Forum: Current Events
Topic: Wikileaks
started by: Self-Banished

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 20 2017,9:06 am
Wow! Thank God for Wikileaks.

< https://youtu.be/iQ2QO-ghQIE >

Ryan, McCain and a pack of other republicans exposed along with Stoke Lady. :popcorn:

Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 26 2017,8:30 am
I do love the way you titled this, how appropriate: : Wikileaks, Just exposed bot sides

Been reading your posts since 2006, not sure what causes your specific kind of stupidity but it seems to be prevalent among a large number of you trumpsters...you guys will believe anything the farther from reality the better..

As much as I love to see you alt-reich folks eat your own a little research shows this to be more fake news..
QUOTE

The story became prominent when conservative media personality Sean Hannity mentioned it on his radio show in mid-December. It had surfaced in a couple of fake news articles before that date.

Hannity asked WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange whether the fake WikiLeaks email was valid.

"I don't have that in front of me," Assange replied. "We have published nearly 100,000 documents, so, I mean I have seen references to things like that. I don't recall seeing an 'eyes only' phrase."

Asked again, Assange said, "I don't know."

But that didn't stop the story from continuing to spread on Facebook on other social media sites. It's resurfaced again in recent weeks.

The Truth Behind This Fake News Story

The fake article cites "an email from John Podesta to Huma Abedin that was released as document number 1078645" in July. This document is supposed to reveal that political action committees run by former GOP candidates Jeb Bush, Carly Fiorina and John Kasich would "receive a significant allowance from advertising budget."

Document number 1078645 actually corresponds to a WikiLeaks-released email from the intelligence company Stratfor on operations in Saudi Arabia in November 2009. It has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. And it is not a matter of a mis-numbered document, since a search of all WikiLeaks for the text of the purported email at the center of the story comes up empty.

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 27 2017,5:25 am
Yeah, I suppose Wikileaks's about as reliable as Wikipedia.
Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 27 2017,6:34 am
idgit—it's not wikileaks that falsified the document, it's the bot Gotcha News Network which is just a mirror for the Alt-Reich...the Conservative
Daily Post originated the tripe...and you and the rest of trumpsters post this garbage all over the internet...but worse, you're dumb enough to believe this stuff without any critical thought as to truth..

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 28 2017,6:36 am
^^ the facts? All one has to do is go back about a year on this site and see YOU were and continue to exspouse socialism. Your continuing life legacy of not being able to go life on your own, depending on others to negotiate your existence.

Wow, the Nazi party lives today :blush:

Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 28 2017,6:50 am

(Self-Banished @ Aug. 28 2017,6:36 am)
QUOTE
^^ the facts? All one has to do is go back about a year on this site and see YOU were and continue to exspouse socialism. Your continuing life legacy of not being able to go life on your own, depending on others to negotiate your existence.

Wow, the Nazi party lives today :blush:

So once again you've posted some bogus far-out lies, when caught your comeback is a personal attack which holds no relevant fact.

your third grade mentality is showing again—you're amazingly stupid...

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 28 2017,8:10 am
^^ personal attack? It's nothing but the truth, you were backing Batsh!t from the start, he wanted it all free. Yes, socialism you dunce! :dunce:
Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 28 2017,9:06 am
Defend your original post! You can't because just like your other 8780 posts it was pure unadulterated bull..

Not that this is relative to the discussion of the original post, but, for your education...or lack of, read the following...
   
QUOTE
National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæ-/[1]), is the ideology and set of practices associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party, Nazi Germany, and other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 28 2017,9:48 am
^^ my education probably exceeds yours

Scientific racism? You mean like Margaret Sanger?

< http://m.washingtontimes.com/news...on-raci >

Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 28 2017,9:55 am
Carlin must have met you...

< View on YouTube >

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 28 2017,12:12 pm
Ah yes, one of the great philosophers of our time. :sarcasm:
Posted by was1 on Aug. 28 2017,4:31 pm
Expat - you are not going to get anywhere.  He wont defend his post, he wont provide any actual facts to back his beliefs.  Incapable.  

With all that is wrong in the world, and right here in our own country, he still throws around Nazi and believes that it is truly tied to socialize and nothing else.  Also, if you disagree with him, you are then one.

Poster boy for Trumpers everywhere.

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 29 2017,5:47 am
Go ahead, call me a Trumper, GDP is up, my numbers are up and as far as this lindy rig thread goes, lots of fun.

Was1 is quite obvious in his leanings now, though he claims to be neutral which turns out to be horse sh!t.

Posted by Expatriate on Aug. 29 2017,7:49 am
crickets is all I hear...

You seem to need a little help defending your original post, the link is to the Federal Election Commission FEC.

You'll be able to verify your claim and make me look the fool...
With your superior education you should have no problem navigating the site..after all you made to 18 gears!    

< http://classic.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml >

Posted by was1 on Aug. 29 2017,8:21 am
not sure what in my post shows my "leanings".  

Sadly SB - you don't want to actually "discuss" any of the topics or have to have any intelligence in your posts.  Instead of trying to educate others to go along with your view points you want to name call, insult and belittle them.  you must think that if you do that enough you will get them to submit to your ways.

The few times you have tried to take the higher road and provide some facts it was much more fun and enlightening for the few posters that are left on this forum.  There use to be many, many more that were active - prior to my getting a little active.  I question where they have all gone and why.  I am starting to get an idea of the why but would like to know the where still.

Posted by Self-Banished on Aug. 29 2017,8:56 am
^^ where have they gone? Quite possibly some left because of all the left wing looms here, you have to admit, I'm about the only conservative here. Expat is a raving moron, Botto's turned into nothing more than a drive by artist. Hymen?  :rofl: Yes I admit to having an abrasive nature and quite possibly it might be possible I've driven some off, even caused some to change their name :blush:

I would think if I were causing so many to leave the boss would kick my ass to the curb but he doesn't.

Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 11 2017,8:48 am

(was1 @ Aug. 29 2017,8:21 am)
QUOTE
 There use to be many, many more that were active - prior to my getting a little active.  I question where they have all gone and why.  I am starting to get an idea of the why but would like to know the where still.

I suspect many are like me... we lurk in the background, but we are still  here.
Powered by Ikonboard 3.1.5 © 2006 Ikonboard