Topic: Ray Rice
started by: Self-Banished
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2014,9:22 am
I can't quite decide what's worse, some POS like this that cold cocks his wife(probably a pretty safe bet to say this isn't the first time) or the dumbass woman that stays with him and defends him. 
< http://abcnews.go.com/Sports...5371986 >
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 09 2014,10:17 am
Or the legal system that didn't throw his ssa in jail.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2014,10:44 am
Oops, correction, he cold cocked his girlfriend then she married him! 
Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 09 2014,2:27 pm
Often times, people with low-self-esteem would rather stay in an abusive relationship than consider being alone. It's sad, but it happens. A lot.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2014,3:10 pm
(Botto 82 @ Sep. 09 2014,2:27 pm)
QUOTE
Often times, people with low-self-esteem would rather stay in an abusive relationship than consider being alone. It's sad, but it happens. A lot.
I hear what you're saying and I've seen it happen but I just don't understand it.
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 09 2014,10:52 pm
Low self-esteem my arse. It's about the Benjamin's and the lifestyle that comes with it.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 10 2014,4:22 am
Sounds like the "Benny's" are stopping, the Canadian league won't even have anything to do with him.
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 10 2014,10:58 am
Wonder how much she'll get for the ring at the pawn shop?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 10 2014,1:23 pm
(MADDOG @ Sep. 10 2014,10:58 am)
QUOTE
Wonder how much she'll get for the ring at the pawn shop?
My God you're racist
Did you watch a lot of 1940's Bugs Bunny?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 12 2014,5:04 pm
< http://abcnews.go.com/Sports...5469738 >Please no.
Posted by Liberal on Sep. 13 2014,12:26 am
What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2014,5:36 am
(Liberal @ Sep. 13 2014,12:26 am)
QUOTE
What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Sadly that went away a long time ago. To get a not guilty verdict takes money.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2014,10:35 am
(Liberal @ Sep. 13 2014,12:26 am)
QUOTE
What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Yep, we'd hate to convict him without any proof
Posted by Liberal on Sep. 13 2014,12:42 pm
I forgot, it's innocent until proven guilty, or until TMZ sensationalizes it.I doubt they'll get a jury in Texas that will agree that whoopin your kid with a switch is child abuse considering they still have corporal punishment in their schools.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2014,7:09 am
A "whoopin" doesn't leave open wounds.
Posted by Liberal on Sep. 14 2014,11:35 am
Not in Minnesota, but Texas is crazy. How do you convict a guy for using a switch on a kid when the school can use a board on them? < http://www.corpun.com/12archive/uss01205.htm#24010 >
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2014,4:04 pm
^^^ever heard of being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Posted by Liberal on Sep. 14 2014,5:21 pm
Actually he was in the right place to hit your kid with a switch, Minnesota is a little more hard nosed about that kind of thing.According to this website < http://kidjacked.com/legal/spanking_law.asp >
Minnesota the law is
Parent/legal guardian/caretaker who intentionally uses unreasonable force or cruel discipline that is excessive under the circumstances is guilty of malicious punishment.
§ 609.377. [Criminal Code] Parent/legal guardian/teacher/caretaker of child or pupil can use reasonable force to restrain or correct a child or pupil.
§ 609.379. [Criminal Code]
Texas law.
Abuse does not include reasonable discipline by a parent/guardian/managing or possessory conservator if child not exposed to substantial risk of harm. Family Code § 261.001. [Civil Code] Parent/stepparent/person standing in loco parentis to child is justified to use non-deadly force against a child under 18 when and to degree the actor reasonably believes necessary to discipline, or safeguard or promote child's welfare. Penal § 9.61. [Criminal]
I think he's more likely to find sympathetic jurors in Texas. I think if he did this in Minnesota he'd have a hard time finding anyone that crazy.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2014,7:11 pm
(Liberal @ Sep. 14 2014,5:21 pm)
QUOTE
Texas law.
Abuse does not include reasonable discipline by a parent/guardian/managing or possessory conservator if child not exposed to substantial risk of harm. Family Code § 261.001. [Civil Code] Parent/stepparent/person standing in loco parentis to child is justified to use non-deadly force against a child under 18 when and to degree the actor reasonably believes necessary to discipline, or safeguard or promote child's welfare. Penal § 9.61. [Criminal]
Abuse does not include reasonable discipline by a parent/guardian/managing or possessory conservator if child not exposed to substantial risk of harm. Family Code § 261.001. [Civil Code] Parent/stepparent/person standing in loco parentis to child is justified to use non-deadly force against a child under 18 when and to degree the actor reasonably believes necessary to discipline, or safeguard or promote child's welfare. Penal § 9.61. [Criminal]
So waterboarding's legal in Texas???
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 16 2014,9:58 pm
I know of parents that never laid a hand on their kids while at the same time abused their kids minds beyond repair..Physical wounds last until they heal, mental wounds last a lifetime..
I'm not trying to describe Maddog and CC or SB and pepi when it comes to how they were raised..
I do mean it when it comes to Jim Hanson..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2014,5:23 am
The Queens do the right thing,< http://abcnews.go.com/Sports...5557213 >