Forum: Current Events
Topic: Obama Smartest, Most Honest
started by: alcitizens

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 02 2012,1:40 am
Nearly half (48 percent) of those surveyed rated Obama's honesty as "excellent" or "good" on a five-point scale; a majority (68 percent) gave the same ratings to Obama on the intelligence factor; and 45 percent found Obama's philosophy of government to be excellent or good.
Romney had the second best scores overall, with (36 percent) finding his honesty above average, 57 percent saying the same for his intelligence, and 39 percent viewing his philosophy of government favorably.

Read more at < http://www.christianpost.com/news...R3uD.99 >

Honesty is the best Policy.. :thumbsup:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 02 2012,4:59 am
< www.obamalies/list-of-lies.net > :rockon:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 02 2012,5:01 am
< http://obamalies.net/list-of-lies >

Sorry :(

Posted by Santorini on Sep. 02 2012,8:26 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 02 2012,1:40 am)
QUOTE
Nearly half (48 percent) of those surveyed rated Obama's honesty as "excellent" or "good" on a five-point scale; a majority (68 percent) gave the same ratings to Obama on the intelligence factor; and 45 percent found Obama's philosophy of government to be excellent or good.
Romney had the second best scores overall, with (36 percent) finding his honesty above average, 57 percent saying the same for his intelligence, and 39 percent viewing his philosophy of government favorably.

Read more at < http://www.christianpost.com/news...R3uD.99 >

Honesty is the best Policy.. :thumbsup:

If he is so popular why would a Texas inmate get 40% of the vote to obamas 60% in the Texas primary??? or why would so many members of his party be refusing to endorse him AND refuse to attend the DNC??
Posted by Santorini on Sep. 02 2012,8:36 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 02 2012,1:40 am)
QUOTE
Nearly half (48 percent) of those surveyed rated Obama's honesty as "excellent" or "good" on a five-point scale; a majority (68 percent) gave the same ratings to Obama on the intelligence factor; and 45 percent found Obama's philosophy of government to be excellent or good.
Romney had the second best scores overall, with (36 percent) finding his honesty above average, 57 percent saying the same for his intelligence, and 39 percent viewing his philosophy of government favorably.

Read more at < http://www.christianpost.com/news...R3uD.99 >

Honesty is the best Policy.. :thumbsup:

this is from October 5, 2011...11 months ago??

quote:

Perry received the highest scores among Evangelicals, in fact Evangelicals rated Perry with scores that far outreaced the other 2 candidates on all 4 attributes.
Perry scored the highest on philosophy of government!!

Posted by grassman on Sep. 02 2012,9:03 am
Was Perry the inmate? :rofl:  :blush:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 02 2012,6:44 pm
"Obama Revealed: The Man, The President" airs Monday at 8 and 11 p.m. ET on CNN
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 02 2012,6:56 pm
N.Y. attorney general opens probe into private equity firms, including Bain

(CBS/AP) - The New York attorney general has opened an investigation into numerous private equity firms, including Bain Capital, according to an official familiar with the inquiry, CBS News has confirmed.

Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman is examining whether the firms used a tax strategy to avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes. The practice involved converting some fees collected for managing accounts into fund investments, resulting in a tax rate of 15 percent instead of 35 percent.

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-25...ng-bain >

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 03 2012,3:58 am
Romney?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 03 2012,5:35 am
^^^must be some real good Kool Aid you're drinking Alky^^^
:dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 03 2012,8:26 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 02 2012,6:44 pm)
QUOTE
"Obama Revealed: The Man, The President" airs Monday at 8 and 11 p.m. ET on CNN

My guess is that the Tea Party would have hated all these guys. But since the last one (Hoover) died about 43 years before the Tea Party movement even started I doubt most of them even know who those other guys even are.
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 03 2012,10:01 am
I would also guess that if any of the politicians from that timeframe, regardless of party, were alive today they would punch the two jokers who are running now square in the face.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 03 2012,5:52 pm
Bin Laden is Dead, GM is Alive.. Former President Bill Clinton isn't throwing any punches at President Obama for the job he's done..

President Clinton will speak at the National Convention on Wednesday..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 03 2012,7:26 pm
Of course Billy the perv's not saying anything bad, got to keep Hilary out of the house so he can play.

Quote: Bin Laden is Dead, GM is Alive..

Yep Bin Laden's dead, took a lot of guts to say"go ahead and kill him Mr. seal" :rofl:

And GM's alive, bailed out from bankruptcy by our government, not allowed to fair as any other business would, what would have happened to the unions?
Instead, GM and Chrysler were wrapped up with a great big bow and given to the unions"don't forget where you got your muffin buttered boys and don't forget to vote" :(

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 03 2012,7:36 pm
bin Laden pulled off 9/11...  :rofl:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 03 2012,11:20 pm
Does balanced budget and budget surplus ring a bell?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 04 2012,5:37 am
Oh what is it today? Oh yeah, 15.9 t-t-trillion in dept.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 04 2012,7:37 am
Bush Vice President Dick Cheney, said "Reagan Proved deficits don't matter" :dunce:

< http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2...printer >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 04 2012,8:18 am
Tell that to your grandchildren. :(
Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 04 2012,10:00 am
I see the flag burning old Bi$ch is speaking tonite. She wasnt proud to be american till she could burn the U.S FLAG.
:soapbox:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 04 2012,10:43 am

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 04 2012,10:00 am)
QUOTE
I see the flag burning old Bi$ch is speaking tonite. She wasnt proud to be american till she could burn the U.S FLAG.
:soapbox:

:rofl:  :crazy:
Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 04 2012,12:57 pm
SO sorry AL  Im not  a DEM A RAT or OR A REP A TARD
IM a hard working American that believes in the constation 100%

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 04 2012,3:57 pm
Damn Pep, do you actually think you're gonna get through that thick skull of his?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 04 2012,8:30 pm
So the question is "why are the Dems having their little party in Charlotte?" It's not a real union friendly town or state for that matter. :p
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 04 2012,9:26 pm
North Carolina is a swing state.. For those of you that don't know what a swing state is: It's a state that could go Republican or Democrat.. North Carolina has a Governor that is Democrat and Obama won in 2008.. The people chose to have a right to work state, not knowing they were voting for a low wage state..

Who isn't going to vote for the Right to Work?? Those that didn't know that it eliminates Rights..

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 04 2012,9:56 pm
No body else wanted them.  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 05 2012,4:10 am
Why yes, who'd want to live in a state that has tons of job opportunities? :sarcasm:  Why would someone vote for that??? :sarcasm:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 05 2012,4:57 am
Let's take a look at this one from good old CBS

< www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57400369-503544/nationa... >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 05 2012,5:06 am
So the question is asked again and again,

"Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?" :D

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 05 2012,8:38 am
NO! NO! NO! I had to get a job to make ends meet. And IM 68 yrs old
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 05 2012,9:23 am
^ retired? Why so young?
Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 05 2012,10:24 am
After 45 yrs of AFL-CIO union dues going to Trumpka for his million doller salary, and to the DEM- A RATRS I decided to retire at 62. Then came mr.OBIMBO the anoited one and after 2 1/2 yrs my 401k dropped in half . Acording to OBIMBO  its still BUSHES fault!!!!!
Posted by Santorini on Sep. 05 2012,10:39 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 03 2012,11:20 pm)
QUOTE
Does balanced budget and budget surplus ring a bell?

Yea...thanks to George H.!!!!
Posted by Santorini on Sep. 05 2012,11:07 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 04 2012,5:37 am)
QUOTE
Oh what is it today? Oh yeah, 15.9 t-t-trillion in dept.

and that doesnt even include obamacare!!
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 05 2012,11:30 am
Funny that alci ;posts a picture of the debt clock.  It seems to be absent from the DNC Convention.  

I wonder why?

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 05 2012,11:40 am
I noticed it was a picture Bush with the 15.9 trillion $$$$ I think it was the anoited one that put 6.3 trillion on that debt. It should be OBOMIOS face on there!!!!!
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 05 2012,12:09 pm
^ actually I heard 4.9 trillion,

But hey, what's a couple of trillion between friends? :(

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 05 2012,3:45 pm
$10 Trillion can be attributed to the George Bush policies, his complete economic collapse of 2008 and the Cleanup of his 8 Disastrous Years.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 05 2012,4:00 pm
Last of the big spenders.. :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 05 2012,4:45 pm
Oh my God(and I noticed the DNC is putting the name of GOD back in their platform) the blaming of Bush is really getting old and pathetic. :dunce:

I also heard the DNC is now acknowledging Israel in their platform too. :blush:

Is the DNC in bit of trouble???

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 05 2012,8:20 pm
The 1.4 trillon that has to be for the last 3 months. RIGHT :D
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 05 2012,8:37 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 05 2012,4:45 pm)
QUOTE
Oh my God(and I noticed the DNC is putting the name of GOD back in their platform) the blaming of Bush is really getting old and pathetic. :dunce:

I also heard the DNC is now acknowledging Israel in their platform too. :blush:

Is the DNC in bit of trouble???

It just goes to show Obama's lack of leadership.  He has lost control of his own party.

Nuff said...

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 05 2012,11:21 pm
How do you lead a pack of GOP snakes?

Republicans choose to hurt people today so they can be the one's to spend tomorrow.. Again..


Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 06 2012,12:51 am
Republicans piss it away faster than a prostitute on crack..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 06 2012,1:56 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 06 2012,12:51 am)
QUOTE
Republicans piss it away faster than a prostitute on crack..

Yeah, I know, I've seen you sister. :flame:
Posted by Santorini on Sep. 06 2012,9:29 am

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 05 2012,8:37 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 05 2012,4:45 pm)
QUOTE
Oh my God(and I noticed the DNC is putting the name of GOD back in their platform) the blaming of Bush is really getting old and pathetic. :dunce:

I also heard the DNC is now acknowledging Israel in their platform too. :blush:

Is the DNC in bit of trouble???

It just goes to show Obama's lack of leadership.  He has lost control of his own party.

Nuff said...

remember in 08 obamas speech mentioned God-Given right??...in contrast to the dnc video that gave mention to the dems new creed...the government is the only thing we all belong to.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 06 2012,9:33 am
Both sides are nothing but a bunch of liars and hypocrites :angry:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 06 2012,10:51 am
Paul Ryan thinks rapists should have visitation rights to see their child of rape..
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 06 2012,11:06 am
Ryan likes big government when it comes down to control of women..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 06 2012,1:03 pm
^ and Barry didn't know bill ayres blah blah blah... :dunce:
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 06 2012,1:18 pm
:dunno: ...
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 06 2012,1:33 pm
^  :rofl:
That is funny!

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 06 2012,5:42 pm
Right to Work is Wrong..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 06 2012,6:32 pm
So I have no right to make a living to feed my family???
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 06 2012,10:03 pm
^ :dunce:

Right-to-Work Legislation eliminates Workers Rights..

Workers Rights that have taken centuries to acquire.. Gone!!

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 07 2012,12:17 am
:sarcasm: Gee, to think I've been working all these years oppressed. :sarcasm:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 07 2012,4:07 am
People worked for FREE 150 years ago.. They did get the guts of hogs, beef and chickens to live on..

Republicans want to take us back to the days of slave labor..

Right-to-Work :rofl:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 07 2012,4:54 am
^Way too much drama pal. :dunce:
Posted by grassman on Sep. 07 2012,6:56 am
Some just cannot or refuse to comprehend what they read or say it will not affect me. Til it bites them in the ass.  :oops:
Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 07 2012,6:57 am
As a union member for 45 yrs. All It did was protect the lazy, the worthless workers. In 45 yrs. I saw it all. I never had to go to the union once to help protect my job. And I retired 3RD on the seniority list. Its justs  a waste of money for union dues,for the rich fat cats that run the unions!!!! like TRUMKA
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 07 2012,6:59 am
^ I like this guy! :D
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 07 2012,7:38 am
It amazes me how two people can look at things so differently.

The real tragedy is how Obummer has divided this country.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 07 2012,8:16 am
^I was just thinking that this morning, it is rather sad.
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 07 2012,1:11 pm
The Republican Party attack on Labor goes farther than unions or collative bargaining these folks would
abolish the minimum wage laws along with the National Labor Relations Board...

Their deregulation style Government would eliminate rules on safety, overtime, wages, worker’s rights etc.
Republican policy will return the worker to the plantation style servitude for the enrichment of the few..
Capitalism fails under these policies, when the worker can’t afford to buy that new car or home, can’t
afford insurance, can’t make the payments the economy suffers...

Abraham Lincoln once urged his fellow partisans to recognize that “labor is the superior of capital, and deserves
much the higher consideration.” Unfortunately, the Republicans are no longer the Party of Lincoln.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 07 2012,1:22 pm
^ Where do you get all this drivel?

Damn! What. Drama queen. :(

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 08 2012,12:35 am
Satire??
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 08 2012,5:55 am
^Yes, exactly what it is, only satire. :dunce:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 08 2012,8:01 am
8.1 % unemployment

368000 drop out of the workforce

Only 98000 jobs created

This isn't satire :(

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 08 2012,1:20 pm
I WONDER HOW THE FOUNDING FATHERS OF THIS NATION WOULD DO IF THAY SAW IT TODAY. THAY TOLD US THAY GAVE US THE REPUBLIC, IT IS UP TO US TO KEEP IT. I DO BELEIVE IF WE DONT CHANGE OUR WAYS, WE WILL LOSE IT. TO A LOT OF PEOPLE THAY THINK THE CONSTUTION IS OUT OF DATE. THATS WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS WERE TALKING ABOUT.
Posted by grassman on Sep. 08 2012,2:36 pm
By Tim Dickinson

August 29, 2012 7:00 AM ET

Mitt Romney likes to say he won't "apologize" for his success in business. But what he never says is "thank you" – to the American people – for the federal bailout of Bain & Company that made so much of his outsize wealth possible.

According to the candidate's mythology, Romney took leave of his duties at the private equity firm Bain Capital in 1990 and rode in on a white horse to lead a swift restructuring of Bain & Company, preventing the collapse of the consulting firm where his career began. When The Boston Globe reported on the rescue at the time of his Senate run against Ted Kennedy, campaign aides spun Romney as the wizard behind a "long-shot miracle," bragging that he had "saved bank depositors all over the country $30 million when he saved Bain & Company."

In fact, government documents on the bailout obtained by Rolling Stone show that the legend crafted by Romney is basically a lie. The federal records, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal that Romney's initial rescue attempt at Bain & Company was actually a disaster – leaving the firm so financially strapped that it had "no value as a going concern." Even worse, the federal bailout ultimately engineered by Romney screwed the FDIC – the bank insurance system backed by taxpayers – out of at least $10 million. And in an added insult, Romney rewarded top executives at Bain with hefty bonuses at the very moment that he was demanding his handout from the feds.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 08 2012,10:12 pm
Wrong Way and the Obama Way..
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 08 2012,10:29 pm

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 07 2012,6:57 am)
QUOTE
As a union member for 45 yrs. All It did was protect the lazy, the worthless workers. In 45 yrs. I saw it all. I never had to go to the union once to help protect my job. And I retired 3RD on the seniority list. Its justs  a waste of money for union dues,for the rich fat cats that run the unions!!!! like TRUMKA

45 years and you were still only 3rd on the list.  So this tells me that a lot of folks stayed with the company for along time. If your company was non union I'm guessing 10-12 years or less would have made you number one on the list.  The lazy and worthless usually weed themselves out as in any job.  I'm sure you enjoyed your wages and benefits for those 45 years. If not why did you stay? If it was so awful and a waste of money why did you invest 45 years of your life to it?  And if your trying to claim that you never used your seniority to your advantage in 45 years your full of it.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,1:19 am
Yes he is full of it..
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 09 2012,1:29 am
And I bet he is enjoying his union pension.
Posted by busybee on Sep. 09 2012,1:44 am
Complain all you want about an elected president, yet it will get you no where unless you have the MONEY to be heard.  

It doesn't matter which political party you support...without the big bucks no one cares about you, your children or future grandchildren, ect...

All any politician WANTS is YOUR VOTE if you don't have any MONEY to INFLUENCE the decisions they make.  

If MONEY wasn't an issue...and politicians had to HONESTLY EARN their wages based upon hard work instead of being paid ahead of time for their PROMISES.. then we might have a chance as a country to move forward.  

Why doesn't anyone in this county ever get tired of the "blame game" and paying millions of dollars to keep the political war of republican vs democrat going?  

Seems to me we should be spending our money on REALITY..instead of gambling it away on political party promises...

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,4:21 am
Vote or be controlled.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,4:27 am
Extremism from the right-wing of the Republican Party are trying to take women back decades..
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 09 2012,8:29 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 03 2012,7:26 pm)
QUOTE
Yep Bin Laden's dead, took a lot of guts to say"go ahead and kill him Mr. seal" :rofl:

Not a single republican politician or pundit had the guts to make that call.  Bush wouldn't, McCain wouldn't, Romney wouldn't, and I've watched the video of Glenn Beck and O'Reilly defending all of them saying it would be crazy to go into Pakistan to get him.

It wasn't until the mission was successful that the conservative politicians and pundits changed their tune.  The media starts saying that it was an easy call to make, or complaining that the President didn't pull the trigger himself.   :dunce:

Pepi
QUOTE
Then came mr.OBIMBO the anoited one and after 2 1/2 yrs my 401k dropped in half . Acording to OBIMBO  its still BUSHES fault!!!!!


So, you think it's Barack Obama's fault that you lost a bunch of money on Wall Street?  Is that what your financial adviser told you?   :rofl:

It seems the talk of "personal responsibility" and financial independence only happens when it ends up going well.  You had a big loss to your 401k and Self-banished wants to know if we're better or worse off than 4 years ago.  Where's the "personal responsibility" and independence, if things go bad you blame the President.   ???

Although, the above quote is why most realized that privatization of Social Security is a bad idea.  Conservatives talk about how the return isn't a good enough percentage.  But when the same people talk about money they've invested themselves, the rate of return changes into a discussion about how much money they lost.

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 09 2012,10:48 am
MOPAR!   The money I ment was my DUES going to the unions so TRUMKA could get his million $$$$ salary and give the rest to the campain never do wells to elect a bimbo to the white house. :finger: And I dont have a union penson.
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 09 2012,12:56 pm

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 09 2012,10:48 am)
QUOTE
MOPAR!   The money I ment was my DUES going to the unions so TRUMKA could get his million $$$$ salary and give the rest to the campain never do wells to elect a bimbo to the white house. :finger: And I dont have a union penson.

So why did you stay for 45 years? It's a simple question. Actually you did not answer any questions. I'm guessing your union saved your job everyday for the last 15 of those 45 years by preventing you from being replaced by someone younger and cheaper.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2012,1:05 pm
So let's try this again, pay special attention those of you wearing the bump helmets  :dunce: Irish, Mopar.

Are you b-e-t-t-e-r  o-f-f t-h-a-n y-o-u w-e-r-e t-h-a-n 4(this is how many fingers of your hand minus Mr. thumb, which you probably have planted elsewhere) y-e-a-r-s a-g-o???

Now, how much were you paying for gas 4 years ago?

What is the unemployment rate now? And how many are leaving the work force because they just "gave up?"

How much money are they printing?

It doesn't matter what Bush did, that was 4 years ago

It doesn't matter what Rummy did with Bain, sometimes you just have to cut your losses.

What does matter is that we have a moron in office who has never, never, ever held a real job in an economy and his experience shows it.

I don't really like Rummy either but to continue on our present course is suicidal.

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 09 2012,1:30 pm
MOPAR ! I didnt say I hated my job, I just didnt like what the AFL-CIO was doing with my union dues. plus 23 $ a hour was good pay. So I could retire at 62.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,2:12 pm
FORWARD! not back to 600,000 jobs lost in 8 years of Bush..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2012,2:56 pm
^ I'm sorry, I forgot to say you to numbnuts. :dunce:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,3:14 pm
Can I go back to Massachusetts when Romney was Governor?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,3:24 pm
What do they think of Romney in Massachusetts?
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 09 2012,4:10 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 09 2012,1:05 pm)
QUOTE
So let's try this again, pay special attention those of you wearing the bump helmets  :dunce: Irish, Mopar.

Are you b-e-t-t-e-r  o-f-f t-h-a-n y-o-u w-e-r-e t-h-a-n 4(this is how many fingers of your hand minus Mr. thumb, which you probably have planted elsewhere) y-e-a-r-s a-g-o???

Now, how much were you paying for gas 4 years ago?

What is the unemployment rate now? And how many are leaving the work force because they just "gave up?"

How much money are they printing?

It doesn't matter what Bush did, that was 4 years ago

It doesn't matter what Rummy did with Bain, sometimes you just have to cut your losses.

What does matter is that we have a moron in office who has never, never, ever held a real job in an economy and his experience shows it.

I don't really like Rummy either but to continue on our present course is suicidal.

Y-e-s I a-m.  Four years of good raises,4 more years seniority, wife got a great job, good contract signed. I'm doing pretty good, thanks for asking.  :thumbsup: Notice where my thumb is!

Cannot blame the President ( any president) for gas prices. Greedy speculators and big oil are the ones responsible for that.

I don't like these candidates at all either. But, if you really think Romney has ever had a " real" job your delusional. He is about as silver spoon as they come. And his quest to destroy the middle class is scary. Obama, big promises, no deliveries.

It's like having to make a choice of stepping in cow poop or dog poop, two totally different animals, same result!

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 09 2012,4:14 pm

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 09 2012,1:30 pm)
QUOTE
MOPAR ! I didnt say I hated my job, I just didnt like what the AFL-CIO was doing with my union dues. plus 23 $ a hour was good pay. So I could retire at 62.

So $15 dollars an hour with no benefits and NO union dues would be alright with you?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 09 2012,9:10 pm
30 Months of Private Sector Job Growth..
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 09 2012,9:15 pm
I think somebody is worried and his name begins with al and ends with citizens.     :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2012,9:37 pm
^I think more than just Al are worried. :D
Posted by busybee on Sep. 09 2012,11:07 pm
Moparman Posted on: Sep. 09 2012,4:10 pm


QUOTE
It's like having to make a choice of stepping in cow poop or dog poop, two totally different animals, same result!


Perfect analogy!!!   :clap:  :rockon:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 10 2012,12:09 am
I know who should be worried.. Everyone if Romney is elected President of the United States..
Posted by grassman on Sep. 10 2012,1:40 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 09 2012,1:05 pm)
QUOTE
So let's try this again, pay special attention those of you wearing the bump helmets  :dunce: Irish, Mopar.

Are you b-e-t-t-e-r  o-f-f t-h-a-n y-o-u w-e-r-e t-h-a-n 4(this is how many fingers of your hand minus Mr. thumb, which you probably have planted elsewhere) y-e-a-r-s a-g-o???

Now, how much were you paying for gas 4 years ago?

What is the unemployment rate now? And how many are leaving the work force because they just "gave up?"

How much money are they printing?

It doesn't matter what Bush did, that was 4 years ago

It doesn't matter what Rummy did with Bain, sometimes you just have to cut your losses.

What does matter is that we have a moron in office who has never, never, ever held a real job in an economy and his experience shows it.

I don't really like Rummy either but to continue on our present course is suicidal.

Do you not understand that certain powers have kept things from happening, just to make Obama fail? I did not vote for the man. I can also recognize an ambush. The States were thrown under the bus.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 10 2012,4:36 am
I'll just say I disagree with you of this one Grassman. Obama's a egomaniac and desperately wants a legacy, that's why he want all the energy change.
Posted by hairhertz on Sep. 10 2012,7:35 am
*all I see is two political parties in Congress bickering & posing while accomplishing nothing, I think we should demand our money back for their collective salaries for the past 4 years*

:soapbox:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 10 2012,9:22 am
Actually, I think you're right. :rockon:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 10 2012,12:39 pm
Obstructionist Republican Congress
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 10 2012,1:06 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 10 2012,12:39 pm)
QUOTE
Obstructionist Republican Congress

...and of course if you have a different opinion than the dems or the president you should just lie down and die :sarcasm:

If Obama wins I think we can count on a widening margin in the House for the rep. If we're lucky a lot of them will be conservatives :thumbsup:

If Rummy wins with a bigger margin in the house, we just might get some better energy policies :)

Posted by Santorini on Sep. 11 2012,10:19 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 09 2012,2:12 pm)
QUOTE
FORWARD! not back to 600,000 jobs lost in 8 years of Bush..

Quote:
...there is another painful dimension to this recovery thats gotten far less attention than the lingering jobs deficit.
Its the fact that most of the jobs we lost offered decent pay, while the ones we are adding are mostly low level service sector positions.  Middle class jobs have been replaced by McJobs.
Mid-wage jobs such as, construction trades and secretaries, accounted for 60% of our employment drop during the recession but made up just 22% of the recovery
through the first quarter of 2012 according to the most recent Current Population Survey data.
Low-wage occupations, such as retail and food service workers, made up 21% of the losses and 58% of the growth!!

You go obama :cheer:

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 11 2012,11:09 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 10 2012,1:06 pm)
QUOTE
If Rummy wins with a bigger margin in the house, we just might get some better energy policies :)

What color is the sky in the fantasy world you live in?  :p

The only people that will be getting better energy policies are 'people' like BP, ExxonMobil and other oil giants.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2012,1:21 pm
^Pure economics Botto, more oil, more coal and more nuclear ='lower prices.
Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 11 2012,1:43 pm
Riiiight...  :p

The oil industry is quite happy with fuel prices where they sit. Do you honestly believe that some simple rule of supply and demand will change that? That ship has sailed, I'm afraid.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 11 2012,2:37 pm
(Santiani)
QUOTE
Middle class jobs have been replaced by McJobs.


So if congress was smart enough, we would be putting people back to work at a discount and at record low interest rates fixing our infrastructure.. It's just good BUSINESS..

(Self-Braindead)
QUOTE
If Rummy wins with a bigger margin in the house, we just might get some better energy policies


OPEC will not allow crude oil to drop below $75.00 per barrel.. The more we produce, the more they cut production.. No Benefit when it comes to prices..  Domestic Oil Production Has Soared Under President Obama..

Coal production is up for 2nd year..  

Nuclear requires a large amount of investment $$$.. Obama has supported the first new nuclear power plant in three decades in Georgia..

QUOTE
My thoughts today are with the families of the victims of 9/11 and the troops that have sacrificed..

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 11 2012,3:26 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 11 2012,1:21 pm)
QUOTE
^Pure economics Botto, more oil, more coal and more nuclear ='lower prices.

Actually you got it all wrong:

More oil just means more to export, no lowers prices for us. Actually prices will go up as big oil will need somebody to pay for all the new infrastructure and equipment needed to drill oil here just to send it somewhere else.

The extreme cost of building new coal or nuclear plants would probably raise energy prices as the utilities will have to recoup these costs as soon as possible.

Energy is about the only commodity that when supply is up prices go up and when demand is down prices still go up. And on top of that you have the "rocket up, flutter down" pricing model, it all adds up to us lowly consumers getting screwed.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2012,3:37 pm
Fine then, keep Obama in office and pay 7 bucks a gallon soon. :dunce:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2012,3:49 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 11 2012,2:37 pm)
QUOTE
(Santiani)
QUOTE
Middle class jobs have been replaced by McJobs.


So if congress was smart enough, we would be putting people back to work at a discount and at record low interest rates fixing our infrastructure.. It's just good BUSINESS..

(Self-Braindead)
QUOTE
If Rummy wins with a bigger margin in the house, we just might get some better energy policies


OPEC will not allow crude oil to drop below $75.00 per barrel.. The more we produce, the more they cut production.. No Benefit when it comes to prices..  Domestic Oil Production Has Soared Under President Obama..

Coal production is up for 2nd year..  

Nuclear requires a large amount of investment $$$.. Obama has supported the first new nuclear power plant in three decades in Georgia..

QUOTE
My thoughts today are with the families of the victims of 9/11 and the troops that have sacrificed..

You have not got a clue to what "good business" is numbnuts :dunce:

Coal production is at a 5 year low

And $75 oil used to mean about $2 to $2.50 gas

But say what you want, with obummer at the helm gas will climb and cheap electricity will be nothing but a fond memory :rofl:

Putting people back to work fixing our infratucture? Sure, what are you gonna pay them with?

Posted by grassman on Sep. 11 2012,4:47 pm
We actually have a surplus of gas, they just hold onto it and push the price up. Why do you think that Keystone pipeline to the gulf is  so important to the oil barons? That is where they have refineries AND world shipping. They export the hell out of it now. Get your head out of the clouds. :frusty:
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 11 2012,5:05 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 11 2012,3:37 pm)
QUOTE
Fine then, keep Obama in office and pay 7 bucks a gallon soon. :dunce:

The market will not bear $7 gas. If it could now or in the future it will be $7 no matter who is president. If oil drops to $60 or even $50 a barrel gas prices will not change much because big oil knows we can/will/be forced to pay $3.89.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2012,5:25 pm

(grassman @ Sep. 11 2012,4:47 pm)
QUOTE
We actually have a surplus of gas, they just hold onto it and push the price up. Why do you think that Keystone pipeline to the gulf is  so important to the oil barons? That is where they have refineries AND world shipping. They export the hell out of it now. Get your head out of the clouds. :frusty:

Actually Warren Buffet benefits mostly from the pipeline veto, must be nice to own a railroad.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2012,5:28 pm
By the way, I thought that the economy wouldn't bear $4 dollar fuel years ago but here we are. :notworthy:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 11 2012,8:01 pm
You have to continue to invest in your tractor trailer to keep it up and running or you go out of BUSINESS.. Sometimes you even have to take out a loan to make repairs..  

US Coal Production
2009, 975.2 Million Tons
2010, 983.7 Million Tons
2011, 992.8 Million Tons

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal >

We'll be paying higher oil/gasoline prices if Romney becomes president.. Wars bring big returns for some..

Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 11 2012,9:16 pm
Funny how when the CinC is donk the media is mute on both the price of gas and the the numberof soldiers still coming home in body bags.  Disgraceful.

Nuff said...

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2012,10:29 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 11 2012,8:01 pm)
QUOTE
You have to continue to invest in your tractor trailer to keep it up and running or you go out of BUSINESS.. Sometimes you even have to take out a loan to make repairs..  

US Coal Production
2009, 975.2 Million Tons
2010, 983.7 Million Tons
2011, 992.8 Million Tons

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal >

We'll be paying higher oil/gasoline prices if Romney becomes president.. Wars bring big returns for some..

Once again you go with the wiki BS :dunce:

Coal production is declining, many electric plants are switching over to propane and this will continue till the whiners piss and moan and bring an end to fraking.Your god Obama wants to bankrupt the coal industry.

So I have to take out loans to repair my equipment? Sorry, haven't what'd to do that in about twenty years, self financed. You see when you're responsible and don't get stupid with money like our politicians have you don't have to over extend yourself.

Rummy's tax return again? Do I have to trot out Dayton again? :rofl:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 12 2012,5:58 am

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 11 2012,9:16 pm)
QUOTE
Funny how when the CinC is donk the media is mute on both the price of gas and the the numberof soldiers still coming home in body bags.  Disgraceful.

Nuff said...

Yes, I seem to remember evil senator chucky wailing in front of a gas station lamenting $1.80 gas. Where's he now???
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 12 2012,7:55 am
It just goes to show how that the lame stream media is in the tank for Obummer.

It took a NavyTimes staff writer to report that during the DNC convention tribute to vets that they displayed Russian Navy warships on the screen.

What a bunch of idiots...and you guys want them running our country...good grief...

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 12 2012,8:03 am
^they are running our country, right onto the ground.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 12 2012,8:05 am
^Nuff said... :rofl:
Posted by grassman on Sep. 12 2012,8:17 am
Not from Wiki.

Energy Resources
U.S. coal production increased, EIA says

Published: Feb. 14, 2012 at 6:18 AM


WASHINGTON, Feb. 14 (UPI) -- Coal production from the United States rebounded from 2009 and showed a second consecutive year of increase, the U.S. Energy Department reported.

Production from the U.S. interior, which includes Texas, increased 6.4 percent from 2010 levels to around 166 million tons. Texas accounted for 40 percent of that increase, the Energy Department's Energy Information Administration reported.

Coal output from the Appalachian region near the East Coast increased 0.6 percent compared to 2010 levels while western coal production declined 1.2 percent compared to 2010, the EIA said.

The reporting agency said about 93 percent of the coal consumed in the United States was used in the electric power sector. The EIA, in a separate report, said that while U.S. natural gas production was increasing, coal would dominate the energy sector for the immediate future.

U.S. exports of coal reached a level not seen since 1991, with around 107 million tons of coal sent to overseas markets last year. The EIA said the United States increased its coal trade to countries like India, Japan and South Korea because flooding in Australia, the world's largest coal exporter, disrupted coal mining there.

So as you can see. Our energy resources are being exported on every level. Except wind, solar,and nuclear.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 12 2012,11:35 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 11 2012,10:29 pm)
QUOTE
Coal production is declining, many electric plants are switching over to propane and this will continue till the whiners piss and moan and bring an end to fraking.Your god Obama wants to bankrupt the coal industry.

Really...
Some day my grandkids will show your grandkids your mindless comments. Seen pictures of mountaintop removal? < https://www.google.com/search?...el=fflb >

After looking at some pics, how about doing some reading on the poisoning and devastation associated with it.

Seen pictures of the tar sands?  https://www.google.com/search?q=tar+sands+devastation+pictures&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=fflb

After looking at the pics, how about doing some reading on the poisoning and devastation associated with it. Also check into the cases of eminent domain happening with tar sands pipelines. Either comply or have your land seized.

It's hard to even keep up with the amounts of fracking problems. These sources of energy/fuel are limitless? Of course not, yet we continue to keep on doing what we always have done instead of devoting more attention to alternatives. It's mind boggling.

Whiners huh?

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 12 2012,11:38 am
Link didn't go through correctly for tar sands.

< https://www.google.com/search?...el=fflb >

If that doesn't work, just put into search : tar sands devastation pictures.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 12 2012,4:32 pm
"If Europe and America are so broke, who has all the money?" ???
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 12 2012,5:01 pm
Cash hoarders! U.S. companies sitting on $5 trillion


Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 12 2012,5:11 pm
Romney Is the Problem, Not the Solution


Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 12 2012,5:46 pm
AL you'll get some smart a$$ comment from SB, Santony or one of the other Limbaugh Beck trickled on bunch
who haven't got a clue...

The true situation in this country is the Republican Party has been attacking the working class, it stated with Ronald Reagan and continues with their Present candidate and blatant Union buster Romney!! The Party of NO must GO!!

"In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s. Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people.
Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent. Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10ths of one percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007-2010. That's the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse. If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy. If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need? There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy. We need to put income into the hands of working families."


< http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroo...747a346 >

Posted by allergic to bogus on Sep. 12 2012,6:36 pm
The name calling continues with the empty headed,  main streammedia piped news mongers. After what has happened today, they still refuse to see that America is going down thanks to their apologetic no idea what he is doing President.
    Apologize and watch people die, how sad for all of the people who strived to make America achieve.. Romney/ Ryan  are the closest answer that we have to get back the proud America most Americans love.

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 12 2012,6:45 pm
If I owned a business I would keep all my money to. You dont know what that idiot in the white house is going to do? :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 12 2012,6:57 pm
Quote: allergic to bogus
QUOTE
Apologize and watch people die

The President is hogtied by a say NO Congress and a group of brain washed bigots...
Even F.D.R, couldn’t fix Republican repression and deregulation by himself in one Term..
Look at the legislation the Republican's oppose, like minimum wage law, look back at their
votes and justify it somehow in your trickle-down brain...;.

why don’t you volunteer for the military they’d wear some of that fat off your butt! we’d see just how
militarist you are with your a$$ on the line for corporate America..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 12 2012,6:59 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 12 2012,5:46 pm)
QUOTE
AL you'll get some smart a$$ comment from SB, Santony or one of the other Limbaugh Beck trickled on bunch
who haven't got a clue...

The true situation in this country is the Republican Party has been attacking the working class, it stated with Ronald Reagan and continues with their Present candidate and blatant Union buster Romney!! The Party of NO must GO!!

"In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s. Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people.
Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent. Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10ths of one percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007-2010. That's the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse. If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy. If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need? There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy. We need to put income into the hands of working families."


< http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroo...747a346 >

Well to start out Expat you will get a smart ass remark from me and I suppose after I get done with this I can expect a dumbass remark from you, life will be in perfect balance then. :thumbsup:

Let start out with two things

1. I don't listen to Rush. :dunce:

2. I'm not a Republican.

You seem to have a great grudge against successful people, hey, not everybody can grab the brass ring but you seem quite bitter about it. Therefore I must conclude that you suck at life.

As for Walmart, old man Walton had a dream and a plan, he worked hard and made it work. If he left his heirs comfortable be happy for them maybe even try to emulate what he did to become a success. Being bitter does nothing but cause stress.

If you truly want to get ahead, work harder and smarter. :thumbsup:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 12 2012,7:04 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 12 2012,6:57 pm)
QUOTE
The President is hogtied by a say NO Congress and a group of brain washed bigots...
Even F.D.R, couldn’t fix Republican repression and deregulation by himself in one Term..
Look at the legislation the Republican's oppose, like minimum wage law, look back at their
votes and justify it somehow in your trickle-down brain...;.

why don’t you volunteer military they’d wear some of that fat off your butt! we’d see just how
militarist you are with your a$$ on the line for corporate America..

Forgive me if I'm wrong but didn't Obama have both a Democrat house and senate for two years ???
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 12 2012,7:17 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 12 2012,6:59 pm)
QUOTE
Let start out with two things

1. I don't listen to Rush. :dunce:

2. I'm not a Republican.

You could have fooled me..
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 12 2012,7:31 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 12 2012,7:04 pm)
QUOTE
Forgive me if I'm wrong but didn't Obama have both a Democrat house and senate for two years ???

I’ll forgive your ignorance, it’s an AM wave transfer into an empty shell, it’s not your fault...

I believe Obama and the Democratic Congress were fairly occupied keeping the western world ( capitalism ) from imploding,
we’re still here they must have been successful...

Posted by Boojadean on Sep. 12 2012,8:43 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 12 2012,7:04 pm)
QUOTE
Forgive me if I'm wrong but didn't Obama have both a Democrat house and senate for two years ???

Obama didn't have a filibuster-proof senate for two years. It was only for 72 days.

< http://sandiegofreepress.org/2012...ha7F-So >

Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 12 2012,10:54 pm

(Boojadean @ Sep. 12 2012,8:43 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 12 2012,7:04 pm)
QUOTE
Forgive me if I'm wrong but didn't Obama have both a Democrat house and senate for two years ???

Obama didn't have a filibuster-proof senate for two years. It was only for 72 days.

< http://sandiegofreepress.org/2012...ha7F-So >

cuz he was golfing the other 293 days... :rockon:
Posted by Boojadean on Sep. 12 2012,11:04 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 12 2012,10:54 pm)
QUOTE
cuz he was golfing the other 293 days... :rockon:

That's not true either. Obama took 78 days of vacation in his first three years compared to 180 for George W. Bush and 112 for Ronald Reagan. George W. Bush spent 1020 days (nearly three years) of his entire 8 year presidency on vacation, almost as much as John F. Kennedy's entire presidency at 1036 days.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 12 2012,11:49 pm
According to Silver's analysis, Obama's odds of winning reelection have risen sharply in the past week and are now a startling 80% .

Read more: < http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt-ro...JzEuj6S >

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 13 2012,1:33 am
I would think that everyone here would be appalled by the burgeoning wealth and income disparity in this country, and what it means for middle-class families, not to mention the future of our children.

But no. The useless partisan bickering continues. I might as well listen to some half-drunk moron arguing with some other half-drunk moron over some Vikings versus Packers drivel.

The rich should be taxed a lot more on their wealth than they are. Focusing on idiocy that suggests that the bottom 50% isn't paying their fair share only gets us further into this plutocratic mess.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,5:14 am

(Expatriate @ Sep. 12 2012,7:17 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 12 2012,6:59 pm)
QUOTE
Let start out with two things

1. I don't listen to Rush. :dunce:

2. I'm not a Republican.

You could have fooled me..

It's not hard to fool a fool. :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,5:25 am

(Botto 82 @ Sep. 13 2012,1:33 am)
QUOTE
I would think that everyone here would be appalled by the burgeoning wealth and income disparity in this country, and what it means for middle-class families, not to mention the future of our children.

But no. The useless partisan bickering continues. I might as well listen to some half-drunk moron arguing with some other half-drunk moron over some Vikings versus Packers drivel.

The rich should be taxed a lot more on their wealth than they are. Focusing on idiocy that suggests that the bottom 50% isn't paying their fair share only gets us further into this plutocratic mess.

So let's try this, what kind of ratio between the rich and the poor would be fair? What would make everyone feel better?
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,7:28 am
I think most folks would be happy with 2012 income levels instead of what is was back in 1989. Yeah, that would be a good start.  

How about 0% poor as a goal to shoot for?

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 13 2012,7:47 am
EXPAT I beg to differ with you, but the house has sent over 35 bills to the DEM. senate.  But majority leader Reed tabled them all, wouldnt even bring them up for a vote?? Its the do nothing DEM SENATE thats the problem. If you dont like the bills let them vote on them aleast. vote for or aginst them. then they would than go to con. commite, So they can work out the defferances.
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 13 2012,7:54 am

(Boojadean @ Sep. 12 2012,11:04 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 12 2012,10:54 pm)
QUOTE
cuz he was golfing the other 293 days... :rockon:

That's not true either. Obama took 78 days of vacation in his first three years compared to 180 for George W. Bush and 112 for Ronald Reagan. George W. Bush spent 1020 days (nearly three years) of his entire 8 year presidency on vacation, almost as much as John F. Kennedy's entire presidency at 1036 days.

I was being facetious and you're being disingenuous with your figures because everyone knows the President is never truly off the clock like most of us.  They never get to punch a time clock like some union member after a 7 1/2 hour day 5 day week (and that doesn't even include mandatory morning and afternoon breaks).  Even Bush was working while at his Crawford ranch or at camp David which the so called "experts" count as a vacation and then slap that number on some website.

nuff said...

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,8:04 am

(Moparman @ Sep. 13 2012,7:28 am)
QUOTE
I think most folks would be happy with 2012 income levels instead of what is was back in 1989. Yeah, that would be a good start.  

How about 0% poor as a goal to shoot for?

OK, what do you consider poor?
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 13 2012,8:23 am
There is a resounding theme from the Obamanites on this site.  Read the following and see if you can identify the similarities of what Obama and his minions are asking for and what this says.

QUOTE
According to Marxist analysis, class conflict within capitalism arises due to intensifying contradictions between highly-productive mechanized and socialized production performed by the proletariat, and private ownership and private appropriation of the surplus product in the form of surplus value (profit) by a small minority of private owners called the bourgeoisie. As the contradiction becomes apparent to the proletariat, social unrest between the two antagonistic classes intensifies, culminating in a social revolution. The eventual long-term outcome of this revolution would be the establishment of socialism - a socioeconomic system based on cooperative ownership of the means of production, distribution based on one's contribution, and production organized directly for use. Karl Marx hypothesized that, as the productive forces and technology continued to advance, socialism would eventually give way to a communist stage of social development. Communism would be a classless, stateless, moneyless society based on common ownership and the principle of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,8:38 am

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 13 2012,7:54 am)
QUOTE

(Boojadean @ Sep. 12 2012,11:04 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 12 2012,10:54 pm)
QUOTE
cuz he was golfing the other 293 days... :rockon:

That's not true either. Obama took 78 days of vacation in his first three years compared to 180 for George W. Bush and 112 for Ronald Reagan. George W. Bush spent 1020 days (nearly three years) of his entire 8 year presidency on vacation, almost as much as John F. Kennedy's entire presidency at 1036 days.

I was being facetious and you're being disingenuous with your figures because everyone knows the President is never truly off the clock like most of us.  They never get to punch a time clock like some union member after a 7 1/2 hour day 5 day week (and that doesn't even include mandatory morning and afternoon breaks).  Even Bush was working while at his Crawford ranch or at camp David which the so called "experts" count as a vacation and then slap that number on some website.

nuff said...

As I'm sure you know giving workers (the people that actually make the company money) breaks greatly increases productivity. But hey, when one sits on their keister all day watching everyone else work its pretty much an all day break.  :thumbsup:
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,8:43 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,8:04 am)
QUOTE

(Moparman @ Sep. 13 2012,7:28 am)
QUOTE
I think most folks would be happy with 2012 income levels instead of what is was back in 1989. Yeah, that would be a good start.  

How about 0% poor as a goal to shoot for?

OK, what do you consider poor?

Less than adequate income.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,10:25 am
^ now let's not dodge this, give me a number,%'or something to start with. Less than adequate is pretty subjective.
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 13 2012,10:43 am

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 13 2012,7:47 am)
QUOTE
EXPAT I beg to differ with you, but the house has sent over 35 bills to the DEM. senate.  But majority leader Reed tabled them all, wouldnt even bring them up for a vote?? Its the do nothing DEM SENATE thats the problem. If you dont like the bills let them vote on them aleast. vote for or aginst them. then they would than go to con. commite, So they can work out the defferances.

Perhaps you’d like to enlighten US with the Bill numbers so we all can read them...

< http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php >

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,1:50 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,10:25 am)
QUOTE
^ now let's not dodge this, give me a number,%'or something to start with. Less than adequate is pretty subjective.

I'm not dodging anything. There is no exact dollar amount as far as income is concerned.

What income would you consider rich?

But if you need a percentage how about 101% more expenses than net income.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,3:10 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 13 2012,1:50 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,10:25 am)
QUOTE
^ now let's not dodge this, give me a number,%'or something to start with. Less than adequate is pretty subjective.

I'm not dodging anything. There is no exact dollar amount as far as income is concerned.

What income would you consider rich?

But if you need a percentage how about 101% more expenses than net income.

What is rich? That's an easy question, there's never enough, you just keep aspiring togain more.

Poor kinda depends on how you want live.

Posted by hairhertz on Sep. 13 2012,4:21 pm
Let me see if I have this right:  if you aren't an arch-conservative, you are a Marxist?   :frusty:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 13 2012,5:06 pm
What happens at the end of the game called Monopoly? Winner takes all..
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 13 2012,5:09 pm
Keep the economy growing.. Tax the Rich..
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 13 2012,5:15 pm
People are catching on..
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,5:23 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,3:10 pm)
QUOTE
What is rich? That's an easy question, there's never enough, you just keep aspiring togain more.

Poor kinda depends on how you want live.

I think you mean on how you have to live, not want.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 13 2012,5:42 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 12 2012,5:46 pm)
QUOTE
The true situation in this country is the Republican Party has been attacking the working class, it started with Ronald Reagan and continues with their Present candidate and blatant Union buster Romney!! The Party of NO must GO!!

"In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s. Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people.
Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent. Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10ths of one percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007-2010. That's the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse. If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy. If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need? There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy. We need to put income into the hands of working families."


< http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroo...747a346 >

The Facts are the Facts.. :clap:

Tax the Rich and watch the economy grow.. Tax the Rich and watch the unemployment rate drop and the deficit drop..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,6:28 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 13 2012,5:06 pm)
QUOTE
What happens at the end of the game called Monopoly? Winner takes all..

I don't get to play monopoly very much
No one wants tomplay with me.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,6:29 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 13 2012,5:23 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,3:10 pm)
QUOTE
What is rich? That's an easy question, there's never enough, you just keep aspiring togain more.

Poor kinda depends on how you want live.

I think you mean on how you have to live, not want.

Hey, some people just suck at life.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,6:31 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 13 2012,5:09 pm)
QUOTE
Keep the economy growing.. Tax the Rich..

When you Tax the rich they tend to move or cut production.
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,6:35 pm
^ And how is that a factor at all if a person is rich or poor?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,6:39 pm
Well, if you suck at life, make poor decisions, are lazy you're probably gonna be poor.
Posted by grassman on Sep. 13 2012,6:54 pm
SB must not own any property, otherwise he would know by now that his property taxes went up to cover the non-payment by the rich. You know, the trickle down theory. Somebody has to pay. :(
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,7:02 pm
I own 3 houses and am quite aware of my property taxes.
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 13 2012,7:22 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,6:39 pm)
QUOTE
Well, if you suck at life, make poor decisions, are lazy you're probably gonna be poor.

Hmmmm... I have seen plenty of "rich" people who make poor decisions, are lazy, and really suck at life. There are also a lot of hard working, good folks who barely have two nickels to rub together. The scary thing is that these situations are increasing everyday.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 13 2012,7:33 pm
^ Luck is a good thing to have on your side too.
Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 13 2012,7:59 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 13 2012,5:06 pm)
QUOTE
What happens at the end of the game called Monopoly? Winner takes all..

If the rich have 90% of the wealth, what good are income taxes going to do?  You will have to get a little more radical than just income taxes.

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 13 2012,8:08 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 13 2012,8:43 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,8:04 am)
QUOTE

(Moparman @ Sep. 13 2012,7:28 am)
QUOTE
I think most folks would be happy with 2012 income levels instead of what is was back in 1989. Yeah, that would be a good start.  

How about 0% poor as a goal to shoot for?

OK, what do you consider poor?

Less than adequate income.

It is interesting that you won't even put a number on what you consider "poor".  I understand though, if you put a number out there, Google will burn up with people trying to find stats to show how that number works against your belief that the "poor" have everything working against them.

It's a little bit like the education funding "debate".  How much money is needed per student?  Is it $6,000, $7000, $8000 or $10,000.  No one seems to know, except that clearly we need to pay more than we are paying now.

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 13 2012,8:20 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 12 2012,5:46 pm)
QUOTE
AL you'll get some smart a$$ comment from SB, Santony or one of the other Limbaugh Beck trickled on bunch
who haven't got a clue...

The true situation in this country is the Republican Party has been attacking the working class, it stated with Ronald Reagan and continues with their Present candidate and blatant Union buster Romney!! The Party of NO must GO!!

"In the United States today, we have the most unequal distribution of wealth and income since the 1920s. Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people.
Today, the six heirs to the Wal-Mart fortune own more wealth than the bottom 30 percent.

Today, the top one percent own 40 percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2 percent. Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just 3/10ths of one percent of the wealth of the country.

According to a new study from the Federal Reserve, median net worth for middle class families dropped by nearly 40 percent from 2007-2010. That's the equivalent of wiping out 18 years of savings for the average middle class family.

The distribution of income is even worse. If you can believe it, the last study on this subject showed that in 2010, 93 percent of all new income created from the previous year went to the top one percent, while the bottom 99 percent of people had the privilege of enjoying the remaining 7 percent. In other words, the rich are getting much richer while almost everyone else is falling behind.

Not only is this inequality of wealth and income morally grotesque, it is bad economic policy. If working families are deeply in debt, and have little or no income to spend on goods and services, how can we expand the economy and create the millions of jobs we desperately need? There is a limit as to how many yachts, mansions, limos and fancy jewelry the super-rich can buy. We need to put income into the hands of working families."


< http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroo...747a346 >

It's difficult to reconcile this data with how the average American lives.  Mr. Sanders would leave me to believe that half of America is caught in crippling poverty.  Yet it seems very few families endure any real sacrifice at all.  Clearly the U.S. is a great place to be "poor" and disadvantaged.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,1:16 am
When taxes are cut, deficits rise?  Here's a chart showing the tax rate history on the highest earners:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,1:20 am
Here's a deficit chart where you can see the deficits rising when tax rates, shown above, decrease:

Republicans spend, increase deficits and cut taxes for the rich..

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,2:03 am
Millionaires Support Warren Buffett’s Tax on the Rich

A survey from Spectrem Group found that 68% of millionaires (those with investments of $1 million or more)  support raising taxes on those with $1 million or more in income. Fully 61% of those with net worths of $5 million or more support the tax on million-plus earners.

< http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth...od=e2tw >

So why haven't they been raised. Because voters elected a bunch of Republican Tea Party Candidates in 2010..

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 14 2012,2:53 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 13 2012,7:33 pm)
QUOTE
^ Luck is a good thing to have on your side too.

That is very true.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,3:09 am

(grassman @ Sep. 13 2012,6:54 pm)
QUOTE
SB must not own any property, otherwise he would know by now that his property taxes went up to cover the non-payment by the rich. You know, the trickle down theory. Somebody has to pay. :(

Albert Lea residents on Thursday called on state District 27A Rep. Rich Murray® to restore the homestead market value tax credit eliminated in 2011 .

Greater Minnesota cities are carrying the brunt of the impact, seeing an average property tax increase of 8.1%

Gov. Dayton wanted to tax the rich. Republican controlled legislature said no..

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 14 2012,7:20 am
We dont need to tax the rich any more. We need to start taxing the 51% that dont pay any FED. INCOME TAX. that way everyone pays a fair share??
Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 14 2012,11:24 am

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 14 2012,7:20 am)
QUOTE
We dont need to tax the rich any more. We need to start taxing the 51% that dont pay any FED. INCOME TAX. that way everyone pays a fair share??

You think taxing the poor is going to help? Stop drinking that republican kool-aid.  :dunce:

The bottom 50% of wage earners in this country control a mere 1% of the nation's wealth.

Tax the rich to 1950's levels, and put heavy tariffs on goods not made in the U.S.A. Put money back in the hands of the American people, and the economy will rebound.

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 14 2012,12:06 pm
If a retired couple making $40,000 a year cant aleast pay around $800-$1200 a year into fed taxes somethings wrong. maybe they should quit drinking.smoking,gambling. It would help the gov. and wouldnt hurt them at all.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,12:21 pm
Not so fair..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2012,1:24 pm

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 14 2012,12:06 pm)
QUOTE
If a retired couple making $40,000 a year cant aleast pay around $800-$1200 a year into fed taxes somethings wrong. maybe they should quit drinking.smoking,gambling. It would help the gov. and wouldnt hurt them at all.

Now now Pepe, the gov. makes quite a bit of money off of smoking and drinking and the injuns take money off gambling. :thumbsup:
Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 14 2012,1:49 pm
They dont get a dime from me I dont smoke,drink,or gamble :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 14 2012,3:01 pm

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 14 2012,12:06 pm)
QUOTE
If a retired couple making $40,000 a year cant aleast pay around $800-$1200 a year into fed taxes somethings wrong. maybe they should quit drinking.smoking,gambling. It would help the gov. and wouldnt hurt them at all.

How about a family of 4 that does not drink, smoke, or gamble? I suppose they could skip 2-3 months of groceries/rent/mortgage so they can send their "fair" share to the govt who in turn bails out the guy who spends that much on cuff links.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2012,5:08 pm
Maybe they shouldn't have had kids.
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 14 2012,5:33 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 14 2012,1:16 am)
QUOTE
When taxes are cut, deficits rise?  Here's a chart showing the tax rate history on the highest earners:

Gawd I hope you never get close to a classroom with a white board.  The kids will leave there dumber than when they walked in.
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 14 2012,7:31 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 14 2012,5:08 pm)
QUOTE
Maybe they shouldn't have had kids.

Ok then, substitute a single person making 15k.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2012,8:08 pm
The only people I know that make that little are kids fresh out of high school. Making money is amlittle tough starting out.

What the he'll difference does it make what a rich person spends his money on? It's their money.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,8:31 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 14 2012,5:33 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 14 2012,1:16 am)
QUOTE
When taxes are cut, deficits rise?  Here's a chart showing the tax rate history on the highest earners:

Gawd I hope you never get close to a classroom with a white board.  The kids will leave there dumber than when they walked in.

You Right-Wingers seem to think tax cuts are free money that doesn't have to be paid for.. The Bush Tax Cuts and 2 wars have not been paid for.. Normally taxes are raised during wartime, not cut, so they can be paid for..

I fear people like you teaching children how to balance a checkbook..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2012,8:41 pm
^ I fear people like you reproducing. :dunce:
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 14 2012,9:05 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 14 2012,8:31 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 14 2012,5:33 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 14 2012,1:16 am)
QUOTE
When taxes are cut, deficits rise?  Here's a chart showing the tax rate history on the highest earners:

Gawd I hope you never get close to a classroom with a white board.  The kids will leave there dumber than when they walked in.

You Right-Wingers seem to think tax cuts are free money that doesn't have to be paid for.. The Bush Tax Cuts and 2 wars have not been paid for.. Normally taxes are raised during wartime, not cut, so they can be paid for..

I fear people like you teaching children how to balance a checkbook..

You know how dumb you sound especially after the Fed pumps another 40 billion into the economy and drops the valuation of the dollar.  You do realize they tried this twice before.  This is another Obama election gimmick, only this time no one is laughing.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 14 2012,9:16 pm
^ Yes, I made mention of this sometime back, thinking they were going to initiate QE3. One of the libs here said it wouldn't happen,
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 14 2012,10:32 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 14 2012,9:05 pm)
QUOTE
You know how dumb you sound especially after the Fed pumps another 40 billion into the economy and drops the valuation of the dollar.  You do realize they tried this twice before.  This is another Obama election gimmick, only this time no one is laughing.

If congress won't do what they were sent there to do, the Fed has to step in and do their job for them..


Posted by busybee on Sep. 14 2012,10:53 pm
Why does it matter??

I'm no happier with our current president than the one before him and the one before than and so on and so forth.  

What does a president really do?

What does any politician really do for anyone?  

They act as if they're "selfless" and "givers" to the public, yet they spend more time on campaigning to get MONEY to WIN an election than what could be spent on providing food and shelter for the homeless and starving citizens of their own country instead.  

Being a politician, no matter party affiliation does not MAKE that person qualified to be anyone who gives a damn about anything, let alone all U.S. Citizen's rights to prosper and be productive in this country.  

It just seems to me that ALL POLITICIANS can make empty promises as long as someone with the big bucks believes their promise can be purchased for a vote in their favor.  

People who don't have the big bucks...have nothing to depend upon when it comes to the election of politicians because they don't have the money to buy into the HOPE that they are promised...thus...elected officials seem to have little if any desire to SERVE the Hard Working and Loyal U.S. Citizen because they have no leverage to USE against them for not following thru with their spoken promises.  

Politics, in my opinion is all about money...always has been...and will continue to be until someone steps up to the plate and does what's right on behalf of U.S. Citizens.

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 15 2012,2:06 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 14 2012,8:08 pm)
QUOTE
The only people I know that make that little are kids fresh out of high school. Making money is amlittle tough starting out.

What the he'll difference does it make what a rich person spends his money on? It's their money.

That would be a fulltime minimum wage job.

What the heck difference does it make how a union employee makes and spends their money then? :dunno:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2012,6:57 am
^Absolutly nothing, but the left seems to think it's their business what a millionaire spends their money on.
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 15 2012,12:54 pm
^ And the right wants to keep them from spending their money on anything.
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 15 2012,4:29 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 14 2012,10:32 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 14 2012,9:05 pm)
QUOTE
You know how dumb you sound especially after the Fed pumps another 40 billion into the economy and drops the valuation of the dollar.  You do realize they tried this twice before.  This is another Obama election gimmick, only this time no one is laughing.

If congress won't do what they were sent there to do, the Fed has to step in and do their job for them..


Boehner put up 800 billion to get the deal done but Obummer wanted another 400 and Boehner said screw it.

Nice try.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 15 2012,5:01 pm
Polls are showing Obama is going to win the state that Romney was born and got his birth certificate.. Michigan!
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2012,6:11 pm
Its a total welfare state, what do you expect?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 15 2012,8:19 pm
Polls are showing Obama is going to win the state that Romney was Governor.. Massachusetts!
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2012,8:43 pm
Cram you poles , it's a long time till election.
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 16 2012,2:11 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2012,6:57 am)
QUOTE
^Absolutly nothing, but the left seems to think it's their business what a millionaire spends their money on.

Nope, we don't care.  They can jump into a pool of gold like Scroodge McDuck if they want.  Libs just don't think Romney should get a huge tax break and shift the burden onto people punching a clock at Hormel or Mrs. Gerry's.  And Buffet's secretary should get racked over the coals so the corner office folks at Berkshire Hathaway can pay a lower rate.

The only solution on the right is to lower or eliminate federal taxes to the rich, and broaden the taxes on everyone else.  That's what we hate.

QUOTE
The only people I know that make that little are kids fresh out of high school. Making money is amlittle tough starting out.


You'd have to notice people older than teens working in minimum wage occupations.  Why is it okay to raise their taxes, or raise taxes on the family making $40k a year, but on the subject of millionaires your rhetoric changes to being against raising taxes?

There's a dissonance with conservatives on tax policy, they're totally okay with raising taxes dramatically for everyone except the rich.  If you don't believe me read through the suggestions in the previous pages regarding raising taxes on people making $40k or $15k a year but we should leave the millionaires alone.  It's like the Fairtax, or shifting from income/estate/corporate taxes to property/sales/sin taxes.

I suppose Grover won't shed a tear if you raise taxes on those making $40k or $15k a year, just cut or eliminate federal taxes on Romney and the Koch brothers.   :crazy:

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 16 2012,7:46 am
I dont care what you say. The guy making $1.00 an hour should pay the same percentage in fed. taxes as the guy making $1000 an hour !!!!!!
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2012,8:19 am

(irisheyes @ Sep. 16 2012,2:11 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2012,6:57 am)
QUOTE
^Absolutly nothing, but the left seems to think it's their business what a millionaire spends their money on.

Nope, we don't care.  They can jump into a pool of gold like Scroodge McDuck if they want.  Libs just don't think Romney should get a huge tax break and shift the burden onto people punching a clock at Hormel or Mrs. Gerry's.  And Buffet's secretary should get racked over the coals so the corner office folks at Berkshire Hathaway can pay a lower rate.

The only solution on the right is to lower or eliminate federal taxes to the rich, and broaden the taxes on everyone else.  That's what we hate.

QUOTE
The only people I know that make that little are kids fresh out of high school. Making money is amlittle tough starting out.


You'd have to notice people older than teens working in minimum wage occupations.  Why is it okay to raise their taxes, or raise taxes on the family making $40k a year, but on the subject of millionaires your rhetoric changes to being against raising taxes?

There's a dissonance with conservatives on tax policy, they're totally okay with raising taxes dramatically for everyone except the rich.  If you don't believe me read through the suggestions in the previous pages regarding raising taxes on people making $40k or $15k a year but we should leave the millionaires alone.  It's like the Fairtax, or shifting from income/estate/corporate taxes to property/sales/sin taxes.

I suppose Grover won't shed a tear if you raise taxes on those making $40k or $15k a year, just cut or eliminate federal taxes on Romney and the Koch brothers.   :crazy:

Wow, what a rant, kinda a pointless rant but a rant nonetheless. :dunce:

How about just not spending so much :thumbsup:

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 16 2012,9:29 am

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 16 2012,7:46 am)
QUOTE
I dont care what you say. The guy making $1.00 an hour should pay the same percentage in fed. taxes as the guy making $1000 an hour !!!!!!

Nobody would have a problem with that if the guy making $1000 dollars per hour paid the same percentage for gas, groceries, housing, utilities, etc...
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 16 2012,9:33 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,8:19 am)
QUOTE

(irisheyes @ Sep. 16 2012,2:11 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2012,6:57 am)
QUOTE
^Absolutly nothing, but the left seems to think it's their business what a millionaire spends their money on.

Nope, we don't care.  They can jump into a pool of gold like Scroodge McDuck if they want.  Libs just don't think Romney should get a huge tax break and shift the burden onto people punching a clock at Hormel or Mrs. Gerry's.  And Buffet's secretary should get racked over the coals so the corner office folks at Berkshire Hathaway can pay a lower rate.

The only solution on the right is to lower or eliminate federal taxes to the rich, and broaden the taxes on everyone else.  That's what we hate.

QUOTE
The only people I know that make that little are kids fresh out of high school. Making money is amlittle tough starting out.


You'd have to notice people older than teens working in minimum wage occupations.  Why is it okay to raise their taxes, or raise taxes on the family making $40k a year, but on the subject of millionaires your rhetoric changes to being against raising taxes?

There's a dissonance with conservatives on tax policy, they're totally okay with raising taxes dramatically for everyone except the rich.  If you don't believe me read through the suggestions in the previous pages regarding raising taxes on people making $40k or $15k a year but we should leave the millionaires alone.  It's like the Fairtax, or shifting from income/estate/corporate taxes to property/sales/sin taxes.

I suppose Grover won't shed a tear if you raise taxes on those making $40k or $15k a year, just cut or eliminate federal taxes on Romney and the Koch brothers.   :crazy:

Wow, what a rant, kinda a pointless rant but a rant nonetheless. :dunce:

How about just not spending so much :thumbsup:

Unfortunately more and more people/ families just cannot spend any less.
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 16 2012,10:31 am
FDR got us out of the Great Depression by taxing the rich and letting the working-class unionize, it didn’t hurt the rich and it created a middle-class with purchasing power that enriched US...

A Progressive Deficit Reduction Plan

1-Repeal all of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax breaks for the top two percent. Repealing the 2001 and 2003 tax breaks for the top two percent would reduce the deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. After President Clinton increased taxes on the top two percent, the economy added over 22 million jobs. After President Bush reduced taxes for the rich, the economy lost over 600,000 private sector jobs.

2-Create an emergency deficit-reduction surtax on millionaires. Enacting a 5.4 percent surtax on adjusted gross income of more than $1 million would raise over $383 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Tax Committee. According to a February 2011 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 81 percent of the American people support the creation of a millionaires surtax to reduce the deficit.

3-End tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas and coal companies. If we ended tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas, and coal companies, we could reduce the deficit by more than $113 billion over the next ten years. The five largest oil companies in the United States have earned about $1 trillion in profits over the past decade.

4-Establish a Wall Street speculation fee of 0.03 percent on the sale of credit default swaps, derivatives, stocks, options, and futures. Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. Establishing a speculation fee would reduce gambling on Wall Street, encourage the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, and reduce the deficit by $350 billion over 10 years without harming average Americans.

5-Eliminate tax breaks for companies shipping American jobs overseas. Today, the U.S. government is actually rewarding companies that move U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas through loopholes in the tax code known as deferral and foreign source income. During the last decade, the U.S. lost about 30% of its manufacturing jobs and over 56,000 factories have been shut down. If we eliminated these tax loopholes, the Joint Tax Committee has estimated that we could raise more than $582 billion in revenue over the next ten years.

6-Prohibit abusive and illegal offshore tax shelters. Each and every year, the United States loses an estimated $100 billion in tax revenues due to offshore tax abuses by the wealthy and large corporations. The situation has become so absurd that one five-story office building in the Cayman Islands is now the "home" to more than 18,000 corporations. The wealthy and large corporations should not be allowed to avoid paying taxes by setting up tax shelters in Panama, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas or other tax haven countries. Cracking down on offshore tax shelters could reduce the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next decade.

7-Establish a currency manipulation fee on China and other countries. As almost everyone knows, China is manipulating its currency, giving it an unfair trade advantage over the United States and destroying decent paying manufacturing jobs in the process. If we imposed a currency manipulation fee on China and other currency manipulators, the Economic Policy Institute has estimated that we could raise $500 billion over 10 years and create 1 million jobs in the process.

8-Tax capital gains and dividends the same as work. Taxing capital gains and dividends the same way that we tax work would raise more than $730 billion over the next decade. Warren Buffet has often said that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. The reason for this is that the wealthy obtain most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which is taxed at a much lower rate than work. Right now, the top marginal income tax for working is 35%, but the tax rate on corporate dividends and capital gains is only 15%.

9-Establish a Progressive Estate Tax. If we established a progressive estate tax on inherited wealth of more than $3.5 million, we could raise more than $300 billion over 10 years. Sen. Sanders introduced the Responsible Estate Tax Act that would reduce the deficit in a fair way while ensuring that 99.7 percent of Americans who lose a loved one would never see a dime of their loved one's estate paid in federal estate taxes.

10-Reduce unnecessary and wasteful spending at the Pentagon, which now consumes over half of our discretionary budget. Much of the huge spending at the Pentagon is devoted to spending money on Cold War weapons programs to fight a Soviet Union that no longer exists. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, have estimated that we could achieve significant savings of around $100 billion a year at the Pentagon while still ensuring that the United States has the strongest and most powerful military in the world.

11-Require Medicare to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry. Requiring Medicare to negotiate drug prices, similarly to what the VA currently does, would save more than $157 billion over 10 years.

12-Eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within every federal government agency. Virtually everyone agrees that there is waste, fraud, and abuse in every agency of the federal government. Rooting out this waste, fraud, and abuse could save between $150 billion and $200 billion over the next 10 years.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2012,12:35 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 16 2012,9:33 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,8:19 am)
QUOTE

(irisheyes @ Sep. 16 2012,2:11 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2012,6:57 am)
QUOTE
^Absolutly nothing, but the left seems to think it's their business what a millionaire spends their money on.

Nope, we don't care.  They can jump into a pool of gold like Scroodge McDuck if they want.  Libs just don't think Romney should get a huge tax break and shift the burden onto people punching a clock at Hormel or Mrs. Gerry's.  And Buffet's secretary should get racked over the coals so the corner office folks at Berkshire Hathaway can pay a lower rate.

The only solution on the right is to lower or eliminate federal taxes to the rich, and broaden the taxes on everyone else.  That's what we hate.

QUOTE
The only people I know that make that little are kids fresh out of high school. Making money is amlittle tough starting out.


You'd have to notice people older than teens working in minimum wage occupations.  Why is it okay to raise their taxes, or raise taxes on the family making $40k a year, but on the subject of millionaires your rhetoric changes to being against raising taxes?

There's a dissonance with conservatives on tax policy, they're totally okay with raising taxes dramatically for everyone except the rich.  If you don't believe me read through the suggestions in the previous pages regarding raising taxes on people making $40k or $15k a year but we should leave the millionaires alone.  It's like the Fairtax, or shifting from income/estate/corporate taxes to property/sales/sin taxes.

I suppose Grover won't shed a tear if you raise taxes on those making $40k or $15k a year, just cut or eliminate federal taxes on Romney and the Koch brothers.   :crazy:

Wow, what a rant, kinda a pointless rant but a rant nonetheless. :dunce:

How about just not spending so much :thumbsup:

Unfortunately more and more people/ families just cannot spend any less.

Sorry I didn't make that clear Mopar, I was referring to the gov. spending less. :thumbsup:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2012,12:37 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 16 2012,10:31 am)
QUOTE
FDR got us out of the Great Depression by taxing the rich and letting the working-class unionize, it didn’t hurt the rich and it created a middle-class with purchasing power that enriched US...

A Progressive Deficit Reduction Plan

1-Repeal all of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax breaks for the top two percent. Repealing the 2001 and 2003 tax breaks for the top two percent would reduce the deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. After President Clinton increased taxes on the top two percent, the economy added over 22 million jobs. After President Bush reduced taxes for the rich, the economy lost over 600,000 private sector jobs.

2-Create an emergency deficit-reduction surtax on millionaires. Enacting a 5.4 percent surtax on adjusted gross income of more than $1 million would raise over $383 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Tax Committee. According to a February 2011 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 81 percent of the American people support the creation of a millionaires surtax to reduce the deficit.

3-End tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas and coal companies. If we ended tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas, and coal companies, we could reduce the deficit by more than $113 billion over the next ten years. The five largest oil companies in the United States have earned about $1 trillion in profits over the past decade.

4-Establish a Wall Street speculation fee of 0.03 percent on the sale of credit default swaps, derivatives, stocks, options, and futures. Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. Establishing a speculation fee would reduce gambling on Wall Street, encourage the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, and reduce the deficit by $350 billion over 10 years without harming average Americans.

5-Eliminate tax breaks for companies shipping American jobs overseas. Today, the U.S. government is actually rewarding companies that move U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas through loopholes in the tax code known as deferral and foreign source income. During the last decade, the U.S. lost about 30% of its manufacturing jobs and over 56,000 factories have been shut down. If we eliminated these tax loopholes, the Joint Tax Committee has estimated that we could raise more than $582 billion in revenue over the next ten years.

6-Prohibit abusive and illegal offshore tax shelters. Each and every year, the United States loses an estimated $100 billion in tax revenues due to offshore tax abuses by the wealthy and large corporations. The situation has become so absurd that one five-story office building in the Cayman Islands is now the "home" to more than 18,000 corporations. The wealthy and large corporations should not be allowed to avoid paying taxes by setting up tax shelters in Panama, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas or other tax haven countries. Cracking down on offshore tax shelters could reduce the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next decade.

7-Establish a currency manipulation fee on China and other countries. As almost everyone knows, China is manipulating its currency, giving it an unfair trade advantage over the United States and destroying decent paying manufacturing jobs in the process. If we imposed a currency manipulation fee on China and other currency manipulators, the Economic Policy Institute has estimated that we could raise $500 billion over 10 years and create 1 million jobs in the process.

8-Tax capital gains and dividends the same as work. Taxing capital gains and dividends the same way that we tax work would raise more than $730 billion over the next decade. Warren Buffet has often said that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. The reason for this is that the wealthy obtain most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which is taxed at a much lower rate than work. Right now, the top marginal income tax for working is 35%, but the tax rate on corporate dividends and capital gains is only 15%.

9-Establish a Progressive Estate Tax. If we established a progressive estate tax on inherited wealth of more than $3.5 million, we could raise more than $300 billion over 10 years. Sen. Sanders introduced the Responsible Estate Tax Act that would reduce the deficit in a fair way while ensuring that 99.7 percent of Americans who lose a loved one would never see a dime of their loved one's estate paid in federal estate taxes.

10-Reduce unnecessary and wasteful spending at the Pentagon, which now consumes over half of our discretionary budget. Much of the huge spending at the Pentagon is devoted to spending money on Cold War weapons programs to fight a Soviet Union that no longer exists. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, have estimated that we could achieve significant savings of around $100 billion a year at the Pentagon while still ensuring that the United States has the strongest and most powerful military in the world.

11-Require Medicare to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry. Requiring Medicare to negotiate drug prices, similarly to what the VA currently does, would save more than $157 billion over 10 years.

12-Eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within every federal government agency. Virtually everyone agrees that there is waste, fraud, and abuse in every agency of the federal government. Rooting out this waste, fraud, and abuse could save between $150 billion and $200 billion over the next 10 years.

What an idiot :dunce:
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 16 2012,12:38 pm
Gotcha SB.  I agree with less govt spending.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2012,12:41 pm
How do you feel about this statement Mopar, "we're screwed no matter who wins"
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 16 2012,12:44 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,12:37 pm)
QUOTE

(Expatriate @ Sep. 16 2012,10:31 am)
QUOTE
FDR got us out of the Great Depression by taxing the rich and letting the working-class unionize, it didn’t hurt the rich and it created a middle-class with purchasing power that enriched US...

A Progressive Deficit Reduction Plan

1-Repeal all of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax breaks for the top two percent. Repealing the 2001 and 2003 tax breaks for the top two percent would reduce the deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. After President Clinton increased taxes on the top two percent, the economy added over 22 million jobs. After President Bush reduced taxes for the rich, the economy lost over 600,000 private sector jobs.

2-Create an emergency deficit-reduction surtax on millionaires. Enacting a 5.4 percent surtax on adjusted gross income of more than $1 million would raise over $383 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Tax Committee. According to a February 2011 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 81 percent of the American people support the creation of a millionaires surtax to reduce the deficit.

3-End tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas and coal companies. If we ended tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas, and coal companies, we could reduce the deficit by more than $113 billion over the next ten years. The five largest oil companies in the United States have earned about $1 trillion in profits over the past decade.

4-Establish a Wall Street speculation fee of 0.03 percent on the sale of credit default swaps, derivatives, stocks, options, and futures. Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. Establishing a speculation fee would reduce gambling on Wall Street, encourage the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, and reduce the deficit by $350 billion over 10 years without harming average Americans.

5-Eliminate tax breaks for companies shipping American jobs overseas. Today, the U.S. government is actually rewarding companies that move U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas through loopholes in the tax code known as deferral and foreign source income. During the last decade, the U.S. lost about 30% of its manufacturing jobs and over 56,000 factories have been shut down. If we eliminated these tax loopholes, the Joint Tax Committee has estimated that we could raise more than $582 billion in revenue over the next ten years.

6-Prohibit abusive and illegal offshore tax shelters. Each and every year, the United States loses an estimated $100 billion in tax revenues due to offshore tax abuses by the wealthy and large corporations. The situation has become so absurd that one five-story office building in the Cayman Islands is now the "home" to more than 18,000 corporations. The wealthy and large corporations should not be allowed to avoid paying taxes by setting up tax shelters in Panama, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas or other tax haven countries. Cracking down on offshore tax shelters could reduce the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next decade.

7-Establish a currency manipulation fee on China and other countries. As almost everyone knows, China is manipulating its currency, giving it an unfair trade advantage over the United States and destroying decent paying manufacturing jobs in the process. If we imposed a currency manipulation fee on China and other currency manipulators, the Economic Policy Institute has estimated that we could raise $500 billion over 10 years and create 1 million jobs in the process.

8-Tax capital gains and dividends the same as work. Taxing capital gains and dividends the same way that we tax work would raise more than $730 billion over the next decade. Warren Buffet has often said that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. The reason for this is that the wealthy obtain most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which is taxed at a much lower rate than work. Right now, the top marginal income tax for working is 35%, but the tax rate on corporate dividends and capital gains is only 15%.

9-Establish a Progressive Estate Tax. If we established a progressive estate tax on inherited wealth of more than $3.5 million, we could raise more than $300 billion over 10 years. Sen. Sanders introduced the Responsible Estate Tax Act that would reduce the deficit in a fair way while ensuring that 99.7 percent of Americans who lose a loved one would never see a dime of their loved one's estate paid in federal estate taxes.

10-Reduce unnecessary and wasteful spending at the Pentagon, which now consumes over half of our discretionary budget. Much of the huge spending at the Pentagon is devoted to spending money on Cold War weapons programs to fight a Soviet Union that no longer exists. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, have estimated that we could achieve significant savings of around $100 billion a year at the Pentagon while still ensuring that the United States has the strongest and most powerful military in the world.

11-Require Medicare to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry. Requiring Medicare to negotiate drug prices, similarly to what the VA currently does, would save more than $157 billion over 10 years.

12-Eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within every federal government agency. Virtually everyone agrees that there is waste, fraud, and abuse in every agency of the federal government. Rooting out this waste, fraud, and abuse could save between $150 billion and $200 billion over the next 10 years.

What an idiot :dunce:

Sounds good to me. What's not to like!
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 16 2012,5:29 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 15 2012,4:29 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 14 2012,10:32 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 14 2012,9:05 pm)
QUOTE
You know how dumb you sound especially after the Fed pumps another 40 billion into the economy and drops the valuation of the dollar.  You do realize they tried this twice before.  This is another Obama election gimmick, only this time no one is laughing.

If congress won't do what they were sent there to do, the Fed has to step in and do their job for them..


Boehner put up 800 billion to get the deal done but Obummer wanted another 400 and Boehner said screw it.

Nice try.

Your stand is Do Nothing or Cut Cut Cut.. Sounds like a plan to stimulate job growth.. :sarcasm:

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 16 2012,6:44 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,12:41 pm)
QUOTE
How do you feel about this statement Mopar, "we're screwed no matter who wins"

I would agree with that.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2012,7:42 pm
^All we can really do (besides complain) is survive.
Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 16 2012,8:25 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,7:42 pm)
QUOTE
^All we can really do (besides complain) is survive.

Yes, and kick the can down the road so our kids can deal with a bigger problem. A lot to be proud of, patriots...
Posted by busybee on Sep. 16 2012,9:36 pm
Moparman, Self Banished and Botto82...well said by all of you!!!   :clap:  :clap:  :clap:
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 16 2012,9:55 pm
Self-Banished, Moparman, Botto and Busybee, Amen.

:clap:

Botto, double Amen.  :clap:  :clap:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,5:36 am
What a bunch of unpatriotic pukes.. I hope like hell you people get what you deserve..
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,6:41 am
Our troops continue to fight and die so we and future generations will continue to have the right to vote for our leaders. They protect us from tyranny..
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,7:15 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,5:36 am)
QUOTE
What a bunch of unpatriotic pukes.. I hope like hell you people get what you deserve..

I could copy/paste a buttload of quotes that would back us up. Where you been the last year?

QUOTE
Our troops continue to fight and die so we and future generations will continue to have human rights.


Our troops continue to fight and die in BS wars started on the premise of lies and backed up by more lies. Wars that do nothing to keep us safer. More and more active military and veterans are realizing that EVERY DAY. More and more every day realize that our government and political system are the things that are unpatriotic.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,7:52 am
If you or anyone thinks the United States of America is SCREWED, you are a dumbass traitor and don't deserve to be called an American..

I agree Iraq was wrong, based on lies.. Afghanistan should have been bombed to hell and back, then done..

War does increase profit margins for the greedy rich.. Our troops followed orders and continue to follow orders.. I support them..

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,8:29 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,7:52 am)
QUOTE
If you or anyone thinks the United States of America is SCREWED, you are a dumbass traitor and don't deserve to be called an American..

We are screwed IF millions more of us don't wake up soon. It will take millions of us to get things fixed. Sadly it seems watching Dancing With The Stars and nuking entire countries is what most Americans are concerned with.
QUOTE
Afghanistan should have been bombed to hell and back, then done..

The US would never bomb the hell out of Afghanistan. - Russia discovered 1 - 3 trillion dollars worth of precious minerals there back in the 80's. Oh, plus all the oil. - That would be such a waste.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,8:39 am
How will millions of us get things fixed?

Again, Vote or shut the frik up..

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,8:46 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,8:39 am)
QUOTE
How will millions of us get things fixed?

By standing up and DEMANDING our government does what it is SUPPOSED to do. For the people by the people. - It definitely is not that.

QUOTE
Again, Vote or shut the frik up..


votevotevote  :cheer:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2012,8:50 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,6:41 am)
QUOTE
Our troops continue to fight and die so we and future generations will continue to have the right to vote for our leaders. They protect us from tyranny..

If we had any leader to vote for. :frusty:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2012,8:52 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,5:36 am)
QUOTE
What a bunch of unpatriotic pukes.. I hope like hell you people get what you deserve..

More of a patriot then you'll ever think of being. :thumbsup:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,8:53 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 17 2012,8:50 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,6:41 am)
QUOTE
Our troops continue to fight and die so we and future generations will continue to have the right to vote for our leaders. They protect us from tyranny..

If we had any leader to vote for. :frusty:

Then don't vote.. Simple..
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2012,8:55 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,7:52 am)
QUOTE
If you or anyone thinks the United States of America is SCREWED, you are a dumbass traitor and don't deserve to be called an American..

I agree Iraq was wrong, based on lies.. Afghanistan should have been bombed to hell and back, then done..

War does increase profit margins for the greedy rich.. Our troops followed orders and continue to follow orders.. I support them..

I support our troops too but the bastardization of our country's morals sickens me. :(
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2012,8:56 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,8:53 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 17 2012,8:50 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,6:41 am)
QUOTE
Our troops continue to fight and die so we and future generations will continue to have the right to vote for our leaders. They protect us from tyranny..

If we had any leader to vote for. :frusty:

Then don't vote.. Simple..

I vote every election.
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,9:01 am
There are thousands of instances showing the US government doesn't support the troops, and cares very little about them.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,9:15 am

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Sep. 17 2012,9:01 am)
QUOTE
There are thousands of instances showing the US government doesn't support the troops, and cares very little about them.

They do get their heads blown off..  :crazy:

You have another conspiracy, don't you?

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,9:19 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,9:15 am)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Sep. 17 2012,9:01 am)
QUOTE
There are thousands of instances showing the US government doesn't support the troops, and cares very little about them.

Yes, they do get their heads blown off..  :crazy:

The poisoned water at Camp Lejune? Not helping the suffering families poisoned at Camp Lejune? Using the troops as test subjects for all sorts of crazy things? Inadequate and faulty equipment, not even safe drinking water in the gulf? Oh yeah, and of course, the big lies that started the wars and continue them.
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,9:22 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,9:15 am)
QUOTE
You have another conspiracy, don't you?

Actually yeah. I think the "war on women" is also a distraction to divide us and keep us from discussing very real and major problems. Look at how much time both those parties spend on the "war on women" and look at how much that has divided we the people. Distraction.

Posted by Santorini on Sep. 17 2012,10:58 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,12:41 pm)
QUOTE
How do you feel about this statement Mopar, "we're screwed no matter who wins"

yea...
but if Obama is re-elected;
just think of the mess he will inherit!!! :rofl:

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 17 2012,11:25 am

(Santorini @ Sep. 17 2012,10:58 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,12:41 pm)
QUOTE
How do you feel about this statement Mopar, "we're screwed no matter who wins"

yea...
but if Obama is re-elected;
just think of the mess he will inherit!!! :rofl:

ok ok, that was freakin funny  :rofl:

I'm glad I accidentally took someone off my ignore list.

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 17 2012,11:35 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,7:52 am)
QUOTE
If you or anyone thinks the United States of America is SCREWED, you are a dumbass traitor and don't deserve to be called an American..

Somebody strike a nerve...

I have a feeling that if the government built a Dachau or a Treblinka in your backyard, and told you to look the other way, you would. History is replete with your kind of no-questions-asked 'patriot'. No, thank you.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,12:27 pm

(Botto 82 @ Sep. 17 2012,11:35 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,7:52 am)
QUOTE
If you or anyone thinks the United States of America is SCREWED, you are a dumbass traitor and don't deserve to be called an American..

Somebody strike a nerve...

I have a feeling that if the government built a Dachau or a Treblinka in your backyard, and told you to look the other way, you would. History is replete with your kind of no-questions-asked 'patriot'. No, thank you.

Was I that obvious that a nerve got struck? :D

All I know is if anything fishy was going on in government it wouldn't take long for it to surface.. Hell you can't even be from a top secret Seal Team that took out bin Landen without putting out a book.. Trust me, if there was a conspiracy of any kind it would be all over the TV and Newspapers nationwide..

We are still the most powerful and wealthy country in the world and when people say we're going to be screwed in the next 4 years with Romney or Obama, I feel disgusted that people call the country I love a loser.. And yes I still feel people that say we will fail are failures in life and a traitor to their country..

"We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire...Give us the tools and we will finish the job."

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2012,12:37 pm
Actually I believe we're rated number 7 right now as far as money goes.

If you've got the majority of the media in your pocket you can get away with anything.

Thus the only person I trust is the one I see in the mirror when I'm shaving :rockon:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 17 2012,12:55 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 17 2012,12:37 pm)
QUOTE
Actually I believe we're rated number 7 right now as far as money goes.

If you've got the majority of the media in your pocket you can get away with anything.

Thus the only person I trust is the one I see in the mirror when I'm shaving :rockon:

You're looking at per-capita(money per person)

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2012,5:49 pm
Ok, so what percent of that GDP are we paying on the debt now? and how high does that percentage go in 10-12 years?
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 17 2012,8:30 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 17 2012,5:36 am)
QUOTE
What a bunch of unpatriotic pukes.. I hope like hell you people get what you deserve..

Nothing could be more patriotic than putting the best interests of the country ahead of blindly following a candidate. I love this country. I do not however like either choice of the person who will lead it come November. if your going to call someone a traitor for criticizing the the government, you should move to China where you will fit right in.

I have voted in every election since I turned 18. I will vote in this one. I still have no idea who I will vote for.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 18 2012,12:25 am
Mitt Romney said in a video clip that almost half of U.S. voters "believe that they are victims." (Hidden Camera)

Read more: < http://www.foxnews.com/politic...nPFKP16 >



18.1 percent of households that paid neither income taxes nor payroll taxes, the center found that more than half were elderly and more than a third were not elderly but had income under $20,000.

Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 18 2012,1:04 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 18 2012,12:25 am)
QUOTE
Mitt Romney said in a video clip that almost half of U.S. voters "believe that they are victims." (Hidden Camera)

Read more: < http://www.foxnews.com/politic...nPFKP16 >



18.1 percent of households that paid neither income taxes nor payroll taxes, the center found that more than half were elderly and more than a third were not elderly but had income under $20,000.

Ouch, that's gotta hurt the Romney campaign right about now.  I hadn't heard about that yet, but Romney is clearly reaching more and more.  His advisers are probably telling him he's going to lose unless he comes out swinging between now and November.

Self-Banished:
QUOTE
Ok, so what percent of that GDP are we paying on the debt now? and how high does that percentage go in 10-12 years?


Did some CBO searches online quick.  Enjoy, and try not to get too depressed reading these.

CBO report from 2010:
QUOTE
Borrowing to finance that deficit--in combination with an expected rise in interest rates--would lead to a fourfold increase in net interest payments over the next 10 years, from $197 billion in 2010 to $778 billion in 2020. As a percentage of GDP, net interest outlays would more than double during that period, rising from 1.4 percent to 3.4 percent.
< CBO:  Federal Debt and Interest Costs >


Here's a more broad < CBO report from this year >, turn to the budget table in Chapter one to see actual and projected revenues and outlays, and the net interest.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 18 2012,8:05 am
What Rummy said is true, guess the truth hurts sometimes.


16 trillion in debt(and I don't care who's fault it is) so you're fine with that?

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 18 2012,9:21 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2012,12:37 pm)
QUOTE

(Expatriate @ Sep. 16 2012,10:31 am)
QUOTE
FDR got us out of the Great Depression by taxing the rich and letting the working-class unionize, it didn’t hurt the rich and it created a middle-class with purchasing power that enriched US...

A Progressive Deficit Reduction Plan

1-Repeal all of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax breaks for the top two percent. Repealing the 2001 and 2003 tax breaks for the top two percent would reduce the deficit by about $1 trillion over the next decade. After President Clinton increased taxes on the top two percent, the economy added over 22 million jobs. After President Bush reduced taxes for the rich, the economy lost over 600,000 private sector jobs.

2-Create an emergency deficit-reduction surtax on millionaires. Enacting a 5.4 percent surtax on adjusted gross income of more than $1 million would raise over $383 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Tax Committee. According to a February 2011 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, 81 percent of the American people support the creation of a millionaires surtax to reduce the deficit.

3-End tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas and coal companies. If we ended tax breaks and subsidies for big oil, gas, and coal companies, we could reduce the deficit by more than $113 billion over the next ten years. The five largest oil companies in the United States have earned about $1 trillion in profits over the past decade.

4-Establish a Wall Street speculation fee of 0.03 percent on the sale of credit default swaps, derivatives, stocks, options, and futures. Both the economic crisis and the deficit crisis are a direct result of the greed and recklessness on Wall Street. Establishing a speculation fee would reduce gambling on Wall Street, encourage the financial sector to invest in the productive economy, and reduce the deficit by $350 billion over 10 years without harming average Americans.

5-Eliminate tax breaks for companies shipping American jobs overseas. Today, the U.S. government is actually rewarding companies that move U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas through loopholes in the tax code known as deferral and foreign source income. During the last decade, the U.S. lost about 30% of its manufacturing jobs and over 56,000 factories have been shut down. If we eliminated these tax loopholes, the Joint Tax Committee has estimated that we could raise more than $582 billion in revenue over the next ten years.

6-Prohibit abusive and illegal offshore tax shelters. Each and every year, the United States loses an estimated $100 billion in tax revenues due to offshore tax abuses by the wealthy and large corporations. The situation has become so absurd that one five-story office building in the Cayman Islands is now the "home" to more than 18,000 corporations. The wealthy and large corporations should not be allowed to avoid paying taxes by setting up tax shelters in Panama, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Bahamas or other tax haven countries. Cracking down on offshore tax shelters could reduce the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next decade.

7-Establish a currency manipulation fee on China and other countries. As almost everyone knows, China is manipulating its currency, giving it an unfair trade advantage over the United States and destroying decent paying manufacturing jobs in the process. If we imposed a currency manipulation fee on China and other currency manipulators, the Economic Policy Institute has estimated that we could raise $500 billion over 10 years and create 1 million jobs in the process.

8-Tax capital gains and dividends the same as work. Taxing capital gains and dividends the same way that we tax work would raise more than $730 billion over the next decade. Warren Buffet has often said that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. The reason for this is that the wealthy obtain most of their income from capital gains and dividends, which is taxed at a much lower rate than work. Right now, the top marginal income tax for working is 35%, but the tax rate on corporate dividends and capital gains is only 15%.

9-Establish a Progressive Estate Tax. If we established a progressive estate tax on inherited wealth of more than $3.5 million, we could raise more than $300 billion over 10 years. Sen. Sanders introduced the Responsible Estate Tax Act that would reduce the deficit in a fair way while ensuring that 99.7 percent of Americans who lose a loved one would never see a dime of their loved one's estate paid in federal estate taxes.

10-Reduce unnecessary and wasteful spending at the Pentagon, which now consumes over half of our discretionary budget. Much of the huge spending at the Pentagon is devoted to spending money on Cold War weapons programs to fight a Soviet Union that no longer exists. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Lawrence Korb, an Assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, have estimated that we could achieve significant savings of around $100 billion a year at the Pentagon while still ensuring that the United States has the strongest and most powerful military in the world.

11-Require Medicare to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry. Requiring Medicare to negotiate drug prices, similarly to what the VA currently does, would save more than $157 billion over 10 years.

12-Eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within every federal government agency. Virtually everyone agrees that there is waste, fraud, and abuse in every agency of the federal government. Rooting out this waste, fraud, and abuse could save between $150 billion and $200 billion over the next 10 years.

What an idiot :dunce:

QUOTE
16 trillion in debt(and I don't care who's fault it is) so you're fine with that?


Everyone thinks debt is too high, Romney has knuckled under to Grover Norquist and signed a no new tax pledge..
So the question is without repealing the Bush tax cuts how do we pay for the Wall Street bailout and the unfunded war debt ??

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 18 2012,9:49 am
Hey Irisheyes I dont believe a thing he said was wrong. It happens to be the truth!  46.7% of the people dont pay fed. taxes. The truth is the truth
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 18 2012,12:19 pm

(pepi-lapew @ Sep. 18 2012,9:49 am)
QUOTE
Hey Irisheyes I dont believe a thing he said was wrong. It happens to be the truth!  46.7% of the people dont pay fed. taxes. The truth is the truth

Did Romney count himself in that 47 percent, it’s one thing when someone on the bottom isn’t required to pay Federal Tax it’s something totally different when a POS hides his money in the Caymans!
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 18 2012,12:21 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 18 2012,12:25 am)
QUOTE
Mitt Romney said in a video clip that almost half of U.S. voters "believe that they are victims." (Hidden Camera)

Read more: < http://www.foxnews.com/politic...nPFKP16 >



18.1 percent of households that paid neither income taxes nor payroll taxes, the center found that more than half were elderly and more than a third were not elderly but had income under $20,000.

So at a $50.000 a plate fundraiser the true Romney reveals himself... :clap:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 18 2012,12:55 pm
:p He told the truth

Are you jealous of his money ??

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 18 2012,2:46 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 18 2012,12:55 pm)
QUOTE
:p He told the truth

Are you jealous of his money ??

^ You mean his daddy's money?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 18 2012,2:53 pm
Where Do the 47 Percent Live? Mostly in states that vote Republican. :laugh:

7 Facts about the Americans Mitt Romney Attacked

Most are taxpayers…
…And future income tax payers
Many are elderly
Many are poor
…Though a few are rich
Many hail from conservative states
Some are young people and students

< http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ed.html >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 18 2012,3:30 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 18 2012,2:46 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 18 2012,12:55 pm)
QUOTE
:p He told the truth

Are you jealous of his money ??

^ You mean his daddy's money?

Actually he donated his inheritance to Brigham Young University in his dad's honor. I don't really like Rummy but he is a self-made man and a hellofalot better choice than bum-bum.
Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 18 2012,5:37 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 18 2012,3:30 pm)
QUOTE
Actually he donated his inheritance to Brigham Young University in his dad's honor. I don't really like Rummy but he is a self-made man and a hellofalot better choice than bum-bum.

There is almost no way Romney is a self-made man, and even if he was it would be almost impossible to prove.  Romney was able to head out on his own and try to start a business because if that business failed he had a safety net. (I believe he has even said his family “borrowed” him money)  I also suspect he was able to get into good schools, land a good job, and attract investors all because of the family he was born into.  Personally I think this is okay.  His advantages do not mean that other Americans are being deprived of opportunity.  It however is laughable for Romney to suggest he is like the average American out there trying to make it.

What is true is that he made a lot of the opportunities given to him.  I think he would be better off if he was more forth coming about his past, and a little more realistic.  His message should be that he wants to promote an America where you can build wealth and provide great opportunities to your kids, like his family did for him.  Then follow that up with good policies.  If he had good policies I think moderate rational people would forget about the advantages he has had.

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 18 2012,5:59 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 18 2012,3:30 pm)
QUOTE

(Moparman @ Sep. 18 2012,2:46 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 18 2012,12:55 pm)
QUOTE
:p He told the truth

Are you jealous of his money ??

^ You mean his daddy's money?

Actually he donated his inheritance to Brigham Young University in his dad's honor. I don't really like Rummy but he is a self-made man and a hellofalot better choice than bum-bum.

Who said anything about an inheritance? Romney was already a multi-millionaire when his father died. Being born into a millionaire family certainly gives a great boost to being a "self made" man.

Did he have to work to pay for school?

Did he have to worry about student loan repayment?

Did he risk losing everything if his business failed?

Did he have a huge safety net?

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 18 2012,6:08 pm
New Obama Ad..


Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 18 2012,9:35 pm
It's worth recalling that a good chunk of the 47 percent who don't pay income taxes are Romney supporters—especially of course seniors. So Romney seems to have contempt not just for the Democrats who oppose him, but for tens of millions who intend to vote for him.

William Krystol
The Weekly Standard


Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 18 2012,11:16 pm
Ok, I need a little help with trying to debunk some more things. Can anyone help debunking these people? :

Medical Professionals for 911 truth:
< http://mp911truth.org/ >

Military Officers for 911 truth:
< http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/#About >

US. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans:
< http://patriotsquestion911.com/Counterterrorism_Veterans.html >

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 19 2012,12:34 am
More than 60% of the 47 percent of households that paid no income tax did pay payroll taxes. And most people also pay some combination of state, local, sales, gas and property taxes.

In 2011, 78,000 tax filers with incomes between $211,000 and $533,000 paid no income taxes; 24,000 households with incomes of $533,000 to $2.2 million paid no income taxes, and 3,000 tax filers with incomes above $2.2 million paid no income taxes.

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50...comment >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 19 2012,4:40 am

(blahblahblah @ Sep. 18 2012,5:37 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 18 2012,3:30 pm)
QUOTE
Actually he donated his inheritance to Brigham Young University in his dad's honor. I don't really like Rummy but he is a self-made man and a hellofalot better choice than bum-bum.

There is almost no way Romney is a self-made man, and even if he was it would be almost impossible to prove.  Romney was able to head out on his own and try to start a business because if that business failed he had a safety net. (I believe he has even said his family “borrowed” him money)  I also suspect he was able to get into good schools, land a good job, and attract investors all because of the family he was born into.  Personally I think this is okay.  His advantages do not mean that other Americans are being deprived of opportunity.  It however is laughable for Romney to suggest he is like the average American out there trying to make it.

What is true is that he made a lot of the opportunities given to him.  I think he would be better off if he was more forth coming about his past, and a little more realistic.  His message should be that he wants to promote an America where you can build wealth and provide great opportunities to your kids, like his family did for him.  Then follow that up with good policies.  If he had good policies I think moderate rational people would forget about the advantages he has had.

I guess if Rummy stood on a street corner handing out $100 bills lib's would still find something bad to say about him. A self made man uses everything he can to his advantage. What's he supposed to do, walk naked into a desert, come back with absolutely nothing, then start a business?
Posted by grassman on Sep. 19 2012,7:19 am
The child credit has done damage to the treasury. True. Some get back more than they put in. What is worse? That or millionaires hiding money to keep it from being taxed by the treasury? The rich have tilted just about everything to their favor. Wages for the middle, working class has been stagnated while their profits rise. Then, they take that money out of the equation totally by hiding it. As it does not take a math wizz to see the outcome. Our property taxes keep rising because govt still needs to be paid. We are once again left, holding the bag. :hairpull:
Posted by hairhertz on Sep. 19 2012,7:44 am

(grassman @ Sep. 19 2012,7:19 am)
QUOTE
The child credit has done damage to the treasury. True. Some get back more than they put in. What is worse? That or millionaires hiding money to keep it from being taxed by the treasury? The rich have tilted just about everything to their favor. Wages for the middle, working class has been stagnated while their profits rise. Then, they take that money out of the equation totally by hiding it. As it does not take a math wizz to see the outcome. Our property taxes keep rising because govt still needs to be paid. We are once again left, holding the bag. :hairpull:

:clap:

those who make the rules have a strong inclination to tilt the advantage derived from those rules in their favor

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 19 2012,9:04 am
^In other words, take advantage of the situation.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 19 2012,10:39 am
Democratic Party seeks to reduce the difference of power between the elite and the ordinary..

Republican Party seeks to increase the power of the elite over the ordinary..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 19 2012,11:17 am
^In other words as Obama wants, a redistribution of wealth.

Socialism.

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 19 2012,11:51 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 19 2012,4:40 am)
QUOTE
I guess if Rummy stood on a street corner handing out $100 bills lib's would still find something bad to say about him. A self made man uses everything he can to his advantage. What's he supposed to do, walk naked into a desert, come back with absolutely nothing, then start a business?

Calling him "self made" is a joke! It's like saying he won a 100 yard dash race after getting to start at the 90 yard mark. With all the advantages handed to him he would have to be a total idiot not to be extremely successful.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 19 2012,12:38 pm
^ as I asked, does a guy have to strip naked, walk into a desert, come out and then start a business?

Are you a self-made man Moparman?

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 19 2012,1:40 pm
I'm sorry you cannot grasp the concept that if your born a millionaire it is much easier to be successful. Nobody ever said he had to strip naked and walk into the desert. That is your crazy extreme statement.However, I'm sure Romney stripped plenty of good folks naked and shipped them out to the wasteland when he sent their jobs overseas. They had no family millions or a high level auto industry job to fall back on. I did not think you were naive enough to really think that Romney can relate to middle class people that make this country run. Do I think he has to apologize for being born into wealth and privilege, absolutely not. But, don't claim to be self made.

Hell no I'm not self made! I have some help along the way, just like I will help my kid someday. Have I made some bad decisions, sure I have, but I recovered, learned, and moved forward. I have also not had everything handed to me because of my last name, or because my daddy had money.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 19 2012,2:16 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 19 2012,11:17 am)
QUOTE
^In other words as Obama wants, a redistribution of wealth.

Socialism.

Right-Wing politics typically justifies a hierarchical society on the basis of natural law or tradition. To varying degrees the right-wing rejects left-wing politics, claiming that the imposition of equality is detrimental to society.

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics >

Natural Law, Social Darwinism or survival of the fittest was realized in Conservative Nazi Germany(Fascism) under Adolf Hitler.

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism >

Socialism in the U.S. has been around since the enactment of Social Security..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 19 2012,2:25 pm
^ then why mess with what works, promotes excellence, ensures survival? Not everybody gets tomb the quarterback,not everyone gets to drive the train.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 19 2012,2:30 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 19 2012,1:40 pm)
QUOTE
I'm sorry you cannot grasp the concept that if your born a millionaire it is much easier to be successful. Nobody ever said he had to strip naked and walk into the desert. That is your crazy extreme statement.However, I'm sure Romney stripped plenty of good folks naked and shipped them out to the wasteland when he sent their jobs overseas. They had no family millions or a high level auto industry job to fall back on. I did not think you were naive enough to really think that Romney can relate to middle class people that make this country run. Do I think he has to apologize for being born into wealth and privilege, absolutely not. But, don't claim to be self made.

Hell no I'm not self made! I have some help along the way, just like I will help my kid someday. Have I made some bad decisions, sure I have, but I recovered, learned, and moved forward. I have also not had everything handed to me because of my last name, or because my daddy had money.

A self-made man uses everything hemcan and has access to, knowledge, resources

I nudge my kid here and there but he's got his own thing going, pretty proud of him. With an old man like you, I think your kid gonna do just fine. :thumbsup:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 19 2012,11:08 pm
Existing Home Prices Rise 9.5% from a year ago

The last time there were six back-to-back monthly price increases from a year earlier was from December 2005 to May 2006. The August increase was the strongest since January 2006 when the median price rose 10.2 percent from a year earlier.

< http://www.realtor.org/news-re...es-rise >


Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 20 2012,2:30 pm
He's the problem..
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 20 2012,3:34 pm
Does anyone else get the feeling the thread seems like a facebook page with all the cute little pix being thrown up?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 20 2012,3:36 pm
They keep you coming back, don't they? :laugh:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 20 2012,4:05 pm
Actually they rather sickening me. :dunce:
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 20 2012,5:12 pm
Actually this whole political race sickens me.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 20 2012,6:05 pm
^ :rockon:  :rockon:  :rockon:
Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 20 2012,7:23 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 20 2012,3:36 pm)
QUOTE
They keep you coming back, don't they? :laugh:

You definitely subject yourself to an impressive stream of propaganda.  Do you ever double check the "facts" or look at these with a critical eye?  Or do you just read them, believe them and send them on?
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 20 2012,9:43 pm
Have there always been so many lies and liars in government, or is it getting worse every election? Maybe it's always been this way, but we are becoming more aware of it?
Whatever the case, I'm sick of lies and liars.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 20 2012,9:57 pm

(blahblahblah @ Sep. 20 2012,7:23 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 20 2012,3:36 pm)
QUOTE
They keep you coming back, don't they? :laugh:

You definitely subject yourself to an impressive stream of propaganda.  Do you ever double check the "facts" or look at these with a critical eye?  Or do you just read them, believe them and send them on?

If you can prove the pix I post are not completely true then bring it on.. Thanks
Posted by grassman on Sep. 21 2012,7:24 am
Both parties side step the important issues to cover up what they are really about. Time for US CITIZENS AND OUR COUNTRY TO BE THEIR CONCERN.:  :peaceout:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 21 2012,8:14 am
Well, as long as there are lemmings on both sides like Al, and in the numbers there are we're screwed. Doesn't matter who's in charge, they're driving America off the cliff.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 21 2012,8:17 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 20 2012,9:57 pm)
QUOTE

(blahblahblah @ Sep. 20 2012,7:23 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 20 2012,3:36 pm)
QUOTE
They keep you coming back, don't they? :laugh:

You definitely subject yourself to an impressive stream of propaganda.  Do you ever double check the "facts" or look at these with a critical eye?  Or do you just read them, believe them and send them on?

If you can prove the pix I post are not completely true then bring it on.. Thanks

You're avatar is correct, you are a clown :dunce: Of the ass variety. :crazy:
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 21 2012,8:46 am

(grassman @ Sep. 21 2012,7:24 am)
QUOTE
Both parties side step the important issues to cover up what they are really about. Time for US CITIZENS AND OUR COUNTRY TO BE THEIR CONCERN.:  :peaceout:

Amen!! :clap:
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 21 2012,10:01 am
hmmm, it seems like a bunch of dissidents are taking over this forum.... I like it.  :beer:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 21 2012,2:40 pm
So Rummy paid like a 14% tax in 2011 and gave over 4 million to charity. How much did Biden give???
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 21 2012,2:45 pm
I thought the libs were saying he didn't pay any taxes :notworthy:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 21 2012,3:03 pm
He didn't pay any income tax, he paid capital gains taxes.. Capital gains are taxed at a much lower rate than income taxes..

Most rich people make their money on investments/capital gains, they don't have to work.. Mostly middle class workers pay income taxes..

Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 21 2012,3:35 pm
So, are you angry at Warren Buffet too?  He doesn't pay Income Tax either.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 21 2012,4:11 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 21 2012,3:03 pm)
QUOTE
He didn't pay any income tax, he paid capital gains taxes.. Capital gains are taxed at a much lower rate than income taxes..

Most rich people make their money on investments/capital gains, they don't have to work.. Mostly middle class workers pay income taxes..

Yeah so? He paid what he was supposed to pay, actually more because he didn't take all the deductions he could have on the charity.

Face it asswipe,  :dunce: you lost this one.

Again I ask, how much di Biden give to charity? Obama?

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 21 2012,4:37 pm

(Glad I Left @ Sep. 21 2012,3:35 pm)
QUOTE
So, are you angry at Warren Buffet too?  He doesn't pay Income Tax either.

Billionaire Warren Buffet said he shouldn’t pay a lower tax rate than his secretary..
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 21 2012,4:51 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 21 2012,4:11 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Sep. 21 2012,3:03 pm)
QUOTE
He didn't pay any income tax, he paid capital gains taxes.. Capital gains are taxed at a much lower rate than income taxes..

Most rich people make their money on investments/capital gains, they don't have to work.. Mostly middle class workers pay income taxes..

Yeah so? He paid what he was supposed to pay, actually more because he didn't take all the deductions he could have on the charity.

Face it asswipe,  :dunce: you lost this one.

Again I ask, how much di Biden give to charity? Obama?

So if Mitt is such a good businessman why didn't he take full advantage of the charity deduction? :dunno:

I mean if he cannot even handle his charitable donations correctly what makes you think he can turn the country around with his good " business sense"? ???

Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 21 2012,6:21 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 21 2012,2:40 pm)
QUOTE
So Rummy paid like a 14% tax in 2011 and gave over 4 million to charity. How much did Biden give???

Biden pays a higher percentage in taxes for EARNED income, a few hundred grand versus eight figures on investments, so no, Biden doesn't have a few mill to give to Salt Lake City.  

The Bible is harder on rich people than liberals ever are, but I'm sure if you write enough checks they'll tell you you can fit through the eye of the needle.

QUOTE
I thought the libs were saying he didn't pay any taxes


I think only some said that about past tax returns, I don't think you want to bring that up considering he could disprove the allegation by making them public.  He refuses too, and if it was Obama you'd all be saying it was a conspiracy.  Speaking of which, has Romney made public his short and long-form birth certificates yet, or is there something different that makes him immune to that?

Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 21 2012,6:57 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 21 2012,4:11 pm)
QUOTE
Yeah so? He paid what he was supposed to pay, actually more because he didn't take all the deductions he could have on the charity.

Face it asswipe,  :dunce: you lost this one.

So before he ran for Pres he didn't take all his deductions, skipped a few so he could stay in the 13% range.  Yep, guess you won this round.   :sarcasm:

QUOTE
Again I ask, how much di Biden give to charity? Obama?


You guys are usually on the defense of what the wealthy do with their money, why does that change when the subject is Obama and Biden?

The Pres gives a decent percentage to charity, as does Romney, Biden doesn't give near as much when looking at their percentages back to back, but neither does Paul Ryan.  But it's not so easy to give a few million to charity when they're making less than a tenth of the money, and taxed much less since it's on investments.  

Good for Romney to give so much to the Mormons.  But if any of us made ten or twenty million as a venture capitalist I'm sure we would have enough leftover to buy our way into heaven.

Funny how many of these guys spend so much time cutting wages, benefits, and pensions from their companies.  Then when they have more money than even they know what to do with everyone thinks they're wonderful for writing a check.  I wonder how many factories he outsourced so he could help out the Mormons.   :angel:

Posted by grassman on Sep. 21 2012,7:19 pm
Yepper, what Irish said! :thumbsup:  :clap: It's all about winning. Just ask Charlie. They will finally realize what they done when the high wears off. Too late.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 21 2012,7:21 pm
Oh, so it's religion you're all jealous of, it's his money, hendonated some of it, to who he saw fit. Not the government taking it and redistributing it. I think that what most Lib have a problem with, lack of control, lack of power.

I did hear on the way home on cspan the obama and his wife gave a pretty good chunk to charity. Now what about Biden? :D

Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 21 2012,8:11 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 21 2012,7:21 pm)
QUOTE
Oh, so it's religion you're all jealous of, it's his money, hendonated some of it, to who he saw fit. Not the government taking it and redistributing it. I think that what most Lib have a problem with, lack of control, lack of power.

^ :rofl: .  No, not jealous of being a Mormon.  I've got the book around here somewhere next to my other religious books.  Fine by me, just not my cup of tea.

But workers in factories and retail stores made him rich, then he talks bad about the same people behind closed doors in Boca Raton.  And the main economic suggestion Romney-Ryan have is the rich paying less and the middle class paying more.  Apparently it's okay to "redistribute" the wealth of bus drivers and secretaries, but when it comes to corporations or capital gains on millionaires you guys want to cut or eliminate their taxes.

I guess after a few decades we know what trickles down.

QUOTE
I did hear on the way home on cspan the obama and his wife gave a pretty good chunk to charity. Now what about Biden? :D


You dodged the suggestion of Paul Ryan, it seems registered republicans have a magic shield that makes them impervious to your questions regarding birth certificates and tax returns.

But, back to Biden, why are you so focused on his money.  Is it jealousy?  I think it's a control issue with conservatives.  Lack of control, lack of power.   :p

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 21 2012,10:00 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 20 2012,9:57 pm)
QUOTE
[If you can prove the pix I post are not completely true then bring it on.. Thanks

How about this one.



The 13.9% comes from Mitt Romney's 2010 form 1040.  Romney paid $3,009,766 on $21,646,507.

So what would the teachers 1040 look like?  

Total income: $40,000
Standard deduction: -$5,700
Personal Exemption: -$3,650

Her taxable income would then be $30,650
Her tax liability would be $4,175

I believe that is a tax rate of 10.4% (not 20%)

She also did a pretty sloppy job on this tax return because she left up to a $2,500 deduction for student loan interest and a deduction of up to $250 for classroom materials.  If she had maxed out these deduction her new tax liability would be $3,763 (a rate of 9.4%)

Additionally she could have deducted 401(k) contributions, traditional IRA contributions and some health savings account (or other fringe benefit) contributions.

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 21 2012,10:26 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 21 2012,4:37 pm)
QUOTE
Billionaire Warren Buffet said he shouldn’t pay a lower tax rate than his secretary..

Has Warren Buffet happened to mention how much money his secretary is paid?  I would say it is somewhere in the range of $100,000 to $500,000.  I am not sure she is the shining example of "ordinary" Americans paying less than billionaires that you would like her to be.

The whole use of the words "fair share" only makes any real debate that much more difficult.  Republicans (in general) want everyone to pay taxes, even if it's a small amount of taxes.  The democrats (in general) want rich people to pay more.  Those are the opposing views on this topic.  In this case "fair" has no meaning except to evoke an emotional response.  Like when your three year old cries and screams something is not fair.

My personal opinion is that the tax rates are fine where they are.  I would even be fine with going back to the "Clinton tax rates" for everyone or just those making more than $250,000 (prefer for everyone if that is what we are doing, but I am not going to argue over it).  I would be even more supportive of the "Clinton tax rates" if any extra money collected went right to the debt.  Problem is I have almost no faith that either Romney or Obama would make that happen.  I also think that more tax cuts for the rich at this point would be pointless.  I firmly believe we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, therefore I think the tax rates (within the ranges discussed so far) are irrelevent.

If however we continue to use buzz words that will evoke emotional responses, it will be that much longer until a mature debate on the topic can be had.

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 21 2012,10:37 pm

(irisheyes @ Sep. 21 2012,6:21 pm)
QUOTE
Biden pays a higher percentage in taxes for EARNED income, a few hundred grand versus eight figures on investments, so no, Biden doesn't have a few mill to give to Salt Lake City.  

I actually heard on the radio today that the Biden's are in a bit of a money pinch right now (conservative station).

Let's keep in mind that the capital gains Romney was taxed on could have been appreciation achieved over many years, so that would somewhat skew his "yearly income".

And that the alternative is that Romney just kept his money in his money bin and didn't sell stock and then the U.S. Treasury would have gotten zero dollars.

Also, what's the harm in capital gains being taxed at a lower rate?  When you make an investment you risk your money.  When you go to work it's all upside, you either work and get paid, or don't work and get $0.

I guess I tend to like policies that will get capital back in the economy through investments.  This however also is not a policy I am willing to go to the mat on, and it is a form of government intervention (gov't trying to promote an action, similar to encouraging home ownership and what not).

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 21 2012,11:35 pm

(blahblahblah @ Sep. 21 2012,10:00 pm)
QUOTE
The 13.9% comes from Mitt Romney's 2010 form 1040. Romney paid $3,009,766 on $21,646,507.

So what would the teachers 1040 look like?  

Total income: $40,000
Standard deduction: -$5,700
Personal Exemption: -$3,650

Her taxable income would then be $30,650
Her tax liability would be $4,175
I believe that is a tax rate of 10.4% (not 20%)

Total income: $40,000

2010 Standard deduction: -$5,700

2010 Taxable income $34,300

2010 Tax bracket is 25% which is $4,756 or a 13.8% Effective tax rate

< http://www.efile.com/tax-service/tax-calculator/tax-brackets/ >

Say that your taxable income for 2010 is $40,000 and your filing status is single. Your first $8,375 will be taxed at 10%. Every dollar from $8,376 to $34,000 will be taxed at 15%. And every dollar from $34,001 to $40,000 will be taxed at 25%.

Picture is deceptive.. :thumbsup:

Posted by busybee on Sep. 21 2012,11:36 pm
I get disgruntled by the fact that everything revolves around MONEY and POLITICAL PARTY LOYALTY when it comes to electing someone that allegedly will have power and control over every citizen's distribution of wealth and loyalty for the "United" States of America.  

Show me a candidate that CARES MORE about something other than money or political party loyalty and competition.  :::   :dunno:

Posted by grassman on Sep. 22 2012,1:47 am
SB: People like you will not see it till, it hits you square in the face. You tout a strong, self made, wonderful unit. When it comes down to it, you are just as disposable as everyone else. The higher the throne, the farther the fall. Remember those words brother.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 22 2012,4:26 am

(busybee @ Sep. 21 2012,11:36 pm)
QUOTE
I get disgruntled by the fact that everything revolves around MONEY and POLITICAL PARTY LOYALTY when it comes to electing someone that allegedly will have power and control over every citizen's distribution of wealth and loyalty for the "United" States of America.  

Show me a candidate that CARES MORE about something other than money or political party loyalty and competition.  :::   :dunno:

The single most powerful person in a world of 7 billion people is the President of the United States..

If money isn't a concern to you then do nothing, sit back and relax and enjoy..

Posted by busybee on Sep. 22 2012,5:14 am
alcitizens · Posted on Sep. 22 2012,4:26 am

QUOTE
The single most powerful person in a world of 7 billion people is the President of the United States..

If money isn't a concern to you then do nothing, sit back and relax and enjoy..


Monetary issues, such as "who" and "how" political campaigning dollars are used and spent by U.S. Citizens in order to "buy" into a presidential candidate is NOT important to me because I don't have the income or monetary resources to make a difference when the competition I have to deal with is either monetarily rich Democrats or Republicans.  

You are correct by stating that nothing can be done about this...yet I will disagree with you about it being a "relaxing and enjoyable" fact.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 22 2012,5:36 am

(grassman @ Sep. 22 2012,1:47 am)
QUOTE
SB: People like you will not see it till, it hits you square in the face. You tout a strong, self made, wonderful unit. When it comes down to it, you are just as disposable as everyone else. The higher the throne, the farther the fall. Remember those words brother.

yes I am, just as deposable. Customers could call tomorrow and say "we no longer need your services" and it's happened before, such is life. I do appreciate the thought though.

Irish and Al are just pissed off that I question their god.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 22 2012,5:00 pm
Republicans vote against jobs for vets..
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 22 2012,5:02 pm
:laugh:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 22 2012,5:08 pm
I always wondered how Bush became Governor of Texas..

Now I wonder how Romney even made it in business..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 22 2012,5:17 pm
^more offerings to your god???
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 22 2012,9:42 pm
Amen..
Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 23 2012,7:51 am
I will start worring about Mitts 14%, When the rest of us 49% start paying at least 9% of our income to the FED. Everyone should pay something. I  :thumbsup: didnt pay anything last year?
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 23 2012,10:08 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 21 2012,11:35 pm)
QUOTE

(blahblahblah @ Sep. 21 2012,10:00 pm)
QUOTE
The 13.9% comes from Mitt Romney's 2010 form 1040. Romney paid $3,009,766 on $21,646,507.

So what would the teachers 1040 look like?  

Total income: $40,000
Standard deduction: -$5,700
Personal Exemption: -$3,650

Her taxable income would then be $30,650
Her tax liability would be $4,175
I believe that is a tax rate of 10.4% (not 20%)

Total income: $40,000

2010 Standard deduction: -$5,700

2010 Taxable income $34,300

2010 Tax bracket is 25% which is $4,756 or a 13.8% Effective tax rate

< http://www.efile.com/tax-service/tax-calculator/tax-brackets/ >

Say that your taxable income for 2010 is $40,000 and your filing status is single. Your first $8,375 will be taxed at 10%. Every dollar from $8,376 to $34,000 will be taxed at 15%. And every dollar from $34,001 to $40,000 will be taxed at 25%.

Picture is deceptive.. :thumbsup:

Let me get this straight.  You're trying to compare earned income with investment income?  Then you go on and use the teacher and claim she is single while Romney is married? :rofl:

Why do some people invest?  How does it affect the economy?  Now, compare that to someone with earned income? I would challenge you that investments either public or private have a far more reaching effect to the economy as a whole than a teacher's earned income, not to mention the immediacy of it.

You're a left wing tool.

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 23 2012,11:18 am

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 23 2012,10:08 am)
QUOTE
Then you go on and use the teacher and claim she is single while Romney is married?

In defense of alcitizen I was the one that made the teacher single in the tax calculation example.  I was trying to use the most conservative estimates of taxes.  That's why I only deducted the standard deduduction and personal exemption when arriving at taxable income.  In my example I left student loan interest, teachers expenses, 401(k) contributions, IRA contributions and health savings accounts contributions out of the taxable income calculation.

The math of that picture is misleading and while I still don't completely agree with alcitizens' math in arriving at taxable income I am satisifed that he realizes it does not add up.

There are other subtle things about the picture that I would argue are propaganda(ish).  You have the 65 year old retired venture capitalist being compared to the young female teacher.  (I realize that a venture capitalist is never going to compare well to a teacher, but I think it would have been a better representation to compare Romney to a teacher who is about to retire.)  They have picked a teaching salary that is below the national average.  The teacher of course is teaching young children.  And they have thrown in the dog on top of the car for good measure.

Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 23 2012,2:05 pm
You don't need to defend him.  He loves to skew things so his arguements are justified in his mind.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 23 2012,3:31 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 23 2012,10:08 am)
QUOTE
Then you go on and use the teacher and claim she is single while Romney is married? :rofl:

Romney got a bigger tax write-off on a dancing horse than he did being married..

How many middle income jobs, pensions and healthcare benefits are wiped out by a school teacher?

Romney is a Right-Wing Vulture..

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 23 2012,6:02 pm

(Moparman @ Sep. 21 2012,4:51 pm)
QUOTE
So if Mitt is such a good businessman why didn't he take full advantage of the charity deduction? :dunno:

I mean if he cannot even handle his charitable donations correctly what makes you think he can turn the country around with his good " business sense"? ???

Does this help? Just trust him.. :rofl:

Posted by busybee on Sep. 23 2012,10:23 pm
Common Citizen Posted on: Sep. 23 2012,10:08 am

QUOTE
Let me get this straight.  You're trying to compare earned income with investment income?  Then you go on and use the teacher and claim she is single while Romney is married? :rofl:

Why do some people invest?  How does it affect the economy?  Now, compare that to someone with earned income? I would challenge you that investments either public or private have a far more reaching effect to the economy as a whole than a teacher's earned income, not to mention the immediacy of it.

You're a left wing tool.


But, aren't there more teacher's/middle income earners that can't afford to invest any money because they don't have it to invest,  than there are people in the U.S. who can afford to invest their money or give to charities?    

Posted by busybee on Sep. 23 2012,10:49 pm
Moparman
Posted on: Sep. 19 2012,1:40 pm

QUOTE
I'm sorry you cannot grasp the concept that if your born a millionaire it is much easier to be successful.
 

So true!  

QUOTE
Nobody ever said he had to strip naked and walk into the desert.


Wouldn't change anything if he did or for that matter if anyone did.  

QUOTE
That is your crazy extreme statement.


:clap:

QUOTE
However, I'm sure Romney stripped plenty of good folks naked and shipped them out to the wasteland when he sent their jobs overseas. They had no family millions or a high level auto industry job to fall back on. I did not think you were naive enough to really think that Romney can relate to middle class people that make this country run. Do I think he has to apologize for being born into wealth and privilege, absolutely not. But, don't claim to be self made.


:clap:

QUOTE
Hell no I'm not self made! I have some help along the way, just like I will help my kid someday. Have I made some bad decisions, sure I have, but I recovered, learned, and moved forward. I have also not had everything handed to me because of my last name, or because my daddy had money.


Sounds like you're self-made and have gratitude for who helped and guided you when you were struggled or made a poor choice.  Moving forward is essential when you know you can't and shouldn't depend on anyone else to pave your own path in life or make a  life for you.

Your child will respect and learn from you about that...I know mine have...thus far...and I am proud of them for not feeling sorry for themselves because I'm not rich and happen to be their sole financial provider.  They sure aren't afraid of a hard day's work.  :)  
Something it seems politicians rarely mention as having ever experienced as a citizen of our country.  :(

Posted by blahblahblah on Sep. 23 2012,11:39 pm
Not so sure about this one either.



I did not calculate this one on my own, but here is at least one source the disagrees with the 9% claimed in the picture.  It's just amazing, 10.55% conveys the same message but for those producing propaganda they just can't help but stretch it as far as they can.

Quote from the Washington Post.

"Had the Romneys deducted all of their charitable donations, they would have paid about $467,000 less in taxes for an effective rate of 10.55 percent, according to an analysis by Rebecca Wilkins, a tax lawyer with the Citizens for Tax Justice. Romney can amend his returns at any point over the next three years to take advantage of the potential deductions.

If the Romneys had not taken any charitable deductions, their rate would have been 18.8 percent, said Wilkins, who studied the returns and used accounting software to determine their effective rates."

< Washington Post Link >

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 24 2012,12:43 am
So he forfeit $2 million in deductions and paid an additional $467,000 in taxes to increase his tax rate to 14.1.. I guess a 9 or 10.55% tax rate doesn't look so good..

Romney: "I don't pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don't think I'd be qualified to become president. I'd think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires."

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 24 2012,7:14 am
ok AL I want to see 10 yrs of your tax returns to see if your honest. :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,9:11 am
^Stop that Pepe, he'll just go back as far as he can, rework it so he gets even more money back from the gov.

Face it, if Obama wins we'll have the privilege of paying $6 a gallon for gas. :(

Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 24 2012,9:19 am
We survived 8 yrs of that POS Bush 41, we could survive 4 more years of this financial idiot too.  It will just take longer to recover IMO.
The last two presidents could quite possibly be the worst back to back presidencies ever.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,9:33 am
^ at least gas wasn't $3.80 a gallon with bush.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,9:35 am

(Glad I Left @ Sep. 24 2012,9:19 am)
QUOTE
We survived 8 yrs of that POS Bush 41, we could survive 4 more years of this financial idiot too.  It will just take longer to recover IMO.
The last two presidents could quite possibly be the worst back to back presidencies ever.

W was our 43rd president.
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 24 2012,9:42 am
Thanks.  Bush 41 was only 1/2 a POS.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,10:10 am
^ :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,10:11 am
Oh what the he'll was it??? A thousands points of light? :rofl:
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 24 2012,10:21 am
Between that and "no new taxes" :facepalm:
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 24 2012,11:49 am
‘I expect to be judged by results. . . .  If stuff hasn’t worked and people don’t feel like I’ve led the country in the right direction, then you’ll have a new president.”  -BHO

We can hope :thumbsup:

Posted by busybee on Sep. 24 2012,12:58 pm
Just cuirious...why if Obama wins...would we pay $6.00 a gallon for gasoline?  

In 1999-2001 I had a lot to do with the management of small (attempts to be self-made) trucking companies, whether they were just starting out or had established their business with-in the last 8 to 10 years. The market was competitive and a small business owner of local trucking company with ten trucks on the road, and/or even over the road truck drivers who leased their own truck on with a small company were making a profit in those days.  

By 2002 thru 2008, all these companies and self-employed truck owners who were leased on to smaller companies couldn't make a profit or ends meet any longer because the price of diesel fuel had skyrocketed.

The larger companies, such as CH Robinson and Dart were able to handle the increase in fuel costs and still make a profit because they could buy their fuel in bulk and at a cheaper rate and tax than the small business trucking companies because they employ more WORKERS at a cheaper rate who needed fuel for their trucks.  

This type of crap really makes me sad because no matter how hard and dedicated a small business owned trucking companies had been to their contracts with other businesses to ship their freight, they couldn't fight, nor survive the increase of diesel fuel prices in the same way that "big business's" could.  

Some of you will claim that's NOT you're problem, yet honestly, I can't help but think that it should be something of  consideration since you claim this country as the only one in the world in which someone is allowed the opportunity to become a self-made millionaire...without any interference or affect from who is who not charge of country, politically by those who you support without question as to how it ever affects any other human being.

I think you're wrong.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,2:11 pm
If you're smart and do things right, you can survive, even thrive.

CH Robinson is not a trucking company, they are a broker, worlds largest in fact.

DART is one of the biggest ripoffs in the business, they avoid costs by "lease purchasing" trucks to drivers that want to become owner ops. This way DART can avoid costs like unemployment, workmans comp etc. Usually what happens is when a driver gets close to paying off their tractor work suddenly drys up and they can't make their payment.

Posted by Moparman on Sep. 24 2012,7:19 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 24 2012,9:33 am)
QUOTE
^ at least gas wasn't $3.80 a gallon with bush.

I know! Toward the end of his stint it was over $4.00. If gas goes to $6.00 it won't be the presidents fault no matter who it is.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 24 2012,8:00 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 24 2012,9:33 am)
QUOTE
^ at least gas wasn't $3.80 a gallon with bush.

Gas was over $4.00 a gallon under Bush until the Bush Great Recession kicked in.. Get your facts straight..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2012,8:32 pm
Diesel tagged $4.80'a gal for a very short time, then dropped back down.
Posted by busybee on Sep. 24 2012,10:12 pm
Self-Banished · Posted on Sep. 24 2012,2:11 pm
QUOTE
If you're smart and do things right, you can survive, even thrive.

CH Robinson is not a trucking company, they are a broker, worlds largest in fact.


Duh...I know that already!  Knew it 13 years ago.  

Do you really think that (being the the largest freight broker) CH Robinson cared about their regular do "gooders" who had always delivered their brokered freight on time if they dared to increase their fuel surcharge, when a bigger trucking company could absorb that cost when the price of diesel fuel skyrocketed?  

CH Robinson dropped any small company that asked for compensation for the increase in fuel.  That's how BIG BUSINESSES WORK...they have a bottom line of profit and anyone who doesn't PROVIDE that to them are a WASTE of their time.  

Every company, whether it be CH Robinson, Dart or a small business owner just starting out DEPENDS upon the PRICE of fuel in order to ship freight from point A to point B and every company who NEEDS SHIPMENTS from POINT A to POINT B is going to look for the CHEAPEST and NOT NECESSARILY the BEST shipping company to serve their needs, rather than protecting their "bottom line profit" when the price of fuel increases, which has NOTHING to do with trucking companies Job Performance or ABILITY to SURVIVIE...

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 24 2012,10:14 pm
Tumbling home and stock prices during the recession cost Americans nearly a quarter of their wealth. From a pre-recession peak of $67.4 trillion in the fall of 2007, household wealth plummeted to $51.2 trillion in early 2009. But as of the April-June quarter, it has climbed back to $62.7 trillion.

Bill Hampel, chief economist at the Credit Union National Association, calculates that Americans will add $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion to their net worth in the current July-September quarter. That would bring net worth to about 4.3 percent below its pre-recession peak.
"We're not there yet, but we're getting close," Hampel said. "Households are rebuilding their capacity to spend."

< http://www.denverpost.com/busines...cession >

Economic Growth!!

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 25 2012,2:00 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 24 2012,8:00 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 24 2012,9:33 am)
QUOTE
^ at least gas wasn't $3.80 a gallon with bush.

Gas was over $4.00 a gallon under Bush until the Bush Great Recession kicked in.. Get your facts straight..

Forgive the Electorate. Their collective memory goes back a year or so, and that's about it. This is the droid army the politicos play to. Having a reasoned discussion of the facts is a rarity, and, in some environs, frowned upon. That's why I enjoy what goes on here.

Having my mind made up on a subject, once and for all, forever and ever, Amen is a luxury of mind shutdown that I do not possess, and I am somewhat jealous of people so equipped. So seeing what I see in this Presidential election cycle, I'm left with nothing but the shaking of my head in disbelief as to how easily we as a nation can be swayed by Madison Avenue-type catchphrases and such. Thank God for all of you that are willing to try and reason through all that B as in B, S as in S.

:beer:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 25 2012,5:17 am

(busybee @ Sep. 24 2012,10:12 pm)
QUOTE
Self-Banished · Posted on Sep. 24 2012,2:11 pm
QUOTE
If you're smart and do things right, you can survive, even thrive.

CH Robinson is not a trucking company, they are a broker, worlds largest in fact.


Duh...I know that already!  Knew it 13 years ago.  

Do you really think that (being the the largest freight broker) CH Robinson cared about their regular do "gooders" who had always delivered their brokered freight on time if they dared to increase their fuel surcharge, when a bigger trucking company could absorb that cost when the price of diesel fuel skyrocketed?  

CH Robinson dropped any small company that asked for compensation for the increase in fuel.  That's how BIG BUSINESSES WORK...they have a bottom line of profit and anyone who doesn't PROVIDE that to them are a WASTE of their time.  

Every company, whether it be CH Robinson, Dart or a small business owner just starting out DEPENDS upon the PRICE of fuel in order to ship freight from point A to point B and every company who NEEDS SHIPMENTS from POINT A to POINT B is going to look for the CHEAPEST and NOT NECESSARILY the BEST shipping company to serve their needs, rather than protecting their "bottom line profit" when the price of fuel increases, which has NOTHING to do with trucking companies Job Performance or ABILITY to SURVIVIE...

Yes I agree that CH Robinson is a cold and calculating company and the thing is if you don't like them, you don't have to do business with them. If you're a long hauler they're nice to use if you want to get home. Also, if you want quick pay, just walk into one of their  offices with signed freight bills and you have a check in about 30min. They serve a purpose, that's about it.

All companies have a surcharge scale and they're all about the same. Everyone seems to be at about 48% right now.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 25 2012,5:34 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 24 2012,10:14 pm)
QUOTE
Tumbling home and stock prices during the recession cost Americans nearly a quarter of their wealth. From a pre-recession peak of $67.4 trillion in the fall of 2007, household wealth plummeted to $51.2 trillion in early 2009. But as of the April-June quarter, it has climbed back to $62.7 trillion.

Bill Hampel, chief economist at the Credit Union National Association, calculates that Americans will add $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion to their net worth in the current July-September quarter. That would bring net worth to about 4.3 percent below its pre-recession peak.
"We're not there yet, but we're getting close," Hampel said. "Households are rebuilding their capacity to spend."

< http://www.denverpost.com/busines...cession >

Economic Growth!!

Their capacity to spend :dunce:  It sad when our economy depends on consumerism instead of manufacturing but what am I saying? I make my money off consumerism, pretty much everything I haul comes from overseas. And that's what I got, there are plenty of people to buy the products I haul, if they don't, somebody else will.

As far as America losing their ass, what do you want? Guarantees? I remember about 2001 and the housing bubble was still intact I had realtors knocking on my door and asking if I wanted to sell my house. Now they knock on my door asking questions about the foreclosure down the street.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 25 2012,2:46 pm
I think high school drop-outs should go into the profession of driving truck.. 200,000 trucking jobs are open for those that can qualify.. They need to be able to sit on their ass and scratch themselves.. :D  

Fill those 200,000 trucker jobs and they'll be able to SPEND, buy a home, buy a car, buy some new chrome stacks and feed their family..

You need to SPEND money to make money.. Same thing goes for government..

Just don't piss it away like Bush/Cheney..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 25 2012,3:10 pm
There you go AL, you could drive truck for a living but I doubt you're smart enough. Don't feel bad though, those customers need to feel welcomed when they walk into the store,  :rofl: Keep up the good work :D
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 25 2012,5:25 pm

(Botto 82 @ Sep. 25 2012,2:00 am)
QUOTE
Forgive the Electorate. Their collective memory goes back a year or so, and that's about it. This is the droid army the politicos play to. Having a reasoned discussion of the facts is a rarity, and, in some environs, frowned upon. That's why I enjoy what goes on here.

Having my mind made up on a subject, once and for all, forever and ever, Amen is a luxury of mind shutdown that I do not possess, and I am somewhat jealous of people so equipped. So seeing what I see in this Presidential election cycle, I'm left with nothing but the shaking of my head in disbelief as to how easily we as a nation can be swayed by Madison Avenue-type catchphrases and such. Thank God for all of you that are willing to try and reason through all that B as in B, S as in S.

:beer:

Coming from you I thought I was going to cry.. I work very hard to get people like you to realize how important it is to not let Mitt become president..

:beer:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 26 2012,5:51 pm
Obama 5 Electoral Votes away from winning a second term as President.. :thumbsup:

< http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls...ap.html >

Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 27 2012,8:25 am
well, no need to have the election then.  Go home everyone crown the king now.  :dunce:
I think the debates will decide it.  And I don't mean the VP debates.  They don't mean jack unless one of them says something insanely stupid.
It is all about the top of the ticket at this point.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,8:42 am
^ Insanely stupid??? Biden??? :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,9:41 am
Joe Scarborough reacts to Romney clip - 'Sweet Jesus'


Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,10:20 am
So I heard a clip yesterday that Obama wants to export more jobs.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,10:37 am
Obama misspeaks: "I want to see us export more jobs"


Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,11:28 am
^ misspeaks? I heard him clearly, he wanted to export more jobs.

Your video wouldn't load by the way.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,11:44 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 27 2012,11:28 am)
QUOTE
^ misspeaks? I heard him clearly, he wanted to export more jobs.

Your video wouldn't load by the way.

You heard him clearly without hearing the video.. :rofl:  

Did you just misspeak or are you just a dumba$$?? :rofl:

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,1:06 pm
Nope, just running around the house this am, had the TV on, pretty sure it was CNBC and I heard it, it was his voice, no mistaking it, said henwanted to export more jobs.

Why? Did I miss something? :D

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,1:35 pm
You said he misspoke? Might this be
A
Freudian slip???

Then again, god doesn't make mistakes. :D

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,3:01 pm
Obama clearly meant to say "export more products." Romney is the job exporter..


Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,3:35 pm

(Glad I Left @ Sep. 27 2012,8:25 am)
QUOTE
well, no need to have the election then.  Go home everyone crown the king now.  :dunce:
I think the debates will decide it.  And I don't mean the VP debates.  They don't mean jack unless one of them says something insanely stupid.
It is all about the top of the ticket at this point.

Huffington Post already shows that if the election were held today, Obama would win.. Obama will be cool at the debates, Romney will continue to look like a dorky robot.. Romney will lose..

< http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012...ion-map >


Posted by Wolfie on Sep. 27 2012,3:47 pm
Obama will get all too many votes from retards like this.
< http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio&feature=share >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,3:50 pm
Sorry, your video doesn't load :(

What else you got???

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,3:54 pm
Wolfe's loaded, I saw the ugly, toothless woman.

Are you sure you're doing it right? :dunce:

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,3:58 pm
I've watched all video's.. Maybe you need a new computer..

< http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwx6Qtfm4lo&feature=player_embedded >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,5:58 pm
Don't post from a computer, I use an I-phone
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 27 2012,6:18 pm
So I'm confused, Obama did say he was in favor of exporting jobs?
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 27 2012,9:27 pm
Yep.  I heard it too.  Obama wants to export jobs.  Let's clarify something...he already does.

Nuff said.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,10:43 pm
Romney supported the Vietnam War and the Draft.. He then moves to France..

< http://www.nytimes.com/2012...ted=all >

Posted by busybee on Sep. 27 2012,10:54 pm
Self-Banished Posted on: Sep. 25 2012,5:17 am

QUOTE
Yes I agree that CH Robinson is a cold and calculating company and the thing is if you don't like them, you don't have to do business with them.


If ONLY that was possible with those who "ATTEMPT" to run and get elected into positions that operate the US Government that affect the hard working citizen!  LOL!!  

QUOTE
If you're a long hauler they're nice to use if you want to get home.


That's how it's always been with CH Robinson.  However, when the price of fuel increases in the U.S. only a companies like CH Robinson can step in and take away direct shipper freight contracts from "local long distance haulers" and turn them into freight that other truck driver's use to get "close to home" because to the shipper, that is their most effective and efficient way to keep their own profits up, regardless of the price of fuel.  

QUOTE
Also, if you want quick pay, just walk into one of their  offices with signed freight bills and you have a check in about 30min. They serve a purpose, that's about it.


They serve the corporate world...cheap labor=company profit.  That's their bottom line and if anything tips in their favor...such as a diesel fuel increase, they will reap the benefits from that...which puts sole proprietors out of business very quickly.  

QUOTE
All companies have a surcharge scale and they're all about the same. Everyone seems to be at about 48% right now.


A fuel surcharge means nothing if a sole proprietor/owner operator of a trucking company can't get at least half of their freight shipments on their own without having to "share" the profit with a company like CH Robinson.

Those days are long gone and have been since at least 2003/04 for many because the profit margin decreased so incredibly that the majority of sole proprietorships had to sell out because they couldn't absorb the increase cost of fuel and shippers desire to pay the least amount that they could to ship their freight out within the U.S.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,11:11 pm
Romney-Ryan Economic Plans Would Increase Unemployment, Deepen Recession

< http://www.thenation.com/blog...ession# >


Posted by busybee on Sep. 27 2012,11:16 pm
alcitizens Posted on: Sep. 25 2012,2:46 pm

QUOTE
I think high school drop-outs should go into the profession of driving truck.. 200,000 trucking jobs are open for those that can qualify.. They need to be able to sit on their ass and scratch themselves.. :D  


Sounds like you're biased about those who drive truck.  Unfortunate theory to have about your fellow American's who make sure you have the things you want at the stores you choose to buy them at.

QUOTE
Fill those 200,000 trucker jobs and they'll be able to SPEND, buy a home, buy a car, buy some new chrome stacks and feed their family..


No they won't.  Those days ended around 2002/03 when the price of diesel fuel went up and never went back down to a competitive level that could compete with "big businesses."  

QUOTE
You need to SPEND money to make money.. Same thing goes for government..


I wouldn't recommend anyone to become an over the road truck driver in the U.S. as a sole proprietor/small business owner as of today.  In 1998-2001, I would have, but not since then because everything changed then and not to the benefit of any loyal, hard working truck driver who made sure U.S citizens had what they needed/wanted when they wanted it to be in the store they chose to buy it at.

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 27 2012,11:23 pm
draft dodger who's now a chickenhawk...

< http://youtu.be/SjeFF4xViP0 >

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 27 2012,11:29 pm

(busybee @ Sep. 27 2012,11:16 pm)
QUOTE
alcitizens Posted on: Sep. 25 2012,2:46 pm

QUOTE
I think high school drop-outs should go into the profession of driving truck.. 200,000 trucking jobs are open for those that can qualify.. They need to be able to sit on their ass and scratch themselves.. :D  


Sounds like you're biased about those who drive truck.  Unfortunate theory to have about your fellow American's who make sure you have the things you want at the stores you choose to buy them at.

I respect what Truck Drivers do.. I was joking around with SB, that's why I put a smiley face at the end of my comment.


Posted by busybee on Sep. 27 2012,11:59 pm
Yea...I understood that...Alcitizens...

Still my opinion that the U.S. Government has the least amount of respect for truck drivers or any hard working citizen...not that it matters...   :(

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2012,6:03 am
If you want to be accurate Al, college dropout. :D
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2012,6:10 am

(busybee @ Sep. 27 2012,10:54 pm)
QUOTE
Self-Banished Posted on: Sep. 25 2012,5:17 am

QUOTE
Yes I agree that CH Robinson is a cold and calculating company and the thing is if you don't like them, you don't have to do business with them.


If ONLY that was possible with those who "ATTEMPT" to run and get elected into positions that operate the US Government that affect the hard working citizen!  LOL!!  

QUOTE
If you're a long hauler they're nice to use if you want to get home.


That's how it's always been with CH Robinson.  However, when the price of fuel increases in the U.S. only a companies like CH Robinson can step in and take away direct shipper freight contracts from "local long distance haulers" and turn them into freight that other truck driver's use to get "close to home" because to the shipper, that is their most effective and efficient way to keep their own profits up, regardless of the price of fuel.  

QUOTE
Also, if you want quick pay, just walk into one of their  offices with signed freight bills and you have a check in about 30min. They serve a purpose, that's about it.


They serve the corporate world...cheap labor=company profit.  That's their bottom line and if anything tips in their favor...such as a diesel fuel increase, they will reap the benefits from that...which puts sole proprietors out of business very quickly.  

QUOTE
All companies have a surcharge scale and they're all about the same. Everyone seems to be at about 48% right now.


A fuel surcharge means nothing if a sole proprietor/owner operator of a trucking company can't get at least half of their freight shipments on their own without having to "share" the profit with a company like CH Robinson.

Those days are long gone and have been since at least 2003/04 for many because the profit margin decreased so incredibly that the majority of sole proprietorships had to sell out because they couldn't absorb the increase cost of fuel and shippers desire to pay the least amount that they could to ship their freight out within the U.S.

Am I to understand you ARE in the business or you WERE in the business?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2012,12:51 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 27 2012,11:11 pm)
QUOTE
Romney-Ryan Economic Plans Would Increase Unemployment, Deepen Recession

< http://www.thenation.com/blog...ession# >


Deepen recession??? I thought the recession had ended acording to the press.

You mean tomtell me that we've never emerged from this recession?

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 28 2012,4:06 pm
30 months of Private Sector Jobs Growth still hasn't been fast enough to lower the unemployment rate very much.. The goal of republicans for the past four years has been to keep economic growth slow to give them a chance at the White House..

For those without a job, we are still in a recession..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2012,4:47 pm
Well quit being recessed and go get a job. :D
Posted by busybee on Sep. 28 2012,7:35 pm
Self-Banished · Posted on Sep. 28 2012,6:10 am

QUOTE
Am I to understand you ARE in the business or you WERE in the business?


Worked for a trucking company from 2000 thru 2006.  I did everything for the company except drive truck.  

It was really sad to see how much things changed for the company and the owner-operators that were leased on to the company in that short period time.  You just can't help but notice how the profit margins decreased when you prepare 1099's over a six year time period and you know it's because larger trucking companies/brokerages could come in and absorb the cost and/or work shippers to give them a better deal with the increase in the price of diesel fuel, better than a smaller company/owner operators.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2012,9:43 pm

(busybee @ Sep. 28 2012,7:35 pm)
QUOTE
Self-Banished · Posted on Sep. 28 2012,6:10 am

QUOTE
Am I to understand you ARE in the business or you WERE in the business?


Worked for a trucking company from 2000 thru 2006.  I did everything for the company except drive truck.  

It was really sad to see how much things changed for the company and the owner-operators that were leased on to the company in that short period time.  You just can't help but notice how the profit margins decreased when you prepare 1099's over a six year time period and you know it's because larger trucking companies/brokerages could come in and absorb the cost and/or work shippers to give them a better deal with the increase in the price of diesel fuel, better than a smaller company/owner operators.

6 whole years eh? I've been playing this game since 1980. I've seen companies come and go, big ones and small ones. I don't claim to be the smartest in the business but if you work hard, take advantage of the right opportunities one can thrive.

I'm playing vulture over a company right now, watching them slowly fail. It' only a matter of time now. :)

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2012,9:50 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 28 2012,4:06 pm)
QUOTE
30 months of Private Sector Jobs Growth still hasn't been fast enough to lower the unemployment rate very much.. The goal of republicans for the past four years has been to keep economic growth slow to give them a chance at the White House..

For those without a job, we are still in a recession..

Fed Ex made an announcement last week that the economy is acting like it's going into another recession. The BNSF is seeing less freight now. I normally attribute this to being an election year and companies are treading lightly, I've seen this before. Let's hope it's the election effect
Posted by busybee on Sep. 29 2012,5:04 am
Self-Banished · Posted on Sep. 28 2012,9:43 pm

QUOTE
6 whole years eh? I've been playing this game since 1980. I've seen companies come and go, big ones and small ones. I don't claim to be the smartest in the business but if you work hard, take advantage of the right opportunities one can thrive.

I'm playing vulture over a company right now, watching them slowly fail. It' only a matter of time now.


I'm by no means degrading truck drivers/owner operators. Some of the best people I ever met were dedicated, hard working truck drivers. (Also met a few nut jobs too.  LOL)  

I guess I'm just saying that it isn't easier today than it was in years past to become self-employed as a truck driver.

Of course, that's the case with any type self employment or job seeking person as of today in the U.S.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 29 2012,8:17 am
Sure it's easy BB, look at all the Somalis entering the market. I don't know where they get the money, they barely speak english and think they're entitled to the best runs. They're just ripe for abuse but I suppose someone has to pull the crap freight.

Nutty truck drivers??? If you want to be a really good driver you have to be a little off plum. :D

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 29 2012,9:12 am
< http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArC7XarwnWI&feature=g-logo-xre >
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 29 2012,2:15 pm

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 29 2012,3:46 pm
Yes Al, he paid 14% on money that had already been taxed once :frusty:  why don't you stop being jealous and go out and make some $$$ :D
Posted by Moparman on Sep. 29 2012,4:45 pm
Really??? When was he taxed on the profit from his investment the first time?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 29 2012,5:54 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 29 2012,3:46 pm)
QUOTE
Yes Al, he paid 14% on money that had already been taxed once :frusty:  why don't you stop being jealous and go out and make some $$$ :D

Again I ask, if the U.S. and Europe are so broke, who has all the money?? I always hear that we need to stop printing money.. Who is it that has all this money that has racked up our national debt?

How do you get a portion of that money at the top put back into our economy?

Why is it the majority have services cut and higher property taxes while the elite continue to expand their empire?

Its time for the wealthy to start investing in America.. The Buffet Rule, a 30% minimum federal tax for those making over $500,000 per year..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 29 2012,6:42 pm
Oh Al, you're nothing more than a social pig. This is investment money, money that is risked and if you go and tax it more than it's most likely gonna stay parked safely away. You want the money supply to increase then lower the capital gains tax. All you want is a handout.  :(
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 29 2012,6:43 pm
By the way if old Warren wants to he can give more to the gov. any time he likes.
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 29 2012,7:26 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 29 2012,3:46 pm)
QUOTE
Yes Al, he paid 14% on money that had already been taxed once :frusty:  why don't you stop being jealous and go out and make some $$$ :D

Corporations by law are a separate entity.  I know it's often claimed as double taxation, but what they're really saying is that the corporation is legally separate from Romney if the corporation gets sued or declares bankruptcy, but at tax time he wants to claim otherwise.  But you can't pierce the corporate veil on paper, so why do it in rhetoric?   :dunno:

That's assuming there IS a corporate tax.  S Corp or large multinationals in recent years have proven there are exceptions to a lot of this.  The 47% get to rub shoulders with the likes of G.E. when it comes to tax liability on income.   :;):

QUOTE
This is investment money, money that is risked and if you go and tax it more than it's most likely gonna stay parked safely away. You want the money supply to increase then lower the capital gains tax. All you want is a handout.  :(


Right, we're to believe Romney and Buffet will stuff their loot under the mattress if they lose their preferable tax status.  We've been hearing that song for a long time, the Gekkos of the world won't be taking their chips and putting them into low interest accounts anytime soon, even if you taxed them at the rate as if they were punching a clock.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 29 2012,8:09 pm
"I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off."

Warren E Buffet
Billionaire Investor

< http://www.nytimes.com/2011...ch.html >

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 29 2012,9:18 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 29 2012,6:42 pm)
QUOTE
All you want is a handout.  :(

All I want is to stop falling behind the rest of the world in education and infrastructure. I also have a problem with a growing national debt created by the rich, for the rich..
Posted by busybee on Sep. 29 2012,10:39 pm
Self-Banished · Posted on Sep. 29 2012,8:17 am

QUOTE
Sure it's easy BB, look at all the Somalis entering the market. I don't know where they get the money, they barely speak english and think they're entitled to the best runs.


I think it's scary that even though the U.S. Federal Motor Carrier Association requires that a Commercial Driver's License holder, "can read and speak the English language sufficiently to converse with the general public, to understand highway traffic signs and signals in the English language, to respond to official inquiries, and to make entries on reports and records;" yet there's people who are operating commercial vehicles in our country who can't.  

QUOTE
They're just ripe for abuse but I suppose someone has to pull the crap freight.


Exactly!  There's only enough "good freight" to be dealt out as of today, thus not everyone who attempts to become self-employed in the U.S. business of commercial freight hauling can experience the "success" you've had.  The competition is more fierce and corrupt than when you said you started in the business in 1980...

Who do you blame for that?  The Samali's or those who are the American Citizen's who "abuse them" and disregard the rules in order to make their own pockets "rich?"

QUOTE
Nutty truck drivers??? If you want to be a really good driver you have to be a little off plum.


:rofl:  :rockon:

Posted by busybee on Sep. 29 2012,11:01 pm
alcitizens · Posted on Sep. 29 2012,9:18 pm

QUOTE
QUOTE
(Self-Banished @ Sep. 29 2012,6:42 pm)
QUOTE
All you want is a handout.  :(


All I want is to stop falling behind the rest of the world in education and infrastructure. I also have a problem with a growing national debt created by the rich, for the rich..


Unfortunately, ALCitizen, wanting is one thing and receiving what you want in this country has been and will continue to be tarnished by "politics."  There's no way to avoid the issue.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 30 2012,12:01 am
(Busybee)
QUOTE
Unfortunately, ALCitizen, wanting is one thing and receiving what you want in this country has been and will continue to be tarnished by "politics."  There's no way to avoid the issue.


President Obama: "We've Come Too Far to Turn Back Now."



The first of the three 90-minute debates between Obama/Romney will be this Wednesday Oct. 3rd from 8 to 9:30 p.m. Central Time.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 30 2012,2:04 am
Narrated by Tom Hanks:


Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 30 2012,7:50 am
^So what? We're supposed to be impressed by some some Hollywood Lib? :dunce:

By the way you're video wouldn't load again.

Posted by busybee on Sep. 30 2012,7:29 pm
Self Banished...

I like Tom Hanks and think he's an excellent actor/producer.  I think he's overpaid, but who isn't in this country when it comes to the "entertainment" of other U.S. citizen's, whether it be sports or movies/television shows?

Most U.S. citizen's would rather be a tv, movie, or sports star than a "truck driver."

I didn't have any trouble with ALCitizen's links...  Did he fix them because of your not being able to view them?

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 30 2012,11:00 pm
Let me know when you get a clue.^ :dunce:
Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 01 2012,8:44 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 30 2012,7:50 am)
QUOTE
By the way you're video wouldn't load again.

You've said you're on an iPhone though.  I've heard Apple isn't very compatible with the Adobe Flash players commonly used for internet video, so that might be your issue.  I've had no trouble viewing them on my PC or Android.

Busybee:
QUOTE
I like Tom Hanks and think he's an excellent actor/producer.  I think he's overpaid, but who isn't in this country when it comes to the "entertainment" of other U.S. citizen's, whether it be sports or movies/television shows?

Most U.S. citizen's would rather be a tv, movie, or sports star than a "truck driver."


The big names are overpaid, but when you consider the risk vs. reward of that industry, it's not too out of line.  For everyone who's making seven figures I bet there's thousands playing ball or doing audtions who are getting an eviction notice.

Rare actors live in a mansion, the vast majority are talking about how once they were in a deoderant commercial.   :D

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 01 2012,9:52 am
And you can let me know when you get a clue. :dunce:
Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 01 2012,10:34 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 01 2012,9:52 am)
QUOTE
And you can let me know when you get a clue. :dunce:

Ha, you did it, you made a funny!   :beer:

I like how you avoid engaging the topic, no real rebuttal of what you're specifically talking about either.   :sarcasm:

Second or third grade debate tactics are great, as long as you're in second or third grade.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 01 2012,1:05 pm
You still don't get it, does it need to be spelled out?

Adolescent accusations? Feel superior now?

Posted by pepi-lapew on Oct. 01 2012,2:24 pm
Im using the write in vote Ill vote the dog catcher in as PRES. He smarter than both.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 02 2012,6:19 pm

(irisheyes @ Oct. 01 2012,10:34 am)
QUOTE
I like how you avoid engaging the topic, no real rebuttal of what you're specifically talking about either.

Second or third grade debate tactics are great, as long as you're in second or third grade.

Reminds me of Romney.. I predict Romney will have a total meltdown during Wednesday's Debate against Obama..
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 02 2012,6:25 pm
^ You two should get a room. :blush:
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 02 2012,7:32 pm
You do know that you're making Republicans look mentally challenged.. Don't you?
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 02 2012,8:18 pm
And you are demonstrating the dems true colors.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 02 2012,9:34 pm
Now that was quite the "zinger.." :dunce:

You hurted my fewings you poopy head..

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 02 2012,9:58 pm
< http://dailycaller.com/2012...zf13thD >

Because my web fu is weak today I can only leave the link but please click on the link and enjoy potus speaking before he was potus I am sure totus is in there somewhere he gives props to his bud Jeremiah Wright.....uncensored.

Now tell me what you really think....

Enjoy!!

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 02 2012,10:07 pm
< http://dailycaller.com/2012...5t0GCIj >

What another one?

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 02 2012,10:09 pm
< http://dailycaller.com/2012...ufo9GuC >

The full one say it isn't so....

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 03 2012,12:34 am
:rofl:

< http://vod.fxnetworks.com/watch/totallybiased/36981946 >

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 03 2012,12:47 am
:laugh:


Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 03 2012,5:19 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 02 2012,9:34 pm)
QUOTE
Now that was quite the "zinger.." :dunce:

You hurted my fewings you poopy head..

Well so sorry to hurt your "feelings" :sarcasm: The level of civility from some of the libs is going into the toilet. Churches vandalized, cars keyed and it gets no better from the other side, houses vandalized because the had vote "no" signs in their yard.

Obama and his buddies have done their best to divide this country by playing one side against another.  

I like Biden recently saying that the middle class has been buried in the last 4 years. His veiw is quite accurate.

Poopy head?

Posted by Glad I Left on Oct. 03 2012,9:05 am
My debate prediction:
Obama will have the better orator skills, but won't rile up Romney too bad.  He is too well versed as a slimy politician. We saw that during the Republican nomination debates.
If Obama stays on point he will win.  When he goes off teleprompter he gets himself into trouble. The only one worse would be Biden, but the VP debates don't mean jack.

In the end I suspect Obama will come off looking better, but after it is over, both sides will claim victory and we will hear about  it ad nauseum for the next week (puke)

Since I will be in Korea and will be voting absentee this year, I am voting for myself as president.  I cannot do any worse than these two clowns.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 03 2012,2:45 pm

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 03 2012,5:19 am)
QUOTE
Obama and his buddies have done their best to divide this country by playing one side against another.  

I like Biden recently saying that the middle class has been buried in the last 4 years. His veiw is quite accurate.

Poopy head?

Ya, and Romney thinks half the country believe they are victims.. Who's really trying to divide America?



The Bush Great Recession has hit the middle class harder than any other income group..

Obstruction by a Radical Republican Congress has slowed job growth and debt reduction.. Smart move politically, bad move for the people of the U.S.

Posted by the breeze on Oct. 03 2012,2:57 pm
The Obama campaign asks women to vote with their 'lady parts'. Can liberals get any cruder?
By Tim Stanley US politics Last updated: October 3rd, 2012

134 Comments Comment on this article


Crude: this is the direction in which US politics is heading

Team Obama made a priceless gaffe on Tuesday. Someone posted an e-card on barackobama.com of a woman with the text: “Vote Like Your Lady Parts Depend On It.”

The e-card was quickly taken down, but the citizen journalists on Twitter had already copied and
< http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news...-cruder >

Posted by the breeze on Oct. 03 2012,3:20 pm
Exclusive: Joseph Farah identifies BHO policy proposal GOP could exploit to victory




There’s an issue out there that can ensure Barack Obama is defeated in 2012.




It’s not Obamacare.


It’s not his religious views.
It’s not his commitment to socialist and anti-American causes.

It’s not even the birth certificate and his eligibility issues.

I believe the issue that will take Obama down if Republicans make it an issue is his administration’s proposed budget cuts for active-duty military personnel and military retirees – but not civilian defense workers.


Obama has tipped his hand. He’s showing the entire country what he thinks about our military service people – the people who risk their lives for their country are worth less than civilian defense workers who push papers around in Washington.

Chances are you don’t know much about this story. There’s a good reason for that. The Big Media don’t want you to know, because they recognize the political radioactivity it represents. This is the Death Star < http://beforeitsnews.com/electio...14.html >

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 03 2012,4:23 pm
Republicans want to control what women can and can't do with their own bodies including their vagina's.. :(

Romney didn't even mention the troops in Afghanistan or those who have sacrificed in combat at the Republican National Convention.. :dunce:

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 03 2012,6:17 pm
^Damn Al, you certainly are a crude a-hole. :notworthy:
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 03 2012,6:25 pm

(Glad I Left @ Oct. 03 2012,9:05 am)
QUOTE
My debate prediction:
Obama will have the better orator skills, but won't rile up Romney too bad.  He is too well versed as a slimy politician. We saw that during the Republican nomination debates.
If Obama stays on point he will win.  When he goes off teleprompter he gets himself into trouble. The only one worse would be Biden, but the VP debates don't mean jack.

In the end I suspect Obama will come off looking better, but after it is over, both sides will claim victory and we will hear about  it ad nauseum for the next week (puke)

Since I will be in Korea and will be voting absentee this year, I am voting for myself as president.  I cannot do any worse than these two clowns.

If you don't like the choices and I can sympathize I prefer the idea to corrupt the system from within otherwise voting for yourself is like urinating directly into the wind and you accomplish nothing but that is your right and do so if you wish!

Thanks for doing what you do  :thumbsup:

I have been other places and have done that it's not an easy road.

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 03 2012,6:52 pm
Hey Al....

I remember suffering though the bill klintoon era I spent many many many 12 hour shifts because of the lack of parts and many, many deployments building nations. I trust no democrat as they worship the free sh*tters and the labor unions along with the eco nutjobs they also love running guns, "winning" the war on terrorism, wasting billions on green energy.

Old joe said it best the middle class is being buried....

But it is by the democrats love of taxation regulation and abusive federal agencies they are oppressing the very people they claim to help that is why I want a divorce from our government they are helping me to death literally.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 03 2012,10:48 pm
^Grinning Dragon gun loving crack pot.. Buy more guns to help the economy.. Tax return on guns is really good.. Or is it?? Cost is very high to bury or cremate the dead.. Does create a job for every death..

If you failed during the Clinton years, you were on crack or you had just been born in an abusive family..

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 03 2012,11:18 pm
TOTUS TOTUS... WHERE ART THOU?

"Jim.... you may want to move on to another topic"

Posted by allergic to bogus on Oct. 04 2012,12:55 am
Mitt showed that HE is presidential material. Who was that bumbling, stammering fool standing up on stage with him.??? Looked like he would much rather be back on the golf course practicing up his skills for his next job!!!
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 04 2012,3:00 am
I'd have to agree ATB, Obama got his ass kicked.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,4:29 am

(allergic to bogus @ Oct. 04 2012,12:55 am)
QUOTE
Mitt showed that HE is presidential material. Who was that bumbling, stammering fool standing up on stage with him.??? Looked like he would much rather be back on the golf course practicing up his skills for his next job!!!

You could see who was desperate.. Romney was short of pulling an Oprah.. Vote for me and I'll give you a Toyota.. :rofl:

Romney did really good at speaking tax cuts for all.. He just can't tell anyone how he's going to pay for it..

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 04 2012,7:27 am
Free Toyota??? No, he did propose a few cuts in there, not nearly enough. I did like one of the cuts he proposed.

DEATH TO BIG BIRD!!! :notworthy:

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 04 2012,7:30 am
Did Romney bring up the NDAA and indefinite detention of Americans? Did he bring up the crazy powers given to the government in that Executive Order of Obama's?


Lemme guess...NO

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 04 2012,7:51 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 03 2012,4:23 pm)
QUOTE
Republicans want to control what women can and can't do with their own bodies including their vagina's.. :(

Liar.

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 04 2012,7:56 am
Alci, you must have holes in your knee pads by now.  Many of the lib pundits are even calling it a win for Romney.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,8:04 am

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 04 2012,7:51 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 03 2012,4:23 pm)
QUOTE
Republicans want to control what women can and can't do with their own bodies including their vagina's.. :(

Liar.

Nobody wants anything to do with your vagina..
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,8:08 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 04 2012,7:27 am)
QUOTE
Free Toyota??? No, he did propose a few cuts in there, not nearly enough. I did like one of the cuts he proposed.

DEATH TO BIG BIRD!!! :notworthy:

No doubt Obama won..
Posted by the breeze on Oct. 04 2012,8:25 am
I liked what Romney said last night. I liked it a lot – what he said made sense. More importantly, I believe he means it
Romney Hits One Out of the Park!
- Jim ONeill (Bio and Archives) Thursday, October 4, 2012


6

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mitt Romney won the first Presidential Debate walking away. It was such a blowout that liberal spinmeisters were left sputtering excuses and searching for explanations.

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews was feeling no tingles last night – not up his leg, not anywhere. “Where was Obama tonight?” he lamented after the debate. Andrew Sullivan observed, “this was a disaster for the president…and his effete, wonkish lectures may have jolted a lot of independents into giving Romney a second look.”


If Romney was at the top of his game, Obama’s performance was, to be charitable, lackluster. Is it possible that even he gets tired of repeating the same lame


< http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/49999 >

Posted by the breeze on Oct. 04 2012,8:26 am
" MSNBC’s Chris Matthews was feeling no tingles last night "  :rofl:
Posted by Glad I Left on Oct. 04 2012,9:15 am
^

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 04 2012,9:23 am

(Glad I Left @ Oct. 04 2012,9:15 am)
QUOTE
^

:clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  :clap:  



Even depends could not contain chrissy's fluids running down his leg because he is scared and upset.

Big Bird your days are numbered no more public teat for you, Cookie Monster you are next for causing the needless and wanton destruction of my favorite snack you have been put on notice!

The times are a changing...

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 04 2012,9:28 am
I really don't think we have to worry about the bird or the monster. Sesame street makes a lot of money on it's own.
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 04 2012,10:17 am

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,7:30 am)
QUOTE
Did Romney bring up the NDAA and indefinite detention of Americans? Did he bring up the crazy powers given to the government in that Executive Order of Obama's?


Lemme guess...NO

Your guess is correct Roz. Romney did NOT bring up either of those issues. It's strange isn't it? People would be stampeding and protesting to throw Obama out immediately if he had. It would be a for sure win for Romney.

What do you think is up with that?

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,10:17 am

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 04 2012,9:23 am)
QUOTE
Even depends could not contain chrissy's fluids running down his leg because he is scared and upset.

Big Bird your days are numbered no more public teat for you, Cookie Monster you are next for causing the needless and wanton destruction of my favorite snack you have been put on notice!

The times are a changing...

People know Romney will say anything.. Chris Mathews knows Romney will say anything.. Obama will sit back and let Romney implode..

Ever heard of a setup? You just seen one.. :thumbsup:

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 04 2012,10:21 am

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,10:17 am)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,7:30 am)
QUOTE
Did Romney bring up the NDAA and indefinite detention of Americans? Did he bring up the crazy powers given to the government in that Executive Order of Obama's?


Lemme guess...NO

Your guess is correct Roz. Romney did NOT bring up either of those issues. It's strange isn't it? People would be stampeding and protesting to throw Obama out immediately if he had. It would be a for sure win for Romney.

What do you think is up with that?

Good question Roz. Maybe martial law type things just aren't as important as other things? Maybe we just have our priorities in the wrong place.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,10:27 am
Drink Much?
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 04 2012,10:38 am
Don't know about her but AL I think you have been having a little of grandpa's cough medicine and I understand, yep it was all a set up chairman 0.... well sucked. That was the plan well it was a success, just like all the other plans that suck they are actually successes we just need to lower expectations to meet reality.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,10:48 am
(Zombie Hunter)
QUOTE
Don't know about her but AL I think you have been having a little of grandpa's cough medicine and I understand, yep it was all a set up chairman 0... well sucked. That was the plan well it was a success, just like all the other plans that suck they are actually successes we just need to lower expectations to meet reality.


Lower Expectations during the next two debates.. SETUP!! :thumbsup:

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 04 2012,10:56 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,10:27 am)
QUOTE
Drink Much?

Al, some of us in the forum have been talking about that NDAA indefinite detention thing and that executive order for months now. If I remember right you have never acknowledged even seeing mention of them in any way. So how about giving us your opinion on those two things.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,11:07 am

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,10:56 am)
QUOTE
Some of us in the forum have been talking about that NDAA indefinite detention thing and that executive order for months now.

Who?? You, Roz, Rosy and Rosalind?? :rofl:
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 04 2012,11:15 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,11:07 am)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,10:56 am)
QUOTE
Some of us in the forum have been talking about that NDAA indefinite detention thing and that executive order for months now.

Who?? You, Roz, Rosy and Rosalind?? :rofl:

No, talking to myself is a new thing. Just started today. Lately I've felt like I must be typing with invisible ink whenever I bring those two topics up.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,11:58 am
Who does Romney care about other than himself?
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 04 2012,12:11 pm
grrrrrrrrrrrrr (shaking my keyboard) stupid thing must be out of ink again.
Posted by Botto 82 on Oct. 04 2012,12:29 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,11:07 am)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,10:56 am)
QUOTE
Some of us in the forum have been talking about that NDAA indefinite detention thing and that executive order for months now.

Who?? You, Roz, Rosy and Rosalind?? :rofl:

I've been talking about it.

My Obamunist friends gloss over it like it never happened. Most everyone else just ratchets up their fear of the government, and sticks their heads back in the sand, where they pipe in nonstop NFL games and episodes of Jersey Shore.

Our civil liberties are going down left and right, and Romney's take on Big Bird dominates the discussion?

We're screwed, and I guess we have it coming. Welcome to Berlin, circa 1938.

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 04 2012,12:37 pm
I do find it offensive that AL tries to use the military as a prop to support chairman 0 that is sad when you use everything but chairman 0's record to support him.

If chairman 0 supported the military he would let them finish the job instead of micromanaging and cutting benefits and needed upgrades because the equipment is wearing out, my part of my healthcare is going up and I can only imagine the retention of qualified and competent personnel must be now.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 04 2012,12:40 pm
Romney doesn't even think the soldiers, or the war is "important" and you blame Obama?
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 04 2012,12:47 pm

(Botto 82 @ Oct. 04 2012,12:29 pm)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,11:07 am)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 04 2012,10:56 am)
QUOTE
Some of us in the forum have been talking about that NDAA indefinite detention thing and that executive order for months now.

Who?? You, Roz, Rosy and Rosalind?? :rofl:

I've been talking about it.

My Obamunist friends gloss over it like it never happened. Most everyone else just ratchets up their fear of the government, and sticks their heads back in the sand, where they pipe in nonstop NFL games and episodes of Jersey Shore.

Our civil liberties are going down left and right, and Romney's take on Big Bird dominates the discussion?

We're screwed, and I guess we have it coming. Welcome to Berlin, circa 1938.

Yep it's coming and yes you are right we have earned it, the people better speak up before they can no longer speak but when they are allowed too.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 04 2012,1:35 pm

(Liberal @ Oct. 04 2012,12:40 pm)
QUOTE
Romney doesn't even think the soldiers, or the war is "important" and you blame Obama?

Who is the current president that is the person that needs to be held responsible for the cuts once again we shall see the "hollow force" era.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,2:39 pm

(Botto 82 @ Oct. 04 2012,12:29 pm)
QUOTE
We're screwed, and I guess we have it coming. Welcome to Berlin, circa 1938.

If this was Germany 1938, you would have already been hanged with a piano wire.. :laugh:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 04 2012,3:43 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 04 2012,12:37 pm)
QUOTE
I do find it offensive that AL tries to use the military as a prop to support chairman 0 that is sad when you use everything but chairman 0's record to support him.

If chairman 0 supported the military he would let them finish the job instead of micromanaging and cutting benefits and needed upgrades because the equipment is wearing out, my part of my healthcare is going up and I can only imagine the retention of qualified and competent personnel must be now.

I think you need to crawl back in your bunker with your cockroach Vietnam supporting draft dodger(Romney).. A cockroach like you isn't qualified to criticize my choice of jack..
Posted by busybee on Oct. 04 2012,5:52 pm
Funkadelic Zombie Hunter
Joined: Sep. 2012

Posted on: Oct. 03 2012,6:52 pm

QUOTE
QUOTE
Hey Al...

I remember suffering though the bill klintoon era I spent many many many 12 hour shifts because of the lack of parts and many, many deployments building nations. I trust no democrat as they worship the free sh*tters and the labor unions along with the eco nutjobs they also love running guns, "winning" the war on terrorism, wasting billions on green energy.

Old joe said it best the middle class is being buried...


When REPUBLICAN BUSH was in OFFICE...PEOPLE signed up and worked long hours to "save" America on behalf of its security and safety and to assert their job was to protect ALL U.S. Citizen's from the threat of Bin Laden type terrorists that would DESTROY US if a full fledged WAR wasn't pursued and to follow thru with destroying and rebuilding another nation thru deployment of U.S. troops to that country.

Maybe that's the only HOPE the U.S. middle class who were jobless had at that time to hope for to make a living to provide for their families and/or themselves because everything was all about the free sh*tters and the labor unions along with the eco nutjobs they also love running guns, "winning" the war on terrorism?"  

QUOTE
But it is by the democrats love of taxation regulation and abusive federal agencies they are oppressing the very people they claim to help that is why I want a divorce from our government they are helping me to death literally.


Seems like you want to blame ONLY OTHER U.S. Citizen's and a SPECIFIC U.S. Political Party for your alleged unhappiness as a citizen of the U.S...

Is that what you're saying???  :dunno:

Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 04 2012,8:31 pm

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 03 2012,6:17 pm)
QUOTE
^Damn Al, you certainly are a crude a-hole. :notworthy:

When talking about the family planning portion of politics, medical terms like vagina and uterus are going to be brought up.  Sorry if that offends you and the Wisconsin legislature.   :laugh:
QUOTE
The News reports:  "'What she said was offensive," said Rep. Mike Callton, R-Nashville. 'It was so offensive, I don't even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company.'

   "Majority Floor Leader Jim Stamas, R-Midland, determined Brown's comments violated the decorum of the House, said Ari Adler, spokesman for the Republican majority."

Brown called a press conference, today, the Detroit Free Press reports. She defended her use of the word "vagina," saying it is the "anatomically medically correct term."

"If they are going to legislate my anatomy, I see no reason why I cannot mention it," she said according to the Free Press.


Why do conservative politiicans advocate for laws regarding the female anatomy if they don't feel comfortable even talking about it in medical terms?

Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 04 2012,8:49 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 04 2012,12:37 pm)
QUOTE
I do find it offensive that AL tries to use the military as a prop to support chairman 0

And you're using the military to support Romney.  :dunno:  

QUOTE
that is sad when you use everything but chairman 0's record to support him.


You'd think the hawks would like him, his record is there.  If McCain or Romney were in office now we'd still be telling the military that they can't go into Pakistan, no matter who's there, but Romney might send them to war with Iran or Russia instead.   :dunce:

QUOTE
If chairman 0 supported the military he would let them finish the job instead of micromanaging and cutting benefits and needed upgrades because the equipment is wearing out, my part of my healthcare is going up and I can only imagine the retention of qualified and competent personnel must be now.


Military costs well over half of the discretionary budget, every year.  Conservatives always complain about the deficit and the debt, then when the biggest portion of the budget comes up you guys are all for more spending.

Which is it, do you want the upgrades and continued benefit package with no changes, or do you want to cut spending?  Because regardless of what Romney tells you, giving a pink slip to Big Bird is probably not going to make that deficit shrink when he's promising to spend more on defense.

Posted by busybee on Oct. 05 2012,12:02 am
irisheyes · Posted on Oct. 04 2012,8:31 pm

QUOTE
Why do conservative politiicans advocate for laws regarding the female anatomy if they don't feel comfortable even talking about it in medical terms?


Because they can...and U.S. Citizen's accept it.  

What other reason is there for it???   :dunno:

You'd think after all these years politics wouldn't be about U.S. males vs U.S. female's anymore.

After all, both the conservative and liberal parties of the U.S. have proven that U.S. Troops are needed in other countries to "fix" the "problem" because of how they disrespect their female's rights to be "independent" and their "abuse" of their children.

Posted by busybee on Oct. 05 2012,12:25 am
irisheyes · Posted on Oct. 04 2012,8:49 pm


QUOTE
And you're using the military to support Romney.  :dunno:

Which is it, do you want the upgrades and continued benefit package with no changes, or do you want to cut spending?  Because regardless of what Romney tells you, giving a pink slip to Big Bird is probably not going to make that deficit shrink when he's promising to spend more on defense.


I'm thinking that some U.S. Citizen's depend on the U.S. Defense budget for their employment...

People in the U.S. seem to vote NOW based upon what they believe will most benefit them financially and nothing else...

Posted by Botto 82 on Oct. 05 2012,3:52 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,2:39 pm)
QUOTE

(Botto 82 @ Oct. 04 2012,12:29 pm)
QUOTE
We're screwed, and I guess we have it coming. Welcome to Berlin, circa 1938.

If this was Germany 1938, you would have already been hanged with a piano wire.. :laugh:

QUOTE

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 04 2012,12:37 pm)
QUOTE
I do find it offensive that AL tries to use the military as a prop to support chairman 0 that is sad when you use everything but chairman 0's record to support him.

If chairman 0 supported the military he would let them finish the job instead of micromanaging and cutting benefits and needed upgrades because the equipment is wearing out, my part of my healthcare is going up and I can only imagine the retention of qualified and competent personnel must be now.

I think you need to crawl back in your bunker with your cockroach Vietnam supporting draft dodger(Romney).. A cockroach like you isn't qualified to criticize my choice of jack..


So, once again, you can't debate someone on the merits (or lack thereof) of their argument(s); you have to make them out to be someone less worthy of life and oxygen and so on, because you say so.

Good luck with that...

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 05 2012,6:26 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,2:39 pm)
QUOTE

(Botto 82 @ Oct. 04 2012,12:29 pm)
QUOTE
We're screwed, and I guess we have it coming. Welcome to Berlin, circa 1938.

If this was Germany 1938, you would have already been hanged with a piano wire.. :laugh:

Don't sweat it Botto, just another idiot whomdoesn't see it coming. :dunce:
Posted by grassman on Oct. 05 2012,7:36 am
If they would cut the waste in military, that would be a start. I read once, coming from someone there,  that 3 PT boats were shipped to Pakistan. For what? What was done about them? Destroyed! :angry:
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 05 2012,8:14 am
I see the unemployment rate dropped to7.8 how convient!  Now are they counting the people that have dropped out of the work force? Maybe even have the courtesy to count the underemployed too?

What a bunch of hacks! :dunce:

Posted by Santorini on Oct. 05 2012,8:15 am

(Liberal @ Oct. 04 2012,12:40 pm)
QUOTE
Romney doesn't even think the soldiers, or the war is "important" and you blame Obama?

But Obama is the one who made military cuts...not Romney :dunno:  and what about Obamas Selective Service status??  never a mention...why not?
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 05 2012,9:17 am
The draft was long over for men of Obama's age when he was 18. He still would have had to register though otherwise he would have been ineligible for financial aid.

Of course he wouldn't have had to register if he weren't a citizen. :D

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 05 2012,12:57 pm
The economy added 181,000 jobs in July, initially estimated at 141,000, and 142,000 in August, up from 96,000. 114,000 jobs added in September.

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50...entBody >


Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 05 2012,3:04 pm

(Botto 82 @ Oct. 05 2012,3:52 am)
QUOTE
So, once again, you can't debate someone on the merits (or lack thereof) of their argument(s); you have to make them out to be someone less worthy of life and oxygen and so on, because you say so.

Good luck with that...

When a whiner biches about a President that is taking troops out of the line of fire, all else is mute..

Longest wars in U.S. history, Trillions spent, thousands dead and he wants a warmonger that did everything to avoid serving in a war he promoted(Veitnam) to be in charge of sending troops into the line of fire.. :crazy:

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 05 2012,3:36 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 05 2012,12:57 pm)
QUOTE
The economy added 181,000 jobs in July, initially estimated at 141,000, and 142,000 in August, up from 96,000. 114,000 jobs added in September.

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50...entBody >


so how can there be so many jobs created and unemployment only drops to a dubious 7.8 %?  From what I understand most of these jobs are public sector, and the private sector actually decreased.

If we went with the size of the workforce that was when Obama first took office unemployment would be more like 11 to 15%.

Posted by grassman on Oct. 05 2012,3:47 pm
Romney's idol.
 object width="420" height="315">

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 05 2012,3:49 pm

(grassman @ Oct. 05 2012,3:47 pm)
QUOTE
Romney's idol.
 object width="420" height="315">

psssttt. Old embed code!!
I think that could work for any of our leaders really.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 05 2012,3:50 pm
QUOTE
But Obama is the one who made military cuts...not Romney :dunno:  and what about Obamas Selective Service status??  never a mention...why not?

Romney is the one that said the soldiers weren't important.

Why don't you explain the crazy selective service theory? :crazy: :rofl:

Posted by hairhertz on Oct. 05 2012,6:29 pm
Big Bird might become the biggest winner of the debates.

How do you fight wars for 20 years without budgeting for them?

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,12:10 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 05 2012,3:36 pm)
QUOTE
so how can there be so many jobs created and unemployment only drops to a dubious 7.8 %?  From what I understand most of these jobs are public sector, and the private sector actually decreased.

If we went with the size of the workforce that was when Obama first took office unemployment would be more like 11 to 15%.

If George W Bush would have lost in the 2000 election, today we would have a booming economy not only in the U.S. but around the World..

The Unemployment Rate would be around 3.5 percent here at home and our national debt would be half of what it is now.. We wouldn't be running a Budget Deficit..

Wages would be higher and inflation would be lower.. The Dow would be sitting at around 20,000.. Security for all would have been realized.

Elections have consequences..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,2:02 am

(hairhertz @ Oct. 05 2012,6:29 pm)
QUOTE
How do you fight wars for 20 years without budgeting for them?

(Grassman)
QUOTE
If they would cut the waste in military, that would be a start. I read once, coming from someone there,  that 3 PT boats were shipped to Pakistan. For what? What was done about them? Destroyed!


2012-2017 (Base) Defense Budget

2012 $530 Billion

2013 $525 Billion

2014 $533 Billion

2015 $545 Billion

2016 $555 Billion

2017 $567 Billion

2013-2017 Reduced $259 Billion Total

2004 (Base) Defense Budget was $376 Billion

2008 (Base) Defense Budget was $479 Billion

(Hollow Force) :crazy:   

< http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudg...ook.pdf >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 06 2012,5:15 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 06 2012,12:10 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 05 2012,3:36 pm)
QUOTE
so how can there be so many jobs created and unemployment only drops to a dubious 7.8 %?  From what I understand most of these jobs are public sector, and the private sector actually decreased.

If we went with the size of the workforce that was when Obama first took office unemployment would be more like 11 to 15%.

If George W Bush would have lost in the 2000 election, today we would have a booming economy not only in the U.S. but around the World..

The Unemployment Rate would be around 3.5 percent here at home and our national debt would be half of what it is now.. We wouldn't be running a Budget Deficit..

Wages would be higher and inflation would be lower.. The Dow would be sitting at around 20,000.. Security for all would have been realized.

Elections have consequences..

So you pulled your crystal ball out your ass and saw all of this? My god you're a tool :dunce:  :crazy:

Yes indeed, elections have consequences, we've learned and payed for so dearly the last four years :frusty:

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,9:24 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 06 2012,12:10 am)
QUOTE
If George W Bush would have lost in the 2000 election, today we would have a booming economy not only in the U.S. but around the World..

The Unemployment Rate would be around 3.5 percent here at home and our national debt would be half of what it is now.. We wouldn't be running a Budget Deficit..

Wages would be higher and inflation would be lower.. The Dow would be sitting at around 20,000.. Security for all would have been realized.

Elections have consequences..

Liar.  

World Trade Center and Katrina.

nuff said...

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,9:28 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 05 2012,3:04 pm)
QUOTE
When a whiner biches about a President that is taking troops out of the line of fire, all else is mute..

Longest wars in U.S. history, Trillions spent, thousands dead and he wants a warmonger that did everything to avoid serving in a war he promoted(Veitnam) to be in charge of sending troops into the line of fire.. :crazy:

You're taking him out of context.  He is merely stating that we have had the capacity to do it not that he wants to do it.  

Quit twisting truths with half truths.

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,9:41 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,3:43 pm)
QUOTE
I think you need to crawl back in your bunker with your cockroach Vietnam supporting draft dodger(Romney).. A cockroach like you isn't qualified to criticize my choice of jack..

He's no more a draft dodger than you are a tax evader.

He was on a religous mission which is what all mormons do at that age.  Then he put in for deferments, was approved, and attended college until 1975.

As far as Obama's military service?  Oh...he doesn't have one either.   :flame:

Posted by Santorini on Oct. 06 2012,10:25 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 05 2012,12:57 pm)
QUOTE
The economy added 181,000 jobs in July, initially estimated at 141,000, and 142,000 in August, up from 96,000. 114,000 jobs added in September.

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50...entBody >


quote from Washington A.P. Oct. 5, 2012

The jump in the number of employed that the government reported comes from a survey of 60,000 households that determines the unemployment rate.  The government asks a series of questions by phone, or in person, they include:
Do you own a business?
Did you work for pay?
If not, did you provide unpaid work for a family business
      or farm? (those who are considered employed)
Afterward, the survey asks participants whether they had a job and if so, whether it was full or part time.
The governments separate survey of employers goes to roughly 140,000 businesses to determine the number of jobs the businesses have created or lost.

hmmmm :dunno:

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 06 2012,10:31 am
So when the rate was  over 8% there was nothing suspicious to you loons, but it drops under 8 and you think it's a conspiracy? :dunce:
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 06 2012,10:48 am
^ I think that all my posts on this subject have been clear, the rate has been artificially suppressed all along.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 06 2012,10:50 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 06 2012,2:02 am)
QUOTE

(hairhertz @ Oct. 05 2012,6:29 pm)
QUOTE
How do you fight wars for 20 years without budgeting for them?

(Grassman)
QUOTE
If they would cut the waste in military, that would be a start. I read once, coming from someone there,  that 3 PT boats were shipped to Pakistan. For what? What was done about them? Destroyed!


2012-2017 (Base) Defense Budget

2012 $530 Billion

2013 $525 Billion

2014 $533 Billion

2015 $545 Billion

2016 $555 Billion

2017 $567 Billion

2013-2017 Reduced $259 Billion Total

2004 (Base) Defense Budget was $376 Billion

2008 (Base) Defense Budget was $479 Billion

(Hollow Force) :crazy:   

< http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudg...ook.pdf >

Hey Al...

You speak about what you do know, you are a third rate propagandist at best and about the the lowest for of life politicizing the military I hope you get to so to a very special place.

:finger:   :finger:

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 06 2012,11:02 am
QUOTE

Hey Al...

You speak about what you do know, you are a third rate propagandist at best and about the the lowest for of life politicizing the military I hope you get to so to a very special place.

^ :crazy:

He gives people the facts to address your lie where you attempted to politicize the military, and you call AL a "third rate propagandist at best"? I guess that makes you a 4th rate propagandist at best.

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 06 2012,12:45 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:41 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 04 2012,3:43 pm)
QUOTE
I think you need to crawl back in your bunker with your cockroach Vietnam supporting draft dodger(Romney).. A cockroach like you isn't qualified to criticize my choice of jack..

He's no more a draft dodger than you are a tax evader.

He was on a religous mission which is what all mormons do at that age.  Then he put in for deferments, was approved, and attended college until 1975.

If he was too Religious to server in the Military than he’s too Religious to carry out the obligations of the Presidency..

You’re not old enough to remember or experience the Military when all male citizens were
required to participate, but when one of these dodger’s like Romney becomes a chickenhawk
it’s really distasteful to those of US who fulfilled our Military obligation..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,2:07 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:41 am)
QUOTE
As far as Obama's military service?  Oh...he doesn't have one either.   :flame:

None? How does Obama's four years as Commander-in-Chief, exercising supreme command authority of all U.S. Military Forces stack up to the Governor? :rofl:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,3:34 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:24 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 06 2012,12:10 am)
QUOTE
If George W Bush would have lost in the 2000 election, today we would have a booming economy not only in the U.S. but around the World..

The Unemployment Rate would be around 3.5 percent here at home and our national debt would be half of what it is now.. We wouldn't be running a Budget Deficit..

Wages would be higher and inflation would be lower.. The Dow would be sitting at around 20,000.. Security for all would have been realized.

Elections have consequences..

Liar.  

World Trade Center and Katrina.

nuff said...

War in Iraq, No WMD, Rebuild

War in Afghanistan ignored so Bush could get the guy who tried to kill his daddy in Iraq, Rebuild

Housing Collapse

Foreclosure Crisis

Financial Sector Collapse

Stock Market Crash

U.S. Automaker Collapse

AIG

Bush did more damage to the U.S. and the World than Bin Laden and Hurricane Katrina X10

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,4:32 pm
War in Iraq - violations of numerous agreements and no fly zones; aiding and abetting terrorists, WMD's allowed to be moved out of Iraq to Syria prior to US military intervention
War in Afghanistan - underminded by the elected democrats holding office after they voted to give Bush authority to go to war
Housing collapse - Frank Dodd debacle
Foreclosure crisis - Frank Dodd debacle x's 2
Financial Sector crisis - Frank Dodd debacle x's 3
US Automakers collapse - Only certain company's who were bailed out by cronyism politics
AIG - Not a government entity

nuff said...

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,4:36 pm

(Expatriate @ Oct. 06 2012,12:45 pm)
QUOTE
If he was too Religious to server in the Military than he’s too Religious to carry out the obligations of the Presidency..

You’re not old enough to remember or experience the Military when all male citizens were
required to participate, but when one of these dodger’s like Romney becomes a chickenhawk
it’s really distasteful to those of US who fulfilled our Military obligation..

That's just dumb and you know it.
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,4:37 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 06 2012,2:07 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:41 am)
QUOTE
As far as Obama's military service?  Oh...he doesn't have one either.   :flame:

None? How does Obama's four years as Commander-in-Chief, exercising supreme command authority of all U.S. Military Forces stack up to the Governor? :rofl:

Any successes he may have experienced as a CinC since taking office is a direct reflection of what G.W. Bush did 8 years prior.  Right?
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,4:52 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,4:32 pm)
QUOTE
AIG - Not a government entity

nuff said...

Is the destruction of millions of lives by Bush OK because they are not a government entity?  :dunce:
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 06 2012,5:50 pm
Millions because of AIG?  Pah...leeze...!!! :rofl:

Those millions are suffering on Obama's watch.

This administration even has to manipulate the unemployment numbers just to make Obummer feel good about having is arse handed to him in the debate.

Nothing like fuzzy math (and a free phone) to make a person feel better about themselves.


Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,6:59 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,5:50 pm)
QUOTE
Millions because of AIG?  Pah...leeze...!!! :rofl:

Not AIG you moron.. Bush!

You seem to enjoy the suffering of millions of people losing their jobs, their homes and everything they've worked for their whole life.. Did you torture animals as a child?

I don't know how Bush can even sleep at night knowing what he's done to millions here and around the world.. His legacy will always be the man that only thought about his own personal gain.. To hell with anyone else.. Sounds like Romney..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,9:26 pm
[Common Citizen,Oct. 06 2012,4:37 pm]
QUOTE
Any successes he may have experienced as a CinC since taking office is a direct reflection of what G.W. Bush did 8 years prior.  Right?

Libya was liberated from the rule of Moammar Gadhafi with no boots on the ground, no troop deaths and at a cost of $1 Billion.. McCain and Romney were against it..
Obama got'er done..

McCain and Romney wouldn't enter Pakistan to take out Bin Laden, gather intelligence and lower the morale of Al-Qaeda..
Obama got'er done..

Bush Kooks prefer to spend Trillions of dollars, put boots on the ground involving thousands of American casualties, commit war crimes and then rebuild their country..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 06 2012,11:05 pm

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 06 2012,10:48 am)
QUOTE
^ I think that all my posts on this subject have been clear, the rate has been artificially suppressed all along.

Yes and you're the last of all brain damaged part-time truck driving economists.. :laugh:

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 07 2012,1:41 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 06 2012,11:05 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 06 2012,10:48 am)
QUOTE
^ I think that all my posts on this subject have been clear, the rate has been artificially suppressed all along.

Yes and you're the last of all brain damaged part-time truck driving economists.. :laugh:

Yes, you're nothing more than a braying jackass. Unemployment is at an all time high. Chrysler I fear is just not gonna make it, GM probably wouldn't be far behind. Dell, Citigroup and plenty more are laying off or are planing to. Sure alot of this started more than 4 years ago but you god Obama hasn't done squat to help. If Rummy wins you can pretty much bet that the number would slam back to reality and hung around his neck.

Part time truckdriving economist?? I watch volume and frequency of trains,I talk to BNSF and CP rail people everyday,my little snapshot of the economy is Midwest freight and it's down considerably.

What do you watch, a computer monitor??? :dunce:

Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 07 2012,5:32 am
In terms of the economy Obama's first term is nearly identical to Reagan's first term, particularly around mid-term elections.  And we know how conservatives idolize that period, so it's odd to hear people say how horrible things are now but how great things were then.  < Bureau of Labor Statistics 1948-2011 >The main difference is that we're in two real wars now as opposed to one cold war then, and at that time there wasn't much for interest on debt, now whether it's Obama or Romney they'll have to pay hundreds of billions (billion, with a B) in interest because many still think that the tax cuts, wars, and Medicare part D don't have to be budgeted for.  It's totally on deficit spending.

Or, maybe all these problems are because of PBS and the Obamaphones.   :sarcasm:

What's even worse, regardless of all the republican complaints about spending Romney has admitted he won't balance the budget, his whole term will be deficit spending, and a second term after that would be deficit spending as well.  Which means those tax cuts to the rich will be borrowed to pay for, just like they have been the past decade.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 07 2012,8:20 am
Our economy has been nothing but a big ponzu scheme since Roossevelt. Raegan wasn't the answer but I know I made money during his tenure! Bush #1 sucked, Clinton rode the tech bubble, nothing more, and we all made money, Bush#2 put us into a dive and Obama done nothing but push the throttle forward so we can crash faster. I'm not saying Rummy will do better but with Obama at the helm failure is coming.

Those little programs that IE and Al are so fond of defending are like my change jar at home, little here, little there, voila! trip to Vegas. It all adds up. I hope these two let their significant other run the money in the household otherwise they would be dumpster diving.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 07 2012,11:50 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 06 2012,10:50 am)
QUOTE
Hey Al...

You speak about what you do know, you are a third rate propagandist at best and about the the lowest for of life politicizing the military I hope you get to so to a very special place.

:finger:   :finger:

Did you say the lowest form of life for politicizing the military?  :rofl:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 08 2012,12:00 am
Two pea's in a pod.. Shock and Awe and then Send in the Troops..

The war in Afghanistan turns 11 years old

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18...ars-old >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 08 2012,5:02 am
^ yep, and I notice you're god still has us there.
Posted by the breeze on Oct. 08 2012,10:16 am
Windfall: Obama Raises $181 Million, Only Around 2% of Donations Reportable

 http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/06/windfall-obama-raises-181-million-only-2-reportable

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by Mike Flynn 6 Oct 2012 671post a comment

The Obama campaign dropped a bombshell this morning. It announced that, combined with the DNC, the campaign raised a staggering $181 million in September. The windfall is a huge increase over July and August, when the campaign raised around $100 million, although it is slightly down from the $193 million it raised in September 2008. The news should raise eyebrows.
The campaign said that just over 1.8 million people made donations to the campaign last month. According to the campaign, over 500k of these were brand-new donors, having neither given in 2008 nor 2012. 98% of contributions were under the reporting threshold of $250. Of these, the average contribution was $53.  

Its really a tale of two worlds. 35k people gave an average of $2,600, while just over 1.7 million people gave an average of $53. Half the campaign's haul came

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 08 2012,5:31 pm

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 08 2012,5:02 am)
QUOTE
^ yep, and I notice you're god still has us there.

How many troops do we have in Iraq and Libya? ZERO

Afghanistan war will end in 2014 at the request of the current Commander-in-Chief..

It's easier to start a war than it is to finish a war.. Obama finished the war in Iraq and helped Libya finish their own war..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 08 2012,9:04 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,4:32 pm)
QUOTE
War in Iraq - violations of numerous agreements and no fly zones; aiding and abetting terrorists, WMD's allowed to be moved out of Iraq to Syria prior to US military intervention

Prove to us that Iraq moved Weapons of Mass Destruction to Syria..

Prove that Sanctions and a No-Fly zone wouldn't keep Iraq isolated..

We could have kept Iraq Isolated for the next hundred years for what it cost us to be at War for 9 years..

Bush Quote: I feel like -- I felt like there were weapons of mass destruction. You know, "mislead" is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional -- I don't think so, I think there was a -- not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was.

< http://en.wikisource.org/wiki...l_Allen >

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 08 2012,9:40 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,4:32 pm)
QUOTE
War in Afghanistan - underminded by the elected democrats holding office after they voted to give Bush authority to go to war

We were attacked on 9-11-2001 by Saudi Arabians and Egyptians stationed out of Afghanistan with Osama Bin Laden as their leader of Al-Qaeda.. We needed to attack Afghanistan, not Iraq..

Romney wants to start another war in Syria while being in a situation of a possible war with Iran.. What a frikin Moron..  


Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 09 2012,12:41 am

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:28 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 05 2012,3:04 pm)
QUOTE
When a whiner biches about a President that is taking troops out of the line of fire, all else is mute..

Longest wars in U.S. history, Trillions spent, thousands dead and he wants a warmonger that did everything to avoid serving in a war he promoted(Veitnam) to be in charge of sending troops into the line of fire.. :crazy:

You're taking him out of context.  He is merely stating that we have had the capacity to do it not that he wants to do it.  

Quit twisting truths with half truths.

Will someone else please explain to me what CC is saying about twisting truth with half truths and how I was taking anyone out of context.. :dunno:

I think CC is a freak.. :crazy: :dunce:

Posted by Botto 82 on Oct. 09 2012,2:04 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 08 2012,9:04 pm)
QUOTE
Bush Quote: I feel like -- I felt like there were weapons of mass destruction. You know, "mislead" is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional -- I don't think so, I think there was a -- not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was.

This is an exemplar of the thinking that we must do a thing just to prevent some other, horrible thing from happening, even if we don't know have limited intelligence. It's the kind of fear mongering that helped us accept the Patriot Act without question, and it's the kind of thinking that makes people in America fearful that they might become collateral damage in some ter'rist attack, which is not the way to live a life, either the life of a person, or that of a people. Assuming you play the lottery, you probably have a better chance at a six-figure jackpot than you have of becoming an Al-Shabaab shish kabob.

Seriously, I have friends, otherwise thoughtful, intelligent people, actually believing that there is a clear and present danger of terrorists blowing them up or somesuch.

Whether we base our foreign policy on 'what-if' thinking, or whether we base our matters of domestic policing on this folly, the results are equally disastrous for free-minded people, and their rights and freedoms.

There must be order kept, both at home and abroad, but not at the cost of the rights and freedoms our forebears fought so vehemently for, just because there might be a boogeyman around the corner.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 09 2012,5:21 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 08 2012,5:31 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 08 2012,5:02 am)
QUOTE
^ yep, and I notice you're god still has us there.

How many troops do we have in Iraq and Libya? ZERO

Afghanistan war will end in 2014 at the request of the current Commander-in-Chief..

It's easier to start a war than it is to finish a war.. Obama finished the war in Iraq and helped Libya finish their own war..

No, we are not in Libya, our ambassador there was sodomized and murdered along with three others. Probably because of incompetence or indifference.

Maybe try a better example next time. :dunce:

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 09 2012,6:58 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 08 2012,5:31 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 08 2012,5:02 am)
QUOTE
^ yep, and I notice you're god still has us there.

How many troops do we have in Iraq and Libya? ZERO

Afghanistan war will end in 2014 at the request of the current Commander-in-Chief..

It's easier to start a war than it is to finish a war.. Obama finished the war in Iraq and helped Libya finish their own war..

Everyone knows this administration is riding the bench at the local Honker's game when it domes to foreign policy.

We had an ambassador and 3 of his employees die because of this administrations illusion.  Our Consulate was breached after several warnings from various sources that the consulate and its staff were in danger.  

Mr. Stevens himself asked for more protection and was denied.

To top it off, our President goes on a mainstream media tour and blames a UNITED STATES CITIZEN for inciting the incident which has now been proven false.

Meanwhile, al Qaeda and the rest of the Middle East are quickly recognizing Obummer's weakness and are rapidly rebuiliding in the middle east

...AND YOU'RE GOING TO BRAG ABOUT LIBYA?

Tool.

btw...< My Webpage >


nuff said...

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 09 2012,7:00 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 09 2012,12:41 am)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:28 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 05 2012,3:04 pm)
QUOTE
When a whiner biches about a President that is taking troops out of the line of fire, all else is mute..

Longest wars in U.S. history, Trillions spent, thousands dead and he wants a warmonger that did everything to avoid serving in a war he promoted(Veitnam) to be in charge of sending troops into the line of fire.. :crazy:

You're taking him out of context.  He is merely stating that we have had the capacity to do it not that he wants to do it.  

Quit twisting truths with half truths.

Will someone else please explain to me what CC is saying about twisting truth with half truths and how I was taking anyone out of context.. :dunno:

I think CC is a freak.. :crazy: :dunce:

You're a liar.  Look at what you wrote.  You said that Mitt Romney did everything to avoid going to Vietnam.  You don't even consider that he didn't go to Vietnam because he chose to serve God.  That's what I am talking about.

You're just sore because no one else is calling you out on your bullsh!t propaganda on here.

I have to admit that is challenging calling out all your bullsh!t.  It would be a full time job for the amount of garbage your putting out.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 09 2012,8:57 am
Clinton got a deferment too. :blush:
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 09 2012,10:17 am

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 09 2012,7:00 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 09 2012,12:41 am)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 06 2012,9:28 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 05 2012,3:04 pm)
QUOTE
When a whiner biches about a President that is taking troops out of the line of fire, all else is mute..

Longest wars in U.S. history, Trillions spent, thousands dead and he wants a warmonger that did everything to avoid serving in a war he promoted(Veitnam) to be in charge of sending troops into the line of fire.. :crazy:

You're taking him out of context.  He is merely stating that we have had the capacity to do it not that he wants to do it.  

Quit twisting truths with half truths.

Will someone else please explain to me what CC is saying about twisting truth with half truths and how I was taking anyone out of context.. :dunno:

I think CC is a freak.. :crazy: :dunce:

You're a liar.  Look at what you wrote.  You said that Mitt Romney did everything to avoid going to Vietnam.  You don't even consider that he didn't go to Vietnam because he chose to serve God.  That's what I am talking about.

You're just sore because no one else is calling you out on your bullsh!t propaganda on here.

I have to admit that is challenging calling out all your bullsh!t.  It would be a full time job for the amount of garbage your putting out.

The truth here is Romney was Draft age in 1965 he had plenty of time to complete his Military Obligation to his Country but chose hide behind religion and college deferments, Romney has flip flopped on Vietnam as he does on most positions..
Romney once said Vietnam was a blunder, on that I’ll agree, IMO Iraq and Afghanistan were also blunders we can’t afford anymore more of these militaristic blunders...

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 09 2012,10:31 am
Who was the last president who actually served during an armed combat and actually had his life in danger like real soldiers? Or their children for that matter?

How about members of Congress who approve any form of armed combat? And their children?

Just curious.


As to claims that Diplomat Chris Stevens was sodomized:

   
QUOTE
Greetings, Concerning your query on the report published by a Lebanese website according to which ambassador Stevens was sodomized. That report falsely quoted our news agency and has no truth whatsover to it. AFP promptly sent a strongly worded complaint to that website and they removed the report and published a denial, saying that AFP did not report such a thing.
< http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog...] >

No information will be available until the autopsy is completed.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 09 2012,10:57 am
QUOTE

Presidents who Served in the Military

   George Washington: Revolutionary War (Continental Army)
   James Monroe: Revolutionary War (Continental Army)
   Andrew Jackson: War of 1812 (Army)
   William Henry Harrison: Indian campaigns (Army)
   John Tyler: War of 1812 (Army)
   Franklin Pierce: Mexican War (Army)
   Abraham Lincoln: Black Hawk War (Indian Wars) (Army)
   Ulysses S. Grant: Mexican War and Civil War (Army)
   Rutherford B. Hayes: Civil War (Army)
   James A. Garfield: Civil War (Army)
   Chester A. Arthur: Civil War (Army)
   Benjamin Harrison: Civil War (Army)
   William McKinley: Civil War (Army)
   Theodore Roosevelt: Spanish American War (Army)
   Harry Truman: World War I (Army)
   Dwight Eisenhower: World War I and World War II (Army)
   John F. Kennedy: World War II (Navy)
   Lyndon B. Johnson: World War II (Navy)
   Richard Nixon: World War II (Navy)
   Gerald Ford: World War II (Navy)
   Jimmy Carter: Cold War era (Navy)
   Ronald Reagan: World War II (Air Force)
   George H.W. Bush: World War II (Navy)
   George W. Bush: Vietnam War era (Air Force Reserve)

< http://www.va.gov/health/NewsFeatures/20110221a.asp >

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 09 2012,11:08 am
Thanks Liberal, I'd already checked that though. I am wondering who actually FOUGHT. Who had their lives endangered like most soldiers do.
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 09 2012,11:17 am
Ok, according to the History Channel, Bush #1 actually fought. < http://www.history.com/this-da...ttacked >

I'd still like to know how many more of our leaders who vote for war actually have ever endangered their lives like real soldiers, or their children have.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 09 2012,11:20 am
G. H. Bush, was shot down WWII

But I bet G.W. had a few skirmishes with angry waitress's and bouncers.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 09 2012,2:51 pm
[quote=Rosalind_Swenson,Oct. 09 2012,10:31 am]As to claims that Diplomat Chris Stevens was sodomized:

   
QUOTE
Greetings, Concerning your query on the report published by a Lebanese website according to which ambassador Stevens was sodomized. That report falsely quoted our news agency and has no truth whatsover to it. AFP promptly sent a strongly worded complaint to that website and they removed the report and published a denial, saying that AFP did not report such a thing.
< ]http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog...] >

No information will be available until the autopsy is completed.

Stevens wasn't sodomized.. The real picture shows him being carried over the shoulder of someone..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 09 2012,3:05 pm
Other photo..
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 09 2012,6:06 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 09 2012,7:00 am)
QUOTE
You're a liar.  Look at what you wrote.  You said that Mitt Romney did everything to avoid going to Vietnam.  You don't even consider that he didn't go to Vietnam because he chose to serve God.  That's what I am talking about.

You're just sore because no one else is calling you out on your bullsh!t propaganda on here.

I have to admit that is challenging calling out all your bullsh!t.  It would be a full time job for the amount of garbage your putting out.

Again, show me proof that WMD was sent to Syria from Iraq..

Before you start calling someone a liar, you should get your facts straight before spewing nothing but lies..

You're like most of the right-wing liars around this site.. You get your facts from radical right-wing sites, the breeze, Rush and Hannity..

You lied when confronted about your torturing of animals as a child, didn't you?

No WMDs in Iraq
< http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/no-wmds-in-iraq/ >

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 09 2012,10:54 pm
^Liar
Posted by Liberal on Oct. 09 2012,11:10 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 09 2012,10:54 pm)
QUOTE
^Liar

That's the best you've got?

How does a person avoid the draft to "serve God"?  If you weren't a tower rat when you were an MP I'm sure you knew plenty of Chaplains in the Army, didn't they serve both God and country?

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 09 2012,11:33 pm

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 09 2012,6:58 am)
QUOTE
Everyone knows this administration is riding the bench at the local Honker's game when it domes to foreign policy.

We had an ambassador and 3 of his employees die because of this administrations illusion.  Our Consulate was breached after several warnings from various sources that the consulate and its staff were in danger.  

Mr. Stevens himself asked for more protection and was denied.

To top it off, our President goes on a mainstream media tour and blames a UNITED STATES CITIZEN for inciting the incident which has now been proven false.

Meanwhile, al Qaeda and the rest of the Middle East are quickly recognizing Obummer's weakness and are rapidly rebuiliding in the middle east

...AND YOU'RE GOING TO BRAG ABOUT LIBYA?

Tool.

btw...< My Webpage >


nuff said...

Again, prove that Obama went on a mainstream media tour and blames a UNITED STATES CITIZEN for an attack in Libya..

He blamed it on a video, not a U.S. Citizen.. Why do Radical Republicans lie about everything? :crazy:

Four Americans died in the line of duty, so should we start a war with a country that Obama has just helped to liberate or maybe we should occupy another Muslim country with troops? :dunce:

There are radical right-wing nuts all over the middle east and north Africa, just like in America.. In GOD we TRUST..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 10 2012,12:54 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 09 2012,5:21 am)
QUOTE
No, we are not in Libya, our ambassador there was sodomized and murdered along with three others. Probably because of incompetence or indifference.

Maybe try a better example next time. :dunce:

Are you sticking with your story about sodomy? :rofl:

Lies will only shorten your life, just say NO to lies.. You can do it..

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 10 2012,4:34 am
OK then, let's put sodomy aside and just go with "brutally murdered" :dunce:

Died in the line of duty??? :crazy:

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 10 2012,6:21 am
Look at this guy.  He defends these murderers.  Implying that these Libyans are a respectful people, posting images of Ambassador Stevens, arguing that he wasn't sodomized,   Meanwhile, he rambles for days, weeks, and how many thread pages later about how terrible a person Romney is just because he is a Republican.

What a dick.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 10 2012,7:17 am
QUOTE

Look at this guy.  He defends these murderers.  Implying that these Libyans are a respectful people, posting images of Ambassador Stevens, arguing that he wasn't sodomized,

Are you saying that the Libyans are not respectful people because a dozen extremists attack a consulate? Wouldn't that be like calling you a "dick" because of the radical right wing republicans? I guess that's sort of a weak argument to use with you, a better example would be people thinking all republicans are "dicks" because of republicans like you.

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 10 2012,7:33 am

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 10 2012,6:21 am)
QUOTE
Look at this guy.  He defends these murderers.  Implying that these Libyans are a respectful people, posting images of Ambassador Stevens, arguing that he wasn't sodomized,  

What far right dark souled blogger has posted this type of tripe, when you parrot this unsubstantiated bull you magnify your own instability..

Posted by the breeze on Oct. 10 2012,9:49 am
State Department denies concluding film sparked consulate attack in Libya
Published October 10, 2012
FoxNews.com




House committee set to hear testimony on Libya attack
House to hold hearing on US Consulate attack in Libya
Truth about Libya attack continues to come outThe State Department denied Tuesday it ever concluded that the deadly consulate attack Sept. 11 in Libya was an unplanned outburst prompted by an anti-Islam movie, despite public statements early on by some in the Obama administration suggesting that was the case.

The Obama administration


Read more: < http://www.foxnews.com/politic...u6nidQ3 >  
"Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset telling our children and our children's children what is was once like in the United States where men were free." --Ronald Reagan
“ The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left .” ~ Ecclesiastes 10:2

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 11 2012,5:23 am
Just enter "Completely Wrong" in a Google Search.. Try it!!
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 11 2012,5:31 am
Who do you think is more honest?
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 11 2012,6:47 am

(Liberal @ Oct. 10 2012,7:17 am)
QUOTE
QUOTE

Look at this guy.  He defends these murderers.  Implying that these Libyans are a respectful people, posting images of Ambassador Stevens, arguing that he wasn't sodomized,

Are you saying that the Libyans are not respectful people because a dozen extremists attack a consulate? Wouldn't that be like calling you a "dick" because of the radical right wing republicans? I guess that's sort of a weak argument to use with you, a better example would be people thinking all republicans are "dicks" because of republicans like you.

You got that right.  The government and the moderates are just as culpable for allowing the few dozen extremist, as you put it, to run the show.

And you know what my point is here Liberal.  You don't even realize that you just proved my point.  You have a bigger hardon for Republicans than these kooks in the middle east killing our citizens.  You only have to read your post to figure that out.

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 11 2012,7:06 am

(Expatriate @ Oct. 10 2012,7:33 am)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 10 2012,6:21 am)
QUOTE
Look at this guy.  He defends these murderers.  Implying that these Libyans are a respectful people, posting images of Ambassador Stevens, arguing that he wasn't sodomized,  

What far right dark souled blogger has posted this type of tripe, when you parrot this unsubstantiated bull you magnify your own instability..

I think it's your instability we should question.  Have you not been listening to the lame stream news or any news for that matter?

In case you missed it:
Extremist in Banghazi, Libya, stormed our Consulate and killed 4 of our citizens.

Our President made numerous public statements that the attack was created because of a video produced by a US Citizen.  (Yes, this administration thinks we're that stupid)   :dunce:

You come down on me (and others) because you don't think the sodomization of Ambassador Stevens is substantiated, yet all of you are mute to the fact that the President lied and blamed a video produced by a US Citizen?  Not to mention that he has been arrested after daring to invoke his constitutional right to freedom of speech.

You're all nuts.

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 11 2012,9:02 am
Enough, let's see a creditable link to this alleged sodomy... They’re all from far right kooks like you..
You self called Christians, the front pew bunch who clamor for revenge, unending religious war with another set of kooks..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 11 2012,9:44 am

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 11 2012,7:06 am)
QUOTE
Not to mention that he has been arrested after daring to invoke his constitutional right to freedom of speech.

Federal prosecutors said Youssef had eight probation violations, including lying to his probation officer and using aliases.

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-20...olation >

You have a serious problem with telling lies, you need help..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 11 2012,10:46 am
Jobless claims plunge to lowest level in 4 1/2 years..

Foreclosures at lowest level in 5 years..

Dow 13,386.52 Up 9.57% in 2012

< http://www.reuters.com/article...0121011 >

Posted by pepi-lapew on Oct. 11 2012,11:56 am
Your wrong as normal AL. Calif. forget to turn in its unenployment figures to the GOV. 339,000 people laid off? The gov. wouldnt lie would they. Our pres. said he had a open book administration didnt he. :lalala:  :lalala:
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 11 2012,11:58 am
^ despite morons at the helm :dunce:

I smell books cooking, along with AL's bullish!t :blush:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 11 2012,2:14 pm
Well, we're glad to say that we've finally gotten to the bottom of what happened.
We spoke to a source at the Labor Department. According to this source, who is an analyst at the Department, here's what happened:
ALL STATES WERE INCLUDED in this week's jobless claims. Assertions that "a large state" was excluded from the report are patently false.

Read more: < http://www.businessinsider.com/what-ha...13pr1E1 >

Weekly Claims

< http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ui/current.htm#.UHcN3cU71SB >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 11 2012,3:18 pm
fortunatly, yours does. :rofl:
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 11 2012,9:28 pm

(Expatriate @ Oct. 11 2012,9:02 am)
QUOTE
Enough, let's see a creditable link to this alleged sodomy... They’re all from far right kooks like you..
You self called Christians, the front pew bunch who clamor for revenge, unending religious war with another set of kooks..


I won't take the time.  Only reports and hearsay which is all your going on too.  But does that change how pissed off you should be about what those bastards did to a US Ambassador?  They get a pass because you think they left out the sodomy?  Really?  For christ sake...


...I take offense to the front pew jab.  I am a back pew Lutheran.  :blush:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 12 2012,12:02 am
U.S. sends new acting ambassador to Libya

Laurence Pope arrived Thursday in Tripoli to take on the role, the State Department announced. With no ambassador in the country, Pope will handle those duties.

"We will continue to assist as Libya builds democratic institutions and broad respect for the rule of law -- the goals that Ambassador Stevens worked hard to achieve," Nuland said in a written statement.

< http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/11/world/africa/libya-us/index.html >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 12 2012,1:46 am
^ yeah, I can see the powers that be with that decision, "hey, let's send Larry, he's kind of a dick" :(
Posted by Santorini on Oct. 12 2012,8:43 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 11 2012,3:18 pm)
QUOTE
fortunatly, yours does. :rofl:

There is no convincing AL :dunce:
He is so enamored with the current potus/admin. and captivation is a tough nut to crack!!  Give AL Citizen a break though...afterall, he does spend alot of time pasting all those cartoons and
defending obama/admin. lies that it is, if nothing else, entertaining observing all the twists and spins :rofl:

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 12 2012,9:13 am
^ Obama is his god.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 13 2012,2:50 pm
Bruce Springsteen to campaign for Obama in Ohio

< http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...io?lite >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 14 2012,8:43 pm
^Oh yeah, with an estimated net worth of 200million he surely represents the 47% :sarcasm:
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 15 2012,1:09 am
Bruce Springsteen came from a low income family and loves this country enough that he is willing to pay more in income tax so others can have a chance to advance their lives..


Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 15 2012,4:45 am
^ and you know this how? You've had conversations with him? :dunce:
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 15 2012,11:30 am
Bruce Springsteen
Rock musician. Born September 23, 1949, in Long Branch, New Jersey, Bruce Springsteen was raised in a working-class household in Freehold Borough. The future Boss's father, Doug Springsteen, had trouble holding down a steady job and worked at different times as a bus driver, millworker and prison guard. Adele Springsteen, Bruce's mother, brought in steadier income as a secretary in a local insurance office. Young Bruce and his father had a difficult relationship. "When I was growing up, there were two things that were unpopular in my house," the singer later recalled. "One was me, and the other was my guitar."

< http://www.biography.com/people/bruce-springsteen-9491214 >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 15 2012,12:04 pm
Doesn't answer the question :dunce:

So you're saying that springsteen's dad was a piece of sh!t that beat his son???

What's this got to do with taxes :dunce:

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 15 2012,12:12 pm
:frusty:
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 15 2012,12:13 pm
:frusty:
Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 15 2012,12:15 pm
:frusty:
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 15 2012,2:23 pm

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 16 2012,11:07 pm
Crowley Crushes Romney On Libya LIE



From the Transcript of Obama on September 12 in the Rose Garden:
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

< http://www.foxnews.com/politic...late-in >

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 16 2012,11:14 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 16 2012,11:07 pm)
QUOTE
Crowley Crushes Romney On Libya



From Transcript:
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

< http://www.foxnews.com/politic...late-in >

Hey al...

You do know that she was wrong don't you? transcripts are a bitch.

Mr. Obama did make reference to the fact that “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,” but his comments that day also appeared to reference the video, when he said, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.” The administration changed its description of the attack, eventually describing it as a terror attack linked to al Qaeda sympathizers.

Not exactly what chairman 0 said on T.V. was it?

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 17 2012,7:39 am
..
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 17 2012,7:47 am
Hey al here is the FULL TEXT ENJOY!!!!!!!!!!!

BOOM!....What was that?

It sounds like a truth bomb going off chairman 0 must have been having a flashback when he answered question he must of thought they were talking about choom!


10:43 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Good morning.  Every day, all across the world, American diplomats and civilians work tirelessly to advance the interests and values of our nation.  Often, they are away from their families.  Sometimes, they brave great danger.

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi.  Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith.  We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed.  And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack.  We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats.  I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world.  And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths.  We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.  But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence.  None.  The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya.  Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans.  Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save.  At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi.  With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya.  When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there.  He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.

Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on.  I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks.  We mourned with the families who were lost on that day.  I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed.  And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it.  Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers.  These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity.  They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.

Thank you.  May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.

END
10:48 A.M. EDT


So...Just where did chairman 0 call the Benghazi terrorism attack terrorism I cannot find it chairman 0 lies people died again.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 17 2012,8:41 am
So when he said that the buck stops with him was that supposed to make him look magnanimous??? :rofl:
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 17 2012,3:05 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 17 2012,7:47 am)
QUOTE
So...Just where did chairman 0 call the Benghazi terrorism attack terrorism I cannot find it chairman 0 lies people died again.

Definition of TERRORISM

: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion

< http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism >



An "act of terror" is a single act of terrorism if the attack was committed by Al-Qaeda..

If the attack was done by a rowdy group of protesters it would be called an "act of terror", not terrorism..

Terrorism involves more than one attack..

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 17 2012,10:23 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 17 2012,3:05 pm)
QUOTE

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 17 2012,7:47 am)
QUOTE
So...Just where did chairman 0 call the Benghazi terrorism attack terrorism I cannot find it chairman 0 lies people died again.

Definition of TERRORISM

: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion

< http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism >



An "act of terror" is a single act of terrorism if the attack was committed by Al-Qaeda..

If the attack was done by a rowdy group of protesters it would be called an "act of terror", not terrorism..

Terrorism involves more than one attack..

Are we heading down this road again? the road that slick willy went down "It depends on what the meaning of the words 'is' is." –Bill Clinton  

al they screwed the pooch just get over it! candy is singing.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 17 2012,10:30 pm
QUOTE

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done.

How much more specific do you kooks want him to be?

Posted by Alfy Packer on Oct. 17 2012,11:28 pm
It was good that Hillary took responsibility for the security issue.  I think that should put the entire matter to rest.

On to the retirement question, I was not comforted that the President wasn't paying attention to his retirement account.  If he is only concerned that Mitts account is bigger than his, he is missing what his policies are doing to all of our retirements.  Sorry to say it really is the economy, and by his own admission he doesn't even care enough to watch what his policies have done to his own retirement.  They say he was awake for last nights debate but with comments like this he must still have sleepies in his eyes!

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 18 2012,6:03 am

(Liberal @ Oct. 17 2012,10:30 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done.

How much more specific do you kooks want him to be?

So where does it say the act in benghazi was an act of terrorism it doesn't, then the administration said it was a protest for 15 days it doesn't fit the storyline the current administration has been using when running for re election "they have won the war and vanquished al qaeda." You know  it's hard to push that line of manure when the benghazi terrorist attack had heavy weapons and NO PROTEST.

The truth...

The current administration lied it's crystal clear to most people, you kool aid drinkers you are on your own, if chairman 0 said the sun rises in the north you would believe it you are the sheeple that threaten our nation ignorance kills.

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 18 2012,6:05 am

(Alfy Packer @ Oct. 17 2012,11:28 pm)
QUOTE
It was good that Hillary took responsibility for the security issue.  I think that should put the entire matter to rest.

On to the retirement question, I was not comforted that the President wasn't paying attention to his retirement account.  If he is only concerned that Mitts account is bigger than his, he is missing what his policies are doing to all of our retirements.  Sorry to say it really is the economy, and by his own admission he doesn't even care enough to watch what his policies have done to his own retirement.  They say he was awake for last nights debate but with comments like this he must still have sleepies in his eyes!

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!

Hitlerly said it was her fault and it's time to move on are you serious!!

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 18 2012,6:19 am
Just a note the security group that the obama administration had (OUT SOURCED) the blue mountain group uk at benghazi and what were they were armed with?      

Wait for it...FLASHLIGHTS AND BATONS now that seems legit in a combat zone doesn't it?

For some of the sheeple (combat zone = two way shooting range) incoming and out going.

It's not like there were previous attacks at the embassy either or were there?

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 18 2012,8:02 am
For all Right-Wing Idiots..
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 18 2012,8:05 am
Sore losers..
Posted by Liberal on Oct. 18 2012,11:04 am
QUOTE

So where does it say the act in benghazi was an act of terrorism it doesn't


QUOTE

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.

How much more specific did you want him to be :crazy:

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 18 2012,11:20 am
The next day in Colorado...

QUOTE

Let me say at the outset that obviously our hearts are heavy this week -- we had a tough day a couple of days ago, for four Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Libya.  Yesterday I had a chance to go over to the State Department to talk to friends and colleagues of those who were killed.  And these were Americans who, like so many others, both in uniform and civilians, who serve in difficult and dangerous places all around the world to advance the interests and the values that we hold dear as Americans.

And a lot of times their work goes unheralded, doesn’t get a lot of attention, but it is vitally important.  We enjoy our security and our liberty because of the sacrifices that they make.  And they do an outstanding job every single day without a lot of fanfare.  (Applause.)

So what I want all of you to know is that we are going to bring those who killed our fellow Americans to justice.  (Applause.)  I want people around the world to hear me:  To all those who would do us harm, no act of terror will go unpunished. It will not dim the light of the values that we proudly present to the rest of the world.  No act of violence shakes the resolve of the United States of America.  (Applause.)


< http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pre...lden-co >


Posted by Santorini on Oct. 18 2012,11:59 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 17 2012,3:05 pm)
QUOTE

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 17 2012,7:47 am)
QUOTE
So...Just where did chairman 0 call the Benghazi terrorism attack terrorism I cannot find it chairman 0 lies people died again.

Definition of TERRORISM

: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion

< http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism >



An "act of terror" is a single act of terrorism if the attack was committed by Al-Qaeda..

If the attack was done by a rowdy group of protesters it would be called an "act of terror", not terrorism..

Terrorism involves more than one attack..

Kind of:
Act of terror and terrorist attack are not the same thing!
Especially when the previous 2 (transcript) paragraphs refer to 2001.
Obama referred to them as the killers...not terrorists.
While all acts of terrorists are acts of terror;
not all acts of terror are perpetrated by terrorists!
but nice try obama...funny, he promised transparency...he was right...we can see right through him :thumbsup:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 18 2012,2:13 pm
Romney lies about everything..
Posted by Santorini on Oct. 18 2012,3:45 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 18 2012,2:13 pm)
QUOTE
Romney lies about everything..

youve never been in a management position, have you?
youve never been on the HR end of business before have you?  if you had...you would know what binders in the context Romney used the term actually meant :dunce:
and the lying part...now thats funny coming from an alinskian and an obama groupie :rofl:  :rofl:

Posted by Alfy Packer on Oct. 18 2012,4:05 pm
QUOTE
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!

Hitlerly said it was her fault and it's time to move on are you serious!!


You see what we have here is, failure, failure to communicate!  I truly think it looks very "weenie" having Hillary take one for the "Obuminator"!

Posted by Santorini on Oct. 18 2012,4:24 pm

(Alfy Packer @ Oct. 18 2012,4:05 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!

Hitlerly said it was her fault and it's time to move on are you serious!!


You see what we have here is, failure, failure to communicate!  I truly think it looks very "weenie" having Hillary take one for the "Obuminator"!

the thing is;
Fast and Furious and Holder claiming no responsibility because he didnt get that memo
and Hillary takes the fall on Libya incident cause the WH was not informed and she made the decision;
WHO is running our country?

Posted by Alfy Packer on Oct. 18 2012,5:22 pm
QUOTE
the thing is;
Fast and Furious and Holder claiming no responsibility because he didnt get that memo
and Hillary takes the fall on Libya incident cause the WH was not informed and she made the decision;
WHO is running our country?


Take it easy, what we need is 4 more years of Obomo campaigning and everyone will get a promise for every pot and a car out of gas in every garage.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 18 2012,8:12 pm
Why the hell would Obama be campaigning for another 4 years? :dunce:
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 18 2012,8:41 pm
Otardo the post turtle?
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 18 2012,8:42 pm



:rofl:  :rofl:

Posted by Alfy Packer on Oct. 18 2012,9:00 pm
QUOTE
Why the hell would Obama be campaigning for another 4 years?  


Because it is what he does!  He does it well and that is what he enjoys doing.  It is all he has done these last 4 years and it is what he will do if given 4 more years.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 18 2012,9:43 pm
All presidents campaign through their first term.. When Obama gets elected to a second term, the last thing he'll be doing is campaigning since he can only serve two terms of 4 years..
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 18 2012,9:53 pm
That chart is pure BS, I pay way more than 4.7%.  State takes about 9% and Feds get around 30%.  Before bush and otardo got into office I payed way less in taxes, now Im getting hosed.  Give me my money back.

And that isn't even including capital gains taxes I pay, there should be no taxes on capital gains, the govt got their money the first time they taxed me on my income, what I do with my measly penance after taxes and decide to invest it, should be all profit.

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 18 2012,10:39 pm
Washington

State and Local Taxes in 2007

< http://www.itep.org/wp2009/wa_whopays_factsheet.pdf >

You're an idiot or need to get a new accountant if you paid 30% federal income tax..

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 19 2012,12:16 am
CBO: Fed tax rates hit historic low
7/11/2112

< http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78386.html >

Posted by Santorini on Oct. 19 2012,1:00 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 18 2012,8:12 pm)
QUOTE
Why the hell would Obama be campaigning for another 4 years? :dunce:

Sweet...you post a pic of the guy who did his best work in the oral office :crazy:
Posted by Santorini on Oct. 19 2012,1:06 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 18 2012,9:43 pm)
QUOTE
All presidents campaign through their first term.. When Obama gets elected to a second term, the last thing he'll be doing is campaigning since he can only serve two terms of 4 years..

you really are a domesticated sheep!
and if he gets another 4 years what do you suppose will be one of the first things on his agenda?
My guess...an executive order doing away with presidential term limits!!!

Posted by Santorini on Oct. 19 2012,1:24 am

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 18 2012,6:03 am)
QUOTE

(Liberal @ Oct. 17 2012,10:30 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.  Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.  We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act.  And make no mistake, justice will be done.

How much more specific do you kooks want him to be?

So where does it say the act in benghazi was an act of terrorism it doesn't, then the administration said it was a protest for 15 days it doesn't fit the storyline the current administration has been using when running for re election "they have won the war and vanquished al qaeda." You know  it's hard to push that line of manure when the benghazi terrorist attack had heavy weapons and NO PROTEST.

The truth...

The current administration lied it's crystal clear to most people, you kool aid drinkers you are on your own, if chairman 0 said the sun rises in the north you would believe it you are the sheeple that threaten our nation ignorance kills.

no way the administration vanquished al qaeda...what with the US supplying them with weapons and all.
kind of makes the fast and furious thing look like childs play someone said!!

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 19 2012,7:07 am

(Santorini @ Oct. 19 2012,1:00 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Oct. 18 2012,8:12 pm)
QUOTE
Why the hell would Obama be campaigning for another 4 years? :dunce:

Sweet...you post a pic of the guy who did his best work in the oral office :crazy:

I see what you did there

:notworthy:  :notworthy:  :notworthy:  :notworthy:

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 19 2012,9:50 am
QUOTE

you really are a domesticated sheep!
and if he gets another 4 years what do you suppose will be one of the first things on his agenda?
My guess...an executive order doing away with presidential term limits!!!



Tell us again how educated you are? :rofl: :dunce:

Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 19 2012,10:16 am
Since oblamo cannot keep his lies straight, he is going to be beta testing a new portable teleprompter during the last debate.
:rofl:

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 19 2012,2:45 pm
Romney’s tax plan in detail...

< http://www.romneytaxplan.com/ >

Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 19 2012,6:49 pm

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 14 2012,8:43 pm)
QUOTE
^Oh yeah, with an estimated net worth of 200million he surely represents the 47% :sarcasm:

No, he's clearly rich, which is great, not a fan of his music though.  More importantly many people like that remember getting their start.  The rest of you will listen to the rhetoric  and think you'll be the next Rockefeller or Trump just long enough for the GOP to make you grab the ankles.

The idea that a man who's the real life version of Gordon Gekko is going to get in the White House and fight for the plumbers and truck drivers, well, it just cracks me up.

Zombie Hunter:
QUOTE
So where does it say the act in benghazi was an act of terrorism it doesn't


By the way, are we still arguing over him saying "act of terror" instead of "terrorism", or did I miss that?  I was reading some of those posts and found it entertaining how Romney and his supporters were attacking him over the lack of the "ism."  

The "ism" is clearly a very important part of the speech apparently, even though it means the same thing to anyone who has even a basic understanding of the English language.  :sarcasm:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 19 2012,10:32 pm
This is how Romney got Rich, Harvest Business and Send the Jobs to China

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, < world news >, and < news about the economy >


Posted by grassman on Oct. 19 2012,11:06 pm
I'd like to take Romney out here in the woods and deserted roads and see how he deals with real life without a silver spoon and daddy! Maybe get a couple of mil for a map! LOL Just kidding I would never do that! Stand Down HLS! :laugh:(but you know you want it) te he
Posted by grassman on Oct. 19 2012,11:34 pm
First off, I want to make it perfectly clear. I did not vote for President Obama. Now I will state that he had GREAT ideas for this country. He was out of his league when it came to adversaries, they ate him up. Now you need to really look at what has happened. Instead of going for what was GOOD FOR THIS COUNTRY, spikes were thrown in the road, to make him a one term President. Would you sell out your Dad to make your Mother look good? enuf said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 20 2012,5:31 pm
Gas prices could soon drop 50 cents a gallon

< http://www.usatoday.com/story...fetcher >

Posted by hairhertz on Oct. 20 2012,7:30 pm
it's almost over...2+ weeks... then we can watch the wrangling of vote tallying...followed by a do nothing
Congress for 4 more years :frusty:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 21 2012,1:41 am

Posted by busybee on Oct. 21 2012,2:03 am
grassman Posted on: Oct. 19 2012,11:34 pm

QUOTE
First off, I want to make it perfectly clear. I did not vote for President Obama. Now I will state that he had GREAT ideas for this country. He was out of his league when it came to adversaries, they ate him up. Now you need to really look at what has happened. Instead of going for what was GOOD FOR THIS COUNTRY, spikes were thrown in the road, to make him a one term President. Would you sell out your Dad to make your Mother look good? enuf said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Why didn't you vote for Obama?  

I know some people who won't vote for a democrat just because they believe if they do they will take away their gun rights...I honestly don't get their reasoning behind that theory.  ???

Posted by Santorini on Oct. 23 2012,10:30 pm

(alcitizens @ Oct. 19 2012,10:32 pm)
QUOTE
This is how Romney got Rich, Harvest Business and Send the Jobs to China

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, < world news >, and < news about the economy >


the Ed Show :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 23 2012,11:03 pm
^ :rofl:


...oops   :blush:

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 23 2012,11:05 pm
I apologize.  I didn't mean to post the previous video.

:dunce:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 23 2012,11:34 pm
Republicans falsely claim that $2 billion went to employ Chinese workers.

< http://www.factcheck.org/2010/10/stimulus-jobs-in-china/ >

< http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/stimulus-money-for-jobs-overseas/ >

Posted by grassman on Oct. 24 2012,6:11 am

(busybee @ Oct. 21 2012,2:03 am)
QUOTE
grassman Posted on: Oct. 19 2012,11:34 pm

QUOTE
First off, I want to make it perfectly clear. I did not vote for President Obama. Now I will state that he had GREAT ideas for this country. He was out of his league when it came to adversaries, they ate him up. Now you need to really look at what has happened. Instead of going for what was GOOD FOR THIS COUNTRY, spikes were thrown in the road, to make him a one term President. Would you sell out your Dad to make your Mother look good? enuf said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Why didn't you vote for Obama?  

I know some people who won't vote for a democrat just because they believe if they do they will take away their gun rights...I honestly don't get their reasoning behind that theory.  ???

During Obama's first campaign, it just felt too easy. I did not feel McCain was that big of a threat. I voted Libertarian. Now with Romney being the candidate, I am going to have to try and stop ol Mitt baby. He is a down right many faced jerk. Democrats are not after our guns. Some people might be in love with the idea, but that is just hand wringing to suggest it will be.
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 24 2012,8:09 am
^ dems are not after our guns??? Tell that to Pelosi, Feinstein and Schumer :dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 24 2012,8:10 am


:rockon:  :rockon:

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 25 2012,5:10 am
So "The Donald" opens his yap again and offers 5million for obama to release his college transcripts and such. IMHO trump should just go away but if you think about it that money would sure do a lot of good for chairity.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 25 2012,5:59 am
90 days 90 reasons



REGGIE WATTS
Reggie Watts is a comedian and musician. He currently appears as the bandleader on the IFC talkshow Comedy Bang Bang.




Share on Tumblr
REASON 62: HE HAS THE POWER OF THREE EAGLES.

He’s not an ass. He’s handsome. He’s eloquent, well-spoken. He’s mixed-race, like me. He’s a hard worker. He enjoys enjoyment. He’s skinny, which I wish I was. He seems to make some good decisions… most of the time. He has the power of three eagles. He is not really weird and inhuman like the other candidate. He’s not creepy, like the other candidate. He’s a known quantity. He seems to enjoy a peaceful, educated world. He’s not Romney. He plays basketball. Romney sucks at basketball. He doesn’t believe in wearing magical underwear, like Romney does. He’s not a robot, like Romney is. He’s tall. He enjoys cats. He’s very friendly and has good teeth. One bad thing about him is that he needs to start saying “to” instead of “tuh.” But he’s halfway in the middle of the things he wants to accomplish; let’s give him a chance to finish it out. Also he’s not Romney. And he’s not a racist. If people vote for Obama, it will be a world filled with people going, “Wow, Americans are pretty smart.” If we vote for Romney, the rest of the world will say, “I don’t know what’s going on, but I don’t think it’s going to be a good time for the next four years.” Vote for Obama if you want to party and be enlightened.
—REGGIE WATTS
 Brooklyn, New York

:dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:  :dunce:


Wow...If reggie says this it must be so chairman 0 has my vote! :finger:

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 25 2012,6:17 am
Des Moines Register, President Obama reversed course, taking credit for a sequester that he anticipates will be "in place.":

OBAMA: "So when you combine the Bush tax cuts expiring, the sequester in place, the commitment of both myself and my opponent -- at least Governor Romney claims that he wants to reduce the deficit -- but we’re going to be in a position where I believe in the first six months we are going to solve that big piece of business." [emphasis added]

More Obama LIES!! but nobody died THIS TIME.

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 25 2012,7:24 am
QUOTE
U.S. could soon overtake Saudi Arabia as world's top oil producer
Article by: JONATHAN FAHEY
Associated Press
October 23, 2012 - 11:09 PM
NEW YORK - U.S. oil output is surging so fast that the United States could soon overtake Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest producer.

Driven by high prices and new drilling methods, U.S. production of crude and other liquid hydrocarbons is on track to rise 7 percent this year to an average of 10.9 million barrels per day. This will be the fourth straight year of crude increases and the biggest single-year gain since 1951.

The boom has surprised even the experts.

"Five years ago, if I or anyone had predicted today's production growth, people would have thought we were crazy," said Jim Burkhard, head of oil markets research at IHS CERA, an energy consulting firm.

The Energy Department forecasts that U.S. production of crude and other liquid hydrocarbons, which includes biofuels, will average 11.4 million barrels per day next year. That would be a record for the United States and just below Saudi Arabia's output of 11.6 million barrels. Citibank forecasts U.S. production could reach 13 million to 15 million barrels per day by 2020, helping to make North America "the new Middle East."

The last year the United States was the world's largest producer was 2002, after the Saudis cut production because of low prices in the aftermath of 9/11. Since then, the Saudis and the Russians have been the world leaders.

The United States will still need to import lots of oil in the years ahead. Americans use 18.7 million barrels per day. But thanks to the growth in domestic production and the improving efficiency of cars and trucks, imports could fall by half by the end of the decade.

The increase in production hasn't translated to cheaper gasoline at the pump, and prices are expected to stay relatively high for the next few years because of growing demand for oil in developing nations and political instability in the Middle East and North Africa.

Still, producing more oil domestically, and importing less, gives the economy a boost.

The companies profiting range from independent drillers to large international oil companies such as Royal Dutch Shell, which increasingly see the United States as one of the most promising places to drill. ExxonMobil agreed last month to spend $1.6 billion to increase its U.S. oil holdings.

Increased drilling is driving economic growth in states such as North Dakota, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana and Texas, all of which have unemployment rates far below the national average of 7.8 percent. North Dakota is at 3 percent; Oklahoma, 5.2.

North Dakota, which is now the nation's No. 2 oil-producing state behind Texas, hit another record for oil and gas production in August and shows no sign of slowing down even as winter approaches.

Lynn Helms, director of the North Dakota Department of Mineral Resources, said that oil production hit 701,134 barrels a day in August, up 3.7 percent. It came from 7,701 wells, a record number for North Dakota.

IHS says the oil and gas drilling boom, which already supports 1.7 million jobs, will lead to the creation of 1.3 million jobs across the U.S. economy by the end of the decade.

The growth of fracking

The factor driving domestic production higher is a newfound ability to squeeze oil out of rock once thought too difficult to tap.

To free the oil and gas from the rock, drillers crack it open by pumping water, sand and chemicals into the ground at high pressure, a process is known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking."

While expanded use of the method has unlocked enormous reserves of oil and gas, it has also raised concerns that contaminated water produced in the process could leak into drinking water.

The demand for frac sand over the past three years has set off a mining rush in southeastern Minnesota and western Wisconsin, where there are vast deposits of the world's most crush-resistant sand.

Production from shale formations is expected to grow from 1.6 million barrels per day this year to 4.2 million per day by 2020, according to Wood Mackenzie, a consulting firm. That means these new formations will yield more oil by 2020 than major oil suppliers such as Iran and Canada produce today.

Staff writers David Shaffer and Tony Kennedy contributed to this report.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 25 2012,7:56 am
^ yes, despite Obama!
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 25 2012,8:00 am

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 25 2012,6:17 am)
QUOTE
Des Moines Register, President Obama reversed course, taking credit for a sequester that he anticipates will be "in place.":

OBAMA: "So when you combine the Bush tax cuts expiring, the sequester in place, the commitment of both myself and my opponent -- at least Governor Romney claims that he wants to reduce the deficit -- but we’re going to be in a position where I believe in the first six months we are going to solve that big piece of business." [emphasis added]

More Obama LIES!! but nobody died THIS TIME.

Wrong, two Seals, an advisor and an ambassador died because of either nefarious reasons or incompetence.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 25 2012,8:04 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 25 2012,8:00 am)
QUOTE

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 25 2012,6:17 am)
QUOTE
Des Moines Register, President Obama reversed course, taking credit for a sequester that he anticipates will be "in place.":

OBAMA: "So when you combine the Bush tax cuts expiring, the sequester in place, the commitment of both myself and my opponent -- at least Governor Romney claims that he wants to reduce the deficit -- but we’re going to be in a position where I believe in the first six months we are going to solve that big piece of business." [emphasis added]

More Obama LIES!! but nobody died THIS TIME.

Wrong, two Seals, an advisor and an ambassador died because of either nefarious reasons or incompetence.

This was about the sequester and how chairman 0 changed his tune last night nobody has died in the sequester...YET!
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 25 2012,8:40 am
^ good enough :notworthy:

I love that Letterman finally figured out that Obama's a liar. :blush:

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 25 2012,9:25 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 25 2012,8:40 am)
QUOTE
^ good enough :notworthy:

I love that Letterman finally figured out that Obama's a liar. :blush:

I have the clip but I don't know how to post it here is the code is somebody can post it.

< http://www.mediaite.com/tv...bailout >

src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=QJNTX3173BX82T81&content_type=content_item&layout=&playlist_cid=&media_type=video&widget_type_cid=svp&read_more=1" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true">

The text is as follows:

David Letterman told MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow that he was disappointed in President Barack Obama who he felt had misrepresented Gov. Mitt Romney’s opposition to the auto bailout. Letterman said that he reread Romney’s op-ed in which the former Massachusetts governor outlined how he would rescue the auto industry, and said that Obama had played “fast and loose” with the facts when he related Romney’s position.

“Here’s what upset me last night; playing fast and loose with facts,” Letterman said to Maddow. He went on to rehash what President Obama said during Monday night’s debate regarding Romney’s position on the auto bailout which he detailed in a 2009 New York Times op-ed entitled “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt“.

“Now, I don’t care whether you’re Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying,” Letterman said. “And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged.”

Maddow went on to say that Romney’s position on the auto bailout was wrong because it relied on private capital to rescue the automotive industry when there was no private credit available. She conceded, however, that Obama was clearer about his position on the auto bailout in the first debate than on Monday night.

MORE OBAMA LIES body count on this unknown...

Posted by grassman on Oct. 25 2012,11:10 am
I think you are missing the point here, Romney wanted private parties to rescue the auto industry after bankruptsy, there were none that would take part. Remember the sky was falling at this time. The only one with the check book was the govt. Like it or not, under Romney's thinking, they would have failed and disappeared.
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 25 2012,11:16 am

(grassman @ Oct. 25 2012,11:10 am)
QUOTE
I think you are missing the point here, Romney wanted private parties to rescue the auto industry after bankruptsy, there were none that would take part. Remember the sky was falling at this time. The only one with the check book was the govt. Like it or not, under Romney's thinking, they would have failed and disappeared.

The point being missed here is this:
It is not the taxpayers responsibility to bail out the auto industry, why should taxpayers be on the hook for mismanagement of a company?  That whole to big to fail BS is just that BS, anything can fail or it can prosper.
I can say with a clear conscience if it was up to me; I would have let those companies go bankrupt.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 25 2012,11:45 am
^ they would have emerged leaner and stronger.
Posted by Botto 82 on Oct. 25 2012,11:54 am
QUOTE
While expanded use of the method has unlocked enormous reserves of oil and gas, it has also raised concerns that contaminated water produced in the process could leak into drinking water.


Eh, frack away, as we're ever so hopeful for the return of $2.00 gallons of gas. :crazy:

There's plenty of clean water. Your grandkids will be fine.

Again: :crazy:

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 25 2012,12:02 pm
Rolling Stone cover, “Obama and the Road Ahead: The Rolling Stone Interview,” by Douglas Brinkley: “We arrived at the Oval Office for our 45-minute interview … on the morning of October 11th. … As we left the Oval Office, executive editor Eric Bates told Obama that he had asked his six-year-old if there was anything she wanted him to say to the president. … [S]he said, ‘Tell him: You can do it.’ Obama grinned. … ‘You know, kids have good instincts,’ Obama offered. ‘They look at the other guy and say, “Well, that’s a bullcrapter, I can tell.”’”


POT THIS IS KETTLE

WOW CHAIRMAN 0 CALLS SOMEBODY ELSE A BULLcrapTER....HELLO HYPOCRISY   :rofl:  :rofl:

Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Oct. 25 2012,2:17 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 25 2012,12:02 pm)
QUOTE
Rolling Stone cover, “Obama and the Road Ahead: The Rolling Stone Interview,” by Douglas Brinkley: “We arrived at the Oval Office for our 45-minute interview … on the morning of October 11th. … As we left the Oval Office, executive editor Eric Bates told Obama that he had asked his six-year-old if there was anything she wanted him to say to the president. … [S]he said, ‘Tell him: You can do it.’ Obama grinned. … ‘You know, kids have good instincts,’ Obama offered. ‘They look at the other guy and say, “Well, that’s a bullcrapter, I can tell.”’”


POT THIS IS KETTLE

WOW CHAIRMAN 0 CALLS SOMEBODY ELSE A BULLcrapTER...HELLO HYPOCRISY   :rofl:  :rofl:

Hey don't forget this little gem.

President Barack Obama spoke in Colorado today as part of a nearly around-the-clock campaigning tour.

The President talked about the desire for wind turbines being manufactured in America, saying he wanted them manufactured "here in China."

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 25 2012,8:46 pm
How can the kool aid drinkers defend this administrations incompetence is beyond me LIES LIES LIES that is all they say chairman 0 is the greatest con artist ever!!
Posted by busybee on Oct. 26 2012,2:42 am
Ugh...why can't I get any honest answers anywhere about anything when it comes to politics...

It's always about Republican or Democrat loyalties when it comes to U.S. Citizens and the media...

NEVER is anything about the true grit ISSUES of how things really affect people who live and attempt to survive and thrive here in this country no matter what and especially for any of those who are struggling even though they were born and raised to TRUST the United States of America and their Government to be their protector who would be honoring their RIGHTS and FREEDOMS  to prosper, be heard, and survive in spite of ALL other countries who don't.

The majority of U.S. Citizens get their support from other U.S. Citizen's whether it be their employment as a teacher, nurse, doctor, attorney, first responder, law enforcement official, fire fighter, Salvation Army, ect.. and their U.S. Families...not the political parties of republicans vs democrats, when the going gets tough.  

The majority of people in this country who help other U.S. citizens survive and thrive, have no desire to stake any claim that they were motivated by political affiliation with any specific political agenda.  They just do what they do because they CARE about U.S. Citizens.  

Dang it all.. how does that happen without the Politicians who want to be elected and take all the credit for it???

Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 26 2012,7:33 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 25 2012,5:10 am)
QUOTE
So "The Donald" opens his yap again and offers 5million for obama to release his college transcripts and such. IMHO trump should just go away but if you think about it that money would sure do a lot of good for chairity.

So Trump should go away, but you also think the President should give in to his demands, again.

Have any of you asked for Romney's birth certificate (short and long-form) yet, or is there something different about Obama that you guys have a hard time accepting?

Nah, I'm sure you're all thinking about the charity.  How it would help people.   :rofl:

QUOTE
Wrong, two Seals, an advisor and an ambassador died because of either nefarious reasons or incompetence.


I thought that was because of terrorism?  I remember another guy ignoring threats, but it was a few thousand who died.  Did you attack the POTUS for that, or are you one of the people who actually approved even more after those deaths?  < 9/11 - Presidential Approval Ratings >

Then there was the con job about WMD, a few thousand died there.  But hey, whats a few thousand here and there in the Bush years compared to the much worse "nefarious actions and LIES" related to Benghazi?   :dunce:

Which lies again, by the way?  Is it because he forgot to say "ism" in the Rose Garden the next day?  Or did we move on to some other thing the RNC/FNC has you all upset about now?

QUOTE
How can the kool aid drinkers defend this administrations incompetence is beyond me LIES LIES LIES that is all they say chairman 0 is the greatest con artist ever!!


It's been several years of one nutty conspiracy after another, regardless of who is in the White House I know that you guys will repeat whatever you hear from the RNC.  That's why many of you have repeated verbatim what the republican strategists have said over and over again, whether it be the "are you better off than four years ago?", gas prices and public lands drilling, or the unemployment numbers that the neocons suddenly started having compassion for after Romney/Ryan/Boehner told you that whether the numbers go up or down it's a bad sign and you should blame Obama.

Most voters might just see through the two minutes of hate.  The POTUS is just a democrat who reformed health care, fixed the auto industry, improved the economy year after year, ended Don't ask don't tell, Iraq, Bin Laden (sorry, he didn't pull the trigger, only ordered it, which is more than ANY republican would do when it came to Pakistan), and the only thing you can do is complain that he didn't do all those things fast enough.

Whew, you're right.  Better vote for Gordon Gekko, the rich shouldn't have to pay taxes, and the 47% don't pay enough.   :sarcasm:

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 26 2012,9:18 am
^'well good morning Kap!

I really didn't think too much of donald's offer but 5m to charity? Well I don't really give a sh!t about that either and obviously neither does bum bum.

Bush pretty much just walked into office when the towers fell but probably should have been paying more attention too but it's coming out now that Obama knew in real time, was most likely watching the feeds and was either to stupid or had other reasons not to lift a finger.

As far as the taxes go. We'll all be paying much more one way or another in Obama's reelected come January. :dunce:

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 27 2012,10:04 am
Just in case you missed this..
Posted by Botto 82 on Oct. 27 2012,10:12 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 26 2012,9:18 am)
QUOTE
Bush pretty much just walked into office when the towers fell but probably should have been paying more attention too

Frak that noise. The Bush (Cheney) Administration orchestrated that whole mess. Anyone who can't see that is blinded by some sick sense of, "My noble country's government wouldn't do THAT, oh no." It's like revisionist history a la Aunt Bea.

The Government of the United States is a corrupt piece of garbage, and I wish it a slow, painful death. There, I said it.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 27 2012,11:09 am
^Walmart is having a sale on tin foil this weekend. :p
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 27 2012,11:40 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 27 2012,11:09 am)
QUOTE
^Walmart is having a sale on tin foil this weekend. :p

:rofl:  :rofl:  He needs the industrial strength tin foil one can only get at the looney bin Media Matters.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 27 2012,10:51 pm
People have been conditioned to think that anyone who questions the official 911 story are kooks. Most who question it are definitely not kooks. The main reasons that make some question it don't get any air time. The big people who question it don't get air time. There are actually a lot of highly credible non-kooks who are calling BS on the governments version.
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 28 2012,12:41 am
Truthers are Dufers.. Sad but True..
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 28 2012,9:39 am
So why does colin powell matter...

Does al lay awake at night wondering what does colon think, maybe he has him on speed dial to get his colon "fix" I don't know. I don't need anybody to tell me what to think and do unlike some of stalins useful idiots that believe government is something we all belong too. :finger:

Posted by hymiebravo on Oct. 28 2012,10:52 am
QUOTE
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was signed into law Feb. 17.



The act will provide several hundred million dollars to Minnesota for transportation needs.

< http://www.dot.state.mn.us/federalrecovery/ >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 28 2012,11:47 am
Yes indeed, I've seen a few of those "shovel ready projects" a light grinding on the road surface and then pave over, about the equivalent of,(oh God hymen, here it comes) "polishing a turd" :rofl:
Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 28 2012,1:47 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 28 2012,9:39 am)
QUOTE
So why does colin powell matter...

Does al lay awake at night wondering what does colon think, maybe he has him on speed dial to get his colon "fix" I don't know. I don't need anybody to tell me what to think and do unlike some of stalins useful idiots that believe government is something we all belong too. :finger:

Colin Powell is a Republican endorsing Obama..

We don't belong to a government, we are the government..

Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy allows people to participate equally—either directly or through elected representatives—in the proposal, development, and creation of laws.

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracies >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 28 2012,4:31 pm
^ no, Colin Powell was a soldier.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 28 2012,4:55 pm
al while technically you are correct there are major differences is democracy

The government of the United States is called a constitutional democracy. It is a democracy because the government is based on the consent of the people. Further, the government operates according to the principle of majority rule. The people, for example, elect their representatives and senators in Congress by majority vote; and the members of Congress make laws according to majority rule.

The popular and democratic government of the United States, however, is limited by the higher law of the Constitution in order to secure, as the Declaration of Independence says, the “unalienable rights” of every person. These legal limitations on the people's government make the United States a constitutional democracy, not an unlimited democracy.

James Madison and other framers of the Constitution feared the new threat to liberty that could come from a tyrannical majority. In times past, the threat to liberty came from the unrestrained powers of a king or an aristocracy. Madison, however, saw a new danger, which he expressed in a letter to Thomas Jefferson (Oct. 17, 1788):

   Wherever the real power in a Government lies, there is the danger of oppression. In our Governments, the real power lies in the majority of the Community, and the invasion of private rights is chiefly to be apprehended, not from acts of Government contrary to the sense of its constituents, but from acts in which the Government is the mere instrument of the major number [majority] of the constituents. This is a truth of great importance, but not yet sufficiently attended to…. Whenever there is an interest and power to do wrong, wrong will generally be done, and not less readily by [a majority of the people] than by a… prince.



Madison wanted government by majority rule of duly elected representatives of the people, but the majority's power must be limited by the higher law of a written constitution. If not, people that the majority disliked could lose basic freedoms and opportunities.

In The Federalist Nos. 10 and 51, James Madison argued for constitutional limits on power in government in order to protect the liberty and security of individuals. He opposed equally the absolutism, or total power, of a monarch or military dictator (the tyranny of one), an aristocracy or oligarchy (tyranny of the few over the many), or a majority of the people (tyranny of the many over the few). In a republic or representative democracy (government by elected representatives of the people), the greatest threat to liberty would come from an unrestrained majority. This threat could be overcome by constructing constitutional limits on majority rule in order to protect minority rights.

A constitutional democracy, then, is government by majority rule with protection of minority rights. It is democratic because of its foundations of popular consent and majority rule. It is constitutional because the power of the majority to rule is limited by a supreme law.

So what did obama do when he "bought" his senators for his pet projects against the will of the people?

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 28 2012,5:57 pm

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 28 2012,4:31 pm)
QUOTE
^ no, Colin Powell was a soldier.

A Republican that was a Soldier.. Even Powell thinks his own party has gone to Goofyville..

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Powell >

Posted by Expatriate on Oct. 29 2012,10:45 am
past Republican Presidents
Romney's not in thier class!

< http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4dwx0PNZWY >

Posted by MADDOG on Oct. 29 2012,11:04 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 28 2012,5:57 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 28 2012,4:31 pm)
QUOTE
^ no, Colin Powell was a soldier.

A Republican that was a Soldier.. Even Powell thinks his own party has gone to Goofyville..

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Powell >

What did you call Powell when he manipulated the facts and convinced the U.N to go to war against Iraq?
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 29 2012,11:29 am
For Al, that would be an inconvenient truth.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Oct. 29 2012,11:42 am

(Self-Banished @ Oct. 29 2012,11:29 am)
QUOTE
For Al, that would be an inconvenient truth.

:notworthy:  :notworthy:
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 29 2012,10:57 pm

(Funkadelic Zombie Hunter @ Oct. 28 2012,4:55 pm)
QUOTE
al while technically you are correct there are major differences is democracy

The government of the United States is called a constitutional democracy. It is a democracy because the government is based on the consent of the people. .

An interesting point of view on the subject of the US being a Republic.

QUOTE
From:  John Porter; October 12, 2012

To:  Americans everywhere;

Thank you for your time and attention.

        First, please let me be very clear, what I have written here for your consideration is not about the Republican Party, Democrat Party, Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Tea Party or any other Party. It is about an idea conceived over two centuries ago, a country, a people, a document, our current president and his intensions for America.

       Two hundred and twenty five years ago (1787) a group of men whom we now refer to as the "founding fathers," following a long and bloody battle for their independence from a dictatorial Monarchy, assembled themselves together in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and did their best to establish a country governed in a God-fearing way by representatives who were selected by the people who were to be governed.  

       No where in the history of all mankind were there any examples or even political theory in existence that offered them any hope that a republican form of government, based on the new concept of consent of the governed, could succeed on a wilderness continent which was much larger than any European state.  

       These men met there on the world stage to carry out the first of three acts in this epic political drama, the drafting of the United States Constitution. The final document was the culmination of a fierce political struggle that had been waged for four sweltering summer months in secret behind guarded closed doors. The document sought to reconcile individual personal liberty with the perceived need for a central government with powers to forge a political and economic common market among thirteen separate and sovereign states.  

       The next two acts to be performed on this world stage were the ratification of the document and the translation from words on parchment paper to institutional form and structure. In 1789 the first congress approved and sent to the states for ratification, a bill of rights of individual liberty, and additional rights reserved to the states. Those ten amendments, ratified on December 15, 1791, became an extremely vital part of the Constitution and crucial to greatly limiting the power of the Federal Government over that of the people and separate states. The Republic of the United States of America, an experiment in people governing themselves was now a reality for the first time in the history of man. Newcomers from other countries, willing to be governed by it's Constitution and Bill of Rights, came in droves to this new land of government by the governed.  

       I here bring to your attention that the United States of America was formed as a Republic and not a Democracy. All our lives you and I have been conditioned to believe we are a Democracy in America. How long has it been since you have heard of America referred to as a Republic? You see, there was purpose behind the words in the Pledge of Allegiance to our flag referring to our country as, "the Republic for which it stands." Ladies and gentlemen rest assured there is a very good reason the term "democracy" does not exist either in our Constitution or the Declaration of our Independence from the Monarchial King of England. A true Democracy is mob rule. Any government set up as a Democracy is the same government we would have if we were set up as a Socialist, Communist, or Marxist government. In these forms the government is a mob ruling over the people with absolutely no rights for individuals or minorities.  

       It has been written, "The Founders were extremely knowledgeable about the issue of democracy and feared democracy as much as a monarchy. They understood that the only entity that can take away the people's freedom is their own government, either by being too weak to protect them from external threats or by becoming too powerful and taking over every aspect of life." Democracy and/or Socialism is mob rule by government. The founders of America were all too familiar with democracies/socialism, and deliberately did everything in their power to prevent a Democracy. It has been written, "In a Republic, the sovereignty resides with the people themselves. In a Republic, one may act on his own or through his representatives when he chooses to solve a problem." The people have no obligation to the government; the government is a servant of the people, and obliged to them, for they are its owner. Not only have many politicians, Republican and Democrat, lost sight of this fact, but a great many of the American people.  

       A Constitutional Republic has a Constitution that limits the powers of the government. The goal of our founding fathers in forming a Constitutional Republic was to avoid the disastrous extremes of either tyranny (absolute ruler) or "mobocracy." (government mob).

       I submit for your consideration, we are witnessing today president Barack Obama, who by way of his own actions and words, is demonstrating his aspirations of becoming an absolute ruler. When he makes public statements of, "Fundamentally changing America," he is promising us to change the workings of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, for they ARE the fundamentals of America. His promising to "redistribute the wealth" is purposely designed to divide the American people. When he publicly promises, and I quote, "If congress doesn't do the things I think necessary, I will not wait on them." "I will do it myself." This kind of talk is deliberately crafted to slowly condition our minds and dumb us down to his way of Socialistic and absolute ruler thinking. I believe with all my being, if re-elected, he will never willingly relinquish the office of president.  

       Barack Obama is not an incompetent fool, ladies and gentlemen. He knows exactly what he is doing and why he is doing it. For four years he has been conditioning the minds of all who will listen and very carefully and cunningly crafting the country for a possible political takeover by way of ignoring the Constitution and the people's congress, and conditioning us to it. All who don't like it, he will bypass and do it anyway. Please familiarize yourself with this man's past. He is the most dangerous man in American history to the Constitutional Republic and individual freedoms which our founding fathers established and left for us. It will be up to us to defend and preserve it. Make no mistake, his view of America is very different than that of our founding fathers, and most Americans today.  

       Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution states: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion"...If we the American people don't stop this man and his Socialist Czars on November 6 this year and start a reversal of the present trend, the free Republic of America will be lost for generations to come to a Socialist, tyrannical government mob. It begs the question, could this be the last Presidential election? There needs to be a great awakening of all freedom loving Americans, or I fear it very well may be. I leave you with a thought to seriously think upon as you prepare to vote...A people can become slaves to a government as well as a plantation owner.

       You have my permission to leave my information below intact as you please forward to all you can in any method you wish.

May God bless America at this critical time in our history.

Until next time:

Your friend in freedom;

John Porter
118 Approach Drive
Harrison, Arkansas 72601
870-741-4119
johnporter1939@cox.net

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 29 2012,10:59 pm
QUOTE
His promising to "redistribute the wealth" is purposely designed to divide the American people. When he publicly promises, and I quote, "If congress doesn't do the things I think necessary, I will not wait on them." "I will do it myself." This kind of talk is deliberately crafted to slowly condition our minds and dumb us down to his way of Socialistic and absolute ruler thinking. I believe with all my being, if re-elected, he will never willingly relinquish the office of president.


I remember hearing this speech and the people in the crowd were actually cheering him on.  

Yikes!! :frusty:

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 29 2012,11:12 pm
I remember reading the same garbage about Bush and the Patriot Act.
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 29 2012,11:25 pm
Ya but the the main difference here is that the Patriot Act was an enacted by Congress.
Posted by irisheyes on Oct. 30 2012,12:51 am
Well, I don't know who John Porter is or if he actually wrote that, but I hadn't realized Obama's plans of refusing to relinquish the Presidency after reelection.  That's probably the reason for the FEMA camps and him making Hawaii forge a birth certificate.  It's all part of his evil plan.   :sarcasm:

QUOTE
QUOTE
His promising to "redistribute the wealth" is purposely designed to divide the American people. When he publicly promises, and I quote, "If congress doesn't do the things I think necessary, I will not wait on them." "I will do it myself." This kind of talk is deliberately crafted to slowly condition our minds and dumb us down to his way of Socialistic and absolute ruler thinking. I believe with all my being, if re-elected, he will never willingly relinquish the office of president.



I remember hearing this speech and the people in the crowd were actually cheering him on.


You guys have gotta get a book on economics at some point.

It isn't socialist/communist/marxist to have a tax policy that requires venture capitalists and people who inherit billions pay taxes on their wealth.  The rest of us are just a little surprised that a tax policy where the rich pay taxes has become a radical idea.

QUOTE
Ya but the the main difference here is that the Patriot Act was an enacted by Congress.


There are numerous U.S. laws that the Patriot Act violates, including F.I.S.A and it explicitly violates protections in the Bill of Rights.  Once again, it seems the Constitution only became popular again after January of 2009 when folks started mailing tea bags to the White House.

Obamacare was enacted by Congress also, as were other reforms and bills signed by Obama.  So, what "main difference" are you referring to?  The forwarded email doesn't specify.

Posted by busybee on Oct. 30 2012,1:02 am
No matter what is wrote on this forum, the local newspaper or what people see on "prime time t.v,." they are going to vote for what they believe in from their "opinion/gut instinct/emotions..."  That's how our country works...tug on a string of one of those...and anything logical, comprehensive, and realistic is tossed to the wayside...
Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 31 2012,12:48 am
Irish,

QUOTE
You guys have gotta get a book on economics at some point.

It isn't socialist/communist/marxist to have a tax policy that requires venture capitalists and people who inherit billions pay taxes on their wealth.  The rest of us are just a little surprised that a tax policy where the rich pay taxes has become a radical idea.


I don't really need you to lecture me on economics.  I thought this guys letter was an interesting take on the subject and that it provoked thought.

QUOTE
There are numerous U.S. laws that the Patriot Act violates, including F.I.S.A and it explicitly violates protections in the Bill of Rights.  Once again, it seems the Constitution only became popular again after January of 2009 when folks started mailing tea bags to the White House.

Obamacare was enacted by Congress also, as were other reforms and bills signed by Obama.  So, what "main difference" are you referring to?  The forwarded email doesn't specify.


My point wasn't about the fact that the Patriot Act violates other laws.  My point is that the act was passed by Congress and not by the President acting alone...ya dig?

The main difference is in the words that Obama spoke.  Has he acted on those words? No.  Did he say them?  You bet your arse he did.  Words have meaning...don't you know.

Posted by hymiebravo on Nov. 01 2012,8:22 am
QUOTE
First, please let me be very clear, what I have written here for your consideration is not about the Republican Party, Democrat Party, Independent Party, Libertarian Party, Tea Party or any other Party. It is about an idea


When somebody starts off like that; you know they have an agenda.

Just like when Common Citizen pretends like he just wants to provoke thought.

Then proceeds to get thoroughly owned by Irisheyes.  :rofl:

It's like watching a severe mismatch on American Gladiators.

Better luck next time Commie!  :rofl:

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 01 2012,9:38 am
^ nice endorsement of Kaptain Kreepy :D
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 01 2012,5:33 pm
Obama has a 79% chance of winning, Romney has a 21% chance..

< http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ >

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 01 2012,5:40 pm
Donald Trump has found PROOF that President Barack Obama is actually a Somali pirate.. :rofl:
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 01 2012,7:54 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 01 2012,5:40 pm)
QUOTE
Donald Trump has found PROOF that President Barack Obama is actually a Somali pirate.. :rofl:

Guess it didn't work out all to well, since pirate obowsAlot kept bowing to his victims.  
Once a puzzy always a puzzy.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 02 2012,6:38 pm
Bloomberg for Obama..
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 02 2012,6:41 pm
Obama has a 81% chance of winning, Romney has a 19% chance..

< http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ >

The Economist endorsed Obama..

Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 02 2012,9:28 pm
:rofl: climate change :rofl:
You climate change freaks are a modern day version of chicken little.
You are arguing the junk science of climate change of a hurricane during, *gasp* hurricane season.  :rofl:

Oh, Noes, hurricanes only hit the Gulf States never the Eastern Seaboard.  It is gotta to be because of climate change :sarcasm:  :rofl:

Hey, I gots an idea.  How about we come up with a tax scheme that can change the weather and that will stop hurricanes from ever happening again, we can market this BS and pull at the over sensitive heart strings of stupid Americans and make them feel guilty for enjoying life, and we can call this scam, "Climate Change"

Oh wait, its already an idea, dammit. :rofl:

Frackin' morons.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 03 2012,7:09 am

(alcitizens @ Nov. 02 2012,6:38 pm)
QUOTE
Bloomberg for Obama..

YES! Bloomberg for Obama! The assclown that was going to go through with the NYC marathon!
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 03 2012,7:14 am
So I'm half asleep this AM and I see a clip of Biden saying something to the effect of "in the last four years I have never been proud to be Obama's VP?"

7.9'unemploment, yep, recovery is just around the corner! :rofl:

Posted by Botto 82 on Nov. 03 2012,9:29 am
Chart the Dow Jones Index for the last 4 years. The Obama Presidency certainly has been good for someone...
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 03 2012,10:45 am
This is an ass-dragging economy, lame as hell for themlast four years.
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 03 2012,10:54 am
Obama has a 84% chance of winning, Romney has a 16% chance..

< http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ >

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 03 2012,11:57 am
^ maybe, maybe not, guess we'll find out Tuesday .
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 03 2012,7:49 pm
Pop singer Katy Perry, sporting a skin-tight minidress with President Barack Obama's campaign slogan "Forward" emblazoned across it..
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 04 2012,2:14 am

(alcitizens @ Nov. 03 2012,7:49 pm)
QUOTE
Pop singer Katy Perry, sporting a skin-tight minidress with President Barack Obama's campaign slogan "Forward" emblazoned across it..

Really al, do you actually put that much stock into some famous putz that espouses a political opinion?
Their opinion means less than yours does, so you should be happy that I would consider your lunacy before theirs.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 04 2012,2:32 am

(Grinning_Dragon @ Nov. 04 2012,2:14 am)
QUOTE
Their opinion means less than yours does, so you should be happy that I would consider your lunacy before theirs.

I' ll take that as a compliment from you.. :thumbsup:

Hoping that a few right-wing turd for brains like you will look at her tight dress and come over to the sane side of the world.. :laugh:

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 04 2012,3:27 am
^ I'm not that shallow and imdon't think GD is either.
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 04 2012,5:36 am

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 04 2012,3:27 am)
QUOTE
^ I'm not that shallow and imdon't think GD is either.

Obama has a 85% chance of winning, Romney has a 15% chance..

< http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ >

You and GD are the epitome of shallow.. Your parents didn't show you enough love..

Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Nov. 04 2012,7:32 am
al is getting desperate...
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 04 2012,8:22 am
^ let's hope.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 05 2012,6:10 am
One more damned day, then no more ads for awhile. :D
Posted by grassman on Nov. 05 2012,8:23 am


Sad that these Super Pacs make little girls cry.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 05 2012,8:58 am
Awww, poor little girl.  :(
Reminds me of hymen. :D

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 05 2012,8:48 pm
Obama has a 91% chance of winning, Romney has a 9% chance..

< http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ >

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 05 2012,10:00 pm
Michal Barone:  < My Webpage >

QUOTE
Fundamentals usually prevail in American elections. That's bad news for Barack Obama. True, Americans want to think well of their presidents and many think it would be bad if Americans were perceived as rejecting the first black president.

But it's also true that most voters oppose Obama's major policies and consider unsatisfactory the very sluggish economic recovery -- Friday's jobs report showed an unemployment uptick.

Also, both national and target state polls show that independents, voters who don't identify themselves as Democrats or Republicans, break for Romney.

That might not matter if Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 39 to 32 percent, as they did in the 2008 exit poll. But just about every indicator suggests that Republicans are more enthusiastic about voting -- and about their candidate -- than they were in 2008, and Democrats are less so…

Bottom line: Romney 315, Obama 223. That sounds high for Romney. But he could drop Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and still win the election. Fundamentals.


Vote for love of country...not revenge...

...nuff said.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 06 2012,4:52 am
Well it's almost 5am and polls will be open soon. I'm sure there'll be reports of fraud on both sides.

So today decides, will we continue with this ass-dragging economy and down the road to socialized healthcare or do we take a chance on a guy that promises prosperity.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 06 2012,5:30 am
Well it's almost 5am and polls will be open soon. I'm sure there'll be reports of fraud on both sides.

So today decides, will we continue with this ass-dragging economy and down the road to socialized healthcare or do we take a chance on a guy that promises prosperity.

Posted by hairhertz on Nov. 06 2012,7:09 am
269 Obama-266 Romney & as promised, 3 electors vote for Ryan

we all win/we all lose  :dunno:

Posted by Gamer on Nov. 06 2012,9:15 am
“I met those of our society who had votes in the ensuing election, and advised them, 1. To vote, without fee or reward, for the person they judged most worthy: 2. To speak no evil of the person they voted against: And, 3. To take care their spirits were not sharpened against those that voted on the other side.” – John Wesley, Oct. 6, 1774

Sound advice even 240 years later. Get out and vote today! :thumbsup:

Posted by grassman on Nov. 06 2012,4:11 pm
I see Biden is celebrating already.
Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 06 2012,8:59 pm
That's BS...

his arms are smaller than that...and icehouse sucks.

Posted by grassman on Nov. 06 2012,9:18 pm
Come on CC, you should know by now that I keep funny pics. :D
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 06 2012,10:40 pm
Congratulations President Barack Obama on your election to another 4 year term as President of the United States.. Kick Ass.. :rockon:
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 06 2012,11:57 pm
Fellow Citizens,

I'm about to go speak to the crowd here in Chicago, but I wanted to thank you first.

I want you to know that this wasn't fate, and it wasn't an accident. You made this happen.

You organized yourselves block by block. You took ownership of this campaign five and ten dollars at a time. And when it wasn't easy, you pressed forward.

I will spend the rest of my presidency honoring your support, and doing what I can to finish what we started.

But I want you to take real pride, as I do, in how we got the chance in the first place.

Today is the clearest proof yet that, against the odds, ordinary Americans can overcome powerful interests.

There's a lot more work to do.

But for right now: Thank you.

Barack

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 07 2012,12:13 am
Ya.. the Divided States of America.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,5:07 am
And marching on to over 20'trillion in debt.
Posted by Funkadelic Zombie Hunter on Nov. 07 2012,5:56 am
America is stuck ON STUPID..... now yuck it up while you pay for your mistakes enjoy 1938/1939 you deserve it!
Posted by grassman on Nov. 07 2012,6:08 am
I think the future could be bright if the whole electorate works together for the country and not themselves. :thumbsup:
Posted by irisheyes on Nov. 07 2012,6:32 am
FOX has been doing damage control since yesterday.  And Donald Trump tweets calling for < revolution > last night.

Speaking of revolution, has anyone checked to see if Ted Nugent is in prison or dead?   :p

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,6:46 am
^ oh come on Kap, now you can go propose to your sweety! :D

Revolution??? I have to admit, it does cross the mind.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,6:49 am

(grassman @ Nov. 07 2012,6:08 am)
QUOTE
I think the future could be bright if the whole electorate works together for the country and not themselves. :thumbsup:

Oh, so now I should just abandon my principles and go along just to get along? :finger:
Posted by grassman on Nov. 07 2012,7:45 am
There is no I in COUNTRY, you self centered prick. :D
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,8:42 am
^ and obviously there are no balls in your pants. :dunce:
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,8:45 am
Let me guess, there was a terrible weedwacking experiment. :p
Posted by binanca on Nov. 07 2012,8:50 am
QUOTE
And Donald Trump tweets calling for revolution last night.


How embarrassing for all the replublicans' to have such a buffoon on their side. :dunce:

Posted by grassman on Nov. 07 2012,10:01 am

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 07 2012,8:42 am)
QUOTE
^ and obviously there are no balls in your pants. :dunce:

Sometimes it takes more balls to the right thing than to do good for oneself. Think about it for a while. Would you take the dollar out of a dying mans hand because he is really not going to need it?
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,10:45 am
Yep. :D
Posted by hairhertz on Nov. 07 2012,11:04 am
let me try to be the thread killer here, it seems to work elsewhere
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,11:42 am

(grassman @ Nov. 07 2012,10:01 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 07 2012,8:42 am)
QUOTE
^ and obviously there are no balls in your pants. :dunce:

Sometimes it takes more balls to the right thing than to do good for oneself. Think about it for a while. Would you take the dollar out of a dying mans hand because he is really not going to need it?

And the gov. Doesn't collect after a persons demise? Like hell they don't why should I be any different?
Posted by hairhertz on Nov. 07 2012,12:08 pm
federal estate tax exemption thru 2012 = $5,000,000 maximum
MN estate tax exeption [2009 info] = $1,000,000 maximum

Fed ex will revert to $1,000,000 in 2013 unless Congress re-passes the current exemption

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 07 2012,12:37 pm
And as of Jan 1'drops to 1million with a 55% tax
Posted by hairhertz on Nov. 07 2012,2:59 pm
Get Congress off their duffs and pass a budget [tax bill] that is a compromise.
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 07 2012,6:09 pm

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 07 2012,11:42 am)
QUOTE
And the gov. Doesn't collect after a persons demise? Like hell they don't why should I be any different?

I think your talking about the Funeral Home, if there’s anything left after the Hospital and Nursing Home they get it, what ever is left after that the worms claim.
Posted by grassman on Nov. 07 2012,6:40 pm

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 07 2012,10:45 am)
QUOTE
Yep. :D

I thought so. :(
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 08 2012,4:39 am
^ and your problem with that is???

Thing is, when I die I'll have made sure I'd given all my money and property away. :D

Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 08 2012,8:17 am

(Expatriate @ Nov. 07 2012,6:09 pm)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 07 2012,11:42 am)
QUOTE
And the gov. Doesn't collect after a persons demise? Like hell they don't why should I be any different?

I think your talking about the Funeral Home, if there’s anything left after the Hospital and Nursing Home they get it, what ever is left after that the worms claim.

How is a nursing home entitled to a person's property?
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 08 2012,8:29 am
Actually it's the county that wants the money. When my Dad passed the county was pretty pissed that we'd prepaid his funeral out of the proceeds when his house was sold.
Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 08 2012,8:41 am
Good for you, my parents and my in-laws have already put into place that the govt gets nothing from them when they die.
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 08 2012,9:01 am
I think prepaid plans are a must if you don’t want to stiff the kids for your final expense.
SB you have experienced the expense of long-term care where the county becomes involved, but I still believe a prepaid funeral is legal.

Dragon sometimes long-term care for the elderly is unavoidable, even a short-term stay can be expensive.
Maybe down in Jindalville the Nursing Home rates are a little lower but not much I’m guessing.

It’s my opinion we should have a Kevorkian Law, death with dignity, I’d much rather just nod off then spend my family's or county/state's resources keep me in a state of lingering agony!

Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 08 2012,9:14 am
Expat-
I understand that long term care is unavoidable, but still does not explain why a nursing home or govt is entitled to that persons assets; law or not, does not give them the exclusive right to another persons property, unless of course it was signed over legally and looked over by an attorney.

Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 08 2012,9:32 am
Dragon,
Just a heads-up for future reference, Louisiana has a Filial Law which makes you responsible for your parents Nursing Home bills.
Here in Minnesota we don’t have this type of law but in a way we’re all still on the hook for the bill because the county steps in when someone goes broke.

< http://www.clarkhoward.com/news...p9 >

Posted by Grinning_Dragon on Nov. 08 2012,10:36 am

(Expatriate @ Nov. 08 2012,9:32 am)
QUOTE
Dragon,
Just a heads-up for future reference, Louisiana has a Filial Law which makes you responsible for your parents Nursing Home bills.
Here in Minnesota we don’t have this type of law but in a way we’re all still on the hook for the bill because the county steps in when someone goes broke.

< http://www.clarkhoward.com/news...p9 >

Good thing my parents and in laws still live in MN then. :;):
Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 09 2012,9:13 pm
Go figure.
< My Webpage >

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 09 2012,9:17 pm
Go figure.
< My Webpage >

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 09 2012,9:20 pm
Go figure.
< My Webpage >

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 09 2012,9:24 pm
Go figure.
< My Webpage >

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 09 2012,9:30 pm
Go figure.
< My Webpage >

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 10 2012,2:04 pm
Obama wins Florida giving him a total of 332 Electoral Votes, Romney gets 206 Electoral Votes..

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-25...-to-206 >

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 10 2012,2:56 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 10 2012,2:04 pm)
QUOTE
Obama wins Florida giving him a total of 332 Electoral Votes, Romney gets 206 Electoral Votes..

< http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-25...-to-206 >

maybe that'll perk up the markets on monday :sarcasm:
Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 13 2012,7:30 pm
Speaking of which...

If you think the capital gains tax rates are going to go up...you best move your money to fixed income until everything blows over.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 14 2012,10:23 am

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 13 2012,7:30 pm)
QUOTE
Speaking of which...

If you think the capital gains tax rates are going to go up...you best move your money to fixed income until everything blows over.

It will only effect those that make over $250,000.. You don't have anything to worry about..
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 14 2012,10:31 am
^  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl: ^

Yeah, right!

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 15 2012,7:42 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 14 2012,10:23 am)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 13 2012,7:30 pm)
QUOTE
Speaking of which...

If you think the capital gains tax rates are going to go up...you best move your money to fixed income until everything blows over.

It will only effect those that make over $250,000.. You don't have anything to worry about..

Did you not comprehend what I posted(?)...

...of course you didn't.   :dunce:

...and people wonder why they need money managers.   :frusty:

oh...oh...wait for it...wait for it...

nuff said...

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 15 2012,9:36 pm

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 15 2012,7:42 pm)
QUOTE
Did you not comprehend what I posted(?)...

...of course you didn't.   :dunce:

...and people wonder why they need money managers.   :frusty:

oh...oh...wait for it...wait for it...

nuff said...

Only an idiot of a money manager would tell his clients to take their money out of stocks and put it in bonds..

Not even those making over $250,000/year will move their investments to something making less than 1%..

The stock market will do better in 2013 than it did in 2012..

You go ahead and lose your ass in the bond market.. :crazy:

Posted by blahblahblah on Nov. 15 2012,11:09 pm

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 13 2012,7:30 pm)
QUOTE
Speaking of which...

If you think the capital gains tax rates are going to go up...you best move your money to fixed income until everything blows over.

Bonds can have capital gains.  

And if you buy taxable bonds you pay standard tax rates on the interest income.

Posted by blahblahblah on Nov. 15 2012,11:17 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 15 2012,9:36 pm)
QUOTE
Only an idiot of a money manager would tell his clients to take their money out of stocks and put it in bonds..

Not even those making over $250,000/year will move their investments to something making less than 1%..

The stock market will do better in 2013 than it did in 2012..

Corporate bonds are paying well over 1%

And every day various money managers suggest their clients change their asset allocations for various reasons.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 16 2012,11:35 am
When interest rates go up the value of bonds go down..

Inflation protected bond funds pay very very low interest..

Bonds will be a poor investment for several years compared to the return on stocks..

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 16 2012,11:46 am
AL's buying shares of Hostess. :rofl:
Posted by blahblahblah on Nov. 16 2012,1:59 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 16 2012,11:35 am)
QUOTE
When interest rates go up the value of bonds go down..


Whether this matters or not would depend on your investment strategy.  If you are going to hold the bonds to maturity then the price change between now and maturity is irrelevent because you are going to be paid face value when the bonds mature (provided the issuer does not default).  Not to mention the fact that future interest expectations are priced into current yields on bonds today, unless you think you figured out this potential higher interest rates in the future thing first.


(alcitizens @ Nov. 16 2012,11:35 am)
QUOTE
Inflation protected bond funds pay very very low interest..


Here is my favorite part of your investing advice.  The second statement about inflation protected securities contradicts your first statement about interest rates going up.  So what you believe is going to happen is that interest are going to go up, pushing down bond values, while somehow returns on inflation protected (inflation being a key component of interest rate changes) securities will not go up?


(alcitizens @ Nov. 16 2012,11:35 am)
QUOTE
Bonds will be a poor investment for several years compared to the return on stocks..


Maybe, maybe not.  

Either way I question whether you should be giving advice on this, and would encourage you to actually talk to someone who understands this before you make any changes to your investment plan.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 16 2012,4:32 pm
If interest rates go up and you need to sell your bonds before they mature, you need to be aware their value may have gone down and you may have to sell at a loss. Remember bond prices move in the opposition direction as yield.

Sell before Maturity & Interest Rates have gone up.
An investor buys a 10 year U.S Treasury Note with a face value of $1,000 and an interest rate of 4.26%. If the investor sells the bond before it matures and interest rates have risen 2%, he or she would only receive $863.34 (plus any interest paid before the sale).

< http://www.investinginbonds.com/learnmore.asp?catid=3&id=57 >

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 16 2012,4:47 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 15 2012,9:36 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 15 2012,7:42 pm)
QUOTE
Did you not comprehend what I posted(?)...

...of course you didn't.   :dunce:

...and people wonder why they need money managers.   :frusty:

oh...oh...wait for it...wait for it...

nuff said...

Only an idiot of a money manager would tell his clients to take their money out of stocks and put it in bonds..

Not even those making over $250,000/year will move their investments to something making less than 1%..

The stock market will do better in 2013 than it did in 2012..

You go ahead and lose your ass in the bond market.. :crazy:

Only an idiot would think that a bond is the only fixed income investment.

With the knowledge you have on fixed income...well...good luck!!

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 16 2012,6:01 pm

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 16 2012,4:47 pm)
QUOTE
Only an idiot would think that a bond is the only fixed income investment.

Oh god I have to hear this.. Please share.. :rofl:
Posted by blahblahblah on Nov. 16 2012,6:45 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 16 2012,4:32 pm)
QUOTE
Sell before Maturity & Interest Rates have gone up.
An investor buys a 10 year U.S Treasury Note with a face value of $1,000 and an interest rate of 4.26%. If the investor sells the bond before it matures and interest rates have risen 2%, he or she would only receive $863.34 (plus any interest paid before the sale).

This example basically implies that borrowing rates for the U.S. government jump 2% overnight.  And under these circumstances you are telling us that we should all be in equities?  

Do you know the price of this bond if I sell it in 5 years and rates are up 2%?  What's the price of the bond if I sell it 8 years and rates are up?

This $1,000 face value bond will pay $42.60/year in interest.  If we ignore the time value of money then it takes about 3.2 years for this bond to earn enough interest so that even if rates drop 2% this investment will not lose money for the investor.  Of course if I sell this bond 3 years from today and rates are up 2% it would be priced at $889.38, so technicially this investor is up $17.18.  Certainly not a huge return, but then not everyone should be hunting for huge returns.

Seriously, you should talk to someone before moving completely into equities.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 16 2012,9:28 pm
Bernanke has said interest rates will most likely be allowed to rise in 2014.. Not good for short term bond investments..

CC is a typical radical republican that would love to see our country crash along with the stock market because of the policies of President Obama.. He wants Obama to have a legacy like Bush already has at the expense of the American people.. :dunce:  

I think the capital gains tax should go up on the wealthy to 20% where it was before Bush..

CC thinks the wealthy won't want to make money if capital gains tax goes back to where it was under Clinton.. CC is an idiot..

He can have the returns you get in CD's and the money market.. :dunce:

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 17 2012,5:26 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 16 2012,6:01 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 16 2012,4:47 pm)
QUOTE
Only an idiot would think that a bond is the only fixed income investment.

Oh god I have to hear this.. Please share.. :rofl:

Savings Accounts
Money Markets
CD's
Fixed annuities
Index Annuties
Immediate annuties
Privately held REIT's

To name a few...

You should really to some homework before you go spouting off.

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 17 2012,5:52 pm

(alcitizens @ Nov. 16 2012,9:28 pm)
QUOTE
Bernanke has said interest rates will most likely be allowed to rise in 2014.. Not good for short term bond investments..

CC is a typical radical republican that would love to see our country crash along with the stock market because of the policies of President Obama.. He wants Obama to have a legacy like Bush already has at the expense of the American people.. :dunce:  

I think the capital gains tax should go up on the wealthy to 20% where it was before Bush..

CC thinks the wealthy won't want to make money if capital gains tax goes back to where it was under Clinton.. CC is an idiot..

He can have the returns you get in CD's and the money market.. :dunce:

Are you some kind of wise guy?  Why do you lie?  Who said I wanted the stock market to go down?  It has nothing to do with Obama.  The fact is that when you raise a tax on somebody, they will take measures into their own hands and reduce their exposure to loss prior to the effective date of the tax change.  In this case, a rising cap gain tax rate.

Do you even know what the advantages are for a person to harvest their capital gains at a 15% tax rate instead of a 20% or 30%?  It's simple math.   :dunce:

There is nothing radical or Republican about that, d-bag.

My original post on this topic merely stated that IF you think the cap gains rate is going to go up, then you may want to move to fixed income.  I could give a rats arse what you do with your money...idiot.

:crazy:

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 17 2012,6:09 pm
Here.  Why don't you read and learn something...and if you disagree the WSJ then you argue with them.

< My Webpage >

And I will stand by my statement that moving to safety may be a good idea until the harvesting is over.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 17 2012,6:36 pm

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 17 2012,6:09 pm)
QUOTE
Here.  Why don't you read and learn something...and if you disagree the WSJ then you argue with them.

< My Webpage >

And I will stand by my statement that moving to safety may be a good idea until the harvesting is over.

Did you happen to read "unless Congress acts"?

Congress will act and stocks will soar.. You go ahead and miss out on the ride..

Your list of fixed income alternatives to stocks are a pathetic source of income at this time..

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 17 2012,7:37 pm
You don't do it for the income chucklehead.  You do it to hedge against a potential stock market loss when people sell to take advantage of the current cap gain tax rate.  Why?  Because fixed income investements are more stable.  Ya dig?

Oh forget it...you're waisting my time.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 17 2012,9:52 pm

(Common Citizen @ Nov. 13 2012,7:30 pm)
QUOTE
Speaking of which...

If you think the capital gains tax rates are going to go up...you best move your money to fixed income until everything blows over.

CC says:
You don't do it for income.. :dunce:
Because fixed income investments are more stable. :dunce:
You best move your money to fixed income until everything blows over. :dunce:
___

We are beyond the Bush years.. People don't need to put all their investments into a savings account drawing a 1/2 percent or less.. Not even the teabaggers in congress will do something that stupid to their own investments,
or would they.. :rofl:

Mid-terms in 2014 will be a walk in the park for Democrats if Republicans obstruct a solution to the fiscal cliff..

Poll shows Americans want deal to avert fiscal cliff

< http://www.gallup.com/poll...ication >

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 18 2012,6:49 am
"until the harvesting is over" accurate term. :(
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 19 2012,12:42 am
For those that like to read this offers a perfect model of how you might structure a series of big trades to move the country back on the growth path - on innovation policy, tax policy, spending policy and so on.

< Open publication > - Free < publishing > - < More bargain >

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 19 2012,1:44 am
Legacy Assured: Obamacare Gaining Momentum As States Pledge Support

As of Friday, 23 states plus Washington, D.C., were proceeding; 15 said they’d defer to the federal government to run their markets and 12 were still mulling over their options. The mostly blue group proceeding included five Republican-led states. The undecided included several states that seemed to be moving toward an active role.

< http://www.newser.com/story...es.html >

Posted by Santorini on Nov. 19 2012,10:30 am

(alcitizens @ Nov. 19 2012,1:44 am)
QUOTE
Legacy Assured: Obamacare Gaining Momentum As States Pledge Support

As of Friday, 23 states plus Washington, D.C., were proceeding; 15 said they’d defer to the federal government to run their markets and 12 were still mulling over their options. The mostly blue group proceeding included five Republican-led states. The undecided included several states that seemed to be moving toward an active role.

< http://www.newser.com/story...es.html >

You seem so proud of this?!  Why?
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 19 2012,11:58 am
^ because it's his god they're talking about.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 19 2012,12:25 pm
Wow, pride. I'm old enough to remember Nixon and I suffered through Carter but fir the first time in my life and I don't take this lightly, I'm not so proud to be an American right now. :(
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 19 2012,3:26 pm

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 19 2012,12:25 pm)
QUOTE
I'm not so proud to be an American right now. :(

We’re not proud of you either!
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 19 2012,4:16 pm
Nor you azzhole. :D
Posted by Liberal on Nov. 19 2012,9:03 pm
"I want my country back" :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2012,6:24 am
^ yes, I'd like my country back, one that doesn't mire it's self in a 4 year recession( sorry, we're a whole half step ahead of that) and is going to go deeper in this coming year with the tax increases that are coming.
Posted by Pretzel Logic on Nov. 20 2012,11:18 am
Don't think of them as tax increases.  Think of them as subsidies for the wealthy expiring.   :p
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2012,11:42 am
So how does punishing the rich make it better for you?

All the wealth the rich have would not put a dent in our debt.

Posted by Pretzel Logic on Nov. 20 2012,11:54 am
Punish is your word.  We gave them a hand up/out. Now I want my country back! :D

Here is a clue. Your talk radio drivel- they are not talkin' about you. :notworthy:

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2012,12:10 pm
Talk radio drivel :rofl:

Do we get a Graham cracker with our milk at nappy time???

Posted by Pretzel Logic on Nov. 20 2012,12:20 pm
Are the fumes gettin' in da truck?

It seems you have an issue with anyone getting a subsidy that does not line your own pocket. Me thinks you talk out of both sides of your stacks. :D

I just want them to pay the same tax rate as I have to.

Who are you defending?

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2012,12:36 pm
Same tax as you do?? So you actually make enough money to have to pay an income tax? Not FICA, not Medicare, actual income tax.

You must be bilingual, I'm not but I'll give it a try," el grande fries señor? Did I do it right??? :rofl:

Posted by grassman on Nov. 20 2012,1:01 pm

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 20 2012,12:36 pm)
QUOTE
Same tax as you do?? So you actually make enough money to have to pay an income tax? Not FICA, not Medicare, actual income tax.

You must be bilingual, I'm not but I'll give it a try," el grande fries señor? Did I do it right??? :rofl:

You must be part politician. Dodge the question with nonsense.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2012,1:08 pm
No, I asked the question, ol'PL came back with the snakey comments. I just threw a little gas on the fire.

As for subsidies, I receive none, nor does my customer. That's reserved for the farmer and probably the ethanol plant, in your area Poet, I think.

Posted by grassman on Nov. 20 2012,2:37 pm
How can letting those tax breaks expire, be a punishment? They were a gift, with a beginning and an end. You act like they were owed forever. That is not how the law was written. Do you want to rewrite it or what?
Posted by Pretzel Logic on Nov. 20 2012,4:38 pm
The King of Quips accuses me of being "snakey" :rofl:  :rofl:   Thanks that was the best chuckle I had all day! :p

I answered your question.

Now maybe you can answer mine, who are you defending?

Are you trying to make us believe you net 250k after expenses doing a daily route?

You are either the smartest truck driver on the planet or full of sb. :D

That you and all of your other upper crust buddies are deserved your tax breaks for all the job creatin' you been  a doin' :p  Your right I am bi lingual I speak English and Trucker :rofl:


One more time, they ain't talkin about you.  They just got you singing their song. Hum a few more bars. :D



(Self-Banished @ Nov. 15 2012)

I have too admit, I make a lot of money on ethanol, but it is nothing more than "farmer welfare"


So which is it? Yes or no, one or two?

Posted by grassman on Nov. 20 2012,5:41 pm
I've been trying to hold back but I think he is full of number two! :thumbsup:
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2012,5:50 pm
Protecting my customer, they're the on that makes my bank account swell.

250k after expenses?? I wish but I'm not that dedicated. I've got a couple of friends that are out in the oil fields pulling almost 7k a week but I'm too old for that game.

Posted by Common Citizen on Nov. 21 2012,12:06 pm
...nuff said   :rofl:


Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 21 2012,12:15 pm
^Yep, that's about right. :(
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 21 2012,7:32 pm

(Santorini @ Nov. 19 2012,10:30 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Nov. 19 2012,1:44 am)
QUOTE
Legacy Assured: Obamacare Gaining Momentum As States Pledge Support

As of Friday, 23 states plus Washington, D.C., were proceeding; 15 said they’d defer to the federal government to run their markets and 12 were still mulling over their options. The mostly blue group proceeding included five Republican-led states. The undecided included several states that seemed to be moving toward an active role.

< http://www.newser.com/story...es.html >

You seem so proud of this?!  Why?

Did you miss the election on Nov. 6th? The people said yes to Obamacare.. Doesn't that sting you teabaggers?

I couldn't be more proud of the sting that you feel..

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 22 2012,2:08 am
^ yes, sure, a little over 50% voted that the little under 50% should pay for everything. So why not feel proud that a bottom-feeder like yourself gets more services free. Meanwhile our economy will go future into the crapper.
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 22 2012,4:56 am
^So you tell US how busy you are bragging about how much money you’re making and in the next breath you tell US how bad things are in the States.
I see why you voted for Willard Flip-Flop now, you haven’t got a clue.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 22 2012,7:18 am
^ I'm busy , but my numbers are down 8% this year. Let me guess, the union guarantees you 40 a week. How safe, how predicable.

Mine go up and down depending on the year , some years are better than some. I've been seeing some drops the last four.

But one things is for sure, I'll never get laid off.I see the future ranks of the unemployed swelling, why not? The workers need a two year rest. How about you expat, do you need a rest?

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 22 2012,10:05 pm

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 22 2012,2:08 am)
QUOTE
^ yes, sure, a little over 50% voted that the little under 50% should pay for everything. So why not feel proud that a bottom-feeder like yourself gets more services free. Meanwhile our economy will go future into the crapper.

People are on to the Republitard ways of the future.. If you and your dorky friends wish to expand the bottom 50% to the bottom 60%, Republitards will NEVER win another election..

People still blame Bush for the explosion in poverty and won't forget soon..

Democrats will clean up your party's mess AGAIN and Republitards will again stand a chance..

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 23 2012,5:22 am
I'd rather lose than compromise my principles.

How's that inflation thing workin' for you? I have to remind myself to ask this again about April or so. :D

Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 24 2012,3:18 pm
...
Posted by grassman on Nov. 24 2012,5:30 pm
This election is a show of how the majority have felt how they have been taken advantage of by the the ones in power and money. It would be great if everyone made money the way the top has. It has not turned out that way. The top collect more while the rest pay more. It is that simple. It's math. The more you make the more you spend, up to a point. When the middle class has less to spend on stuff besides the usual necessary bills, things become stagnant. That is why the top want to go global. They have run this place dry.
Posted by pepi-lapew on Nov. 25 2012,8:11 am
Do you know how many small bussneses will close do to bimbocare? There are a lot of them that make over 250,000 dollers and thay file reg income taxes like I do. There will be alot of small retailors that will close, because of bimbocare. I have been told by 2014 my medicare will double each month. And I will start paying the same for my TRICARE mil. ins. now i can pay for all the losers that get free medical, like all the Illegals :rofl:  :rofl:
Posted by Botto 82 on Nov. 25 2012,9:34 am
Medical care should either be free for everyone, or those losers in government should have to pay the same as everybody else. Pick one.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 25 2012,9:51 am
^ again, producers paying for the deadbeats. :(
Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 25 2012,10:03 am
Deadbeat, Short Haul truck drivers don’t make squat, best look in the mirror deadbeat.
You must be the last English speaking truck driver in that dead end butt profession!

Posted by grassman on Nov. 25 2012,10:37 am
:rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 25 2012,2:01 pm

(Expatriate @ Nov. 25 2012,10:03 am)
QUOTE
Deadbeat, Short Haul truck drivers don’t make squat, best look in the mirror deadbeat.
You must be the last English speaking truck driver in that dead end butt profession!

Ohh! Bad name calling, who peed in your cheerios? Yep, I'll probably end up one of the last but with the industry 200,000 plus drivers short I'll always make money. There's also the fact that driving truck is not all I do.

But what would a wire monkey(and I don't mean pole monkey) know about it? Anyone can pull wire, it's not hard. What I don't know how to do I just pull out the checkbook. Reminds me, I have to get ahold of the union electrician to do some more side work.

Posted by Expatriate on Nov. 25 2012,2:54 pm
Electrician nope,  Doh
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 25 2012,3:09 pm
^ or whatever.
Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 16 2014,7:05 pm
Well, does he or doesn't he?  Only his hairdresser knows for sure.





Wait.  There's more.

Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 16 2014,7:11 pm
How much did the taxpayers write a check to gruber for?


Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 17 2014,4:21 am
^^^ I think I heard $400K a year.
Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 17 2014,8:57 pm
The quietness here makes me wonder if the libbies on this site are either dumbfounded in how they can argue this or perhaps it makes a good case.  

I mean really.  If Gruber said that Bambino had to count on the stupid American voter, where does that leave those who voter for him?

:D

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 18 2014,4:32 am
How ironic the name of this thread is now considering what's coming out now. Absolute proof of what Buster and his followers think of their voting base. :dunce:

Now all we need is a comment from the poster who started this thread :rofl:

Posted by Liberal on Nov. 18 2014,8:49 am
You're surprised that liberals are not up in arms over the latest Fox news? :dunce:
Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 18 2014,9:24 am

(Liberal @ Nov. 18 2014,8:49 am)
QUOTE
You're surprised that liberals are not up in arms over the latest Fox news? :dunce:

No, I thought the surprise was on the liberals.  

Some were caught being lied to by their own.

Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 18 2014,9:24 am
And other liberals were caught in the lie.
Posted by Liberal on Nov. 18 2014,9:29 am
You guys think you have the smoking gun that proves ACA was a scam, what are you going to do about it?  :dunce:
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 18 2014,11:13 am
Sometimes there's just not a damned thing that can be done  :(

But the dems calling their own constituents stupid?

A little satisfaction is good for the soul :D

Posted by Liberal on Nov. 18 2014,11:20 am
Why can't you do anything? You kooks have the Congress, go ahead and try to impeach him over something an MIT professor said. :rofl:
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 18 2014,11:56 am
^^you confuse me for a republican or a democrat,
Me? Pretty much just a spectator,
But it is getting interesting :D

Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 18 2014,5:42 pm
:p  :oops:  :rofl:
Posted by Liberal on Nov. 18 2014,5:50 pm
Right, and I'm not a democrat.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 19 2014,5:19 am
^^don't sell yourself short :sarcasm:
You a wonderful democrat :thumbsup:

Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 19 2014,8:44 am

(Liberal @ Nov. 18 2014,5:50 pm)
QUOTE
Right, and I'm not a democrat.

No more than I'm a republican.
Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 20 2014,9:41 am
Jim Hanson always said he wasn't a Republican, he said he was a conservative.. :rofl: Him and his Heritage crap.. :rofl:  

I'm a conservative progressive that respects the US Constitution while Republicans misinterpret it just like they do the bible.. I lean Dem.. :rofl:

Posted by MADDOG on Nov. 20 2014,10:10 am
I think you're < a little more than that >.
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 20 2014,10:58 am

(alcitizens @ Nov. 20 2014,9:41 am)
QUOTE
I'm a conservative progressive

No, that would be an oxymoron

Emphasis on the moron.

Posted by alcitizens on Nov. 20 2014,6:43 pm
Blue Dog Democrats are conservative..
Posted by irisheyes on Nov. 24 2014,10:17 am

(Self-Banished @ Nov. 20 2014,10:58 am)
QUOTE

(alcitizens @ Nov. 20 2014,9:41 am)
QUOTE
I'm a conservative progressive

No, that would be an oxymoron

I'm not sure that it is.  The example above of the Blue Dog Democrats is a good one, like Tim Penny.  Or Teddy Roosevelt, he might've been a Progressive domestically but a he was a hawk on foreign policy.
< Heritage Foundation - Teddy Roosevelt:  Conservative Icon or Progressive Crusader? >

Personally I don't use the term Progressive much to describe current politics.  It's used by conservatives when they're repeating the diatribes they hear on Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity, so it's lost its meaning.  They go after Progressivism the way the Two Minutes of Hate went after Emmanuel Goldstein.

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 24 2014,11:17 am
^^^ it is progressivism, plain and simple.
Posted by irisheyes on Nov. 26 2014,4:01 pm
^You're not much of a deep thinker, are you?   :;):
Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 26 2014,4:18 pm

(irisheyes @ Nov. 26 2014,4:01 pm)
QUOTE
^You're not much of a deep thinker, are you?   :;):

You're not much of a thinker :blush:
Posted by irisheyes on Nov. 26 2014,5:46 pm
^I have deep thoughts all the time.  < Deep Thoughts Link >


       
       
       
       

Posted by Self-Banished on Nov. 26 2014,10:34 pm
^^piled higher and deeper :D
Posted by MADDOG on Jun. 12 2015,3:22 pm
God I love this < Long-Haired Country Boy >.

QUOTE
June 8:


An Open Letter To President Obama — 2015

Dear Mr. President,

This letter is not written in a spirit of hate, disrespect, nor is it motivated in any way by racial bias and is written with respect due the office and the awesome tasks that have been laid on your shoulders.

I write this letter because I am a tax paying American citizen who has experienced the American Dream and wants his children and grandchildren to have the same advantages and opportunities that he has had.

And no, Mr. President, I was not born into a one-percenter family, I come from a blue collar background, never went to college, have made a living doing manual labor and went into my chosen profession at ground level, worked hard and sacrificed to achieve success.

On April 13, 1967 I arrived in Nashville, Tennessee with a wife, a two-year-old baby, a twenty-dollar bill and the clutch out of my car.

I won’t go into the mountains and valleys that I’ve traveled since then except to say that I have been successful and somebody did help me build the business I own. Almighty God, not the government.

I employ thirty people, good citizens and family people, hard-working people, the kind of gun-clinging, God-fearing folks who make America the greatest nation the world has ever known.

Mr. President, it seems to me that you have little faith in American ingenuity, American capability, American exceptionalism and even American patriotism.

You seem to think that America needs a monolithic, big brother type government to oversee and regulate every aspect of American life, that citizens are not competent to control their own affairs and make their own decisions without some oppressive bureaucracy to call the shots.

Mr. President, the answer is not government, conversely, the problem is government. A government that has doubled the national debt, increased unemployment, lowered take home pay, increased food stamp participation and disability claims and introduced socialized medicine.

You support teacher’s unions which take political activism more seriously than education.

You intentionally lied to the American people about your stand on marriage being between a man and woman, and continue to lie when it is politically expedient for you to do so.

You surround yourself with inexperienced ideologues and political yes men and take the advice of individuals who are swimming in waters way too deep for them.

Your petulance is unbecoming, Mr. President, and your criticism of anyone who disagrees with you is downright unmanly. You come off like a spoiled child who has been denied his way.

And while you blame your shortcomings on opposing political parties, you had both houses of congress and the White House in the first two years of your term. Plus an electoral mandate to do just about anything you wanted to, so the least you can do is cowboy up and take the blame for the messes you’ve made.

Your apparent disregard for the maintenance and morale of our armed services is extremely unwise and dangerous.

Mr. President, the office you hold is not a place for the faint of heart and when you draw a red line you’d dang well better be willing to back it up, because when you don’t every tyrant and despot in this world takes it for a sign of weakness and will take advantage, Putin and China being a prime example.

In making any kind of deal with Iran you spit in the face of Israel and plant the seeds of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

The last report showed that the US economy actually shrunk by .07% while the national debt and other obligations grow by the day.

No matter how many apologists come forth and no matter how much double talk you and the puppets who speak for you come up with, the greatest nation the world has ever known is losing a war with a small army of criminals and thugs that grows bigger every day simply because you don’t have the guts to face the problem.

You’re running out of diversions Mr. President, slight of hand political policies eventually stop working and lies finally float to the top of water.

Time is running out for you Mr. President and the horrible thing about it is that time is running out for America too.

What do you think?

Pray for our troops and the peace of Jerusalem.

God Bless America

Charlie Daniels

Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 12 2015,3:39 pm
^^ very nice :thumbsup:
Posted by Liberal on Jun. 12 2015,4:32 pm
Typical right wing moron. Does he think God built the infrastructure to run his business? Was it God that supplied the electricity to run his business, or was it the TVA?
Posted by alcitizens on Jun. 12 2015,5:42 pm

(MADDOG @ Jun. 12 2015,3:22 pm)
QUOTE
You seem to think that America needs a monolithic, big brother type government to oversee and regulate every aspect of American life, that citizens are not competent to control their own affairs and make their own decisions without some oppressive bureaucracy to call the shots.

I see comments on this site that should have been started as a NEW topic. This is one of those comments..

I have learned something really big over the past two years, people really need to watch their LOCAL government much closer..

Oversight is limited at the City level while most Township's have nearly no oversight.. Regulations may be heavy at the Federal level but locally there is limited protection for property owners..

People around these parts tend to trust their elected officials up there at City Hall.. They're making a bad mistake..

Johnny said, "Devil, just come on back if you ever wanna try again,
I done told you once—you son of a bitch—I'm the best that's ever been."

Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 13 2015,6:28 am

(alcitizens @ Jun. 12 2015,5:42 pm)
QUOTE

(MADDOG @ Jun. 12 2015,3:22 pm)
QUOTE
You seem to think that America needs a monolithic, big brother type government to oversee and regulate every aspect of American life, that citizens are not competent to control their own affairs and make their own decisions without some oppressive bureaucracy to call the shots.

I see comments on this site that should have been started as a NEW topic. This is one of those comments..

I have learned something really big over the past two years, people really need to watch their LOCAL government much closer..

Oversight is limited at the City level while most Township's have nearly no oversight.. Regulations may be heavy at the Federal level but locally there is limited protection for property owners..

People around these parts tend to trust their elected officials up there at City Hall.. They're making a bad mistake..

Johnny said, "Devil, just come on back if you ever wanna try again,
I done told you once—you son of a bitch—I'm the best that's ever been."

We've had our tiffs over time but I wholeheartedly agree with you :thumbsup:
It's not just a saying but a fact, "all politics is local" and it seems over the decades we've slipped into a spiraling, downward plunge. Our elected officials seem to be becoming worse and worse. Instead of electing statesmen we're electing trash, substandard citizens who if put in the private sector would be barely qualified to be greeters at Wally World.

This is not a democrat or republican thing, this is both sides. The sad thing is that it has become "sides" as childish as kids playing "fort" at recess. Our salvation begins at the local level, from "dog catcher" on up.

Posted by alcitizens on Jun. 13 2015,9:47 am
QUOTE
We've had our tiffs over time but I wholeheartedly agree with you :thumbsup:
It's not just a saying but a fact, "all politics is local" and it seems over the decades we've slipped into a spiraling, downward plunge. Our elected officials seem to be becoming worse and worse. Instead of electing statesmen we're electing trash, substandard citizens who if put in the private sector would be barely qualified to be greeters at Wally World.

This is not a democrat or republican thing, this is both sides. The sad thing is that it has become "sides" as childish as kids playing "fort" at recess. Our salvation begins at the local level, from "dog catcher" on up.


I really did burn out on politics and I do owe you an apology.. You have the right to babble on and on about whatever you want..  :laugh: :thumbsup:

I've done heating & air & ventilation for many years and have my Universal refrigeration certification.. I also did plumbing for many years in the trenches installing water main and sewer systems at Kroger stores in Georgia.. I was a plumber-steamfitter at Farmstead Foods in Albert Lea for a few years back in the 90's...

I can only imagine how limited our elected officials are mechanically..  Being a professional troubleshooter is something most people are not.. Our leaders have to go with what the so called experts have to say, leaving them vulnerable to being misled at any turn.. I call it leading the leaders..  :amen:

Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 14 2015,6:18 am
:) ^^ accepted and offered

I think back to politicians in our recent era and the only one that I can think of that was actually close to being a statesman was Wellstone, I didn't agree with him on anything but I beleive he was honest in his heart. Very unlike the POS's we have at present, they're just egomaniacs.

Posted by alcitizens on Jun. 14 2015,6:16 pm
I really think the 24 hour news cycle on cable created a bunch of show boater's by all party's.. All the radicals got even more radical, Republicans are proof..
Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 14 2015,8:19 pm
^^thing is we were being spoon fed bullsh!t at 5&6 o'clock when we were young. Now they just use a bigger shovel all day

Now we are being tasked to think, to consider and mostly to filter.

Posted by alcitizens on Jun. 15 2015,5:46 am
They make more money from one book deal than they do during their entire political career..

The crazier they talk to their base, the more free press they get to promote themselves..

Posted by Self-Banished on Jun. 15 2015,8:34 am
Do hard cover books actually sell that much anymore?
Posted by MADDOG on Jun. 15 2015,10:01 am

(Liberal @ Jun. 12 2015,4:32 pm)
QUOTE
Typical right wing moron. Does he think God built the infrastructure to run his business? Was it God that supplied the electricity to run his business, or was it the TVA?

Hey.  You're making progress.

You ask if he believes God gave him what he has in his music business.  I believe he has that faith.



"I choose to bow and confess now, and I invite you to join me."  -Charlie Daniels

Powered by Ikonboard 3.1.5 © 2006 Ikonboard