Topic: Top 10 Unhinged Liberal Attacks
started by: the breeze
Posted by the breeze on Aug. 06 2011,3:12 pm
Comments Top 10 Unhinged Liberal Attacksby Human Events
< http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45333 >
08/06/2011
With the debt-ceiling madhouse resolved (at least for the time being), it would be instructive to look back and see how the so-called “adults” in the Democratic Party and their media sycophants acted during the deliberations. Here are the Top 10 Unhinged Liberal Attacks during the debt talks.
1. Saving life on the planet: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi may have made her all-time silliest statement when she tried explaining what was at stake in the debt battle: “What we're trying to do is save the world from the Republican budget. We're trying to save life on this planet as we know it today.”
2. Satan sandwich: Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D.-Mo.) took to Twitter to denounce the final deal: “This deal is a sugar-coated Satan sandwich. If you lift the bun, you will not like what you see.”
3. End of democracy: New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, the Left’s chief cheerleader for massive deficits, had this to say: “What Republicans have just gotten away with calls our whole system of government into question. After all, how can American democracy work if whichever party is most prepared to be ruthless, to threaten the nation’s economic security, gets to dictate policy? And the answer is, maybe it can’t.”
4. Eat your peas: President Obama, before storming off from the debt talks like a petulant child, pretended like he was the adult in the room by scolding the opposition: “It's not going to get easier, it's going to get harder. So we might as well do it now, pull off the Band-Aid, eat our peas."
5. Taliban Tea Party: Martin Frost, former chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, compared the Tea Party to the Taliban: “We now have a group of U.S. politicians seeking political purity, who seem to have much in common with the Taliban. They are Tea Party members, and because of blind adherence to smaller government, they seem intent on destroying what American political leaders have constructed in more than two centuries of hard, often painful, work. Like the Taliban, they see compromise as an unacceptable alternative.”
6. Extremists lock down Congress: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went wild after House Republicans passed the Boehner debt-ceiling bill: “No, no, no. We cannot be in this battle all the time. Right now the extremists have locked down this Congress. We’re doing nothing. The extremists have locked down the White House. They’re not able to do their work.”
7. Dictatorship to spark panic and chaos: Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, told Politico, “Aren’t we at the point where the closer we get to chaos, the more concern that there should be about coming to the table and compromising with Democrats? This is not leadership. This is almost like dictatorship. I know they want to force the outcome that … their extremists would like to impose. But they are getting ready to spark panic and chaos.”
8. Absolutists hold economy hostage: Sen. John Kerry told MSNBC: “The Chinese are looking at us right now and they are just gleeful and incredulous at the way in which one of the great competitors is imploding on itself, because a group of absolutists and extremists don't understand the implication of what they are doing, and are prepared to hold the entire economy hostage, and it is unprecedented of anything I have seen in all of the time I have been in public life, and I think it is damaging and dangerous and reckless and irresponsible."
9. Full-blown terrorists: Representing academia on this list is American University law professor Williams Yeomans, a former aide to Sen. Ted Kennedy, who made this reasoned discourse, writing in Politico: “It has become commonplace to call the Tea Party faction in the House ‘hostage takers.’ But they have now become full-blown terrorists. They have joined the villains of American history who have been sufficiently craven to inflict massive harm on innocent victims to achieve their political goals.”
10. Sabotage, gargoyles, adamantine nihilists: Few can match the pen of New York Times writer Maureen Dowd , but her screed against the Tea Party set a new high for rhetorical excess: “The maniacal Tea Party freshmen are trying to burn down the House they were elected to serve in. It turns out they wanted to come inside to get a blueprint of the historic building to sabotage it. Like gargoyles on the Capitol, the adamantine nihilists are determined to blow up the country’s prestige, their party and even their own reelection chances if that’s what it takes.”
Posted by Santorini on Aug. 06 2011,11:50 pm
Love it!!They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
So what do they do?
METAPHOR attack
(dont they have a clue how classless it makes em look! But they do not have any other weapons in their arsenal. What can be expected from the D ont E xpect M uch Service bunch 
Posted by Liberal on Aug. 07 2011,9:26 am
It seems that every time Santeria posts later in the evening she doesn't make any sense at all. Her posts read like something that's been put through an online translator. 
?
Posted by irisheyes on Aug. 07 2011,11:26 am
(Santorini @ Aug. 06 2011,11:50 pm)
QUOTE
Love it!!
They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
The dems aren't in charge of the House of Reps anymore, so you'll have to start asking yourself why they haven't come up with a balanced budget. They want to make cuts to Dept of Interior or Planned Parenthood, but they also promise to spend more on defense, which is more than half of the discretionary budget. Naturally the numbers aren't going to add up.
Numerous repubs said they'd balance the budget, and long after the election we're still waiting for specifics of how they're going to, "get right to it."
As for pork, that's a bipartisan thing. Both republicans and democrats love adding pork to legislation and it will continue to happen regardless of what promises they make.
Posted by the breeze on Aug. 07 2011,1:39 pm
(irisheyes @ Aug. 07 2011,11:26 am)
QUOTE
(Santorini @ Aug. 06 2011,11:50 pm)
QUOTE
Love it!!
They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
The dems aren't in charge of the House of Reps anymore, so you'll have to start asking yourself why they haven't come up with a balanced budget. They want to make cuts to Dept of Interior or Planned Parenthood, but they also promise to spend more on defense, which is more than half of the discretionary budget. Naturally the numbers aren't going to add up.
Numerous repubs said they'd balance the budget, and long after the election we're still waiting for specifics of how they're going to, "get right to it."
As for pork, that's a bipartisan thing. Both republicans and democrats love adding pork to legislation and it will continue to happen regardless of what promises they make.
Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for 4 more years < http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329449#ixzz1UGZCf84J >
Posted by irisheyes on Aug. 07 2011,4:41 pm
(the breeze @ Aug. 07 2011,1:39 pm)
QUOTE
Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for 4 more years < http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329449#ixzz1UGZCf84J >
Have you fact-checked this yet, or just WND and other websites of questionable integrity? I looked up the Communist Party USA website and didn't find anything endorsing Obama.
The right-wing websites were spreading the same type of stuff about John Kerry. < Snopes - John Kerry communist endorsement >
Posted by allergic to bogus on Aug. 07 2011,10:08 pm
Easy to spot a Dem, they always are full of venous name calling when they can't think of a solution or are intimidated by a strong female conservative...
Posted by the breeze on Aug. 08 2011,7:35 am
(irisheyes @ Aug. 07 2011,4:41 pm)
QUOTE
(the breeze @ Aug. 07 2011,1:39 pm)
QUOTE
Yikes! Look who just endorsed Obama for 4 more years < http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=329449#ixzz1UGZCf84J >
Have you fact-checked this yet, or just WND and other websites of questionable integrity? I looked up the Communist Party USA website and didn't find anything endorsing Obama.
The right-wing websites were spreading the same type of stuff about John Kerry. < Snopes - John Kerry communist endorsement >
< http://www.google.com/search?...GZAG_en >
Posted by Liberal on Aug. 08 2011,10:18 am
If someone writes something crazy, and google indexes the crazy writing, and Foxnation reports on the crazy writing, it doesn't change the fact that it's just a crazy person writing crazy stuff on a fake news website.I'd honestly believe something The Onion wrote before I'd believe anything from World Nut Daily was true.
Posted by the breeze on Aug. 08 2011,3:33 pm
(Liberal @ Aug. 08 2011,10:18 am)
QUOTE
If someone writes something crazy, and google indexes the crazy writing, and Foxnation reports on the crazy writing, it doesn't change the fact that it's just a crazy person writing crazy stuff on a fake news website.
I'd honestly believe something The Onion wrote before I'd believe anything from World Nut Daily was true.
I'd honestly believe something The Onion wrote before I'd believe anything from World Nut Daily was true.
" I'd honestly believe something The Onion wrote before I'd believe anything from World Nut Daily was true." at least you are honest.
Posted by This is my real name on Aug. 08 2011,3:47 pm
(Liberal @ Aug. 08 2011,10:18 am)
QUOTE
If someone writes something crazy, and google indexes the crazy writing, and Foxnation reports on the crazy writing, it doesn't change the fact that it's just a crazy person writing crazy stuff on a fake news website.
I'd honestly believe something The Onion wrote before I'd believe anything from World Nut Daily was true.
I'd honestly believe something The Onion wrote before I'd believe anything from World Nut Daily was true.
What's really scary is that there are people who actually believe that the articles in The Onion are true. A recent example was the Planned Parenthood Abortionplex story. Okay, it's actually more hilarious than scary - but scary that some people are that easily deceived and can't recognize satire.
A Chinese news service picked up their story about Washington D.C. demanding a new Capitol building, or they would move to another city. They later ran a retraction, with the statement to the effect that "apparently Americans sometimes think it's funny to write false news stories".
That said - World Net Daily recently lost even more credibility when their source in a "news story" was a quote lifted from a previous World Net Daily column. They quoted themselves and called it a source.
World Net Daily isn't news. It's a site designed to sell books and videos, peppered with articles referencing those books and videos.
Posted by Santorini on Aug. 09 2011,12:09 am
(allergic to bogus @ Aug. 07 2011,10:08 pm)
QUOTE
Easy to spot a Dem, they always are full of venous name calling when they can't think of a solution or are intimidated by a strong female conservative...
Posted by Liberal on Aug. 09 2011,12:12 am
Venous name calling?
Posted by Santorini on Aug. 10 2011,11:09 am
(Liberal @ Aug. 09 2011,12:12 am)
QUOTE
Venous name calling?
the dems new definition of the term terrorist comes to mind
Posted by Santorini on Aug. 10 2011,11:22 am
(irisheyes @ Aug. 07 2011,11:26 am)
QUOTE
(Santorini @ Aug. 06 2011,11:50 pm)
QUOTE
Love it!!
They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
They(dems) can not come up with a budget plan (because the word is foreign to them!), they just want to continue to spend, spend, spend, spend! They do not like having the checkbook reins tightened! (loss of control makes em look bad in front of their pork buddies!)
The dems aren't in charge of the House of Reps anymore, so you'll have to start asking yourself why they haven't come up with a balanced budget. They want to make cuts to Dept of Interior or Planned Parenthood, but they also promise to spend more on defense, which is more than half of the discretionary budget. Naturally the numbers aren't going to add up.
Numerous repubs said they'd balance the budget, and long after the election we're still waiting for specifics of how they're going to, "get right to it."
As for pork, that's a bipartisan thing. Both republicans and democrats love adding pork to legislation and it will continue to happen regardless of what promises they make.
You are right. Dems are NOT in charge of the house anymore! And the Rep. DID come up with a good solution to balance the budget but remember Reid?
The senate? The Rep. solution failed before it even reached the senate. You do not seriously think anything the house passes will get past Reid or Obama do you? Their hands are virtually tied. The rep-controlled house is held hostage by the dem-contolled senate and presidency!
They NEED to make cuts to programs like planned parenthood. Why spend federal dollars on duplicated programs? Planned parenthood is beginning to be a thing of the past!
Posted by Liberal on Aug. 10 2011,1:52 pm
What I was asking is what is "venous name calling", I know what venomous name calling is but for the life of me I can't figure out what "venous name calling" is. 
You're literally too stupid to insult.