Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

Page 1 of 212>>

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: 2 wars, cost to U.S. treasury< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
nedkelly Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: Dec. 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 23 2011,7:39 am  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Does anyone know the actual cost of the two wars we have had going for many years? Has anyone compiled the cost of equipment repairs and replacement, the medical needs of the wounded veterans and family support of those who will never return...
I wonder what the hidden costs of the wars have or will be compared to the  govts. released figures.. Methinks the hidden costs are the big future issue!!!!!!!!!... :( ......ned
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 2
Rosalind_Swenson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 970
Joined: May 2011
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 23 2011,12:20 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(nedkelly @ Oct. 23 2011,7:39 am)
QUOTE
Does anyone know the actual cost of the two wars we have had going for many years? Has anyone compiled the cost of equipment repairs and replacement, the medical needs of the wounded veterans and family support of those who will never return...
I wonder what the hidden costs of the wars have or will be compared to the  govts. released figures.. Methinks the hidden costs are the big future issue!!!!!!!!!... :( ...ned

Most of the estimates I'm finding are at 4 trillion +. Most of them say they include medical needs of the veterans up to 2020. I don't know if any estimates include the cost of shipping all of the equipment back home/storage of equipment once back. What are we going to do with all the left over war items? Tanks, weapons, god-only-knows-what-else. It's not like they can hold a yard sale to get rid of it and get some money back. I agree with you on the hidden costs, and I'm sure we will never know what that will be.

--------------
Government is too big and too important to be left to the politicians. Chester Bowles.



“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.”
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 9775
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 23 2011,12:29 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

You do realize that we didn't create an armed force to go to war, right? The equipment will go back to the fort/base they took it from.

The transportation costs to get the stuff back to the bases/forts will be insignificant compared to the $4,000,000,000,000.00 we've already spent.


--------------
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"


The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 4
Stone-Magnon Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1540
Joined: Dec. 2010
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 23 2011,12:56 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Our function for the next 100 years is one of world policemen. We are not going to be the richest by any stretch, but we are going to export war and attempt to control it. We will keep the best equipment for ourselves. We are now world policemen. The drug war may have been our training.

China will be an economic powerhouse that will dwarf us but we'll be the cops with the weapons.

It's all gonna be fine until 2056 when China tires of the cost and goes in house.

I have a way of seeing the future that I can't explain. . It's why I'm free and you wouldn't be had you walked in my shoes. I can tell you because anything you do won't change the future.


--------------
...everybody must get stoned


-Bob Dylan
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 5
Self-Banished Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2452
Joined: Feb. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 23 2011,5:47 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

OK, I'll bite, why 2056?

--------------
"No enterprise is more likely to succeed than one concealed from the enemy until it is ripe for execution."
Niccolo Machiavelli

What one person receives without working another person works without receiving.

Join the Democrat party, the party of excuses!

Domari nolo
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 6
nedkelly Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: Dec. 2009
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 24 2011,7:12 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(Liberal @ Oct. 23 2011,12:29 pm)
QUOTE
You do realize that we didn't create an armed force to go to war, right? The equipment will go back to the fort/base they took it from.

The transportation costs to get the stuff back to the bases/forts will be insignificant compared to the $4,000,000,000,000.00 we've already spent.

But what will it cost to repair or replace equipment, tanks, planes etc. after all the sand damage to engines, tracks, bearings, etc? it will not be insignificant by no means!
Another instance of a war charged on the nations credit card...Another cost to be put at Obama's feet by McConnell, and Boehner, and Cantor, because they don't have the guts to tax those that can afford to pay!...ned
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 7
Expatriate Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2326
Joined: Oct. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 24 2011,3:07 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

The country has suffered at least 36,395 casualties in Iraq since 2003, including more than 4,400 dead                    

In Afghanistan since 2001, we have lost over 1,700 dead and nearly 10,000 wounded.

The VA is flooded with post traumatic stress claims, the true cost is yet to be determined.

What did we accomplish?


--------------
History is no more than the lies agreed upon by the victors.
             
                                                   ~NAPOLEON BONAPARTE
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 8
grassman Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 2550
Joined: Mar. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 24 2011,4:29 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Certain private contractors made oodles of money?

--------------
git er done!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 9
jimhanson Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 8491
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 25 2011,9:58 am Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

We won the war--and lost the peace.

The unasked and unanswered question SHOULD be:

"Now that we've failed most basic diplomatic mission to even convince the Iraqis to let us have a base there--what do we do with them?"

We've built an infrastructure--bases and airports--electrical grids, etc.

The Iraqis are more afraid of Iran than they are of the U.S.--and who can blame them with the constant U.S. vacillation on policy?  The Obama Administration is perceived as weak by most of the world--most nations know that they can't count on the U.S. to do what they say they will do.  The Iraqis decided to pal up with their old enemies instead of the waffling U.S.  That says a lot of our foreign policy--or lack thereof.

Iraq expects that it will be like Vietnam--we will just leave.  If Obummer had any foreign policy experience (or a backbone) he would have told them "Yes--we will leave--and when we do, we will take our airbases--take our improvements, take our oil industry improvements, take our electricity system--and you will go back to where you were.  I'm sure there is even another Saddam to rule you."

"And by the way--we won't be buying any of that oil from you, either--you'll be like your new pal Iran--sitting on lakes of oil--and no way to use it."


--------------
"If you want to anger a Conservative, tell him a lie.  If you want to anger a LIBERAL, tell him the TRUTH!"
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 10
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 9775
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 27 2011,2:56 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE

The unasked and unanswered question SHOULD be:

"Now that we've failed most basic diplomatic mission to even convince the Iraqis to let us have a base there--what do we do with them?"

The reason it's unasked is nobody wants to be accused of asking a dumb question.

So, now you want to put military bases in every country we're involved with? How much military spending is enough for you conservatives? We've been in Germany, Japan, and South Korea for 40-50 years after we built bases there. Do you kooks really want America's younger generations hanging out in that dump for another 40-50 years?

QUOTE

We've built an infrastructure--bases and airports--electrical grids, etc.

Well, we did blow them up when we preemptively attacked a sovereign nation. :dunno:

QUOTE

The Iraqis are more afraid of Iran than they are of the U.S.--and who can blame them with the constant U.S. vacillation on policy?  The Obama Administration is perceived as weak by most of the world--most nations know that they can't count on the U.S. to do what they say they will do.  The Iraqis decided to pal up with their old enemies instead of the waffling U.S.  That says a lot of our foreign policy--or lack thereof.

You seriously can't believe that they're getting better relations with Iran because of Obama's foreign policy. :crazy:



--------------
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"


The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
11 replies since Oct. 23 2011,7:39 am < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


Page 1 of 212>>
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply 2 wars
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon