Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

1 members are viewing this topic
>Guest

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Fire Department staffing cost< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
Liberal Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Moderator
Posts: 11451
Joined: Aug. 2003
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 23 2012,3:24 pm  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

QUOTE

Albert Lea residents could expect a $12 annual property tax increase if the city chooses to restore its Fire Department to full-time staffing levels.

That’s the estimate Albert Lea City Manager Chad Adams gave the City Council Monday during a special meeting set up to discuss the department and its future staffing.

The estimate is for the owner of a $100,000 home.

The meeting was set up Monday as the city is dealing with tight budget times with the loss of state funding and other revenue. City officials have been reviewing whether changes should take place to the department and earlier this year hired Florida-based consultant firm Almont Associates to examine the department.

The firm, hired for $30,000, looked at who should lead the department, the responsibilities of the firefighters and the staffing of the department.

After researching and reviewing the firm’s findings, Adams presented two options to the council for where to take the department. Both options included having a public safety director who oversees the police and fire departments, along with a deputy fire chief who would supervise three fire captains and have other additional duties. One captain position would be eliminated.

One option called for restoring full-time staffing levels and the other option called for reducing staffing by one person on each shift.

Adams said the option to reduce the staffing by one person on each shift would also require a property tax increase of about $8 annually for a $100,000 home owner, to allow for accounting changes for the cleaning of City Hall and the hiring of additional paid on-call firefighters. Equipment needs would be covered by fire interest funding.

http://www.albertleatribune.com/2012...options


So we're talking about saving $4 a year by not returning to full staffing? Why are we even talking about doing what Austin did? Didn't they lose a boatload of buildings in their downtown by not having a properly staffed fire department?

I'm all for saving tax dollars but this just seems to be penny wise and pound foolish idea.


--------------
The people are masters of both Congress and courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert it!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 2
SlapMyMonkey Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: Dec. 2010
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 23 2012,3:34 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

they need to save the $4 so they can hire another consultant so they can screw us some other way.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
twingroves Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: Oct. 2007
PostIcon Posted on: Aug. 23 2012,6:52 pm Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

i think  they should hire a consultant to find out why they hire so many consultants :dunno:
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
2 replies since Aug. 23 2012,3:24 pm < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


 
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Fire Department staffing cost
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code
Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon Emoticon