Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 3040
Joined: Oct. 2003
Posted on: Dec. 02 2014,12:30 am
(Common Citizen @ Dec. 01 2014,8:56 pm)
QUOTE
Just when did the marketing department for the global warming movement rebrand themselves to climate change and how many of those scientist make their living off of government grant money supporting the theory.
Scientists in academia are hardly a "marketing department" for a movement. There was a time when people questioned evolution (oh wait, they still do) and the earth NOT being flat. And much like conservatives today, when they responded to these new breakthroughs in scientific consensus, they wouldn't offer evidence, they'd only offer their personal opinions.
QUOTE
Now that Al Gore has made it a Democrat Plank, the state run media runs with it, while he makes billions off of a theory that preys on the (unfounded) guilt of the party loyalists.
We don't have a state run media, we have a corporate run media, CC.
QUOTE
I mean after all, who is for pollution anyway.
If someone is making a lot more money by using an outdated plant and would rather not let carbon credits get in the way of their margin, than yes, they'd have a pretty good motivation to be FOR pollution.
I don't deny that the climate changes or that the earth has experienced both cooling and warming periods since it's creation. But I do get suspicious of policitcal motives when we suddenly blame man for it's current climate pattern, slap a monetary figure on it, and take up the cause to steal money from one group and give it to another (Carbon Credits) without concrete evidence that it was man who caused it in the first place. Not to mention the left wing groups wanting to regulate cow flatulence for Christ's sake.
How do scientist explain all the previous climate changes before man? Volcanoes, plate shifts, and sun spot activity, that's how. Do those things not occur today?
How do scientist explain the rising sea levels and tundra turning to forests in northern Europe in the past when the Earth was less populated with humans and before the dawn of machines?
No one wants pollution but when we think the solution is a monetary one, we're just fooling ourselves. It will go from one greedy group to another and you and I are stuck carrying the water.
Not to mention the left wing groups wanting to regulate cow flatulence for Christ's sake.
No one wants pollution but when we think the solution is a monetary one, we're just fooling ourselves. It will go from one greedy group to another and you and I are stuck carrying the water.
Water and carbon. The building blocks of life. Who would ever have thought we would pay for drinking water one day. If the water supply gets diminished any further, we will be carrying the water bottles to those flatulent cows you speak of. How much will food cost then?!
If there's no climate change, why is there HAARP??
Didn't that buckle under Bambino's ambitious defense defunding?
-------------- Actually my wife is especially happy when my google check arrives each month. Thanks to douchbags like you, I get paid just for getting you worked up. -Liberal
Remember boys and girls,
sources of information. 
