Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 1 of 212>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: house taxes< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
gizmo Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 125
Joined: Aug. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 30 2006,2:59 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

just recieved my house taxes in the mail ,cant believe they went up again,,they went up 150 dollars more,,,for what this time. can anybody tell me the reason.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 2
Replicant Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1570
Joined: Dec. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 30 2006,3:17 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Well the notice of proposed taxes did go out last November or so and nothing changed since then so shouldn't be a surprise.

If you're in the city, about $75 or so of the increase is due to adding back the rain and dark tax that you were paying on the water & sewer bill last year.  Part of the property tax instead of a separate fee.  It's deductible.  :thumbsup:

Of course, if your house's valuation went up, so did your overall property tax too.


--------------
Some drink deeply from the river of knowledge.  Others only gargle. - Woody Allen

The problem is not that we have too many fools, it's that the lightning isn't distributed right. - Mark Twain.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
scorenix Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 30 2006,3:50 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Quote (Replicant @ Mar. 30 2006,3:17pm)
If you're in the city, about $75 or so of the increase is due to adding back the rain and dark tax that you were paying on the water & sewer bill last year.  

Well, yes and no.  Last year, when they created the two utilities, they kept the revenue in the general fund, then shifted the expenses off to the utilities.  When they took the expenses back into the general fund, they also brought with it the new revenue.  Then increased it further.

City taxes went up over 20%.  So too did the water bill.  At the county level, they say they are facing a $700,000 funding reduction due to the Republican Congress deficit cutting bill they passed about a month ago.  For a county already strapped and unwilling to face the fact that state and federal governments are CUTTING aid, not restoring aid, it puts further future tax increases an almost sure bet.

But I am sure our county board is up to the task of managing our county budget.


--------------
"Here is something for those who think I have not done much on my own to think about.  I must then be one of the luckiest people around, and I think I am, I should then be able to keep that same luck going for the benefit of our area." - New ALEDA Executive Director Dan Dorman.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 4
Pretzel Logic Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 392
Joined: Oct. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 30 2006,6:33 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

It always puzzled me that our sewer rates went up because they said since Farmstead was no more that they were not getting the revenue from it any more. One would think that with less water flowing thru to be treated the costs should be less. How is less more? If another wet industry was to locate and use our unused capacity would we see a reduction?

--------------
I stepped up on the platform
The Man gave me the news
He said you must be jokin' son
Where did you get those shoes?

Wally & Don
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 5
Two Bears Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 527
Joined: May 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 31 2006,1:49 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Quote (Pretzel Logic @ Mar. 30 2006,6:33pm)
It always puzzled me that our sewer rates went up because they said since Farmstead was no more that they were not getting the revenue from it any more. One would think that with less water flowing thru to be treated the costs should be less. How is less more? If another wet industry was to locate and use our unused capacity would we see a reduction?

:beer:  :beer:  :beer:  :beer:  :beer:  :beer:  :beer:

--------------
VOTE  - ADAM AND EVE   NOT    ADAM AND STEVE


HAVING A LIBERAL ALONG IS LIKE LOSING TWO GOOD MEN
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 6
Ole1kanobe Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1360
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 31 2006,8:40 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Quote (Pretzel Logic @ Mar. 30 2006,6:33pm)
It always puzzled me that our sewer rates went up because they said since Farmstead was no more that they were not getting the revenue from it any more. One would think that with less water flowing thru to be treated the costs should be less. How is less more? If another wet industry was to locate and use our unused capacity would we see a reduction?

Sounds pretty straight for coming from a pretzel.
:)


--------------
The world is a dangerous place to live, not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
-Albert Einstein-

Some of what is said here (myself included) is about as tolerable as listening to someone vacuum a cat.
-nphilbro-
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 7
The Coach Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: Feb. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 31 2006,9:11 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Quote (Pretzel Logic @ Mar. 30 2006,6:33pm)
It always puzzled me that our sewer rates went up because they said since Farmstead was no more that they were not getting the revenue from it any more. One would think that with less water flowing thru to be treated the costs should be less. How is less more? If another wet industry was to locate and use our unused capacity would we see a reduction?

The  problem is, the treatment plant was built for a capacity of X million gallons back when Farmstead was going full tilt.  Shortly after it was built, that capacity need went away.

Put in other terms, you've got a 1000 horsepower engine sitting there spinning when you really only need 200 HP right now.  Still costs the same amount to keep it spinning, but now you've got less capacity to spread that fixed cost of keeping it running.

That means everyone's bill goes up.

So yes, IF another large wet industry came (remember Sparks said we can make them comfortable, but not high tech firms), then those fixed costs would be spread over a larger base, reducing, or more likely slowing the increase in cost being passed onto residents.

This brings up the question, would I rather have higher paying tech jobs, and maybe a higher sewer bill?  Or would I rather see some big wet industry that pays $11 an hour or so jobs, that a family can't survive on, can't buy and improve a house thereby increasing the tax base that helps the whole community?  Hmmm....


--------------
I'm The Coach, but don't call me.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 8
scorenix Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 31 2006,9:31 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Not only did usage decline, but the revenue stream disappeared.  Natural Biologics was also a huge user of the sewage system.  Right up there and just behind Farmstead.  So when they closed, the sewage system took a hit with lost revenue.

Sparks now says getting further companies for JOBZ will be very difficult.  I would ask him how, under his vision, does Albert Lea grow in the future when you can no longer nine years of no property taxes, no sales taxes, reductions on income taxes, etc.  Of course, his answer will be expansion of JOBZ benefits to area companies, and over the next couple of years, you will see JOBZ benefits handed out to only local companies.


--------------
"Here is something for those who think I have not done much on my own to think about.  I must then be one of the luckiest people around, and I think I am, I should then be able to keep that same luck going for the benefit of our area." - New ALEDA Executive Director Dan Dorman.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 9
Replicant Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1570
Joined: Dec. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 31 2006,12:27 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Quote (scorenix @ Mar. 30 2006,3:50pm)
Well, yes and no.  Last year, when they created the two utilities, they kept the revenue in the general fund, then shifted the expenses off to the utilities.  When they took the expenses back into the general fund, they also brought with it the new revenue.  Then increased it further.

Smoke and mirrors.  In 2005, the city looked like they didn't raise taxes, when in fact they instituted the lighting and storm water utility fees.  For this year's taxes they loudly proclaim taxes went up so much because residents wanted the fees taken away, like it's the citizen's fault.

Just curious Scorenix, which way would you prefer the lighting and storm water be handled?


--------------
Some drink deeply from the river of knowledge.  Others only gargle. - Woody Allen

The problem is not that we have too many fools, it's that the lightning isn't distributed right. - Mark Twain.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 10
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 16954
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 31 2006,12:34 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

It's obviously all Clinton's fault... :sarcasm:

--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
11 replies since Mar. 30 2006,2:59 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 1 of 212>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply house taxes
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon