Forum: Miscellaneous
Topic: Off topic Sex Offenders posts
started by: cheeba

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 25 2006,12:22 pm
I just called this guy at his cell number (Number Removed)

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

he said, "NO"...

I asked him why not - and he asked me why would anyone want to write such a story...

I told him that some people are probably concerned about the nature of his criminal convictions - and the fact that he is in the business of entertaining small children with magic tricks...

I told him that I would probably write the story with or without his cooperation - there was a long silence and then he said he wanted to think about it and call me back in a few minutes...



Posted by Scurvy Dog on Jan. 25 2006,1:05 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number of (number Removed)

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

he said, "NO"...

I asked him why not - and he asked me why would anyone want to write such a story...

I told him that some people are probably concerned about the nature of his criminal convictions - and the fact that he is in the business of entertaining small children with magic tricks...

I told him that I would probably write the story with or without his cooperation - there was a long silence and then he said he wanted to think about it and call me back in a few minutes...

Repoman, admit it. When you were younger you called people up and said, "I know who you are and I saw what you did," didn't you?

On that note, maybe the Tribune will do a story on this guy.  :sarcasm:



Posted by ICU812 on Jan. 25 2006,1:23 pm
Quote
Repoman, admit it. When you were younger you called people up and said, "I know who you are and I saw what you did," didn't you?


I wonder if the guy he was talking to figured out it was Repo when he finished each sentence with period, period, period.

Posted by Scurvy Dog on Jan. 25 2006,1:29 pm
Quote (ICU812 @ Jan. 25 2006,1:23pm)
Quote
Repoman, admit it. When you were younger you called people up and said, "I know who you are and I saw what you did," didn't you?


I wonder if the guy he was talking to figured out it was Repo when he finished each sentence with period, period, period.

That's really funny exclamation point.  :rofl:
Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 25 2006,2:02 pm
Quote (ICU812 @ Jan. 25 2006,1:23pm)
Quote
Repoman, admit it. When you were younger you called people up and said, "I know who you are and I saw what you did," didn't you?


I wonder if the guy he was talking to figured out it was Repo when he finished each sentence with period, period, period.

I haven't said period, period, period for a long time...

only kids talk like that...

geesh...

I say dot, dot, dot...  :p

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 26 2006,3:40 am
Like Chad believed, REPO NEVER CALLED ME, OR OUR HOUSE OR BUSINESS, Just like he called this jerk? :laugh:


Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 26 2006,3:57 am
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

he said, "NO"...

I asked him why not - and he asked me why would anyone want to write such a story...

I told him that some people are probably concerned about the nature of his criminal convictions - and the fact that he is in the business of entertaining small children with magic tricks...

I told him that I would probably write the story with or without his cooperation - there was a long silence and then he said he wanted to think about it and call me back in a few minutes...

HERE IS THE EVIDENCE



Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 26 2006,3:59 am
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 26 2006,3:40am)
Like Chad believed, REPO NEVER CALLED ME, OR OUR HOUSE OR BUSINESS, Just like he called this jerk? :laugh:

YOU DON'T THINK HE CALLED ME, KMA CHAD
Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 26 2006,5:04 am
keep hitting the bottle, Geokoff...  :dunce:

did I post somewhere that I didn't have a phone...  :dunno:

I called the guy because his number was in the ad and I was thinking about doing an article on the subject and sending it in to the AL Tribune...

I've never called you or your landlord...

writing a story about you boxing the clown doesn't seem all that interesting...  :p

besides that - you posted on here that you had a voice print on the guy that called your business and the house - and you had numbers from your phone bill that you were going to produce to show us all that I was your caller...  :dunce:

I imagine that Homeland Security has all of this information sealed in a plastic evidence bag...  :rofl:

IF you received a call it was probably from someone else on this Forum - just twisting your tit because you're such a twit...  :dunce:  :rofl:

you and Magical Mark should take your act on the road - you can soak a bar rag in booze, wring it out into your mouth until it's dry and then he can make it disappear...  :rofl:

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 26 2006,5:07 am
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Jan. 26 2006,3:57am)
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE

you missed your calling - you should have been an attorney or a detective...

that piece of evidence that I called you and your woman escaped the attention of everyone else on the forum...  :dunce:  :rofl:

Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 26 2006,7:31 am

Posted by Liberal on Jan. 26 2006,8:02 am
Quote

YOU DON'T THINK HE CALLED ME, KMA CHAD

The little fella seems angry. :rofl:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 26 2006,10:29 am
People who terrorize behind usernames are no better than sex offenders identify yourselves repo and botto you can't cause someone might kick you arse. Repo is a liar and botto is a punk. End of Flame.
Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 26 2006,1:55 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 26 2006,10:29am)
People who terrorize behind usernames are no better than sex offenders identify yourselves repo and botto you can't cause someone might kick you arse. Repo is a liar and botto is a punk. End of Flame.

Terrorize? Are you serious?

Anybody who gets as worked up over this crap as you obviously do needs to take a serious vacation from the Internet.

Posted by bob on Jan. 26 2006,3:56 pm
i think george needs a frontal lobotomy
Posted by bob on Jan. 26 2006,3:57 pm
he's got his under pants twisted to tight today
Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 26 2006,4:14 pm
Quote (bob @ Jan. 26 2006,3:56pm)
i think george needs a frontal lobotomy

Clearly, the bottle infrontomy didn't work...
Posted by Ole1kanobe on Jan. 26 2006,7:19 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 26 2006,10:29am)
People who terrorize behind usernames are no better than sex offenders identify yourselves repo and botto you can't cause someone might kick you arse. Repo is a liar and botto is a punk. End of Flame.

You've got to be sh|ttin' me.
Now anything that you don't like that is posted is going to be terrorism?
:frusty:  :frusty:  :frusty:

Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 28 2006,11:14 am
The Geo and Repo show will be right back...

*INTERMISSION*

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 28 2006,3:11 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Jan. 28 2006,11:20am)
The same amount of resource it takes to slap a DUI plate on the back of a car possibly?

OK, Mr George 'Convicted of Drunk Driving' Gillespie -  what good does it do them to slap a DUI plat on the back of a drunk's car when they can turn around and do what you do and just drive your girlfriend/landlord's car...  :dunce:

I'm glad they instituted the DUI plates - but you are a fuggin moron in every way possible...  :p

be careful driving around in Albert Lea - that car that you assume swerved to miss a squirrel just might be in the hands of town drunk - George Gillespi...  :finger:



Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 28 2006,3:14 pm
MADD should put up a web site that shows the address of all Drunks with Drunk Driving convictions like George "the Bar Rag Wringer" Gillespie - the Otis Campbell of Albert Lea... :p

he is truly an amiable dunce...  :dunce:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 28 2006,5:27 pm
I learned my lesson 18 years ago on the first offense testing at .10 but this thread isn't about me or you as you think everything revolves around you. You are delusional.

You posted you represented yourself as a reporter of the tribune. Falsely identifying yourself for your own personal pleasure. You are truly sick. Like it or not this bum does have the right of protection from sick individuals such as yourself. I bet the tribune would love to find out who you are.

Don't bother erasing your post I back you idiot rants up in a file called Repos post in my computer daily

I am a reformed drunk driver I have no plates that say watch me, but you sir there is no cure for being an a$$hole excuse me, Major A$$HOLE you will always be one and you don't need a sign to warn anyone that you are they can see it as soon as you open your mouth.



Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 28 2006,8:47 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Jan. 28 2006,5:27pm)
I learned my lesson 18 years ago on the first offense testing at .10 but this thread isn't about me or you as you think everything revolves around you. You are delusional.

You posted you represented yourself as a reporter of the tribune. Falsely identifying yourself for your own personal pleasure. You are truly sick. Like it or not this bum does have the right of protection from sick individuals such as yourself. I bet the tribune would love to find out who you are.

Don't bother erasing your post I back you idiot rants up in a file called Repos post in my computer daily

I am an a$$hole excuse me, Major A$$HOLE

OK Mo-Ron Gillespie - town drunk...  :p

are you saying that I said I work for the AL tribune - because I didn't - go check your "REPO file"...  :rofl:

I said I was writing an article for the AL Tribune - a big difference - anyone can do that and submit it for publication...

or are you saying that you thought that the only articles ever published by newspapers are written by the writers that they employ - if that's the posture that you are taking (and I'm pretty sure that it is) - then you are an even bigger fuggin' dunce than I thought you were...  :dunce:

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 28 2006,8:48 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number (number Removed)

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...



Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 28 2006,9:30 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 28 2006,8:48pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

No matter how you try to white wash it is harassment by means of using a communication devise.

For example, online stalking/harassing is usually defined as “…repeated unsolicited contact by electronic means…” with the intent to “…terrify, intimidate, or harass…” another. The medium in this instance can include computers, Fax machines, telephones, etc.



Posted by FlyguyAL on Jan. 28 2006,11:09 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 28 2006,9:30pm)
For example, online stalking/harassing is usually defined as “…repeated unsolicited contact by electronic means…” with the intent to “…terrify, intimidate, or harass…” another. The medium in this instance can include computers, Fax machines, telephones, etc.

Oh, BTW GEO this < website > copied you.  :sarcasm:

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 28 2006,11:46 pm
Quote (FlyguyAL @ Jan. 28 2006,11:09pm)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Jan. 28 2006,9:30pm)
For example, online stalking/harassing is usually defined as “…repeated unsolicited contact by electronic means…” with the intent to “…terrify, intimidate, or harass…” another. The medium in this instance can include computers, Fax machines, telephones, etc.

Oh, BTW GEO this < website > copied you.  :sarcasm:

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

the other day I tried to bring to his attention that he had put up a post stating that he had noticed several errors in different movies that was exactly - verbatim what was on an already existing web site dedicated to pointing out errors in movies - and he steadfastly maintained that he had caught these by himself - on his own...  :dunce:

what a fuggin' dunce - this was actually brought to my attention by two of the more intelligent posters on this forum - just to properly give credit where credit is due - they sent me a PM about Geokoff's bogus claims...

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 28 2006,11:52 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Jan. 28 2006,9:30pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 28 2006,8:48pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

No matter how you try to white wash it is harassment by means of using a communication devise.

For example, online stalking/harassing is usually defined as “…repeated unsolicited contact by electronic means…” with the intent to “…terrify, intimidate, or harass…” another. The medium in this instance can include computers, Fax machines, telephones, etc.

OK...

you got me - dead to rights...

call Barney Fife or whoever it is you call in your fuggin' world of make believe cops-n-robbers and get them on the trail...  :dunce:

take a screen shot of my post - get an affadavit from the AL Tribune that they don't have a reporter by the name of Repo Man - contact your buddy Mark the Magician for an afadavit that he felt harrassed - seal all of this stuff in a evidence bag and bring it to the Homeland Security Office...  :p  :dunce:  :p

you fuggin' goofball...  :dunce:

don't you ever pass out  ...  :dunno:  :p



Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 29 2006,12:09 am
now all of you go back and look at that picture of Mark the Magician and then look at Geo's pic at Wal-Mart and I ask you - could it be:



no wonder he is so fuggin' worked up about me writing an article...  :p

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 29 2006,4:32 am
You have beared many instances of false witness against me on this forum I will have your ass on this. There is a law now thanks to my cousin George W Bush.
Posted by Liberal on Jan. 29 2006,3:25 pm
Quote

You have beared many instances of false witness against me on this forum I will have your ass on this. There is a law now thanks to my cousin George W Bush.

Geo, this is a really funny post. It's too bad you don't drink yourself stupid on a regular basis, I'm pretty sure there would be many more posts like that for everyone to enjoy if you did.

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 29 2006,4:17 pm
Quote (Liberal @ Jan. 29 2006,3:25pm)
Quote

You have beared many instances of false witness against me on this forum I will have your ass on this. There is a law now thanks to my cousin George W Bush.

Geo, this is a really funny post. It's too bad you don't drink yourself stupid on a regular basis, I'm pretty sure there would be many more posts like that for everyone to enjoy if you did.

I wonder if the Department of Homeland Security would be interested in the town drunk trying to pass himself off as a member of the 1st Family...  :rofl:  :dunce:  :rofl:

Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 29 2006,5:01 pm
Between Geo's drunken ramblings and TTT's dope-induced rants, small wonder the Fountain Center campus needs to expand. More parking lots!
Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 29 2006,5:19 pm
FYI - I can write an article for the Trib - but they are requesting that I lose the dot, dot, dot thing...

that is a deal breaker...  :p

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 29 2006,9:47 pm
I am related distantly I have written proof I have posted this before and showed where the relation is and how distant. It goes back to the Mayflower so my claim is true anyone that cares to see the information is available at my business.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 29 2006,10:00 pm
< President Bush ancestery >

< My ancestry >

As you can see my Great great great great grand grandfather married the daughter of John Howland

My mother is Dorothy Chipman and yes I was excepted into the MN chapter of the Mayflower Society .

I am arm with facts on this they are available



Posted by Liberal on Jan. 29 2006,10:04 pm
Quote

BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARY:

John Howland came on the Mayflower as a servant to John Carver.  He is best remembered for having fallen off the Mayflower during a mighty storm, as recorded by Bradford:


:rofl:

Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 30 2006,1:00 am
Quote
BIOGRAPHICAL SUMMARY:

John Howland came on the Mayflower as a servant to John Carver.  He is best remembered for having fallen off the Mayflower during a mighty storm, as recorded by Bradford:



Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,2:28 am
< your info is incorrect >

you Norskies and Danes can't accept there is an Irishman in town with further ties to the original Mayflower descendants I proved it and have it in writing and related to Bush and Ford Quit Grabbing for straws.



Posted by Botto 82 on Jan. 30 2006,3:14 am
Norskies and Danes? I've got more Sioux blood than anything else.

Get off my land, drunk.

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,10:28 am
What I posteded and got bashed for was telling Repo he had no right to harrass this bum magic man which is on the topic. It is because of idiots like him we are not being informed.


Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,5:19 pm
THE 51 PILGRIMS
AT THE FIRST THANKSGIVING :

4 MARRIED WOMEN : Eleanor Billington, Mary Brewster, Elizabeth Hopkins, Susanna White Winslow.
5 ADOLESCENT GIRLS : Mary Chilton (14), Constance Hopkins (13), Desire Minter (20 sickly), Priscilla Mullins (19), Elizabeth Tilley (15).
8 ADOLESCENT BOYS : Francis & John Billington, John Crackston, Samuel Fuller (2d), Giles Hopkins, William Latham, Joseph Rogers, Henry Samson.
13 YOUNG CHILDREN : Bartholomew, Mary & Remember Allerton, Love & Wrestling Brewster, John Cooke, Humility Cooper, Samuel Eaton, Damaris & Oceanus Hopkins, Richard More, Resolved & Peregrine White.
21 MEN : John Alden, Isaac Allerton, John Billington, William Bradford, William Brewster, Peter Brown, Francis Cooke, Edward Doty, Francis Eaton, Samuel Fuller, Richard Gardiner, John Goodman, Stephen Hopkins, John Howland, Edward Lester, George Soule, Myles Standish, William Trevor, Richard Warren, Edward Winslow, Gilbert Winslow.


< http://www.pilgrimjohnhowlandsociety.org/john_howland.shtml >



Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,5:26 pm
In sundry of these storms the winds were so fierce and the seas so high, as they could not bear a knot of sail, but were forced to hull for divers days together. And in one of them, as they thus lay at hull in a mighty storm, a lusty young man called John Howland, coming upon some occasion above the gratings was, with a seele of the ship, thrown into the sea; but it pleased God that he caught hold of the topsail halyards which hung overboard and ran out at length. Yet he held his hold (though he was sundry fathoms under water) till he was hauled up by the same rope to the brim of the water, and then with boat hook and other means got into the ship again and his life saved. And though he was something ill with it, yet he lived many years after and became a profitable member both in church and commonwealth.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,5:48 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 28 2006,8:48pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

Go ahead write you story but we all know the tribune will not publish it without you providing accurate, verifiable contact information. Go ahead I would like to read it.

You folks who say I am drunk sorry your hero Repo is a bigger fool than I am a drunk.



Posted by scorenix on Jan. 30 2006,6:02 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 30 2006,5:48pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 28 2006,8:48pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Jan. 25 2006,12:22pm)
I just called this guy at his cell number (Number removed)

I told him I was thinking about doing an article for the AL Tribune and I asked him if he was interested in discussing his criminal history from Iowa for the story...

Go ahead write you story but we all know the tribune will not publish it without you providing accurate, verifiable contact information. Go ahead I would like to read it.

You folks who say I am drunk sorry your hero Repo is a bigger fool than I am a drunk.

I'm not sure why there is a fight over this.  If in fact Repo was writing an article, and a letter to the editor would suffice, he would be within his right, and I would think his obligation, to ask "Amazing Mark" for his comment.  It allows Repo to write an article without fear of libel.  Because suppose he wrote an article and it turned out "Amazing Mark" did not have a criminal record.  He could be sued for libel.  By asking him, did he wish to comment on his criminal past, and "Amazing Mark" chose not to, he would be free to write an article.  And allowing "Amazing Mark" to comment was his opportunity to set the record straight.

Write a book, an article, what have you, and any editor will make you prove line by line.

In this case, I have to go with Repo.  From what is written, it would have been the responsible thing to do.



Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,7:31 pm
The fight is not over him writing the article the fight is his sole purpose to call this guy was to harass him Repo will never do a story that will get published in the Albert Lea Tribune. I know and you know he will have to identify himself and that will never happen.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,8:35 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 30 2006,5:26pm)
In sundry of these storms the winds were so fierce and the seas so high, as they could not bear a knot of sail, but were forced to hull for divers days together. And in one of them, as they thus lay at hull in a mighty storm, a lusty young man called John Howland, coming upon some occasion above the gratings was, with a seele of the ship, thrown into the sea; but it pleased God that he caught hold of the topsail halyards which hung overboard and ran out at length. Yet he held his hold (though he was sundry fathoms under water) till he was hauled up by the same rope to the brim of the water, and then with boat hook and other means got into the ship again and his life saved. And though he was something ill with it, yet he lived many years after and became a profitable member both in church and commonwealth.

John was trying to take down the forward most sail (the smallest forward sail) in the storm and was was thrown overboard. He had caught the largest sails ropes and save himself using it to climb back onto the ship. Sounds like a survivor to me.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 30 2006,8:57 pm
Date:  03/07/05 Phone:

Name: George Gillespie
Address: Albert Lea, MN
E-Mail Address:

1. Name of your Mayflower Pilgrim Ancestor: John Howland

2. Son/Daughter: Hope Howland Married: John Chipman
3. Son/Daughter: John, Honorable Chipman Married: Mary Skiff
4. Son/Daughter: Perez Chipman Married: Margaret Wheeler
5. Son/Daughter: Stephen Chipman Married: Agnes ?
6. Son/Daughter: James Chipman Married: Charlotte Crockett Hutchinson
7. Son/Daughter: Joseph Venable Chipman Married: Mary McCausland
8. Son/Daughter: William Thomas Chipman Married: Adora Bell Russell
9. Son/Daughter: William Joseph Chipman Married: Willie Betty Ford
10. Son/Daughter: William Thomas Chipman Married: Della May Parks
11. Son/Daughter: Dorothy Chipman Married: George Gillespie
12. Son/Daughter: George Gillespie II Married:

Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 30 2006,10:27 pm
I'll send the Trib an article - if they use it or not will be their business - I will send it via overnight US Mail so I will have proof that they got it...

I'm not done with it - but I'll write it - under the pen name 'Bruce Wayne'...

they can publish it or not - but if they don't publish it within 10 days of my mailing I will post it here...

George - why are you so preoccupied with my identity...  :dunno:

do you want to beat me up...  :dunno:

Posted by Wolfie on Jan. 30 2006,10:37 pm
I thought it was only against the law to impersonate a law enforcement officer of any type.  As far as anyone else is concerned Repo or anybody could say "I am a reporter.", or "I am a pharmacist." or better yet "I am a small business owner with no skills and no pride for my own life that I have to tell people I am descended from mayflower passengers and am distantly related to the Pres."  And unfortunately there isnt a law against it.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,10:14 am
My claim is provable I pointed you to many web sights There is a book called the "Descendants of John Howland" which list all of them as I listed above My sister has a copy I will have her scan it in and email the page to me.

You cannot claim to be associated with a company that you do not work for and harass people in their name you put that  company in a position of liability for your action that company will most likely retaliate and sue you for falsely representing yourself.

And Repo I just want to know who you are so I can send you a bar rag I thought you should have original equipment for this is the dumbest thing you ever did. I wouldn't ever follow through on my legal threats it was all laughable it made great conversation with people that post here that personally I do know other than talking about the county and the city.

We all have to take responsibility for our actions whether it be getting behind the wheel driving just above the legal limit of consumed alcohol or being stupid If I was you I would clean my shoes cause I think you really stepped in it.



Posted by Liberal on Jan. 31 2006,11:06 am
Quote

I thought it was only against the law to impersonate a law enforcement officer of any type.

Ask Krusty about that :rofl:

Quote

You cannot claim to be associated with a company that you do not work for and harass people in their name you put that  company in a position of liability for your action that company will most likely retaliate and sue you for falsely representing yourself.

He never claimed that he worked for the Tribune, he has said all along that he said he was writing an article for the Tribune and as scorenix pointed out "a letter to the editor would suffice". Also he never said the "Albert Lea Tribune" and since he doesn't live here he could have easily meant The Star Tribune.

So as far as the Tribune's legal threat, it's not a big deal and certainly not the first time I've gotten a letter like that. I certainly won't give up Repoman's IP address or anyone elses without a court order and even if I were compelled to give up the IP address his ISP would still require another court order. That's going to cost a fair amount of money for a case that would be difficult just to prove legal standing let alone prove any damages by his actions.

I can see where his actions may have put the Tribune in a tight spot by posting what he did on the forum but people probably do things like that all the time, they just don't find out about it because people usually don't admit they did it on a public forum.

Quote

My claim is provable I pointed you to many web sights There is a book called the "Descendants of John Howland" which list all of them as I listed above My sister has a copy I will have her scan it in and email the page to me.

Don't you understand that you can't validate your stupid statement by proving that you and GW are descendants of the same drunken manservant on the Mayflower?

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,11:21 am
Why would you call the man Drunken cause he was swept off the boat in a storm. I can validate it the information that he and I are descended from this man is a matter of public record. There is a book that as I said my sister has that list all of the descendent of John Howland It list  my family up to my mother and her bothers along with the Bush Family and other famous people to the link I provided.

Quote
 
George says:
Would you scan the cover of the book of the chipman family where and the page of John and Hope and then the page of mom and email it to me.
tina says:
yes will try to do it tonight
George says:
thank You


As soon As My Sister sends me this I will post it.



Posted by bob on Jan. 31 2006,2:11 pm
hey geo why dont you sit in a corner with your little bottle of booze and you stupid,rambling,drunk


Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,2:39 pm
You man enough to back up your statement BOB. You posted on here I shouldn't be calling anyone out cause they could be bigger and tougher, hiding behind a user name and calling people names, and bearing false witness against people, makes you something to be proud of. Grow up or act your age.
Posted by bob on Jan. 31 2006,2:47 pm
i wouldnt go threating people that you have no clue on who they are or what they are capable of dumb ass
Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,2:57 pm
Quote (bob @ Jan. 31 2006,2:47pm)
i wouldnt go threating people that you have no clue on who they are or what they are capable of dumb ass

I wouldn't be insulting people for the same reason BOB

Where did I threaten you anyway sounds like a threat from you though. Back it up.



Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 31 2006,3:56 pm
The Tribune has made a legal threat - c'mon...  :p

I'm doing an article 'for them' (rather I am or WAS going to send it to them) regarding convicted sex offenders moving into Minnesota from Iowa...

maybe I'll send it to the Austin Herald if this is how they react...

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,4:09 pm
Go ahead and send it Repo I am Sure they would be glad to get it.
Posted by REPOMAN on Jan. 31 2006,4:43 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Jan. 31 2006,4:09pm)
Go ahead and send it Repo I am Sure they would be glad to get it.

part of your master plan, Geokoff...  :finger:

you were breathing down my neck last year - remember...  :rofl:

I remember one time you posted a question to me:
Quote
"Do you feel my hot brath on your neck??


:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

you better go back to the Mayflower with your Net-Detective kit...  :p

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,5:06 pm
I didn't do anything this site is read by everyone in the news media cause it is the first line of information in the community the people who post here provide up to date information as news develops in our community. The Game said they read the forum for news tips throughout the day as radio is the first to report breaking news. I was contacted by the tribune right after I posted when Brian Setzer was in town for Brians contact information.

Like to take credit Repo but I don't deserve it. I wouldn't do it to you anyway I would flame with you and it is fun breaks up the boredom.

Chad stands by his convictions and I am not going to jeapordize my friendship with Chad just because when it came to you and me I am as guilty of insulting you as much as you are guilty of insulting me.

You got to admit you should have thought this one through before you posted. Like I said we all have our stupid moments in life.

BTW How do you like using Vonage Sound pretty clear there That was a pretty neat trick using My home number to come up on the caller ID.


What is Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing?
Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing is setting the number you are calling from without the use of an operator / company PBX system. By far the easiest method thanks to the increasing take-up of internet telephony services are VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) service providers who allow you when using their service to set whatever caller ID you like (which is also used as ANI).



Posted by FlyguyAL on Jan. 31 2006,7:22 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 31 2006,5:06pm)
What is Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing?
Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing is setting the number you are calling from without the use of an operator / company PBX system. By far the easiest method thanks to the increasing take-up of internet telephony services are VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) service providers who allow you when using their service to set whatever caller ID you like (which is also used as ANI).

Geo, these < websites > just keep copying you.  Are you ok with that?  :dunno:  :p

Posted by GEOKARJO on Jan. 31 2006,7:35 pm
Quote (FlyguyAL @ Jan. 31 2006,7:22pm)
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Jan. 31 2006,5:06pm)
What is Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing?
Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing is setting the number you are calling from without the use of an operator / company PBX system. By far the easiest method thanks to the increasing take-up of internet telephony services are VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) service providers who allow you when using their service to set whatever caller ID you like (which is also used as ANI).

Geo, these < websites > just keep copying you.  Are you ok with that?  :dunno:  :p

I tend to use quick reply more than I use the ad reply feature with all the feature buttons. I generally hit space four times when I cut and coping info from a web site to bring that info to support comments I have on a subject. That is why you seldom see clickable smileys on my post.
Posted by Wareagle11B on Jan. 31 2006,7:40 pm
:deadhorse:
Posted by Wareagle11B on Jan. 31 2006,7:50 pm
Get the idea yet folks?  :rofl:
Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 01 2006,11:13 am
I am positive that newspapers print articles that are submitted to them from non-reporters...

my mother-in-law has submitted several articles that have been printed by a newspaper and she has encouraged me to do the same...

the AL Tribune - if they are upset - I must ask why...  :dunno:

this is a story that needs to be told...

I mean Mark the Magician and another sex offender moved here from Iowa and live at the same address on Garfield...

I believe that I used to hear somewhere that felons were not to associate with other felons - how about when both felons have the same type of criminal history...

that's a story begging to be written...

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 01 2006,11:36 am
Call down and talk to the editor nothing will get resolved here.
You are right if your article is new worthy and fact driven they may run you as a feature columnist. I have had material printed by them.

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 01 2006,12:17 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 01 2006,11:36am)
Call down and talk to the editor nothing will get resolved here.
You are right if your article is new worthy and fact driven they may run you as a feature columnist. I have had material printed by them.

I'm really just wondering whose calling the shots over there...  :dunno:

this is about a big a non-issue as I can think of...

maybe they kind of feel like fools because they ran an article on him in October that probably drove business his way and with just a little bit of checking they might have figured out what they were dealing with...

not that I think they need to do background checks on everyone that they do a story on - but maybe it is a tad embarrasing for them at this point...

but if they want to get into a legal battle over this they are more than welcome...

what a preposterous waste of time on their part...  :dunce:  :dunce:

Posted by Replicant on Feb. 01 2006,1:18 pm
In reading between the lines and connecting a couple dots, here is what I've gathered...

Magic Mark got a phone call from someone saying they want to write a story for the Tribune (evidently not saying they worked for the Tribune).

Magic calls the Tribune office asking what's up.

Tribune is now trying to find out who made the call to Magic, apparently has fruitlessly contacted the Forum for info.

Allegedly the phone call to Magic was done with a obfuscated Caller ID.

My observations:

The call to Magic didn't constituted harrassment (it was one call placed to a phone number published on Magic's website).  Further, the website URL was published in a newspaper article last October by virtue of including Magic's e-mail address.  This article was done with Magic's knowledge and cooperation.

Evidently the caller did not claim to be a reporter employed by the Tribune.  Even if he/she did, I don't know of any law saying that's illegal, as there is with say, a government official or law enforcement officer.  Maybe it's not playing by the "rules", but I suspect many investigative reporters, PI's, bill collectors, bounty hunters, and others use this very same tactic to gain information.

As to the Caller ID obfuscation, it's unclear if that's illegal.  Regardless, since a caller has the option to turn off identification, and many calls show up as "unavailable" etc., you're forced to realize that Caller ID does not give you good information 100% of the time.

Posted by preemptiveprevention on Feb. 01 2006,7:52 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 01 2006,11:13am)
I am positive that newspapers print articles that are submitted to them from non-reporters...

my mother-in-law has submitted several articles that have been printed by a newspaper and she has encouraged me to do the same...

the AL Tribune - if they are upset - I must ask why...  :dunno:

this is a story that needs to be told...

I mean Mark the Magician and another sex offender moved here from Iowa and live at the same address on Garfield...

I believe that I used to hear somewhere that felons were not to associate with other felons - how about when both felons have the same type of criminal history...

that's a story begging to be written...

You haven't considered my idea of turning it into a reality show on television?

or maybe a documentary?

instead of calling it Fahrenheit 9/11 you could call it.....

"Hypnosis 911"
:thumbsup:

Posted by steph on Feb. 02 2006,10:09 am
http://www.albertleatribune.com/articles/2005/02/15/news/news3.txt

Heard from a friend that this guy was to go to court today.  I wonder if anyone will cover this story

Posted by preemptiveprevention on Feb. 02 2006,1:13 pm
Quote (steph @ Feb. 02 2006,10:09am)
http://www.albertleatribune.com/articles/2005/02/15/news/news3.txt

Heard from a friend that this guy was to go to court today.  I wonder if anyone will cover this story

"three detectives with the ALPD obtained a search warrant on Benish's residence, at 309 E. Hawthorne St., for evidence of child pornography."

How close is that to the school?

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 02 2006,2:30 pm
It is a few blocks away however there is a day care just a few houses up at the corner of Marie and Hawthorne


Posted by preemptiveprevention on Feb. 02 2006,8:11 pm
Quote (steph @ Feb. 02 2006,10:09am)
http://www.albertleatribune.com/articles/2005/02/15/news/news3.txt

Heard from a friend that this guy was to go to court today.  I wonder if anyone will cover this story

If this guy is really going to court today I bet he wishes he went to court on it a couple of months ago. I bet with all the talk in the community (Albert Lea Tribune,Channel 6 news, and www.albertlea.com) this person that had child porn will get a tough sentence!!

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 02 2006,9:49 pm
I would call him and see what he has to say for himself - but maybe the AL Tribune would like to take a crack at some investigative journalism...  :p
Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 02 2006,9:55 pm
besides - if I called him George would feel even more sorry for him than he did for Mark the Magician...

what a fuggin' idiot... :p

Posted by Botto 82 on Feb. 02 2006,11:03 pm
Winner of the forum's coveted Most Superbowls Watched Drunk award...


Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 03 2006,3:58 am
Quote (Botto 82 @ Feb. 02 2006,11:03pm)
Winner of the forum's coveted Most Superbowls Watched Drunk award...


So how is quitting smoking working please tell us. I just got done working what about you?



Posted by steph on Feb. 03 2006,9:20 am
Haven't heard anymore.  I thought that maybe the Tribune or KAAL would have covered the story with all thats going on.
Posted by Replicant on Feb. 03 2006,10:50 am
Quote (steph @ Feb. 03 2006,9:20am)
Haven't heard anymore.  I thought that maybe the Tribune or KAAL would have covered the story with all thats going on.

< Benish given four years to stay clean, submit to probation conditions >
I'm sure KAAL will read the Tribune and decide to cover it too.

Posted by Botto 82 on Feb. 03 2006,10:59 am
Quote (Replicant @ Feb. 03 2006,10:50am)
I'm sure KAAL will read the Tribune and decide to cover it too.

Sit-on-your-ass-and-wait-for-the-story journalism?   :rofl:
Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 03 2006,11:43 am
Quote
The Tribune was unable to contact Benish for comment for this article.


Like they really tried very hard...  :p

if you want to contact the neighborhood pervert in AL how hard would that be...  :dunno:

Posted by Replicant on Feb. 03 2006,12:04 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 03 2006,11:43am)
Quote
The Tribune was unable to contact Benish for comment for this article.


Like they really tried very hard...

if you want to contact the neighborhood pervert in AL how hard would that be...

Are neighborhood perverts very willing to talk anywhere?  

I'm impressed the attempt was made, not surprised the offender didn't want to talk.

Posted by preemptiveprevention on Feb. 03 2006,4:08 pm
Quote (Replicant @ Feb. 03 2006,12:04pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 03 2006,11:43am)
Quote
The Tribune was unable to contact Benish for comment for this article.


Like they really tried very hard...

if you want to contact the neighborhood pervert in AL how hard would that be...

Are neighborhood perverts very willing to talk anywhere?  

I'm impressed the attempt was made, not surprised the offender didn't want to talk.

Instead contacting the perverts and sex offenders in the community, people in the community should be contacting people that have the power to pass laws regarding these kind of people.

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 04 2006,11:51 am
Quote (Replicant @ Feb. 03 2006,12:04pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 03 2006,11:43am)
Quote
The Tribune was unable to contact Benish for comment for this article.


Like they really tried very hard...

if you want to contact the neighborhood pervert in AL how hard would that be...

Are neighborhood perverts very willing to talk anywhere?  

I'm impressed the attempt was made, not surprised the offender didn't want to talk.

It would seem like it wouldn't be all that difficult to make contact with the guy - if he said he didn't want to comment for the article - then they should report it that way...

but they simply stated that they were unable to contact him for comment - that was my point...

stake out his house for a couple of hours or try a little harder - these are important topics - more important than the run of the mill articles that the Tribune churns out on a daily basis...

I want to know what is going on in the heads of these people who are messing with the youth like this...

it's really unbelievable...

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 04 2006,1:26 pm
When I found this in my mail this morning I first thought, Repo. However you would have just called. Now I think about it, I suspect bob :dunce:

< Letter I recieved >

Quote
bob





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: Jan. 2006  Posted: Jan. 31 2006,2:47pm    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i wouldnt go threating people that you have no clue on who they are or what they are capable of dumb ass

--------------
if you dont like what i have to say then cry me a river build a bridge and get the hell over it

censorship sucks  

Posted by Replicant on Feb. 04 2006,4:53 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 04 2006,11:51am)
It would seem like it wouldn't be all that difficult to make contact with the guy - if he said he didn't want to comment for the article - then they should report it that way...

but they simply stated that they were unable to contact him for comment - that was my point...

stake out his house for a couple of hours or try a little harder

OK, point taken, they didn't even get to the point where he said "no comment."  I don't know how the attempt was made, I doubt they have the resources time-wise to let someone sit outside the house until he shows up.  My guess/assumption is that they tried calling, and either he wasn't home, or he was home and didn't answer.  To someone in that situation, I imagine Caller ID is a necessity to avoid harassment, which is ironic, but brings up the point that harassing these folks is illegal.  Point being, if they called and it said "Albert Lea Tribune", and I had just been in court, you can bet they wouldn't be trying to sell a subscription.

Maybe they went and knocked on his door.  Again, maybe he just didn't answer.  Who knows.  At least they made an attempt.  That's my point.

I agree it would be interesting to see what's happening in their head.  Occasionally they have done stories on reformed drug addicts or spouse-beaters where the person's identity is withheld, if that person was local.  But given the nature of the offense, I doubt we're going to see many sex offenders openly talk.

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 04 2006,11:36 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 04 2006,1:26pm)
When I found this in my mail this morning I first thought, Repo. However you would have just called. Now I think about it, I suspect bob :dunce:

< Letter I recieved >

Quote
bob





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: Jan. 2006  Posted: Jan. 31 2006,2:47pm    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i wouldnt go threating people that you have no clue on who they are or what they are capable of dumb ass

--------------
if you dont like what i have to say then cry me a river build a bridge and get the hell over it

censorship sucks  

what difference does it make who you suspect...

turn it over to who ever you turn over your stuff to...

I suspect that you did it up yourself - or one of your ex's sent it to you for not paying child support for so many years...  :p

if Homeland Security was interested in me posting a picture of you in a racoon costume taking your dog from behind I can't imagine what they will do with that letter...

Posted by Botto 82 on Feb. 05 2006,12:21 am
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 04 2006,11:36pm)
what difference does it make who you suspect...

turn it over to who ever you turn over your stuff to...


Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,4:54 am
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 04 2006,11:36pm)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 04 2006,1:26pm)
When I found this in my mail this morning I first thought, Repo. However you would have just called. Now I think about it, I suspect bob :dunce:

< Letter I recieved >

Quote
bob





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: Jan. 2006  Posted: Jan. 31 2006,2:47pm    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i wouldnt go threating people that you have no clue on who they are or what they are capable of dumb ass

--------------
if you dont like what i have to say then cry me a river build a bridge and get the hell over it

censorship sucks  

what difference does it make who you suspect...

turn it over to who ever you turn over your stuff to...

I suspect that you did it up yourself - or one of your ex's sent it to you for not paying child support for so many years...  :p

if Homeland Security was interested in me posting a picture of you in a racoon costume taking your dog from behind I can't imagine what they will do with that letter...

sorry I am Current in my obligations, however to the author bring it on I am locked and loaded.
Posted by Ole1kanobe on Feb. 05 2006,10:37 am
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,4:54am)

sorry I am Current in my obligations, however to the author bring it on I am locked and loaded.

So to resolve this letter/note delivered to you you are calling the person out to a gun fight? On a public forum??
By posting that you have just gave up any legal rights and/or protection you may have had. Now if someone comes and shoots up your shop, people will see this (including authorities) and figure that you did it to yourself.
Ever think that someone may have sent it to you just to see what you would do about it on the forum? Just to get you all riled up.

Posted by TheTruth on Feb. 05 2006,10:59 am
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,4:54am)
however to the author bring it on I am locked and loaded.

Maybe by posting this on the forum he doesn't have to worry about getting sued by the next person that walks into the web room when he shoots them?

Maybe he could put a sign in his window also that says "Beware Locked and Loaded".

I can see the headline already:
GEOKARJO shoots customer after customer says "Hi, my name is Rob"
In his defense GEOKARJO's lawyer said GEOKARJO thought the customer said "Hi, my name is BOB".

Posted by Botto 82 on Feb. 05 2006,11:21 am
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,4:54am)
sorry I am Current in my obligations, however to the author bring it on I am locked and loaded.

Another brilliant maneuver...  :dunce:

The forum minus-mind strikes again...  :p

It's better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt...  :dunno:

What a 'tard...  :rofl:

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 05 2006,2:22 pm
I have a question...  :dunno:

what obligations is Geokoff representing that he is current in...  :dunno:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,2:43 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 04 2006,11:36pm)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 04 2006,1:26pm)
When I found this in my mail this morning I first thought, Repo. However you would have just called. Now I think about it, I suspect bob :dunce:

< Letter I recieved >

Quote
bob





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: Jan. 2006  Posted: Jan. 31 2006,2:47pm    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i wouldnt go threating people that you have no clue on who they are or what they are capable of dumb ass

--------------
if you dont like what i have to say then cry me a river build a bridge and get the hell over it

censorship sucks  

what difference does it make who you suspect...

turn it over to who ever you turn over your stuff to...

I suspect that you did it up yourself - or one of your ex's sent it to you for not paying child support for so many years...  :p

if Homeland Security was interested in me posting a picture of you in a racoon costume taking your dog from behind I can't imagine what they will do with that letter...

You commented this I replied I am current in my obligation. As far as locked and loaded doesn't necessarily mean I am sitting with a gun at hand. It is slang for ready to go. Whom ever sent the letter only be the one to worry. He stated I wouldn't know where or when or why, I am ready and will walk the streets of this town with awareness and courage I walked in the jungles of Vietnam where the threat to being harmed was real.

All I am saying is  The threat is a prank nothing will ever become of it.



Posted by bob on Feb. 05 2006,2:51 pm
FIRST OF ALL I DID NOT SEND THAT BUT THINK WHAT YOU WANT TO ASS MONKEY CUZ UNLIKE YOU I DO KNOW WHO I AM DEALING WITH AND THE THOUGHT OF YOU WALKING AROUND TOWN THINKING YOU'RE IN THE JUNGLE AGAIN JUST CRACKS ME UP  SO IF YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO BLAME PEOPLE FOR crap THEY HAVEN'T DONE THEN GO AHEAD BUT BE PREPARED TO SUFFER THE REPROCUSSIONS OF YOUR ACTIONS
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,2:59 pm
Quote (bob @ Feb. 05 2006,2:51pm)
FIRST OF ALL I DID NOT SEND THAT BUT THINK WHAT YOU WANT TO ASS MONKEY CUZ UNLIKE YOU I DO KNOW WHO I AM DEALING WITH AND THE THOUGHT OF YOU WALKING AROUND TOWN THINKING YOU'RE IN THE JUNGLE AGAIN JUST CRACKS ME UP  SO IF YOU WANT TO CONTINUE TO BLAME PEOPLE FOR crap THEY HAVEN'T DONE THEN GO AHEAD BUT BE PREPARED TO SUFFER THE REPROCUSSIONS OF YOUR ACTIONS

Oh believe me I will not go on the offensive until I am attacked.
Posted by bob on Feb. 05 2006,3:02 pm
I THINK SOMEONE'S HITTING THE BOTTLE A LITTLE TO HARD TODAY
Posted by bob on Feb. 05 2006,3:07 pm
:frusty:  :finger:  :rofl:  :dunce:  :rofl: DUMB ASS
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,3:25 pm
You know last night I was asked by a constant reader of the forum if I even drank. They stated every time I had been in the bars all they saw me drinking was water. I said yes I will have a drink but I only drink a couple of drinks and it is usually at the end of the evening just before the bar closes. I still have to clean the bar and stock it. I get home around 3:30 am take a shower and usually up till 4 am having a snack and reading the forum before I catch 5 hours sleep and open the store to do the same long day over again.

Why do I work the long hours I do?

If you want something in life you have to work for it.

If you want to keep the things in life you have you have to work at it.

Sorry I am actually taking a break from doing a little household repairs. I don't drink at home especially when there are young ones around. I don't portrait to my children and grandchildren that being drunk is an acceptable lifestyle.

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 05 2006,4:51 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 05 2006,3:25pm)
You know last night I was asked by a constant reader of the forum if I even drank.

if that question was put to you by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that you drink...  :rofl:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,6:18 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 05 2006,4:51pm)
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,3:25pm)
You know last night I was asked by a constant reader of the forum if I even drank.

if that question was put to you by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that you drink...  :rofl:

You don't know the real me as much as you think you do.

You could as others on the forum know the real me.

The only ones taking pot shots are the ones who could never know the real me cause I would never let you get that acquainted.

The way you write is an indication as to your personalities I wouldn't associate with you anyway.



Posted by TheTruth on Feb. 05 2006,8:40 pm
I know this is going to sound very elementary,
but I would really like to hear.......
Which one started it?
:dunno: REPOMAN  :dunno: or  :dunno: GEOKARJO :dunno:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,8:44 pm
It is like this what came first the chicken or the egg.
Posted by TheTruth on Feb. 05 2006,8:55 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,8:44pm)
It is like this what came first the chicken or the egg.

So which one of you is the chicken and which one is the egg?

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 05 2006,9:03 pm
Quote (TheTruth @ Feb. 05 2006,8:55pm)
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,8:44pm)
It is like this what came first the chicken or the egg.

So which one of you is the chicken and which one is the egg?

It isn't worth thinking about is my point. I restrict all my forum activities to the forum and don't make any unwanted contact through any other means. I don't insult members family or accuse them of unfounded actions. It started due to mine and repos difference in opinion concerning freedom, property rights and the smoking ban. Repo argues through intimidation and harassment.



Posted by TheTruth on Feb. 05 2006,9:07 pm
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,9:03pm)
Quote (TheTruth @ Feb. 05 2006,8:55pm)
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 05 2006,8:44pm)
It is like this what came first the chicken or the egg.

So which one of you is the chicken and which one is the egg?

It isn't worth thinking about is my point. I restrict all my forum activities to the forum and don't make any unwanted contact through any other means. I don't insult members family or accuse them of unfounded actions. It started due to mine and repos difference in opinion concerning freedom, property rights and the smoking ban. Repo argues through intimidation and harassment.

Do you ever find that you have a better understanding of an issue when you hear an opposing viewpoint?
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 06 2006,1:11 am
As long as the opponent doesn't resort to slander,  harassment, and false witness, to prove a point yes I do
Posted by bob on Feb. 06 2006,2:27 pm
i think geo is the chicken
Posted by Botto 82 on Feb. 06 2006,2:46 pm
Here's Geo's definition of harassment:   :p

People pointing out his obvious foibles on the in-ter-net.  :dunce:

What a maroon...  :frusty:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 06 2006,2:55 pm
Quote (bob @ Feb. 06 2006,2:27pm)
i think geo is the chicken

< My High School I attended. and You think, You are insulting me >  :rofl:
Posted by Wareagle11B on Feb. 06 2006,3:06 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 05 2006,4:51pm)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 05 2006,3:25pm)
You know last night I was asked by a constant reader of the forum if I even drank.

if that question was put to you by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that you drink...  :rofl:

'Scuse me Repo but I happened to be the person who asked and in all the times I see George I have never ONCE seen him with more than a glass of water or a soda in his hand. I found out that yes he does drink but big deal. I asked him because of all the references made on here to his drinking and I was curious if there was any basis to it. I stated it once before and I shall do so again now......What a person does on their own time is of no concern to anybody but them so if George drinks hey that's his business.
Posted by bob on Feb. 06 2006,3:21 pm
you think that just cause your old high school has a website that you can't be insulted is that what your trying to say?                                   what exactly are you trying to say?      i don't speak moron
Posted by Wareagle11B on Feb. 06 2006,4:40 pm
Quote (bob @ Feb. 06 2006,3:21pm)
                                  what exactly are you trying to say?      i don't speak moron

But apparently you are quite fluent in Babylonian cause you speak like a BABBLING IDIOT (jkn)  :rofl:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 06 2006,4:46 pm
Quote
Roosters win District Title
The '05 Pleasant Hill Rooster Football squad won it's first District Title since 1988, last Friday by defeating Oak Grove 39-6. While displaying solid defense throughout, the Roosters offense broke out to score 32 points during a 16 minute stretch spanning the end of the 2nd Quarter to the beginning of the 4th. The District crown was clinched after first defeating Grain Valley then Oak Grove (both State ranked). The Roosters will face KC Southeast Friday before hosting Odessa next Wednesday in the opening round of the State playoffs.






Where I came from calling us chicken only made us tougher, Albert Lea Tigers football squad should take lessons from these guys Population of a town of 6000  District Champions losing state Title by one Game.

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 06 2006,5:32 pm
Quote (Wareagle11B @ Feb. 06 2006,3:06pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 05 2006,4:51pm)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 05 2006,3:25pm)
You know last night I was asked by a constant reader of the forum if I even drank.

if that question was put to you by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that you drink...  :rofl:

'Scuse me Repo but I happened to be the person who asked and in all the times I see George I have never ONCE seen him with more than a glass of water or a soda in his hand. I found out that yes he does drink but big deal. I asked him because of all the references made on here to his drinking and I was curious if there was any basis to it. I stated it once before and I shall do so again now......What a person does on their own time is of no concern to anybody but them so if George drinks hey that's his business.

since you hang with Geokoff I might need to slow this response down a notch...  :p

I said that if that question was put to him by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that he drinks - why bother to ask...  :dunno:

without even going into the older incident of the DWI and the time he got caught boxing his clown when he was drunk in his truck at Northtown - just consider how many times he has posted that he now has his alcoholism under control - and only drinks every so often (every night is what I hear)...  :rofl:

I mean - and I $hit you not - how much of a stiff do you have to be in order to think that it's appropriate to wring a bar rag out into your mouth...   :dunce:

and saying it was for a free drink is no excuse either - in fact in actuality it makes it even worse if anything...  :frusty:

what Geokoff does is his business - true - but he posts his business here on the forum and on other areas of the Web every day - it is a forum - we do comment...

and you have to be blind to not be able to recognize when he is PWI - Posting While Intoxicated...  :rofl:

so I'll comment on what I want to comment on and you can find some other way to kiss Geokoff's ass...  :finger:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 06 2006,6:17 pm
Did I or did I not predict Repos response correctly.  Man you are just too, predictable due to your repetitious post, could you at least come up with a new original insult that doesn't involve my loved ones or friends.   The bar rag joke is as about old as "You Might Be a Redneck" you need some new material, even the forum is changing the channel.

Your statement about the north side is false and slanderous and has been reported



Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 06 2006,11:35 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 06 2006,6:17pm)
Did I or did I not predict Repos response correctly.  Man you are just too, predictable due to your repetitious post, could you at least come up with a new original insult that doesn't involve my loved ones or friends.   The bar rag joke is as about old as "You Might Be a Redneck" you need some new material, even the forum is changing the channel.

Your statement about the north side is false and slanderous and has been reported

of course you knew approximately what my response would be...  :;):

I am nothing if not predictible...

you won't find me posting, mailing or calling in threats - I just tell the truth as I see it or believe it to be - and let the chips fall where they will...

and as for the bar rag "gag" being an old one - you'll have to pardon me as no self respecting drunk that I've ever been around would have done it...  :dunce:

but like the Warbeagle says - that's your business...  :rofl:

Posted by jimhanson on Feb. 07 2006,8:42 am
Quote
to think that it's appropriate to wring a bar rag out into your mouth...
On the lighter side.....(oops, not supposed to use the dot dot dot) :p

Just before he died, I took my Dad fishing on God's Lake.  We got caught in a thunderstorm--a bad one--didn't know if we would make it back.  We got back to the camp, thoroughly drenched.  He decided we needed some brandy to warm up--but when he went to get his bottle out of his duffel, he found the cap had come off.

I saw him laughing, and not knowing why, asked him what was so funny.  "It's a hell of a note", he said, "when a guy has to wring out his underwear, just to get a drink!" :laugh:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,10:18 am
Liberal Posted in Referee forum

Quote
Posted on Feb. 06 2006,9:39pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement is false and slanderous? Jesus, the guy has accused you of dressing up as a racoon and screwing a dog, what the hell would you call that?


I replied

Quote
It is time for a freaking change here I am tired of you idea of freedom of speech means he can accuse me of being a freaking
level one sex predator


So why even have a dirty word filter there is no agreement through referees only Chads pick and choose ok you want to agree that is OK to post slanderous crap. Your no better than the person posting it.



Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,10:35 am
oh, c'mon Georgie...

you said yourself you enjoy the flaming...

where's the love...

it's OK when you accuse me of terrorizing your family and baloney like threatening you - but if I make a statement that you disagree with all of a sudden you turn into a pain in Chad's ass...

c'mon man - bust out that racoon costume and catch yourself a new dog - have some fun you dumb goof...

suck on all the bar rags you want - it makes no difference to me - but don't get indignant when someone addresses it here on the forum...

as Jackie Gleason would say - you're a real riot Alice...  :rofl:

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,10:40 am
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 06 2006,6:17pm)
Did I or did I not predict Repos response correctly.  Man you are just too, predictable due to your repetitious post, could you at least come up with a new original insult that doesn't involve my loved ones or friends.   The bar rag joke is as about old as "You Might Be a Redneck" you need some new material, even the forum is changing the channel.

Your statement about the north side is false and slanderous and has been reported

this statement was originally posted by someone that had first hand knowledge - and I'm pretty sure you acknowledged at the time that it was a one time thing - although you weren't in your truck when it happened...  :dunno:

am I missing something...  :dunno:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,10:43 am
It is one thing to give someone chit it is another to accuse them of crimes they never committed. You are the only one that posted it, no one else you better be prepared to back it up (which you cannot) keep posting it and see what I do.


Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,10:44 am
by the way, George - after you PM'd me last - I tried to respond - but you still have me blocked...

if you are really willing to walk down Broadway in a Toga with a pacifier in your mouth PM me again so I know it isn't just another cheap trick...  :rofl:

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,10:45 am
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,10:43am)
It is one thing to give someone chit it is another to accuse them of crimes they never committed.

who did that...  :dunno:

you're the one that has gone to Homeland Security, the County Attorney, the City Attorney, the Sheriff and the PD accusing me of crimes I never committed...

I just sit here and marvel at your stamina...  :p

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,10:47 am
You did with your clown post bozo, you are the only clown I would ever box, right in the nose, mouth and eyes.


Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,10:52 am
Accuse you of crimes you never committed your calls coordinate with your post, your post are backed up in my computer I never accused you of anything you didn't do. I said you didn't write the letter, I don't even think bob did, I think it was a walmart employee for my links to the walmart law suits.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,10:54 am
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,10:44am)
by the way, George - after you PM'd me last - I tried to respond - but you still have me blocked...

if you are really willing to walk down Broadway in a Toga with a pacifier in your mouth PM me again so I know it isn't just another cheap trick...  :rofl:

Yea right
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,10:56 am
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,10:45am)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,10:43am)
It is one thing to give someone chit it is another to accuse them of crimes they never committed.

who did that...  :dunno:

you're the one that has gone to Homeland Security, the County Attorney, the City Attorney, the Sheriff and the PD accusing me of crimes I never committed...

I just sit here and marvel at your stamina...  :p

You accused me of reporting your post to the Tribune hell I didn't have to. At least I am man enough to post and let people know who I am, cause I have nothing to be ashamed of, and everything to be proud of.



Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,11:00 am
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,10:56am)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,10:45am)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,10:43am)
It is one thing to give someone chit it is another to accuse them of crimes they never committed.

who did that...  :dunno:

you're the one that has gone to Homeland Security, the County Attorney, the City Attorney, the Sheriff and the PD accusing me of crimes I never committed...

I just sit here and marvel at your stamina...  :p

You accused me of reporting your post to the Tribune hell I didn't have to. At least I am man enough to post and let people know who I am, cause I have nothing to be ashamed of, and everything to be proud of.

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,11:05 am
Hide behind your user name take no responsibility for your post, all you do is make the forum your own little playground


Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,11:13 am
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 07 2006,10:56am)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,10:45am)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,10:43am)
It is one thing to give someone chit it is another to accuse them of crimes they never committed.

who did that...  :dunno:

you're the one that has gone to Homeland Security, the County Attorney, the City Attorney, the Sheriff and the PD accusing me of crimes I never committed...

I just sit here and marvel at your stamina...  :p

You accused me of reporting your post to the Tribune hell I didn't have to. At least I am man enough to post and let people know who I am, cause I have nothing to be ashamed of, and everything to be proud of.

I didn't accuse you of reporting my post to the AL Tribune - I suspect you did - as you look for any crack you can find to cause a problem for me - but I did nothing wrong for the AL Tribune to get their underwear in a bundle...

I never hid from what I did - and what I did was very upfront and out in the open...

I no more harrassed that guy than the man on the moon - unless calling him once and asking him for his input for an article I was writing and I was intending on sending to the AL Tribune is harrassement...

Geokoff - you've falsely accused me of threatening you and your relatives - and your lady friend...

what a crock - don't you comprehend - even a little bit - what a laughing stock you've become...  :dunno:

I mean - when a guy sends you a post that you don't like you turn it into an issue that is so far blown out of proportion that one can no longer distinguish fact from fiction...

then you tell various posters that you are taking the posts from this site to the authorities to try to commence a legal case against me...

you even say you are going to contact - or already have contacted the Department of Homeland Security - and that is a major example of why you have become a laughing stock - the Forum Dunce as it were...  :dunce:

if it makes you feel any better - you do have some suporters - Warbeagle and your underwear...

as to the letter you received - if that came thru the US mail then contact the postal authorities - I'm sure they can help you out - I've never threatened you and I only hasseled you enough to get back at you for harrasing others...

I have to admit - it is fun giving you a cyber-ass kicking...  :rofl:

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,11:19 am
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,11:05am)
Hide behind your user name take no responsibility for your post, all you do is make the forum your own little playground

I take full responsibility for my posts...  :thumbsup:

let me ask you this - why is it so important to you to have my real name...  :dunno:

what would you do with it if you had it...  :dunno:

why would anyone in their right mind give their name to someone that in the past 9 months claims to have turned them into the police, the sheriff, the DA and evey other authority he can conjure up...  :dunno:

also - why would I give you my real name when you have threatened to physically assualt me numerous times...  :dunno:

mole boxer..  :rofl:

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,11:21 am
if it becomes mandatory for people to use real names on their posts then you will find that the posting on the forum would really trim down...
Posted by George's Mom on Feb. 07 2006,11:34 am
Dammit, George. Toughen up. Your still not too old to take out to the wood shed.
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,11:39 am
My Mom Died 5 years ago and you know it your material is rehashed vomit find something new.


Posted by George's Mom on Feb. 07 2006,11:41 am
That's no excuse for your bad behavior.
Posted by George's Mom on Feb. 07 2006,11:45 am
Remember your old Racoon halloween costume. The dog still has nightmares about that. You were such a troubled kid. :p


Posted by TheTruth on Feb. 07 2006,11:47 am
How does "George's Mom" feel about the sex offenders issues going on right now?
Posted by Botto 82 on Feb. 07 2006,11:53 am
Quote (GEOKARJO @ Feb. 07 2006,10:18am)
Quote
Posted on Feb. 06 2006,9:39pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement is false and slanderous? Jesus, the guy has accused you of dressing up as a racoon and screwing a dog, what the hell would you call that?

No, he parodied Geo dressing up as a raccoon. Big difference...
Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,12:23 pm
Quote (TheTruth @ Feb. 07 2006,11:47am)
How does "George's Mom" feel about the sex offenders issues going on right now?

Did you read

She died 5 years ago. She has no thoughts and no opinions or any views on any subject, she is ashes in an urn on my shelf.



Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,1:00 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,12:23pm)
Quote (TheTruth @ Feb. 07 2006,11:47am)
How does "George's Mom" feel about the sex offenders issues going on right now?

Did you read

She died 5 years ago. She has no thoughts and no opinions or any views on any subject, she is ashes in an urn on my shelf.

C'mon George...

quit throwing the sympathy frisbee will ya...

the poster's user name is "George's Mom" - that isn't to insinuate to anyone that it is really your mother...  :dunce:

if someone posts as "President Bush" would you assume that it was either really the President or someone that was making a serious attempt to make us believe it was the President...  :dunno:

the biggest problem with common sense is that it's not very common - and you are a fuggin' moron for pretending that some of these concepts are so tough to comprehend...  :dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:

there - I said it...  :finger:

Posted by Liberal on Feb. 07 2006,1:04 pm
Since Geo feels the need to post my remarks from the moderators forum, I'll post what I was responding to.

The whiner complained to the moderators that Repoman had made a false or slanderous statement saying Geo was caught in a compromising position in a parking lot.
Quote

Email address of sender: george@web-room.net

Reported on: Feb. 06 2006,6:43pm

Message:
and the time he got caught boxing his clown when he was drunk in his truck at Northtown

Statement is false and slanderous


My response was
Quote

Statement is false and slanderous? Jesus, the guy has accused you of dressing up as a raccoon and screwing a dog, what the hell would you call that? :dunno:


I wasn't defending anyone or picking a side by my post. I was just pointing out that it looks rather odd that Geo wouldn't want other posts removed where false statements were made, but this last one for some reason was over the line? :dunno:

As far as the dirty word filter goes there were no words that the filter would have caught in his post. And about Geo talking tough to everyone, I hope people realize that he's about 5' 4" and not exactly the picture of health, so he's really no threat to anyone except maybe your family dog.

Posted by GEOKARJO on Feb. 07 2006,1:14 pm
If I am 5' 4" you are 5' 3" and I believe I am just as healthy as you.  :notworthy: Who would believe the raccoon story? So your saying I can say anything I want and accuse you or anyone of illegal preditory behavior and it  is alright by you.


Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,1:25 pm
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 07 2006,1:14pm)
If I am 5' 4" you are 5' 3" and I believe I am just as healthy as you.  :notworthy: Who would believe the raccoon story? So your saying I can say anything I want and accuse you or anyone of illegal preditory behavior and it  is alright by you.

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

you can't make this stuff up (as the common man would say)...

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

Posted by Wareagle11B on Feb. 07 2006,2:40 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 06 2006,5:32pm)
Quote (Wareagle11B @ Feb. 06 2006,3:06pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 05 2006,4:51pm)
Quote (GEOKOFF @ Feb. 05 2006,3:25pm)
You know last night I was asked by a constant reader of the forum if I even drank.

if that question was put to you by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that you drink...  :rofl:

'Scuse me Repo but I happened to be the person who asked and in all the times I see George I have never ONCE seen him with more than a glass of water or a soda in his hand. I found out that yes he does drink but big deal. I asked him because of all the references made on here to his drinking and I was curious if there was any basis to it. I stated it once before and I shall do so again now......What a person does on their own time is of no concern to anybody but them so if George drinks hey that's his business.

since you hang with Geokoff I might need to slow this response down a notch...  :p

I said that if that question was put to him by a constant reader of the forum then I would think they would already know that he drinks - why bother to ask...  :dunno:

without even going into the older incident of the DWI and the time he got caught boxing his clown when he was drunk in his truck at Northtown - just consider how many times he has posted that he now has his alcoholism under control - and only drinks every so often (every night is what I hear)...  :rofl:

I mean - and I $hit you not - how much of a stiff do you have to be in order to think that it's appropriate to wring a bar rag out into your mouth...   :dunce:

and saying it was for a free drink is no excuse either - in fact in actuality it makes it even worse if anything...  :frusty:

what Geokoff does is his business - true - but he posts his business here on the forum and on other areas of the Web every day - it is a forum - we do comment...

and you have to be blind to not be able to recognize when he is PWI - Posting While Intoxicated...  :rofl:

so I'll comment on what I want to comment on and you can find some other way to kiss Geokoff's ass...  :finger:

Well for starters I don't "HANG" with George nor do I kiss his ass. I happen to go to the same bar (Eddies) he does on occasion and I happen to play on one of Eddies Dart League teams as well. Perhaps you should go back to some of my earlier posts where I stated that you AND George needed to take your flame "war" to another room. Perhaps one you or he made for that particular purpose.  I posted what I did because, as I said, I have NEVER seen George with anything other than a NON alcoholic drink in his hand. As for his PWI's he isn't the only one who posts quite early/late for that matter and if he is doing a PWI I am sure he is not the first nor will he be the last. Heck look at 3T. I bet he posts while he is stoned quite frequently.  :rofl:  I never said you couldn't post what you wished either Repo. I simply wished to point out that the person who asked was me and nothing more. Take your issue to someone else.  :finger:

Posted by Wareagle11B on Feb. 07 2006,3:03 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,11:13am)
if it makes you feel any better - you do have some suporters - Warbeagle and your underwear...

Uh Repo before you enjoy your next round of FILET OF SOLE, in other words sticking your foot in your mouth, keep me out of your little games with George. I don't support him in anyway and I think he is old enough to decide on what he is getting into. I have stated before that he does tend to make an issue of things that are, for the most part, miniscule. Keep me out of your games with George Repo and perhaps learn to go back and read my other posts where he, and you, are concerned.  :finger:

Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,3:25 pm
so much wind for so little results...

you and your girlfriend hang with George and his girlfriend - so that in and of itself renders you guilty of poor judgement...

because as the saying goes "birds of a feather..."

another saying that is fitting here is "you're judged by the company you keep"...

if you hang with a dunce, play darts with a dunce, well let's just say if you walk with a dunce and quack like a dunce then...  :dunce:  :dunce:

in the meantime - if you truly want to get elected to anything higher than journeyman window washer - you should disassociate yourself with the riff-raff - marry your girlfriend instead of shacking up with her - and get serious about the issues of the day...

for crissakes the people of Albert Lea are not going to take you seriously for elective office with your resume - period period period

Posted by Wareagle11B on Feb. 07 2006,3:48 pm
Ahhhh to be so small minded and so ignorant as well as arrogant. Do me a favor Repo and contain your "flame" war to George. As for my resume', as you call it, my knowledge of the issues of today are quite extensive and just a touch more informed than most of the average people. You don't live here in AL so I don't expect you to have the faintest clue as to who I am or what I could bring to the political table so to speak. All you know is what I told you but then I also told you that to know me you would have to sit down and talk to me. That invite is still open Repo and no it won't involve anyone but you and me unless you wish to invite someone else. Perhaps instead of sitting here on the forum you should get motivated to come down here and actually get to know some of us personally. I think we would both be surprised at what the other person brings to the table. As for me and my FIANCE' what you don't know is best left alone and that is a bit of advice you may wish to heed. My fiance' is friends with George's G/F yes and I am as well but then you'd be surprised at who we call our friends. If I am, as you say, judged by the company I keep then I would say that I am in pretty good company because Geo and his G/F are not the only friends I have. Oh yeah and one more thing for ya Repo, I never said I played on the same team as Geo only that I played for the same bar. As for being elected to a political position Repo, at least I have the initiative to get out and try even though it may not happen this year because neither my Councilman nor my Commish is up. What have you done to make a difference Repo? If you have sent that article in to the Tribune then that is a step in the right direction and I commend you for it.
Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,3:53 pm
OK...

as far as I am concerned - of the people that have indicated that they are willing to run for office - Chad Hayson for Mayor is someone that I could see getting bi-partisan support...

Posted by Wareagle11B on Feb. 07 2006,4:10 pm
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,3:53pm)
OK...

as far as I am concerned - of the people that have indicated that they are willing to run for office - Chad Hayson for Mayor is someone that I could see getting bi-opartisan support...

You'll get no argument from me on this issue Repo. Despite our differing viewpoints politically I honestly believe Chad would be the best person for Mayor. I intend to support him all I can should he decide to make it official which I hope he does.
Posted by Scurvy Dog on Feb. 07 2006,4:14 pm
Quote (Wareagle11B @ Feb. 07 2006,4:10pm)
Quote (REPOMAN @ Feb. 07 2006,3:53pm)
OK...

as far as I am concerned - of the people that have indicated that they are willing to run for office - Chad Hayson for Mayor is someone that I could see getting bi-opartisan support...

You'll get no argument from me on this issue Repo. Despite our differing viewpoints politically I honestly believe Chad would be the best person for Mayor. I intend to support him all I can should he decide to make it official which I hope he does.

I also would vote for Chad, though I am a conservative. In fact, I wrote him in for mayor for the 2004 election, because I was unwilling to vote for either candidate on the ballot.
Posted by REPOMAN on Feb. 07 2006,11:18 pm
there you go Chad - two Republicans going your way...  :thumbsup:
Posted by preemptiveprevention on Feb. 08 2006,11:13 am
If Chad Hayson were to run for mayor, how would Chad Hayson feel about a city ordinance giving Albert Lea the ability to have better community notification in regards to the Pedophile Sex Offenders living in Albert Lea? :dunno:
Powered by Ikonboard 3.1.5 © 2006 Ikonboard