Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 4 of 21<<12345678>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

 reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Why would we ever fast-track the keystone pipeline< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 31
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,11:59 am  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Maddog's idea of debunking climate change is to post a link to a paper by 15 people claiming that there is no such thing. Just another example of the Iowa education system.

--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 32
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22589
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,12:58 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
^^sometimes it's lonely being right.

--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D…

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 33
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,5:18 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
I like how you kooks know that 97% of climate scientists agree, but you choose to believe the 3% that is bought and paid for by big oil/coal. And even better you somehow believe that the 3% is equal to the 97%. :crazy:

Where else do you find 97% of scientists agreeing on something, and people not believing them because their political party tells them not to?

--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 34
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22589
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,5:32 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
http://ossfoundation.us/project...vidence


http://www.petitionproject.org


Now is that global warming or climate change?

What was it in the 70's, global cooling?



Don't forget the ozone :rofl:

Attached Image
Attached Image

--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D…

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 35
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 22589
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,5:44 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
http://youtu.be/nq4Bc2WCsdE

Just in case Alky's reading :p

--------------
:D Remember boys and girls,

Don’t be a Dick :D…

Or a “Wayne” :oops:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 36
Botto 82 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 6293
Joined: Jan. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,6:21 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
And then there's this:

QUOTE
Curiously, this doesn’t seem to be making much of a splash (no pun intended) on the evening news. Let’s repeat this: The United States Navy has figured out how to turn seawater into fuel and it will cost about the same as gasoline.

This technology is in its infancy and it’s already this cheap? What happens when it’s refined and perfected? Oil is only getting more expensive as the easy-to-reach deposits are tapped so this truly is, as it’s being called, a “game changer.”

I expect the GOP to go ballistic over this and try to legislate it out of existence. It’s a threat to their fossil fuel masters because it will cost them trillions in profits. It’s also “green” technology and Republicans will despise it on those grounds alone. They already have a track record of trying to do this. Unfortunately, once this kind of genie is out of the bottle, it’s very hard to put back in.

Article

--------------
Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum.

- Kurt Vonnegut
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 37
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,6:33 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Dec. 01 2014,5:32 pm)
QUOTE
http://ossfoundation.us/project...vidence


http://www.petitionproject.org


Now is that global warming or climate change?

What was it in the 70's, global cooling?



Don't forget the ozone :rofl:

Ozone?

Attached Image
Attached Image

--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 38
Common Citizen Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 4818
Joined: Jul. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,8:56 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
SB posted a curios question.

Just when did the marketing department for the global warming movement rebrand themselves to climate change and how many of those scientist make their living off of government grant money supporting the theory.

Now that Al Gore has made it a Democrat Plank, the state run media runs with it, while he makes billions off of a theory that preys on the (unfounded) guilt of the party loyalists.  I mean after all, who is for pollution anyway.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 39
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,10:49 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Grant money that supports a theory. Since government grants are public info what don't you try to back up your right wing bullsh1t with an example of one of these predetermined outcome grants.

My guess is Limbaugh didn't give you that info so I really don't expect much from you, and I'm guessing I'm not alone with that.

--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 40
irisheyes Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 3040
Joined: Oct. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Dec. 01 2014,11:56 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Dec. 01 2014,11:45 am)
QUOTE
Seems that for every climate change scientist there's one that debunks it. Why destroy our economy(you'll notice China's partisipation :sarcasm:) for someone's possibly dubious opinion?

Sorry about getting flippant with the sheep(I just can't help myself sometimes) I do think you think for yourself, not like other liberals on this site.

Not quite, SB.  Global warming isn't a "dubious opinion", and the consensus among scientists is far stronger than the opinions about "global cooling" in the 70's.

How do you consider this "thinking for yourself"?  Nothing you've posted is independent thought.  In a debate between climate scientists and the Republican mainstream, you've chosen a side that bases it's opinion on what corporations tell them to repeat.

Attached Image
Attached Image

--------------
You know it's going to be a bad day when you cross thread the cap on the toothpaste.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
203 replies since Nov. 19 2014,7:44 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 4 of 21<<12345678>> 		reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Why would we ever fast-track the keystone pipeline
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon