|
|
| Post Number: 31
|
guest
Unregistered
|
 |
Posted on: Dec. 09 2003,1:04 pm |
|
   |
Let's see ruff ruff, You are the one who said it would cost billions for the infrastructure, yes you said billions with a “B”. I on the other hand reasoned through the necessary costs and presented more realistic numbers. You then presented a bunch of fallacies regarding the necessary infrastructure which I then disproved with facts I received from the developer of the project. When I pointed this out you then said you hope it makes it. If you hope it makes it why state items as fact which are no where near fact? Why use numbers for costs which present an unfeasible project when the numbers are not 1/10 of what you are stating? I truly hope it does go through. This would be great. I have never said it should not be built nor have I said I thought it was impossible. Unlike the many here I want this town and area to grow and succeed, many here say they do but when a proposal is brought up you right away try to point out its potential flaws and say it wont work. Or do as scrappy does blow a lot of bs and then say I hope it works.
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 32
|
red_rocker
Unregistered
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 09 2003,1:52 pm |
|
 |
this stupid water park will never fly. face it, the town is dead and until you get some REAL jobs, it isnt coming back. you know its bad when everyone is excited over a new business which will employ 8 people? sad. thanks paul sparks for a job well done
"As they increase their sales we'll have to put full-time people in their plant." The number of new jobs could be eight to 10, but for now, only two or three new jobs will be filled by local residents. They will be hired by Alamco
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 33
|
rosebudinal 
Group: Members
Posts: 303
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 09 2003,2:33 pm |
|
|
Didn't realize that Bloomington made announcement the same day. Someone suggested to me that they could haul in a bunch of that dirt from Wallyworld construction and make it an off season Ski resort during the winter months. Great idea. 
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 34
|
dufus
Unregistered
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 19 2003,6:02 pm |
|
|
If this is serious (building a waterpark), why build it out in Hayward??? If you want a big draw to pump $ into town, build it in town!
I just don't get the Hayward draw? Why Hayward?
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 35
|
GEOKARJO
Google This!!!
Group: Members
Posts: 7799
Joined: Aug. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 19 2003,7:23 pm |
|
|
WHY HAYWARD  ??
1. NO BISHOP
2. NO SPARKS
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 36
|
Haywardite
Unregistered
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 19 2003,11:02 pm |
|
|
maybe Hayward because the guy that wants to build it has land there and he lives there.......not too hard to understand
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 37
|
Guest
Unregistered
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 20 2003,1:14 am |
|
|
Hey Geokarjo I thought you were out of here. You were whinning in the other posts. Minnow is right you are a dink.
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 38
|
Doc Holiday
Unregistered
|
|
Posted on: Dec. 20 2003,12:35 pm |
|
|
Not to hard to tell who the guest is. P Bishop herself.
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 39
|
Belcher
Unregistered
|
 |
Posted on: Dec. 22 2003,2:52 pm |
|
|
| Quote (Guest @ Dec. 19 2003,11:02:pm) | | maybe Hayward because the guy that wants to build it has land there and he lives there.......not too hard to understand |
once this guy does his homework he will realize that building something like this in Hayward will never make economic sense. I doubt it even makes sense in Albert lea, sure as hell isn't going to work in Hayward.
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 40
|
carnation
Group: Members
Posts: 77
Joined: Dec. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Apr. 16 2004,11:34 pm |
|
|
Land is still trying to be aquired for this water park and land owners have been approached recently. Maybe it is a possibility!
|
|
|
|
|
|
