Topic: Arnold
started by: Spidey
Posted by Spidey on Sep. 06 2003,8:13 am
Is it just me, or does anyone else believe Arnold Schwartzneger would be better off not telling people that he lied in that magazine interview? Who really cares what he did when he was a youngster trying to get into the business. Did drugs ... had sex ... ooh aah ... that's really horrible! <sarcasm* It would be different if he molested little kids or killed someone, then yes, I would want to know this ... but PLEASE ... he would rather people believe he's a liar rather then that he was a normal young person.
Maybe I missed something ... ?
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 06 2003,8:23 am
Spidey, it's just politics as usual, any muck or skeleton's are always drug out. Do drugs and have s#x, yeh, I used to, but don't anymore. 
Posted by Tiger on Sep. 06 2003,9:04 am
Maddog, no sex either!!
Posted by Ole1kanobe on Sep. 06 2003,9:17 am
I would have to agree with MD on this one.I seem to remember someone taking this route before in an election (the come-clean honest act) trying to gain the vote of the common man (non business owner, just normal working Joe) by 'coming clean'. Difficult to really say if any of what he is saying is true though, he is trying to win an election after all.
Posted by Spidey on Sep. 06 2003,10:40 am
I guess my point was ... he would rather be known as a liar. I think lying is far worse, but that's just me.
Posted by Ole1kanobe on Sep. 06 2003,1:16 pm
True, especially when people have to trust him to do the right thing if elected.