Topic: Janet's halftime show
started by: Jesus Juice
Posted by Jesus Juice on Feb. 01 2004,11:52 pm
I don't know if it was all the Jesus juice I drank but I swear I saw Janet exposed at the end of her show at halftime.And I don't know if it is the Jesus juice talking right now but I sure liked what I saw.
-JJ
Posted by guest 300 on Feb. 02 2004,7:29 am
check it out:Janet Jackson www.drudgereport.com
Streaker www.thestreaker.org.uk
Posted by guest on Feb. 02 2004,10:14 am
SWEEEEETTT!!!!!
Posted by LisaMarie on Feb. 02 2004,10:22 am
How did I know you boys would be talking about that first thing this a.m.? 
Posted by minnow on Feb. 02 2004,10:24 am
What's the big deal? National Geographic has been showing black ladies tits for at least 45 years!
Posted by Manolo Ray on Feb. 02 2004,12:33 pm
And minnow's been wanking off to NG for 44!! 
Posted by snickers on Feb. 02 2004,2:38 pm
maybe Timberlake had too much jesus juice before he took the stage?
Posted by jimhanson on Feb. 02 2004,2:49 pm
From Worldnet Daily| Quote |
| The show included: Janet Jackson grabbing her breasts; Sean P. Diddy repeatedly fondling his crotch; striptease cheerleaders; gyrating transvestites; simulated lesbian sex; Jackson and Timberlake groping each other. |
It also featured Kid Rock with an American flag worn as a poncho.
From commentator Dave Williams
| Quote |
| So now we have Justin Timberlake, the "gay" member from N-sync, that couldn't "perform" for Britney Spears", "inadvertently" ripping off Janet Jackson's costume |
| Quote |
| "Inadvertently?" With lyrics like "I'm going to have you naked by the end of this song"? Why would she have a metal "decoration" in place? She was quoted last week as saying "something shocking" was going to happen? (MTV had it on its website and has since removed it, but it is cached on Google) |
| Quote |
| MTV produced the show. CBS said they were unaware of its content. CBS and MTV are sister companies--both owned by Viacom. |
These guys are fast on their feet when it comes to "spin". I can see an entirely new career for Gabe and several County Commissioners after November--they will be unemployed, and they can "spin" with the best of them.
Posted by BeBack on Feb. 02 2004,2:58 pm
Janet got the spot light off of Micheal for at least last night. I guess Micheal will have to buggery another little boy to get back in the press. What a screwed up family!
Posted by Jesus Juice on Feb. 02 2004,3:49 pm
| Quote (Guest @ Feb. 02 2004,2:58:pm) |
| What a screwed up family! |
They sure are.
Speaking of Michael, is there any doubt that my avatar is the absolute coolest you have ever seen?
-JJ
Posted by BeBack on Feb. 02 2004,4:01 pm
JJ, ya need some bondo. Do you remember the movie where the two babes sold their soles and were forced to live longer than their plastic reconstructive surgery was designed to last. Too bad Micheal didn't see it before he went too far.
Posted by Tiger on Feb. 02 2004,4:10 pm
I really don't see what the big deal is. So she flashed a boob, whooptydoo. I don't think wasting money on an investigation is going to help matters. In a week or so nobody will even be talking about it.
Posted by minnow on Feb. 02 2004,4:19 pm
She didn't even do that...she flashed a pasty. It's going to hard to prove, because when white will have to admit they've allowed black breasts..real breasts..no pasties in print for years. Are black breasts considered "dirty" now because we can finally view them as sexual objects instead of mere animals or something?
It's just right wingnuts...you know, the same people prosecuting this was on drugs and terrorism. Now it's war on black tits. These people always have to be at war with somebody. Like I've said..if it weren't for Bin Laden and Saddam they've be going after you and me!
Ain't dat right Jimbo?
Posted by guest on Feb. 02 2004,4:28 pm
| Quote |
Like millions of Americans, my family and I gathered around the television for a celebration Instead, that celebration was tainted by a classless, crass and deplorable stunt. Our nation's children, parents and citizens deserve better. I have instructed the commission to open an immediate investigation into last night's broadcast. Our investigation will be thorough and swift. FCC Chairman Michael Powell |
Does it sound like this guy is a little bent out of shape because his kids and parents saw a nearly naked breast?
Posted by jimhanson on Feb. 02 2004,4:42 pm
Minnow--Why do you ask me? Do I EVER ask for MORE regulation? I'm the guy that looks for LESS government intrusion. I'm the guy that thinks the government has TOO MUCH power. I'm the guy that defends Mal Prinzing. Doesn't make a bit of difference to me what's on TV--I rarely watch the broadcast channels--there isn't much there--"News" shows in the morning (that are anything but), the mindless drivel of "Hollywood celebrities" (famous only for being famous), soap opera's, "reality" TV (that's anything but), and the ever-popular show for the terminally vacuous--Wheel of Fortune.
If you want to watch crotch-grabbing, boob-flashing, lesbian transvestites, with a guy that wears an American flag as a shirt--go right ahead--(actually, I've been to skydiving parties where that was pretty much the norm!
)--but nobody should fall for the fabrication that it was "inadvertent" or that "we didn't know they were going to do that". As Clint Eastwood said, "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining!" On the other hand, anybody that would watch that for "entertainment" would probably be dumb enough to believe the "spin"--after all, SOMEBODY voted for the local County Commissioners!
(sarcasm) Back to the Telletubbies!
Posted by Torked on Feb. 02 2004,4:45 pm
| Quote (Tiger @ Feb. 02 2004,4:10:pm) |
| I really don't see what the big deal is. So she flashed a boob, whooptydoo. I don't think wasting money on an investigation is going to help matters. In a week or so nobody will even be talking about it. |
so Tigar, when my 6 year old asks me 'why did that boy rip her shirt off?' I'll just tell her whooptydoo, its no big deal.
Personally for myself, I could care less but it would be nice if you could watch the Super Bowl with your kids without seeing a couple of "role models" rip clothes off exposing a tit. And if you think it was an accident and a prop malfunction, keep dreaming!
Posted by minnow on Feb. 02 2004,4:46 pm
He's saying (FCC) what he knows Bush wants to hear, so he can keep and save is job. He hasn't got a breast to lean on thoughm because they used a pasty which makes it legal. Bad taste is still not illegal...yet...
"when my 6 year old asks me 'why did that boy rip her shirt off?' I'll just tell her whooptydoo, its no big deal."
----> Well you certainly don't sit there and try to explain the concept of adult sexuality you fool! It's not someone elses fault because cat got YOUR tongue...
Posted by Tiger on Feb. 02 2004,4:53 pm
Torked, I never said i thought it was an accident. Kids see big plastic clevage every day on the cover of magazines as they stand in line with you at the grocery store. Face it sex sells!!
Posted by BeBack on Feb. 02 2004,5:09 pm
Your right, a bare breasts are no big deal, why don't we all start showing them. That includes flabby old men, and grandmothers too. If ya got em, flaunt em We are living in a confusing time but this display wasn't needed anymore than the kiss Brit gave Madonna. I can't say it was entertaining. Now if they would have lit that sucker in the American Flag on fire, that would have been entertaining! I also liked the farting horse. Next year mabe he could be the half time show.
Posted by groundhog on Feb. 02 2004,5:40 pm
| Quote (Guest @ Feb. 02 2004,4:45:pm) | ||
so Tigar, when my 6 year old asks me 'why did that boy rip her shirt off?' I'll just tell her whooptydoo, its no big deal. Personally for myself, I could care less but it would be nice if you could watch the Super Bowl with your kids without seeing a couple of "role models" rip clothes off exposing a tit. And if you think it was an accident and a prop malfunction, keep dreaming! |
Tell the kid woman are sex objects, they are to be submissive to men at all times. When a man wants something from a woman, he takes it wether she likes it or not. Think about it, there would be no rape if women would just do what men tell them.
Posted by Time Tested. on Feb. 02 2004,8:31 pm
Stop with the inappropritate ghost names. "Jesus Juice" is unacceptable. That, in essence, is using the Lords name in vain. At least have a little respect for yourself and those that read the postings.
Posted by minnow on Feb. 02 2004,9:13 pm
This coming from a ghost name...LOL...that's rich.
Posted by BeBack on Feb. 02 2004,9:14 pm
The term "Jesus Juice" is a reference to the substance that Micheal would give his young victums before forcing himself on them. I don't know if it is what Micheal calls the drink or a name given it by those reporting the story but I have heard the term used on the news several times. I know that this doesn't make the term any more attractive.
Posted by Al Franken on Feb. 02 2004,10:01 pm
Minnow you should talk, you ghost!
Posted by minnow on Feb. 02 2004,10:09 pm
Red Wine is jesus blood...white wine is Jesus juice. I can't help but crack up when I hear it. The same people who want pot smokers in jail are the same ones drinking Jesus blood in church!
This country is so screwed up...
Posted by Jesus Juice on Feb. 02 2004,10:49 pm
thx for the support minnow, all I can say to this is that if Jesus drank it, it must be good.
Posted by LisaMarie on Feb. 03 2004,8:55 pm
Anyhoo, back on the subject, did you see CBS will be time-delaying the Grammys?
Posted by The Advocate on Feb. 03 2004,8:56 pm
Minnow is again letting his intelligence show.
Posted by minnow on Feb. 03 2004,9:53 pm
I always let my intelligence show...LOL... 