Topic: First Lady
started by: hymiebravo
Posted by hymiebravo on Sep. 07 2016,10:08 pm
I just Googled William Jefferson Clinton and at the top of the search query was an Ad that said something about stopping crooked Hillary. But that's not the topic.
They say Nancy Reagan may have heavily influenced presidential decisions. You hear that same thing about Eleanor Roosevelt.
Do you think former President Clinton will be able to do as good a job as the spouse of the president as both of the aforementioned women?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 08 2016,4:29 am
I'm betting Billy's not liking the even more intense scrutiny he's getting since Chairman Cow started her campaign. If she were to win, he would probably be on an even shorter leash than he is now. Maybe we'll see the White House divorce. This of course if she should win which is starting to come into question.
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 08 2016,8:38 am
To be honest, I'd rather have XY Clinton than XX Clinton.
Posted by hymiebravo on Sep. 10 2016,10:30 am
It seems odd that nobody talks about it that much. Essentially you will get a 2 termr president, that people for the most seemed to like, again.
People yammer and complain about insider this and insider that. Yet whenever somebody wants something from the government who do they search out?
Do they search-out outsiders who have no idea how the systems works?
Doesn't that apply to just about anything to as well?
You always want experienced people with vast amounts of knowledge.
She has already been president in a way. Just backwards and in heels like Ginger Rogers hasn't she?
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 13 2016,4:25 pm
(hymiebravo @ Sep. 10 2016,10:30 am)
QUOTE
Do they search-out outsiders who have no idea how the systems works?
Sounds idiotic, but that's exactly what the current Republican party does. Seek out someone who knows nothing about the office or responsibilities they're running for, on the basis that they say how great they are.
Conservative politics is the only place someone brags about having no knowledge or experience for the job they're trying to get.
QUOTE
You always want experienced people with vast amounts of knowledge.
Ideally, yes.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2016,6:22 pm
^^ ideally yes?Of course, this is why Trump needs to be to be pres, not some stroke ridden, never held a real job in the private sector crook that runs a "charitable" organization so corrupt the Al Capone himself would have taken notes.
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 15 2016,8:21 am
(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2016,6:22 pm)
QUOTE
Of course, this is why Trump needs to be to be pres, not some stroke ridden, never held a real job in the private sector crook that runs a "charitable" organization so corrupt the Al Capone himself would have taken notes.
Once again, Trump is the only one who actually does things that are both unethical and blatantly illegal with his charity, he uses it to buy personal items and donating it to at least one PAC. But most of the media instead spends their time trashing a charity to help people with malaria and HIV because the Clinton's might have met a donor for coffee.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2016,9:03 am
^^ < http://www.lifezette.com/polizet...y-state >Poor guy better run and hide.
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 15 2016,9:19 am
Once again, meeting someone for coffee isn't illegal or unethical. The media focus on the Clinton foundation is especially bizarre considering Republicans are okay with Trump and Malania using donations that were earmarked for veterans and instead buying sports memorabilia and artwork.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2016,10:06 am
^^ who knows what Billy and hilly are buying. 