that he isn't schooled in constitutional law. His last anti 2nd Amendment screed of lies was ripped apart by those who are accredited in not only in early American history and law but as well as those in constitutional law.Thom's main thrust is "interest balancing", however the supreme court in the past has rejected many of those types of arguments and as of late has really begun to shut those types of arguments down. Basically, thom doesn't know what he's talking about.
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 06 2023,4:01 pm
^^
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 06 2023,7:10 pm
Typical, show casing your intelligence level of a toddler once again.If a basic understanding of con-law is beyond your purview just say so.
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 08 2023,5:27 am
^^ Are you drinking salt water? Don't worry I'll flush the toilet twice this morning, should be in Louisiana in the coming days...
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 08 2023,6:33 am
U.S. Supreme Court Unethical? - Lewis Black's Rantcast< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 18 2023,5:12 am
Is the Most Corrupt SCOTUS Justice Begging To Be Impeached?< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 15 2023,4:11 am
Supreme Court Adopts 1st-ever "Code of Conduct" After 234 YEARS! | Christopher Titus< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 16 2023,5:46 am
This SCOTUS Case Turned America From Democracy To OligarchyFirst, the Supreme Court legalized bribery. They freely accepted gifts & vacations from billionaires (some with pending cases before the Court.) Now SCOTUS has decided to implement a judicial code of ethics…however, the unenforceable code is simply more smoke & mirrors from a Court that can’t or won’t hold itself accountable…just another in a long line of judicial political scandals.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 30 2023,6:00 am
Supreme Court Latest SHAM Move to Help COMMIT FRAUD Instantly ExposedThe majority conservative Supreme Court looks ready to make it much more difficult to protect the public against SEC violations in a case funded by right-wing billionaires such as the Koch brothers and those tied to Leonard. Attorney and MeidasTouch contributor Dina Sayegh Doll reports.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Dec. 04 2023,6:39 am
^^ “yawn”
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Dec. 04 2023,8:42 am
Oh NOES, money is being spent on challenges. Now do one where soros, bloomberg, et al, who also spend tons of money on court challenges.You do know it takes money to mount challenges and see it through the judicial process, yes? It's not like they get to automatically start at the supreme court.
It's almost as if it has to start in the lower inferior courts first.
In the end all that matters is if the current law is constitutional as determined by text, and history.
You cannot possibly be this obtuse/ignorant?
Posted by Expatriate on Dec. 05 2023,4:06 am
^^^ A Dollop of George Soros, why don't you just go full-blown QAnut..never mind..
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Dec. 05 2023,8:40 am
(Expatriate @ Dec. 05 2023,4:06 am)
QUOTE
^^^ A Dollop of George Soros, why don't you just go full-blown QAnut..never mind..
Typical response from those who refuse to do research and just live regurgitating what they've been spoon fed.
Quite telling that instead of a well reasoned rebuttal you fall back on ad hominems.
It's OK to admit such subjects are beyond your intellectual capacity.
Posted by Expatriate on Dec. 05 2023,11:19 am
Billionaires Don’t Want You to Know About This Supreme Court Case | Robert ReichToday the Supreme Court will hear what could be the most important tax case in decades.
Moore v. US could permanently shield billionaires from a wealth tax.
This is why billionaires give luxury gifts to Supreme Court justices. For this exact moment.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Dec. 05 2023,5:06 pm
^^ and he pulls Robert Reisch out of his ass again.
Posted by Expatriate on Dec. 13 2023,4:44 am
Donald Trump THROWS A FIT About Jack Smith Asking SCOTUS for Ruling!!!Jesse talks about the latest news related to Jack Smith's direct request to the United States Supreme Court asking for a ruling on whether or not Donald Trump has absolute immunity from federal prosecution and whether his previous impeachment has any bearing on the matter.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Dec. 13 2023,7:56 am
^^ SCOTUS would most likely sit on it then kick it back to the lower court, appeals will slow it down, most likely past election. Trump wins, game over.
Posted by Expatriate on Dec. 14 2023,5:34 am
^^
Posted by Expatriate on Dec. 28 2023,5:49 am
Report Shows Billionaires Are Showering Federal Judges With Lavish GiftsBillionaires have decided that buying politicians isn’t enough, so they’ve started buying off judges. These wealthy donors are sending judges all over the globe to attend their “education” summits, but all the judges have learned is that they have to play ball and rule for corporations in order to keep getting these sweet rewards.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Dec. 28 2023,7:02 am
Maybe we should talk about George Soros buying state AG’s He bought ours😲
Here’s a pic of one of Ellisons past girlfriends after a night of passion
Posted by Expatriate on Dec. 28 2023,11:15 am
^^^ more phooey from a Racist Russian TROLL...
Posted by Expatriate on Jan. 11 2024,5:10 am
..
Posted by Self-Banished on Jan. 11 2024,7:36 am
< https://www.newsweek.com/conserv....1798460 >
Posted by Expatriate on Jan. 17 2024,4:03 am
Corporations Have Been Salivating Over This SCOTUS Decision | Robert ReichThe Supreme Court is hearing two cases that could upend federal regulations designed to protect us.
Big corporations are salivating for a ruling that goes their way.
Here’s what you need to know.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Jan. 18 2024,8:27 am
Sen. Whitehouse: SCOTUS could limit agency experts 'who can call BS' on big businessLawrence O’Donnell speaks to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island about the United States Supreme Court hearing oral arguments in a pair of related cases that could have a massive impact on the authority of executive branch agencies to enforce regulations.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Jan. 18 2024,6:03 pm
^^ Larry baby
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 09 2024,5:13 am
Right-Wing Supreme Court DROPS THE BALL at HearingThe Weekend Show Host, Anthony Davis reports on the SCOTUS Oral Argument held in the Trump Disqualification case and the lasting impact this MAGA controlled court will leave on the United States.
< View on YouTube >
'Forget the Constitution, we're tRump's RepubliCON Justices'!!
Posted by Self-Banished on Feb. 09 2024,5:27 am
“I didn’t get want I want, wah, wah,”😭😭😭Justice will be served comrade Dick Whistle
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 22 2024,4:30 am
Matt Walsh ATTACKS JOHN OLIVER - Tells Trump to Put Him in Prison!!!Jesse talks about the idiotic, nearly 12-minute segment on his Daily Wire show, during which he attacked John Oliver and asserted that the comedy proposal that aired on HBO, which was directed at disgraced Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, was illegal and indicated that as soon as Trump becomes President of the United States again, he should punish Oliver with imprisonment.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Feb. 23 2024,5:28 am
Oh look comrade whistler of the lower appendages, you’ll be able to see over the steering wheel now.< https://www.amazon.com/dp....b4&th=1 >
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 23 2024,10:10 am
^^^ the missing link Fatso can't even make a working link, what a doofus.. Supreme Court KEY DECISION on Trump ABOUT TO DROP
Michael Popok of Legal AF explains why there has been a WEEK LONG DELAY by the Supreme Court to rule on Trump’s immunity appeal, currently holding up his DC trial, is likely the result of the majority ready to DENY TRUMP’s appeal. However, they are waiting on Thomas and Alito to finish writing their DISSENTS, which would allow DC trial of Trump by July.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Feb. 23 2024,5:51 pm
🧐
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 24 2024,4:54 am
Jim Jordan & James Comer use Russian disinformation to try to impeach Joe Biden. What happens now?Now that we know that Representatives Jim Jordan and James Comer used Russian lies/disinformation to try to impeach President Biden, what should happen to them moving forward? Should they be investigated to determined if they were complicit in a conspiracy with Russia to defraud the United States and interfere in a presidential election?
This video takes on the implications of the recent arrest of Alexander Smirnov, Jordan and Comer's star witness who admitted telling lies about Hunter and Joe Biden, and revealed those lies were fed to him by Russian operatives.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Feb. 24 2024,6:30 am
^^ the word you’re searching for is “evidence”
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 25 2024,5:03 am
^^^^^^
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 26 2024,4:17 am
uh-oh the Supreme Court Stiffed old Marge...Marjorie Taylor Greene suffers HUMILIATING LOSS in Court
The Supreme Court rejected Marjorie Taylor Greene’s bid to overturn the hefty fines she incurred for repeatedly refusing to wear a mask on the House floor during the pandemic. Dina Doll report
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Feb. 26 2024,4:33 am
^^ and I’ll bet you took the shots too🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Posted by Expatriate on Feb. 29 2024,4:37 am
Laurence Tribe: The Supreme Court is suppressing evidenceAfter the Supreme Court agrees to hear Donald Trump’s immunity claim, Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe joins MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell to discuss the impact this could have on Donald Trump’s reelection. Professor Tribe says that this is “not the way a country that is concerned to preserve the rule of law and constitutional democracy would proceed.”
< View on YouTube >
Rep. Goldman on how Dems can rein in a ‘rogue Supreme Court’
Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) joins MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell to discuss what he says is possibly “the greatest ethical lapse” from Supreme Court justice in history: Clarence Thomas’s refusal to recuse himself from Donald Trump’s immunity case after Thomas’s wife was involved in “the conduct that underlies the criminal charges.”
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Mar. 01 2024,5:36 am
Larry O’ Donnell🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Oh God that’s funny🤣🤣🤣🤣
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 01 2024,5:00 pm
^^^ SPEAKING OF FUNNY!!GOP Deposition of Hunter BACKFIRES in Their Faces
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on Hunter Biden putting the screws into the GOP Congress Members at the private deposition they took of him.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 02 2024,4:52 am
...
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 04 2024,10:50 am
Bombshell court decision has massive implications for Trump< View on YouTube >
BREAKING: Supreme Court rules Trump can remain on Colorado ballot
The Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald Trump can remain on the Colorado ballot
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Mar. 04 2024,11:44 am
I tried to tell you only congress can apply that applicable section and 9-0 verifies what I told you.
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 04 2024,12:27 pm
^^ @GDSo much for the Constitution and States Rights, the Supreme Court just set a precedent that will bite US all in the ass.
The 14th Amendment Section 3 is self-executing! Hence the last sentence of Section 3...
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Supreme Court MAKES RULING in Trump Disqualification Case
MeidasTouch Trial Attorneys Ben Meiselas and Michael Popok report on the Supreme Court ruling on case involving the disqualification of Donald Trump under the 14th Amendment Section 3.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Mar. 04 2024,12:54 pm
By what you are trying to argue and was brought up during oral arguments...Should a state or states determine who should be qualified and unqualified for the rest of the nation? The obvious answer is no and that was the case here, colorado overstepped their authority and it isn't self executing, it must be executed by congress and congress alone since it's a federal matter.
Even the two dimbulbs (soto and brown) agreed that it's congress' sole role and not that of the states.
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 04 2024,1:11 pm
^^ Texas and a few other RED States were attempting to disqualify Biden under some bogus actuation using the the 14th Amendment Section 3...as retaliation for Trump's insurrection disqualification. I believe this is what accounts for the 9-0 vote..
Last sentence of 14 Amendment Section 3
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
It should have been Congress that allowed Trump back on the ballot NOT the Supreme Court according to the Constitution of the Untied States...
Nonetheless the Constitution and States Rights have taken a HIT!!
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Mar. 04 2024,2:46 pm
Maybe stop listening to msnbc clownshow.biden should be kicked off anyways for being a retard, plagiarist, pedo.
Anyways. You are a lil to late, federalism took a hit when the 14th was passed and ratified, as it weakened state powers and authority.
This isn't about state rights, it's about power and authority and under the 14th states do NOT have the power nor authority in this matter, it has always been congress' purview.
Posted by Self-Banished on Mar. 04 2024,5:50 pm
My favorite word of the day, “unanimous”
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 06 2024,3:08 am
Did SCOTUS Rewrite the US ConstitutionSCOTUS’s latest ruling allowing Trump on the ballot has some progressives asking if the US Constitution is being re-written by a far right court.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Mar. 06 2024,6:05 pm
^^wow, SERIOUS BUTTHURT!
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 12 2024,4:10 am
Supreme Court MASSIVE ERROR has Major ConsequenceOn a special Legal AF interview hot take, podcast co founder Michael Popok interviews former federal judge J. Michael Luttig about his view that the Supreme Court’s decision effectively eliminating the insurrection disqualification provision in 14th Amendment, Section 3 was unconstitutional in itself and wrongly decided.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Mar. 12 2024,5:35 am
^^ I guess in your feeble mind the entire SCOTUS isn’t viable anymore?
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 13 2024,3:47 am
^^ When the Court averts the Constitution to favor an adjudicated insurrectionist who has called for the termination of the Constitution one has to question the Courts motive! Political? (the three Justices Trump appointed should have recused themselves) IMO They've set a precedent that could eventually reinterpret parts of the Constitution you care about like the Second Amendment...
Republicans respond to Trump calls for “termination” of parts of U.S. Constitution
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Mar. 13 2024,5:59 pm
^^ so you’re trying to insinuate that your legal opinion is more accurate than the entire SCOTUS,I see
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 14 2024,4:36 am
^^^^^How SCOTUS Stole Everything From the American People…Even the Vote
A major supreme court case could be behind most of the corruption that exists in America.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Mar. 14 2024,4:38 am
^^ that 9-0 thing really gets to you🤡
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 15 2024,2:56 am
Supreme Court STEPS INTO IT with Move IT WILL REGRETIt appears that in its latest decisions, the Supreme Court is placing its heavy hands on the scales ⚖️ of justice for Donald Trump. Where are we as a nation and can we rely on this SCOTUS at all to deliver justice? Suri Crowe weighs in as a citizen and observer of these latest outrageous rulings.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 19 2024,4:03 am
Supreme Court Makes MAJOR ERROR in RulingOn a special Legal AF interview hot take, podcast co founder Michael Popok interviews former federal judge J. Michael Luttig and they debate whether the Supreme Court just turned the constitution and the role of federal courts and the Supreme Court on its head and gave Congress alone the power to keep insurrectionists off the ballot, neutering the Supreme’s own power.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Mar. 27 2024,3:47 am
Supreme Court SHUTS DOWN Right-Wing STOOGE of TrumpThe MAGA insurrectionist from New Mexico, Couy Griffin, was just sent packing by the U.S. Supreme Court under the 14th Amendment. Dave Aronberg, State Attorney for Palm Beach County, reports.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Expatriate on Apr. 29 2024,5:23 am
Presidential Immunity??SCOTUS just heard a case on presidential immunity. We shouldn’t be here, but since we are, it’s incredibly clear what we need to do.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on Apr. 29 2024,5:53 am
^^ while you’re in the kitchen bitch,make a Sammie for me.
Posted by Expatriate on Apr. 30 2024,4:59 am
^^^^ You don't need another sandwich,....Fatso... VVVVVVVV
Posted by Self-Banished on Apr. 30 2024,6:30 pm
^^ I’d ask you but you’d fuck it up😗
Posted by Expatriate on May 05 2024,4:36 am
Supreme Court HINTS at STUNNING Decision SOON…Ben Meiselas and Michael Popok on the Legal AF podcast debate and discuss: whether the Supreme Court can ever recover historically from the stain of what they are about to do: find immunity for presidential/Trump criminality —including plotting coups and planning assassinations while while in office.
< View on YouTube >
Posted by Self-Banished on May 05 2024,1:21 pm
assassinations? Wow, you really are fucked up