Democracy Banana Republic Style, Stein asks for a hand recount pays for it, Walker steps in and uses the machines that are in question only allowing hand counts in smaller rural districts where republicans have an advantage.
In Michigan and Pennsylvania Trump ties up the recount using a bias court..You have to ask yourself whats up with that, why not let the recount proceed if you're confident you're the legitimate winner...
In my opinion we should have random recounts for elections just to keep our elected and appointed officials honest. We have to audit taxes to keep people honest we should have random recounts to ensure our elections are on the up and up.. lets say five states randomly picked per election cycle..
Attached Image
-------------- History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 3040
Joined: Oct. 2003
Posted on: Dec. 14 2016,7:25 am
(Self-Banished @ Dec. 12 2016,8:34 am)
QUOTE
^^ WAAAAHHHHHH! I WANT A RECOUNT!! WAAAAHHHHHHJ, AND I DON'T CARE WHAT THE OUTCOME IS, I WANT IT CHANGED!! WAAAAHHHH!!!
The cry baby routine is kind of ironic, there's only one Presidential candidate I recall saying numerous times that the system was "rigged", and only them winning would be accepted. It's the guy you supported, so isn't it hypocritical for you to mock anyone else?
Hillary accepted the results immediately. The Green party candidate Jill Stein didn't, and she raised money to recount. Big deal, they'll recount, I doubt it will change anything.
QUOTE
Yes, maybe we should recount Nevada and Minnesota which were even closer.
Sure, if Trump or state Repubs want to raise money or circulate a petition. What's wrong with that?
You guys are the ones always complaining about massive voter fraud, you want a recount or to look into it, go for it.
-------------- You know it's going to be a bad day when you cross thread the cap on the toothpaste.
^^ Trump wasn't a cry baby about, he went out and work hard at his campaign, Stroke lady sat on her ever widening ass and did nothing but sling sh!t, sometimes not sticking her head out for days (from the pics I saw of election night, probably drunk) Now when she loses she lights up the conspiracy theory BS and wants everyone to believe it, then she tacks on to Stein's recount scam to make extra $$ so she can muddy the waters
I mentioned Minnesota and Nevada to prove a point, why would Trump or the repubs want a recount, they won .
You make the case for Jill Stein and random recounts..
I'm sure you'll go off on the regular republican tangent of voter ID, we have voter registration which is Constitutional unlike the poll tax situation voter ID would create.. It's been proven time and time again we don't have major voter fraud on the individual level.
Detroit's problem is more along the lines of antiquated voting machines.. The problem with machines in general is software, the count may be faster, but I'd prefer a hand count even with the added cost and time.
I'll quote myself:
QUOTE
In my opinion we should have random recounts for elections just to keep our elected and appointed officials honest. We have to audit taxes to keep people honest we should have random recounts to ensure our elections are on the up and up.. lets say five states randomly picked per election cycle..
-------------- History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
No, this was ballot box stuffing, plain and simple, It looks as if Trump won the state by more than the 10k plus originally posted election nite. The greatest discrepancies occurred in the Detroit area with more votes counted than there were voters, the Detroit area being heavily for Clinton.
No wonder the dem party is in so much trouble, they can't even cheat right. This