|
Post Number: 11
|
|
Post Number: 12
|
twingroves
Group: Members
Posts: 599
Joined: Oct. 2007
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 21 2012,1:26 pm |
|
|
thats way they like it here is because our freedom that they never fought for
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 13
|
Rosalind_Swenson
Group: Members
Posts: 1527
Joined: May 2011
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 21 2012,3:13 pm |
|
|
(sumpdump @ Sep. 21 2012,12:34 pm)
QUOTE As once stated..."Kill em all, let God sort em out" or ALLLAAAHHH for the mussies out there. Please answer two questions for me: 1.) So, how are you better than any of the muslims who chant or hold signs saying: "Death to America"?
2.) Why do you think you are better than the millions of muslims who would never even think about hurting another person?
twingroves: QUOTE thats way they like it here is because our freedom that they never fought for
People leaving oppressive countries in hope of better lives? Lazy bastards.
-------------- And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 14
|
irisheyes
Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 3040
Joined: Oct. 2003
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 21 2012,7:36 pm |
|
|
(Common Citizen @ Sep. 20 2012,8:25 pm)
QUOTE The Obummer administration would like you to believe this was all a result of a youtube video. Pahleaze... Did you think that before, or after you watched Hannity? Hannity: Obama WH Blames Outbreak on Youtube Video
Just a few days ago republican Peter King was interviewed, and like most republican politicians or pundits he made it sound like it was all over a youtube video. Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) contradicted him. So it's not a left versus right issue, both sides overplayed the importance of the video.
QUOTE When you have braggarts consistently touting that Obama killed one of their apostles...what do you expect.
Until January of '09 you were one of them who bragged about the President "keeping us safe". Why does the President being a democrat change that?
Both Clinton and Bush were attacked for not getting Bin Laden. Now someone gives the order to get him, in Pakistan (something McCain, Romney, and even the pundits wouldn't have done), and you guys have been furious ever since.
-------------- You know it's going to be a bad day when you cross thread the cap on the toothpaste.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 15
|
busybee
Group: Members
Posts: 2510
Joined: May 2004
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 21 2012,11:57 pm |
|
|
Furious? What infuriates me the most is the FACT that 99% of the people in the United States are MORE CONCERNED about how people are treated and NOT respected by their government in other countries than they are about how their OWN PEOPLE are being treated poorly and disrespected.
Focusing on other country's problems and attempting to "fix" them is non-productive to the U.S...always has been and always will be.
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 16
|
alcitizens
Albert Lea
Group: Members
Posts: 3664
Joined: Jul. 2009
|
|
Posted on: Sep. 22 2012,11:39 pm |
|
|
Libyan citizens protest militia groups
|
|
|
|
Post Number: 17
|
Rosalind_Swenson
Group: Members
Posts: 1527
Joined: May 2011
|
|
Posted on: Oct. 08 2012,8:49 am |
|
|
The whole thing just keeps getting fishier all the time.
This is from the first investigation so far: "It was clearly never, as Administration officials once insisted, the result of a popular protest. In addition, multiple U.S. federal government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the September 11 attack, the U.S. mission in Libya made repeated requests for increased security in Benghazi. the mission in Libya, however was denied these resources by officials in Washington." http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2htm...ges=yes
U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens wanted a Security Support Team, made up of 16 special operations soldiers, to stay with him in Libya after their deployment was scheduled to end in August, the commander of that security team told ABC News...
Wood, a member of the Utah National Guard who ordinarily works in security for the Department of the Interior, is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee hearings on Wednesday.
Asked for comment to the memo and Wood’s comments, a spokesman for the House Oversight Committee told ABC News: “Diplomats working in Libya viewed security provided by highly trained Americans as critical to their safety and mission. The Oversight Committee’s investigation continues to seek answers about why — even as threats against Americans increased — senior State Department officials erroneously decided such security was no longer needed.” http://abcnews.go.com/blogs...ugust-2
In the unsigned memorandum from the U.S. mission to the militia, which appears to be a draft, guards “are required to acquire and maintain their own weapons and ammunition,” the document states.
The security presence appears to have been bare-bones, with three or more armed militia members on the compound any time the “principal officer” was present — either the head of the mission or the ambassador. A somewhat larger group of unarmed contractors was also hired to guard the site but was not mentioned in the memorandum with the militia. When the principal officer was not present, a single militia member was instructed to be at the front gate between 8 a.m. and midnight. Between midnight and 8 a.m., one militia member was scheduled to be on roving patrol. The militia members were supposed to work a minimum of eight hours a day and were to be paid a stipend of about $28 a day, a relatively standard wage. They were housed on the U.S. compound. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world..._2.html
-------------- And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
|
|
|
|
|
|