Forum: Current Events
Topic: Obama wants Muslims to Fight it Out, Not the U.S.
started by: alcitizens

Posted by alcitizens on Aug. 31 2014,9:42 pm
Shia and Sunni Muslims share the main articles of Islamic belief and are considered by most to be brethren in faith. In fact, most Muslims do not distinguish themselves by claiming membership in any particular group, but prefer to call themselves simply, "Muslims."

< http://islam.about.com/cs/divisions/f/shia_sunni.htm >

Radical Shia and Sunni Muslim's have and will always be radical, just like Radical Republicans..

Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 01 2014,4:58 am
QUOTE
Obama wants Muslims to Fight it Out, Not the U.S.
 So what you're saying is that"We don't have a stategy yet" is his cover for "I want to go home before things get really bad and actually turn into a < calliphate >?"

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 01 2014,6:15 am
The question is, is it malice? or incompedence?
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 01 2014,11:44 pm
Saddam Hussein was Sunni and so was his Generals.. Now those Generals run ISIS because President Bush made it possible for the Shia to take control of Iraq..

Sunni's are the minority..

Shia VS Sunni

Stay Tuned..

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 02 2014,8:27 am

(MADDOG @ Sep. 01 2014,4:58 am)
QUOTE
 So what you're saying is that"We don't have a stategy yet"

:p
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 03 2014,8:50 am
That's pretty easy considering a do nothing president is en route to making this issue worse than it is now or a year ago when he was first informed of the danger posed.

This has little to do with the first or second Iraq situation.  These extremists pose far greater danger to us than Saddam, the Sunni or Shiites ever did.  Loss of lives is always tragic, but which do you choose?  Combat readied troops trained for these incursions or families at a stadium watching a ball game or an airport terminal filled with travelers.  

Your cartoon involves no more speculation than scenarios of what could occur once these extremists infiltrate our borders.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 03 2014,9:37 am

(MADDOG @ Sep. 03 2014,8:50 am)
QUOTE
Your cartoon involves no more speculation than scenarios of what could occur once these extremists infiltrate our borders.

They're probably already here thanks to our bumbler in chief. :oops:

Posted by pepi-lapew on Sep. 03 2014,11:02 am
I have a copy of his statement,  The idiot in chief made four years ago if war broke out between the Jews and muslims.  He would side with the towel heads every time?
Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 03 2014,12:03 pm
If I were King, I'd tell the Islamic world at large that they either take care of this problem themselves, within a specified time frame, like three months, or we'll a) turn the Israelis loose on you or b) nuke Mecca and Medina. I'm pretty sure that would get some action.
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 03 2014,12:35 pm

(Botto 82 @ Sep. 03 2014,12:03 pm)
QUOTE
If I were King, I'd tell the Islamic world at large that they either take care of this problem themselves, within a specified time frame, like three months, or we'll a) turn the Israelis loose on you or b) nuke Mecca and Medina. I'm pretty sure that would get some action.

Barack O'Botto.  Kind of has a ring to it.  :D  

I could go along with your suggestion except for the destruction of Mecca and Medina.  That would stoop you to their low level.

Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 03 2014,12:36 pm
Whoops!  I meant King Barack O'Botto.  :thumbsup:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 03 2014,12:38 pm
Kind of like stampeding cattle through the Vatican?
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 03 2014,3:41 pm
Beats me?  I'm still trying to translate the liberal gibberish of alki.  Apparently when Barack el Ali Muhammad Bambino says "We don't have a strategy yet" it translates to "Let the sand n****** fight it out."
Posted by Liberal on Sep. 03 2014,3:58 pm
Stay classy Iowa.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 03 2014,4:02 pm
^^works for me :D
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 03 2014,5:22 pm

(Liberal @ Sep. 03 2014,3:58 pm)
QUOTE
Stay classy Iowa.

Sorry, my foot slipped.  :oops:
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 03 2014,6:11 pm
^^^Here, this'll make you feel better...
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 03 2014,7:32 pm
My God, ISIS consists of 15 to 20 thousand people.. Last I heard, Iraq has forces that total about 150 to 200 thousand..

I don't understand why it is so important that the U.S. babysit these kooks..

I swear they're nothing but a bunch of frikin pussies..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 09 2014,6:21 pm
This would explain a lot...

< http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.com/2013...of.html >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2014,6:15 am
So we're going back to war? Continuing one?
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 11 2014,8:38 am
I actually thought his address to the nation wasn't bad...If he speaks the truth and if he meant what he said.  

A couple things he said concerns me though.  His comparison to Somalia and Yemen.  We did little in Yemen and a lousy performance in Somalia.

I don't know if he can be believed.  I've seen the red line in the sand already.  We'll have to see how he presents this to Congress.  I suspect he will make every attempt to make them the fall guys on this if he screws it up.  He's too much of a "its my way or the highway' type of narcissist to believe he will get it right.

Will he work to eradicate ISIS for the benefit of the U.S. and the world or will he turn this into a political stunt?

When is his next tee time?

What part is any Arab coalition going to play a part in this?

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2014,9:17 am

(MADDOG @ Sep. 11 2014,8:38 am)
QUOTE
..If he speaks the truth and if he meant what he said.  

:rofl:

I especially liked when he said "ISIS are not Muslim"

:dunce:

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 11 2014,9:37 am
American citizens need to stop letting these crazy people run our country. How many times are these BS'ers going to be allowed to lie? Big whopping lies that do nothing to make us safer or better. These big whopping lies they tell while trying to start wars and meddle in other countries do the exact opposite of making this country safer or better. How many enemies do we intend on making around the world?
We need to stay the F out of other countries altogether. Stop meddling, stop lying. It only continues to make things worse.

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 11 2014,10:19 am
:dunce:
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 11 2014,11:24 am
Operation Permanent Bullshiit.
Posted by Liberal on Sep. 11 2014,11:54 am
ISIS is obviously Muslims, just like North Korea is obviously a democratic country, and the Westboro Baptist church is Baptists.
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 11 2014,12:17 pm

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Sep. 11 2014,9:37 am)
QUOTE
We need to stay the F out of other countries altogether. Stop meddling, stop lying. It only continues to make things worse.

As long as you're stopping just short of isolationism remember how well that works for Roosevelt.  I'll stay out of your back yard as long as you stay out of mine might have worked for Madison (almost), but it doesn't get there anymore.
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 11 2014,12:27 pm
Liberal
QUOTE
ISIS is obviously Muslims


I think rather than trying to start an argument, you could have stated ISIS is mostly Muslims, but most Muslims are not ISIS.

Is that something you could state?

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2014,12:48 pm

(Liberal @ Sep. 11 2014,11:54 am)
QUOTE
ISIS is obviously Muslims, just like North Korea is obviously a democratic country, and the Westboro Baptist church is Baptists.

Really?
I'm not around Koreans or Baptist everyday

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2014,1:15 pm

(MADDOG @ Sep. 11 2014,12:27 pm)
QUOTE
Liberal
QUOTE
ISIS is obviously Muslims


I think rather than trying to start an argument, you could have stated ISIS is mostly Muslims, but most Muslims are not ISIS.

Is that something you could state?

They're all nuts
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 11 2014,1:16 pm

(MADDOG @ Sep. 11 2014,12:17 pm)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Sep. 11 2014,9:37 am)
QUOTE
We need to stay the F out of other countries altogether. Stop meddling, stop lying. It only continues to make things worse.

As long as you're stopping just short of isolationism remember how well that works for Roosevelt.  I'll stay out of your back yard as long as you stay out of mine might have worked for Madison (almost), but it doesn't get there anymore.

I'm not talking about isolationism. I'm talking about screwing with other countries we have no business screwing with. Meddling in their affairs to get the outcome WE would rather THEY have.  Starting wars with lies. Putting military bases in how many countries? Is isolation or hegemony the only 2 choices there are?
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 11 2014,2:37 pm
- Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara in a private letter to President Lyndon B. Johnson, May 196792
"Who is the enemy? How can you distinguish between the civilians and the noncivilians? The same people who come and work in the bases at daytime, they just want to shoot and kill you at nighttime. So how can you distinguish between the two? The good or the bad? All of them look the same."

Posted by Liberal on Sep. 13 2014,12:24 pm
QUOTE

“Well, I think there was one important point that he was making about them not being Islamic or a form of true Islam,” he said. “I think it is important not only to the American public but for the world and the Islamic world to point out this is not a true form of Islam. This is an aberrant form that should not represent most of the civilized Islamic world.”



I guess Rand Paul must just be looking to start an argument. :dunce:

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 13 2014,12:35 pm

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Sep. 11 2014,1:16 pm)
QUOTE
I'm not talking about isolationism. I'm talking about screwing with other countries we have no business screwing with. Meddling in their affairs to get the outcome WE would rather THEY have.  Starting wars with lies. Putting military bases in how many countries? Is isolation or hegemony the only 2 choices there are?

“The United States spends over $87 billion conducting a war in Iraq while the United Nations estimates that for less than half that amount we could provide clean water, adequate diets, sanitations services and basic education to every person on the planet. And we wonder why terrorists attack us.”

― John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2014,11:01 am
^^^how about we pull out of these sh!thole countries and keep the 87 billion for our country?
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 15 2014,11:35 am

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2014,11:01 am)
QUOTE
^^^how about we pull out of these sh!thole countries and keep the 87 billion for our country?

Never thought of that.  :O    Think of how many government program $87 billion would pay for.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 15 2014,12:49 pm

(MADDOG @ Sep. 15 2014,11:35 am)
QUOTE

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2014,11:01 am)
QUOTE
^^^how about we pull out of these sh!thole countries and keep the 87 billion for our country?

Never thought of that.  :O    Think of how many government program $87 billion would pay for.

Lots of pretend jobs for union workers :thumbsup:
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 16 2014,10:24 am
You'd think after so many failed attempts in the middle east by multiple countries eventually we'd learn that the old adage the enemy of enemy is my friend is crock of sh!t.
The delusional ass clowns that run those countries and/or vying for power in a region will never be our friend.
We need to get the funk out and stay out.
I'd just as soon spent another 1 trilion and a failed TARP program than give it to some sh!thole country that will take it then turn around and try to kill us.

[/rant]

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 16 2014,10:50 am
Afghanistan should have been bombed in retaliation for 9/11 and Iraq/Saddam should have been contained further with no fly zones..

Republican President George Bush decides to destroy, occupy and then rebuild both.. :crazy:

Him and Cheney both made millions because of those wars.. They're nothing but a couple of con men..

The middle east is friked up more than it already was because of those two freaks..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2014,11:34 am
^^They're all con men AL, doesn't matter what letter's next to their name.

We've been rebuilding wrecked countries since WW I

Posted by Botto 82 on Sep. 16 2014,1:51 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 15 2014,12:49 pm)
QUOTE
Lots of pretend jobs for union workers :thumbsup:

Say what you will about unions, but the country was doing far better on the whole when all those union workers had jobs. Flint, Michigan then vs. now is a great microcosmic example of that.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2014,2:31 pm
Flint Mich. is an example of unions gone wrong.

Big time.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 16 2014,4:27 pm

(Self-Banished @ Sep. 16 2014,11:34 am)
QUOTE
We've been rebuilding wrecked countries since WW I

Germany, Japan and South Korea have a U.S. military base..

The U.S. also has a military base in the middle east country of Turkey..

ISIS will be vaporized..

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 16 2014,4:50 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 16 2014,4:27 pm)
QUOTE
ISIS will be vaporized..

I highly doubt that, how do you kill an enemy you can't see? :dunno:

I see another Vietnam unfolding before our eyes.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 16 2014,5:04 pm
We see the majority of ISIS.. We just don't advertise it..

I predict a massacre in Mosul, Iraq with video's produced and directed by non other than ISIS Motion Pictures Inc.. :blush:  

ISIS will say "Americans kill us, and for that they are responsible for the deaths of the Infidels in Iraq"..

Just having a dramatic moment.. :D

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2014,2:59 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 16 2014,5:04 pm)
QUOTE
Just having a dramatic moment.. :D

I should say.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 17 2014,9:11 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 16 2014,5:04 pm)
QUOTE
We see the majority of ISIS.. We just don't advertise it..

I predict a massacre in Mosul, Iraq with video's produced and directed by non other than ISIS Motion Pictures Inc.. :blush:  

ISIS will say "Americans kill us, and for that they are responsible for the deaths of the Infidels in Iraq"..

Generals gathered in their masses
Just like witches at black masses
Evil minds that plot destruction
Sorcerers of death's construction
In the fields the bodies burning
As the war machine keeps turning
Death and hatred to mankind
Poisoning their brainwashed minds... Oh Lord yeah!

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 18 2014,7:32 pm
Looks like the little bastards might be knocking on the door

< http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog...tact-jw >

Hope everyone's got protection

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 20 2014,4:46 am

Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 20 2014,11:28 am
Mohamed Abu barry Obama releases the list of countries in his coalition to fight the Sand Nazis.

QUOTE
< 50 nations with US in fighting ISIL >

ASHINGTON--The State Department on Friday released the names of more than 50 nations plus the European Union and NATO who are part of the U.S.-led "global effort" to destroy the Islamic State militants, also known as ISIL or ISIS.

"The breadth and diversity of countries and organizations making contributions across one or more of the lines of effort demonstrate the global and unified nature of this fight.  Below are some of the partners that have made contributions and commitments to date.  This is an ongoing effort, and we expect the number of countries to grow," the State Department said in a statement.

The nations are:


Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 20 2014,2:39 pm
well golly
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 21 2014,5:01 am

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 21 2014,5:45 pm

(MADDOG @ Sep. 20 2014,11:28 am)
QUOTE
Mohamed Abu barry Obama releases the list of countries in his coalition to fight the Sand Nazis.

Saudi Arabia has also put $500 million into the coffers of the U.N. humanitarian aid agencies in Iraq

< http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/14/world/meast/isis-coalition-nations/ >

Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 22 2014,3:00 pm
We armed and trained a million man Iraqi Army yet they turn and run in the face of a smaller force!
This problem cannot and will not be solved by Air Power or American troops, it seated deep in the heart of the Iraqi
soldier who doesn’t feel his government represents him, the Government to him are mere aristocrats more or less placed in
power by US..

We can thank Dick, Rummy and George for over ruling Army and CIA opinion by disbanding the Iraqi Army and Police Force, what a cluster Fvvk this turned into.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 22 2014,3:13 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 22 2014,3:00 pm)
QUOTE
soldier who doesn’t feel his government represents him, the Government to him are mere aristocrats more or less placed in
power by US..

Funny you should say that..
Posted by Expatriate on Sep. 22 2014,4:25 pm

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 22 2014,4:51 pm
Remember...
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 22 2014,10:39 pm

(Expatriate @ Sep. 22 2014,3:00 pm)
QUOTE
We can thank Dick, Rummy and George for over ruling Army and CIA opinion by disbanding the Iraqi Army and Police Force, what a cluster Fvvk this turned into.

That sounds about as dumb as blaming the Twins '91 coaching staff on this years win/loss record.
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 22 2014,11:27 pm
A Democrat cleaning up after a Republican once again..

The Bush legacy is officially crap..

Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 23 2014,8:57 am
And a Republican will be cleaning up the mess the current Dem left.
There is no difference between the two.  They both suck.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 23 2014,10:34 am

(alcitizens @ Sep. 21 2014,5:45 pm)
QUOTE

(MADDOG @ Sep. 20 2014,11:28 am)
QUOTE
Mohamed Abu barry Obama releases the list of countries in his coalition to fight the Sand Nazis.

Saudi Arabia has also put $500 million into the coffers of the U.N. humanitarian aid agencies in Iraq

< http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/14/world/meast/isis-coalition-nations/ >

...and the US probably spent a couple of hundred millon last night.
Defense stocks are up today. How humanitarian :sarcasm:

Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 23 2014,11:10 am
QUOTE
March 25, 2014

< Obama to kill Navy’s Tomahawk, Hellfire missile programs >

President Barack Obama is seeking to abolish two highly successful missile programs that experts say have helped the U.S. Navy maintain military superiority for the past several decades.

The Tomahawk missile program—known as “the world’s most advanced cruise missile”—is set to be cut by $128 million under Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal and completely eliminated by fiscal year 2016, according to budget documents released by the Navy.

In addition to the monetary cuts to the program, the number of actual Tomahawk missiles acquired by the United States would drop significantly—from 196 last year to just 100 in 2015. The number will then drop to zero in 2016.


Gee, we used 47 of them last night.


Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 23 2014,11:33 am
^*^see, he's getting rid of them, but it's gonna take him awhile, there's over 4000 in inventory.
What a guy.

Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 23 2014,12:21 pm
Personally I don't like the idea of the video show recognizable facial features.  I don't put anything past these zealots that they wouldn't come after families if they could as retaliation.  Just my opinion.
Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 23 2014,2:21 pm
^^^Them? Naw, they're as harmless as a new born puppy, they wouldn't audit a soul :sarcasm:
Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 23 2014,2:53 pm

(MADDOG @ Sep. 23 2014,11:10 am)
QUOTE
QUOTE
March 25, 2014

< Obama to kill Navy’s Tomahawk, Hellfire missile programs >

President Barack Obama is seeking to abolish two highly successful missile programs that experts say have helped the U.S. Navy maintain military superiority for the past several decades.

The Tomahawk missile program—known as “the world’s most advanced cruise missile”—is set to be cut by $128 million under Obama’s fiscal year 2015 budget proposal and completely eliminated by fiscal year 2016, according to budget documents released by the Navy.

In addition to the monetary cuts to the program, the number of actual Tomahawk missiles acquired by the United States would drop significantly—from 196 last year to just 100 in 2015. The number will then drop to zero in 2016.


Gee, we used 47 of them last night.



You think I'm going to believe the Washington Times?  :crazy:  :rofl:

The National Enquirer is more credible..

Posted by Liberal on Sep. 23 2014,4:01 pm
Maddog has a bad case of ODS, and he would quote the Weekly World News if he thought it made Obama look bad.
Posted by MADDOG on Sep. 23 2014,9:02 pm

(alcitizens @ Sep. 23 2014,2:53 pm)
QUOTE
You think I'm going to believe the Washington Times?  :crazy:  :rofl:

The National Enquirer is more credible..

QUOTE
< Defense News > WASHINGTON — Most of the US Navy’s aviation programs take significant hits in the 2015 budget, including the P-8A Poseidon, F-35C Joint Strike Fighter, and MH-60R helicopter, and plans to buy the MQ-8C Fire Scout unmanned shipboard aircraft have been shelved for now.

The budget also takes a big bite out of weapons procurement, notably the elimination of Tactical Tomahawk cruise missile procurement after this year.
 
QUOTE
Weapons procurement showed striking reductions from last year’s plans. Then, the Navy planned to buy 980 Tactical Tomahawks, the primary cruise missile in use throughout the fleet. The new plan shows only 100 missiles in 2015 and none thereafter.

The reduction reflects shifting investment to a new next-generation land attack weapon, said Lt. Caroline Hutcheson, a Navy spokeswoman at the Pentagon, who also noted that the current inventory of Block IV Tactical Tomahawks exceeds combat requirements. A recertification line for existing missiles will be established to retain effectiveness of current TacToms, she added.

Buys of Standard SM-6, Rolling Airframe and Evolved Sea Sparrow missiles, as well as the Mk 48 heavyweight torpedo and Mk 54 lightweight torpedo were also reduced, and procurement of the advanced medium-range air-to-air missile is suspended in 2015. Purchases of the Hellfire air-to-ground missile and the advanced JSOW-C version of the Joint Standoff Weapon were dramatically reduced — Hellfire from 1,519 from 2015-2018 to zero; JSOW-C from 1,799 over the same period to 400.


QUOTE
The destroyer Sterett launches a Tomahawk cruise missile, a mainstay of Navy forces worldwide. Purchases of new Tactical Tomahawks are being slashed, from 784 over four years to just 100. (MC1 Carmichael Yepez / US Navy)

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 23 2014,9:37 pm
The U.S. Congress passed a sequestration agreement because Republican's threatened destroy the credit of the United States and throw the U.S. into default on our debt..

They failed to make the cuts required and were forced to make cuts to defense, among other programs..

Now they just passed legislation to spend $500 million for the fight against ISIS..

Do you suppose Tomahawk Missiles and Hellfire Missiles are part that half of a trillion dollars? :sarcasm:

Posted by Liberal on Sep. 23 2014,9:55 pm
Funny, his first article from the Moonies blamed Obama, the other articles make no mention of Obama. :dunce:
Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 24 2014,8:06 am

(MADDOG @ Sep. 23 2014,9:02 pm)
QUOTE
QUOTE
< Defense News > WASHINGTON — Most of the US Navy’s aviation programs take significant hits in the 2015 budget, including the P-8A Poseidon, F-35C Joint Strike Fighter, and MH-60R helicopter, and plans to buy the MQ-8C Fire Scout unmanned shipboard aircraft have been shelved for now.

The budget also takes a big bite out of weapons procurement, notably the elimination of Tactical Tomahawk cruise missile procurement after this year.

The military budget is in desparate need of cuts, it's over half of our discretionary budget and most of those aviation programs are being cut because DoD doesn't even want more of those planes.

It's the F-22 debate all over again, the most expensive fighter in the world and chances are if we made as many as the conservatives want us to we'd just end up mothballing them at an Air Guard base.

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 24 2014,8:40 am
Kinda looks like everyone gets a taste of this one

< http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news...es.html >

Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 26 2014,7:42 am
I sure hope someone told the 1st Infantry Division that, although they are moving their HQ to Iraq, their CinC was quoted as saying, "There is no military solution to Islamic terrorism.  It has nothing to do with Islam, which is the religion of peace."

Can you imagine your old high school coach saying something like, we have no solution for our opponent tonight, but please go out there and give her hell anyway. C'mon...be a sport.

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 26 2014,8:07 am
The 1st Infantry Division will replace service members who have been in Iraq since June.

< http://www.military.com/daily-n...aq.html >

Posted by alcitizens on Sep. 26 2014,8:21 am
Up to 300 Iraq troops killed. Others missing, possibly dead or having fled. Dozens of military vehicles, from tanks to ambulances, destroyed or seized. And the Iraqi military in disarray, so much so the country's Prime Minister has sent "anti-terrorism forces ... to hold the negligent (military) leaders responsible."

< http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/25/world/meast/iraq-isis-rout-questions/ >

Posted by irisheyes on Sep. 27 2014,10:44 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 26 2014,7:42 am)
QUOTE
I sure hope someone told the 1st Infantry Division that, although they are moving their HQ to Iraq, their CinC was quoted as saying, "There is no military solution to Islamic terrorism.  It has nothing to do with Islam, which is the religion of peace."

No, Rush Limbaugh said that.  I Googled the quote and all the hits come back to a recent Rush Limbaugh episode.   ???

< Google Results >

Posted by Self-Banished on Sep. 28 2014,8:13 am
Great article

< http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Gov...l-Islam >

Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 29 2014,10:42 am

(irisheyes @ Sep. 27 2014,10:44 pm)
QUOTE

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 26 2014,7:42 am)
QUOTE
I sure hope someone told the 1st Infantry Division that, although they are moving their HQ to Iraq, their CinC was quoted as saying, "There is no military solution to Islamic terrorism.  It has nothing to do with Islam, which is the religion of peace."

No, Rush Limbaugh said that.  I Googled the quote and all the hits come back to a recent Rush Limbaugh episode.   ???

< Google Results >

Limbaugh may have commented on it but Obama said it.  

Here is the full quote and source.

"Finally, this resolution recognizes that there is no military solution to the problem of misguided individuals seeking to join terrorist organizations, and it, therefore, calls on nations to work together to counter the violent extremism that can radicalize, recruit, and mobilize individuals to engage in terrorism." Obama

< Whitehouse.gov >

Posted by grassman on Sep. 29 2014,2:11 pm
I think ol SADDAM had everyone under control now didn't he. Let me see, who took him out. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! :sarcasm:
Posted by Common Citizen on Sep. 30 2014,11:09 am
Under control?  If you consider genocide a means of controlling the populace, then I agree.  What a great leader...pfft...
Posted by Glad I Left on Sep. 30 2014,1:52 pm
^^ And gawd forbid you lose a soccer match...
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Sep. 30 2014,2:36 pm

(Common Citizen @ Sep. 30 2014,11:09 am)
QUOTE
Under control?  If you consider genocide a means of controlling the populace, then I agree.  What a great leader...pfft...

Yet the US government looked the other way when Saddam used chemical weapons, and even helped him acquire chemical and biological agents, and even did their best to stop any UN investigation when Iran went to the UN telling them Iraq was using chemical weapons....until he wasn't useful any more.
And I'm in no way defending anything Saddam did, but if we're going to bring up genocide, how many hundreds of thousands more people did the sanctions kill? Sanctions that were deliberately planned in advance knowing full well how devastating it would be to innocent civilians by destroying their water/sewer treatment programs. Remember the UN statistics saying that in just five years half a million children had died due to sanctions?

Who knows what things would be like in that area if the US wouldn't have constantly been furthering their own interests. And every other part of the world this exceptional and indispensable country sticks it's greedy little mitts into.

If we didn't have so many monstrous weapons the rest of the world would have stomped us to pieces years ago.

Posted by Common Citizen on Oct. 01 2014,7:00 am
You're not actually blaming the U.S. for the actions of the Sadaam regime against their own people?  Don't be a hater.  

This is where we split ways.  No matter how upset you are with the government of the country you are a citizen of, I would place the blame of any collateral damage squarely on the shoulders of the Iraq leaders and the decisions they made knowing full well what the risks were to them and the people they ruled over with an iron fist.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 01 2014,9:20 am

(Common Citizen @ Oct. 01 2014,7:00 am)
QUOTE
You're not actually blaming the U.S. for the actions of the Sadaam regime against their own people?  Don't be a hater.  

This is where we split ways.  No matter how upset you are with the government of the country you are a citizen of, I would place the blame of any collateral damage squarely on the shoulders of the Iraq leaders and the decisions they made knowing full well what the risks were to them and the people they ruled over with an iron fist.

What I'm trying to say is that, even though the US knew Saddam was using chemical weapons (after helping him acquire them) they still kept helping him and considered him an ally. Congress even tried imposing sanctions against Iraq a few times. One was called Prevention of Genocide act of 1988, after a reported big gassing, try to find out what happened with that. Saddam's use of chemicals wasn't a problem until he invaded Kuwait. Before that, everything he did was a non-issue, no matter what he did.

How are we the good guys, and Saddam the bad guy, if we were helping him the whole time?

I don't think Saddam worried about collateral damage for anything since he had gotten a free pass on so many horrible things after becoming buddies with the US.

And what we did to the infrastructure of Iraq breaks pretty much every single International Treaty there is.

Posted by MADDOG on Oct. 01 2014,10:05 am

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 01 2014,9:20 am)
QUOTE
What I'm trying to say is that, even though the US knew Saddam was using chemical weapons (after helping him acquire them) they still kept helping him and considered him an ally.

They were only allies to one extent.  The United States aligned with Iraq and backed Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war because of the anti American revolution in Iran in '79.

Right or wrong, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" fit this one, Roz.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 01 2014,10:29 am

(MADDOG @ Oct. 01 2014,10:05 am)
QUOTE

(Rosalind_Swenson @ Oct. 01 2014,9:20 am)
QUOTE
What I'm trying to say is that, even though the US knew Saddam was using chemical weapons (after helping him acquire them) they still kept helping him and considered him an ally.

They were only allies to one extent.  The United States aligned with Iraq and backed Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war because of the anti American revolution in Iran in '79.

Right or wrong, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" fit this one, Roz.

They still looked the other way when he was using chemical weapons that they helped him acquire in the first place. Then later bring up the same chemical attacks they condoned the first time around as a pretext for attacking Iraq.
Think the anti American revolution in Iran would have happened in the first place if America hadn't meddled in Iran's affairs? If America hadn't ousted the elected Prime Minister who decided to make his country better by taking control of the country's own oil instead of letting western countries profit  while Iranian citizens suffered?

Read some things historian William Blum has written.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 01 2014,10:41 am
There is a reason that global polls keep pointing to the US being the biggest threat to world peace, by an overwhelming majority to any other country.
Posted by Liberal on Oct. 01 2014,11:51 am
Regardless of what they say on the conspiracy sites we didn't supply him with the chemical weapons.


QUOTE


The know-how and material for developing chemical weapons were obtained by Saddam's regime from foreign sources.[24] Most precursors for chemical weapons production came from Singapore (4,515 tons), the Netherlands (4,261 tons), Egypt (2,400 tons), India (2,343 tons), and West Germany (1,027 tons). One Indian company, Exomet Plastics, sent 2,292 tons of precursor chemicals to Iraq. Singapore-based firm Kim Al-Khaleej, affiliated to the United Arab Emirates, supplied more than 4,500 tons of VX, sarin and mustard gas precursors and production equipment to Iraq.[25] Dieter Backfisch, managing director of West German company Karl Kolb GmbH, was quoted by saying in 1989 that "for people in Germany poison gas is something quite terrible, but this does not worry customers abroad."[24]

< http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack#Chemical_attack >


Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 01 2014,1:15 pm

(Liberal @ Oct. 01 2014,11:51 am)
QUOTE
Regardless of what they say on the conspiracy sites we didn't supply him with the chemical weapons.


QUOTE


The know-how and material for developing chemical weapons were obtained by Saddam's regime from foreign sources.[24] Most precursors for chemical weapons production came from Singapore (4,515 tons), the Netherlands (4,261 tons), Egypt (2,400 tons), India (2,343 tons), and West Germany (1,027 tons). One Indian company, Exomet Plastics, sent 2,292 tons of precursor chemicals to Iraq. Singapore-based firm Kim Al-Khaleej, affiliated to the United Arab Emirates, supplied more than 4,500 tons of VX, sarin and mustard gas precursors and production equipment to Iraq.[25] Dieter Backfisch, managing director of West German company Karl Kolb GmbH, was quoted by saying in 1989 that "for people in Germany poison gas is something quite terrible, but this does not worry customers abroad."[24]

< http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack#Chemical_attack >


Links about this subject were already put into the forum a year or two ago, but here is another:


QUOTE
The newspaper says a review of a large tranche of government documents reveals that the administrations of President Reagan and the first President Bush both authorized providing Iraq with intelligence and logistical support, and okayed the sale of dual use items — those with military and civilian applications — that included chemicals and germs, even anthrax and bubonic plague.
...

Congressional investigations after the Gulf War revealed that the Commerce Department had licensed sales of biological agents, including anthrax, and insecticides, which could be used in chemical weapons, to Iraq.

When Iraq used chemical weapons against the Kurds in 1987, there was anger in Congress and the White House. But a memo in 1988 from Assistant Secretary of State Richard W. Murphy stated that "The U.S.-Iraqi relationship is … important to our long-term political and economic objectives."

"We believe that economic sanctions will be useless or counterproductive to influence the Iraqis," the Post quoted the memo as saying.


< http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-and-iraq-go-way-back/ >


And the US also helped by trying to thwarting investigations  and resolutions:

QUOTE
Iran had submitted a draft resolution asking the U.N. to condemn Iraq's chemical weapons use. The U.S. delegate to the U.N. was instructed to lobby friendly delegations in order to obtain a general motion of "no decision" on the resolution. If this was not achievable, the U.S. delegate was to abstain on the issue. Iraq's ambassador met with the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Jeane Kirkpatrick, and asked for "restraint" in responding to the issue - as did the representatives of both France and Britain.


< http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/ >

But this information was also put into the forum a year or two ago.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 01 2014,1:29 pm
I can quote wikipedia info too. But I'm sure your wikipedia choices are much more reliable than mine.

QUOTE
[T]he United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required. The United States also provided strategic operational advice to the Iraqis to better use their assets in combat... The CIA, including both CIA Director Casey and Deputy Director Gates, knew of, approved of, and assisted in the sale of non-U.S. origin military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to Iraq. My notes, memoranda and other documents in my NSC files show or tend to show that the CIA knew of, approved of, and assisted in the sale of non-U.S. origin military weapons, munitions and vehicles to Iraq.

The full extent of these covert transfers is not yet known. Teicher's files on the subject are held securely at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and many other Reagan Era documents that could help shine new light on the subject remain classified. Teicher declined to discuss details of the affidavit with the Washington Post shortly before the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[17]

About two of every seven licenses for the export of "dual use" technology items approved between 1985 and 1990 by the U.S. Department of Commerce "went either directly to the Iraqi armed forces, to Iraqi end-users engaged in weapons production, or to Iraqi enterprises suspected of diverting technology" to weapons of mass destruction, according to an investigation by House Banking Committee Chairman Henry B. Gonzalez. Confidential Commerce Department files also reveal that the Reagan and Bush administrations approved at least 80 direct exports to the Iraqi military. These included computers, communications equipment, aircraft navigation and radar equipment



On February 9, 1994, Senator Riegle delivered a report -commonly known at the Riegle Report- in which it was stated that "pathogenic (meaning 'disease producing'), toxigenic (meaning 'poisonous'), and other biological research materials were exported to Iraq pursuant to application and licensing by the U.S. Department of Commerce." It added: "These exported biological materials were not attenuated or weakened and were capable of reproduction."[29]

The report then detailed 70 shipments (including Bacillus anthracis) from the United States to Iraqi government agencies over three years, concluding "It was later learned that these microorganisms exported by the United States were identical to those the UN inspectors found and recovered from the Iraqi biological warfare program."[30]

Donald Riegle, Chairman of the Senate committee that authored the aforementioned Riegle Report, said:

U.N. inspectors had identified many United States manufactured items that had been exported from the United States to Iraq under licenses issued by the Department of Commerce, and [established] that these items were used to further Iraq's chemical and nuclear weapons development and its missile delivery system development programs. ... The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think that is a devastating record.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control sent Iraq 14 separate agents "with biological warfare significance," according to Riegle's investigators.


< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki...raq_war >

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 01 2014,2:13 pm
We sold Iraq bubonic plague and anthrax, not chemical weapons like you lied about.

So, along with being crazy, you're also a liar?

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 02 2014,12:31 am

(Liberal @ Oct. 01 2014,2:13 pm)
QUOTE
We sold Iraq bubonic plague and anthrax, not chemical weapons like you lied about.

So, along with being crazy, you're also a liar?

You're a hoot.

From my two links:

QUOTE
that included chemicals and germs, even anthrax and bubonic plague.


QUOTE
Commerce Department had licensed sales of biological agents, including anthrax, and insecticides, which could be used in chemical weapons, to Iraq.


QUOTE
U.N. inspectors had identified many United States manufactured items that had been exported from the United States to Iraq under licenses issued by the Department of Commerce, and [established] that these items were used to further Iraq's chemical and nuclear weapons development and its missile delivery system development programs. ... The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think that is a devastating record.



The next paragraph from your wiki page:
QUOTE
Among the chemical precursors provided to Iraq from American companies such as Alcolac International and Phillips was thiodiglycol, a substance needed to manufacture mustard gas, according to leaked portions of Iraq's "full, final and complete" disclosure of the sources for its weapons programs. The provision of chemical precursors from United States companies to Iraq was enabled by a Ronald Reagan Administration policy that removed Iraq from the State Department's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Alcolac was named as a defendant in the Aziz v. Iraq case presently pending in the United States District Court (Case No. 1:09-cv-00869-MJG). Both companies have since undergone reorganization. Phillips, once a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum is now part of ConocoPhillips, an American oil and discount fossil fuel company. Alcolac International has since dissolved and reformed as Alcolac Inc



Here's some more:
QUOTE
On October 27, 1992, the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs held hearings that revealed that the United States had exported chemical, biological, nuclear, and missile-system equipment to Iraq that was converted to military use in Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons program. Many of these weapons -- weapons that the U.S. and other countries provided critical materials for -- were used against us during the war.

< http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/medsear...s01.htm >

  I find Riegles' full report quite disgusting in how the vets have been treated and how the government and military have lied about what happened in the gulf war and the illnesses of vets. You think they are just a bunch of whiney wimps lying to get a free handout though right? Maybe if you read the report you won't think that. Unless of course your reading comprehension problem gets in the way.

QUOTE
The story of U.S. involvement with Saddam Hussein in the years
before his 1990 attack on Kuwait--which included large-scale
intelligence sharing, supply of cluster bombs through a Chilean front
company, and facilitating Iraq's acquisition of chemical and biological
precursors--is a topical example of the underside of U.S. foreign
policy.

...

A review of thousands of declassified government documents and
interviews with former policymakers shows that U.S. intelligence and
logistical support played a crucial role in shoring up Iraqi defenses
against the ``human wave'' attacks by suicidal Iranian troops. The
administrations of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush authorized the
sale to Iraq of numerous items that had both military and civilian
applications, including poisonous chemicals and deadly biological
viruses, such as anthrax and bubonic plague.

...

When United Nations weapons inspectors were allowed into Iraq after
the 1991 Gulf War, they compiled long lists of chemicals, missile
components, and computers from American suppliers, including such
household names as Union Carbide and Honeywell, which were being used
for military purposes.


...

The Commerce Department also
approved the export of insecticides to Iraq, despite widespread
suspicions that they were being used for chemical warfare.


< http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys...796.htm >

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 02 2014,1:27 am
The chemicals we sold them was Thiodiglycol that has many uses. Anthrax and bubonic plague are not chemical weapons, they're not even chemicals.

Even though other countries sold them 4500 tons of actual mustard gas you think they used the Thiodiglycol that Reagan and Bush sold them to make mustard gas? :dunce:

Does it hurt to be that stupid?

QUOTE


Thiodiglycol has both polar and nonpolar solvent properties. It is used as a solvent in a variety of applications ranging from dyeing textiles to inks in some ballpoint pens. In chemical synthesis, it is used as a building block for protection products, dispersants, fibers, plasticizers, rubber accelerators, pesticides, dyes, and various other organic chemicals. In the manufacture of polymers, it is used as a chain transfer agent. As an antioxidant, it is used as an additive in lubricants.



Maybe you can highlight the part where your bs posts proves we sold them chemical weapons like you claimed? Of course you can't do that because you're a liar and nobody has ever proven we sold them chemical weapons.

It's amazing that you can be so ignorant. First you bitch because we wouldn't sell them pipes and chlorine for their water plants because they had used them to make weapons in the past. And you also bitch because we sold them insecticides because they could use it to manufacture chemical weapons. And if we had not sold them the insecticide you'd be bitching about all the Iraqis that died of insect borne preventable disease.

Just more sport bitching from our resident crazy.

Did you actually quote the forum PrisonPlanet and then conveniently forget to link to the source?  http://www.prisonplanet.com/news_alert_123002_enemies.html

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 02 2014,4:50 am
:)
Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 02 2014,6:41 am
I never said we "sold" them complete chemical weapons. I said we helped him acquire them. Thiodiglycol is one chemical we sold to them. My CBS link that I quoted says we sold them dual use items, I know we didn't sell them complete ready to use chemical weapons. Try finding any credible source which lists all the chemicals we sold.

From the GPO link I quoted:  facilitating Iraq's acquisition of chemical and biological precursors.

If the wikipedia page section you quoted is correct, and any country did sell Iraq complete ready to use chemical weapons, do you honestly think we didn't know they were getting them? We sure knew he was using them, and didn't care that he was. Even blocked the UN from trying to do anything about his chemical weapon use. Even sent him the bubonic plague and anthrax AFTER that Halabja attack you wiki'd. Read Riegel's report to see how honest and forthcoming the government is about all of this.
Prison Planet? I sourced all of my quotes and information. CBS news, GWU, two government websites and your wikipedia page.

You're the last person on this forum who should call anyone a liar.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 02 2014,7:03 am
LIbERal:
QUOTE
Even though other countries sold them 4500 tons of actual mustard gas


Me:
QUOTE
If the wikipedia page section you quoted is correct, and any country did sell Iraq complete ready to use chemical weapons


Never mind. The wiki page doesn't say any country sold them any actual mustard gas. It says those countries sold Iraq precursors... just like we did.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 02 2014,9:40 am
You're a liar, nothing shows that we helped Iraq get chemical weapons but you'll just keep trying to twist the words of people to try to prove we sold them percursors even though we sold them dual use items. Like I said earler if we hadn't sold them pesticides you'd be sport bitching about how the US let Iraqis die from insect borne illnesses because we wouldn't sell them pesticides.

So now it's America's fault that other countries sold them chemical weapons?

If you dislike the evil American government so much why don't just move your bunker to Mexico, or Canada?

Also countries sold them the chemical precursors and the equipment needed to turn them into chemical weapons because it's sort of dangerous  to ship things like 4500 TONS of mustard gas. You're trying to insinuate that we did something similar by selling them dual use chemicals.

And just because inspectors find chemicals from American companies it doesn't mean the American company sold it to them, they most likely sold it to a third party and that third party could have sold it without our knowledge or consent.

You just like to sport bitch, you're one of those people that sits in front of a computer all day bitching about how tough life is, and how evil the government is, because you're either too stupid, or too lazy to try to change anything.

Posted by Rosalind_Swenson on Oct. 02 2014,12:13 pm
QUOTE
You're a liar, nothing shows that we helped Iraq get chemical weapons but you'll just keep trying to twist the words of people to try to prove we sold them percursors even though we sold them dual use items. Like I said earler if we hadn't sold them pesticides you'd be sport bitching about how the US let Iraqis die from insect borne illnesses because we wouldn't sell them pesticides.


Me twisting words??!! I've been copy and pasting quotes, and linking to the sources.

QUOTE
If you dislike the evil American government so much why don't just move your bunker to Mexico, or Canada?


Nope, sorry, gonna stay. I hate the government, love the country. So I'll stay and try to help others make this country be what it only pretends to be.

QUOTE
Also countries sold them the chemical precursors and the equipment needed to turn them into chemical weapons because it's sort of dangerous  to ship things like 4500 TONS of mustard gas. You're trying to insinuate that we did something similar by selling them dual use chemicals.


It is the same thing. And we knew full well they were using chemical weapons didn't we? YES we did. And we looked the other way didn't we? YES we did. We were even covering for him so he wouldn't get into trouble about it didn't we? YES we did. They knew how often chemical weapons were being used in Iraq, do you think they honestly didn't know what some of the things we were selling them was going for?? And even if the US government was as stupid as you think they were, why would they just allow it to go on then?
Secretary of State:
QUOTE
"The U.S.-Iraqi relationship is … important to our long-term political and economic objectives."
  Really?

QUOTE
You just like to sport bitch, you're one of those people that sits in front of a computer all day bitching about how tough life is, and how evil the government is, because you're either too stupid, or too lazy to try to change anything.


Except I don't bitch about how tough life is. Not my life anyway. I love my life and I'm extremely happy. And I am trying to change things, that's why I go on forums and chats. So you'll just have to keep getting your panties in a bunch cuz I'm not leaving your forum. Not until you've completely killed it anyway, or not until you ban me.  :D

Posted by alcitizens on Oct. 14 2014,11:00 pm
Iraq Shiite Militias Killing Sunnis

< http://www.nbcnews.com/storyli...n225791 >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 15 2014,3:50 am

(alcitizens @ Oct. 14 2014,11:00 pm)
QUOTE
Iraq Shiite Militias Killing Sunnis

< http://www.nbcnews.com/storyli...n225791 >

Ah, the religion of peace, I feel warm and fuzzy.

< http://www.thereligionofpeace.com >

< http://www.nytimes.com/interac...ml?_r=1 >

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 23 2014,4:05 pm
Canadians referr to this POS as terrorist

< http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ce.html >

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 23 2014,6:50 pm
Huh?
Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 23 2014,6:53 pm
Read the link again,
Let's try radicalized muslim.
These are titles that Buster refuses to use.

Posted by Liberal on Oct. 23 2014,10:45 pm
I wasn't joking, read your post. I can usually figure out typos but there are several ways to read the question depending on what words are typos. :dunno:

I get now that it was a sarcastic remark about talk radio claims that Obama doesn't call a terrorist a terrorist.

Posted by Self-Banished on Oct. 24 2014,5:00 am
He does seem rather phobic to that word.
Powered by Ikonboard 3.1.5 © 2006 Ikonboard