Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Minn. landowners livid over mineral contracts, What is wrong with this picture?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 05 2011,6:51 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

From your daily fish wrap
http://www.albertleatribune.com/2011...ntracts
QUOTE
MINNEAPOLIS — There might be hidden treasures under Ron Brodigan’s land, and he’s not happy about that at all.

Almost half of the 260 acres near Isabella owned by Brodigan and his son could be subject to drilling based on leases the state awarded last spring to companies that search for valuable minerals. Under Minnesota law, landowners have little say in the process and don’t get a cut of the profits, even if they eventually lose their land.

The state’s Executive Council, made up of the governor and other top state officers, voted 5-0 in June to send the leases back to the Department of Natural Resources for more work after Brodigan and other landowners objected.

The council was supposed to revisit the issue at its regular meeting Sept. 7. But Gov. Mark Dayton met Thursday with Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Landwehr and Iron Range Resources Commissioner Tony Sertich, and they decided to push the discussion back until a special meeting in October, Dayton spokeswoman Katie Tinucci said.


What a stupid law, and how is this even Constitutional?  The landowners own the minerals and the Rights to it, NOT the STATE.  And as such should be awarded any royalties the owners see fit to receive, if the owners want 90% then they get 90%.  I hope these landowners fight tooth and nail to get their due.  It is theirs, nothing less nothing more.

This law needs to be repealed.  Maybe the landowners can get together and seek counsel in regards to getting this UNCONSTITUTIONAL law repealed.


--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 2
Rosalind_Swenson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1527
Joined: May 2011
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 06 2011,8:37 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Eminent domain. It's crap and has been going on for ages. Here's a google page link on it. I didn't want to put any one source on the board since it seems nobody here can agree on what news source to trust! http://www.google.com/search?...+domain

I agree, it's an unbelievable thing to have happen in America, and it shouldn't happen. People have been fighting it for years. Unsuccessfully.


--------------
And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
hymiebravo Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 4989
Joined: Jan. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 07 2011,8:00 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

It looks like Isabella is located within the Superior National Forest:

QUOTE
In June 2008, legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives to sell 6,700 acres (27 km2) of land in the forest to a mining company; the company wants the land to mine deposits of "copper, nickel, platinum and palladium".[9]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_National_Forest
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 4
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 07 2011,9:39 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(hymiebravo @ Sep. 07 2011,8:00 am)
QUOTE
It looks like Isabella is located within the Superior National Forest:

QUOTE
In June 2008, legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives to sell 6,700 acres (27 km2) of land in the forest to a mining company; the company wants the land to mine deposits of "copper, nickel, platinum and palladium".[9]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_National_Forest

Ok, but what does this have to do with private property?

--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 5
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 07 2011,10:30 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

So if I was on my land, and I was "shooting at some food" and struck oil, it wouldn't be mine?

Well, I guess I might as well scratch "Dig a silver mine in the backyard" off my bucket list.


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 6
Grinning_Dragon Search for posts by this member.
rideo draconigena
Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 3095
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 07 2011,11:20 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Liberal @ Sep. 07 2011,10:30 am)
QUOTE
So if I was on my land, and I was "shooting at some food" and struck oil, it wouldn't be mine?

Well, I guess I might as well scratch "Dig a silver mine in the backyard" off my bucket list.

Well it seems if you live in MN, it wouldn't be yours.  Some how the state believes it can lay claim to YOUR property if you have something of value on it and you have no say in regards to turning a profit off of it or let alone have any say when the state deems it can sell a permit to some company and allow them to trespass on your property, and yet still demand that you pay your property tax in whole when the state has illegally stolen a portion of your property with out due compensation for loss of property.

Straight up BS.   :finger: the state.


--------------
*SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS / MOLON LABE / Se Defendendo
memoria of cado frater ,Semper fidelis
*The object of war is NOT to DIE for YOUR Country, but to make the OTHER BASTARD DIE for HIS...Patton
My Constitutional Rights trump your dead.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 7
hymiebravo Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 4989
Joined: Jan. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 08 2011,8:02 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I was just trying to flesh out a bit more detail. That little snippet was extremely vague.

It had me wondering if the law wasn't an old law dating back to the steel mines or something.

It's not always a bad thing when a government entity wants to purchase land from you. There are plenty of examples in the immediate area where people have made out quite well selling land in that manner.

There was a furniture store in Austin that made out real nicely because of a Mower County purchase their "business". They probably wouldn't have been able to negotiate a similar deal otherwise.

In Freeborn County I wonder what sort of deal the people who owned the land behind Love's got for that government sponsored purchase.

Or the so called spec building purchase as well.

Sure that again isn't that closely related to the mining story. But I'm merely pointing out that some people make out nicely in government sponsored purchases.

And again what a vague little snippet that was.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 8
Glad I Left Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2306
Joined: Aug. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 08 2011,8:34 am Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

Yeah, but what if you don't want to sell.  The :finger: State can just call emminent domain and take it anyway.  That is bull Sh!t IMO.

--------------
After we screw up health care reform, let's take on the initiative of unscrewing the education system (gov't education)
Tacitus: (c. 56 AD-c. 117) "The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates."
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
7 replies since Sep. 05 2011,6:51 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


 
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Minn. landowners livid over mineral contracts
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon